Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 Did Cloud Seeding Cause the Devastating Floods? Let’s Talk About Cause and Effect. Two days before catastrophic flooding along the Guadalupe Corridor, a cloud seeding operation took place. Then came 16 hours of rain. Surges up to 30 feet above crest. Up to 40 feet in San Antonio....

21,874 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

PLOT TWIST: Marjorie Taylor Greene was actually right when she claimed scientists could alter the weather. This is not a “conspiracy theory.” Over 50 countries, including the US, are using cloud seeding and geoengineering to change the weather. This has been proven true by numerous scientific studies, historical military operations, and active government programs. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense's Operation Popeye during the Vietnam War successfully used cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, while China's massive weather modification efforts have been publicly documented, with plans to control half the country's weather by 2025. Additionally, a U.S. federal agency, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), acknowledges the use of cloud seeding to increase precipitation. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has also warned that The World Economic Forum and Bill Gates have “hijacked geoengineering,” with Gates funding these projects around the world. “They aggravate the problem then sell us the solution,” Kennedy said, and the solution is that “they want is more social controls.” “Geoengineering is a threat that the environmental community needs to know about and the rest of us needs to know about.” And if you ask Amazon's Alexa a specific question about Hurricane Helene, she sounds like a “conspiracy theorist.” Weather manipulation is real, it's happening now, and it’s far bigger than most people realize.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

289,197 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Florida Senator Jason Pizzo @senpizzo questions Augustus Doricko CEO of Rainmaker Technology Corporation about Cloud Seeding and Weather Modification during the Senate Committee Hearing on Florida's Weather Modification Bill SB56 Transcript- Senator Pizzo : St Thomas Aquinas proved that that which is of matter cannot be of matter as a conclusive proof from a theological perspective. But here's a question I have, is there a fixed amount of water molecules in a local or in a universal atmosphere? Because it would seem to follow that if whatever you're taking from the atmosphere, naturally occurring from the atmosphere, to seed a particular targeted area is taking a natural precipitation or weather pattern from some other area that might be depending on natural cyclical precipitation schedule. Augustus Doricko : The question of stealing from Peter to pay Paul. That is a question that is old as cloud seeding itself and it's one that requires sophisticated permitting to ensure that that's not going on. What I'm saying is that there is a fixed amount of water on the planet and in the atmosphere, however, 91% of all the water that traverses the continental United States does not precipitate over the United States. Moreover, precipitating clouds are only about 20% to 40% efficient so most of the water from precipitating clouds does not actually come down. Moreover, lots of clouds don't ever naturally precipitate and so what you can do with sophisticated radar processing like we've developed is identify clouds that are never going to naturally precipitate or that are going to precipitate over the oceans and then purely do positive sum seeding by targeting those clouds rather depleting other watershed. Senator Pizzo : There's a tipping point when you reach a saturation level of a cloud formation that lets go and just lets loose, so even if in its travels and I agree with you, but the supposition is that even in its travels it may be picking up more and becoming more dense and then at some point falling wherever it falls. But if you were to go ahead and target an area, let's say for instance by way of exercise, to bring potable water to the West we wanted to go ahead and Dam up and then fill the Grand Canyon. That is placing and depositing a large volume of water which would otherwise be precipitation somewhere else in the world. So my question is if you're going to deposit a large volume of water in one particular area doesn't it naturally follow that it's taking away from some other area later on? Full Conversation here -

Florida Sky Watchers

10,611 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr