Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John really write the Gospels? Or were they actually anonymous? This week, NT scholar Mike Licona joins me to unpack his latest debate w/ NT scholar (and skeptic) Bart Ehrman. 👉📱

DrFrankTurek's profile picture

Frank Turek

240,431 subscribers

17,042 views • 14 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Was Jesus Really Crucified? Gospel of John 19:17 says Jesus carried his own cross. Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21, Luke 23:26 all say Simon of Cyrene carried the cross instead. Why the contradiction? 🤔 John’s gospel was written decades later, and he never actually met Jesus. Plus Early Christian writings (over 100 were removed from the Bible we have today!) tell a different story: * Second Treatise of the Great Seth (NHC VII,2, 55–56): Jesus says Simon was crucified in his place. * Apocalypse of Peter (NHC VII,3, 81–83): Jesus watches Simon get crucified Then in the Qur’an 4:157 is says “They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him but it was made to appear so to them.” 👉 So who was really crucified…. Jesus or Simon?
1:02

Was Jesus Really Crucified? Gospel of John 19:17 says Jesus carried his own cross. Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21, Luke 23:26 all say Simon of Cyrene carried the cross instead. Why the contradiction? 🤔 John’s gospel was written decades later, and he never actually met Jesus. Plus Early Christian writings (over 100 were removed from the Bible we have today!) tell a different story: * Second Treatise of the Great Seth (NHC VII,2, 55–56): Jesus says Simon was crucified in his place. * Apocalypse of Peter (NHC VII,3, 81–83): Jesus watches Simon get crucified Then in the Qur’an 4:157 is says “They did not kill him, nor did they crucify him but it was made to appear so to them.” 👉 So who was really crucified…. Jesus or Simon?

Lily Jay

46,422 views • 10 months ago

“That c*nt”: Zelensky’s Office ramps up its smear campaign against Holocaust scholar Marta Havryshko The presidential spin doctors from ISLND TV—Zelensky’s unofficial attack dogs—have released an interview with Viktor Rozovyi, a fighter from "elite" Azov’s 3rd Assault Brigade. Rozovyi is a textbook misogynist, sexist, and homophobe. He has publicly compared women in the military to dogs and told rape jokes about them in the media. After I criticized his degrading remarks, Azov launched a coordinated campaign of intimidation and defamation against me. His latest interview with ISLND TV, where he affectionately refers to me as “that c*nt” and accuses me of being a “Russian fifth columnist,” is simply the next installment in this patriotic soap opera. Apparently, Azov finds my work exposing the neo-Nazi presence in their ranks—and my critical publications about sexual violence committed by the OUN and UPA—far more threatening than, say, actual swastikas in their battalion. And instead of addressing their neo-Nazi problem or distancing themselves from historical war criminals, they’ve decided the real enemy is... a Holocaust scholar. With the help of Zelensky’s PR henchmen, naturally. Because nothing screams “European values” quite like attacking historian who expose uncomfortable truths.
1:36

“That c*nt”: Zelensky’s Office ramps up its smear campaign against Holocaust scholar Marta Havryshko The presidential spin doctors from ISLND TV—Zelensky’s unofficial attack dogs—have released an interview with Viktor Rozovyi, a fighter from "elite" Azov’s 3rd Assault Brigade. Rozovyi is a textbook misogynist, sexist, and homophobe. He has publicly compared women in the military to dogs and told rape jokes about them in the media. After I criticized his degrading remarks, Azov launched a coordinated campaign of intimidation and defamation against me. His latest interview with ISLND TV, where he affectionately refers to me as “that c*nt” and accuses me of being a “Russian fifth columnist,” is simply the next installment in this patriotic soap opera. Apparently, Azov finds my work exposing the neo-Nazi presence in their ranks—and my critical publications about sexual violence committed by the OUN and UPA—far more threatening than, say, actual swastikas in their battalion. And instead of addressing their neo-Nazi problem or distancing themselves from historical war criminals, they’ve decided the real enemy is... a Holocaust scholar. With the help of Zelensky’s PR henchmen, naturally. Because nothing screams “European values” quite like attacking historian who expose uncomfortable truths.

Marta Havryshko

28,076 views • 1 year ago

Really?! this isn’t blasphemy or mocking! Scripture defines blasphemy as speaking contempt or irreverence against God, reviling His name/works, or crediting the Holy Spirit’s power to evil (Leviticus 24:10-16, Exodus 20:7, Matthew 12:31-32, Mark 3:29, John 10:33). It requires words or claims, not a picture. Jesus gave believers His power: “Whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things” (John 14:12). “Lay hands on the sick and they will recover” (Mark 16:18). Faith moves mountains (Matthew 17:20). The disciples healed in His name (Acts 3:6, 5:12-16). James 5:14-15 calls for prayer and anointing for healing. A symbolic image of a person in a healing pose with light effects doesn’t claim divinity or speak against God, it visually echoes what Jesus said we’re empowered to do through faith. Poor taste for some? Sure, debate that. Mocking Jesus or biblical blasphemy? Not even close! It’s symbolic art echoing what JESUS said we can do through faith.
0:32

Really?! this isn’t blasphemy or mocking! Scripture defines blasphemy as speaking contempt or irreverence against God, reviling His name/works, or crediting the Holy Spirit’s power to evil (Leviticus 24:10-16, Exodus 20:7, Matthew 12:31-32, Mark 3:29, John 10:33). It requires words or claims, not a picture. Jesus gave believers His power: “Whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things” (John 14:12). “Lay hands on the sick and they will recover” (Mark 16:18). Faith moves mountains (Matthew 17:20). The disciples healed in His name (Acts 3:6, 5:12-16). James 5:14-15 calls for prayer and anointing for healing. A symbolic image of a person in a healing pose with light effects doesn’t claim divinity or speak against God, it visually echoes what Jesus said we’re empowered to do through faith. Poor taste for some? Sure, debate that. Mocking Jesus or biblical blasphemy? Not even close! It’s symbolic art echoing what JESUS said we can do through faith.

John “TIG” Tiegen

36,189 views • 3 months ago

Threat Alert! Australia is Allowing Muslim Preacher Wissam 'Abu Ousayd' Haddad to Build an Islamic Army that Wants to Destroy non-Muslims... The “respected” Islamic scholar has threatened and has expressed his hatred of non-Muslims, homosexuals, Christians, Jews, Hindus, critics of Islam, former Muslims, Western leaders, and the very nations themselves. In his latest rant, he quoted the "peaceful" Hadith about the killing of the Jews... "Towards the end of times, when the Muslims will be fighting the Jews, the trees will speak, the stones will speak and they will say 'oh Muslim, oh believer, there is a Yahud (Jew) behind me, come and kill him'.' This is the same "peaceful" Muslim scholar who declared that saying 'Merry Christmas' is "more severe and hated by Allah" than congratulating someone for drinking alcohol, committing murder, committing adultery, or gambling Read more about Abu Ousayd here and see his other video sermons:
0:40

Threat Alert! Australia is Allowing Muslim Preacher Wissam 'Abu Ousayd' Haddad to Build an Islamic Army that Wants to Destroy non-Muslims... The “respected” Islamic scholar has threatened and has expressed his hatred of non-Muslims, homosexuals, Christians, Jews, Hindus, critics of Islam, former Muslims, Western leaders, and the very nations themselves. In his latest rant, he quoted the "peaceful" Hadith about the killing of the Jews... "Towards the end of times, when the Muslims will be fighting the Jews, the trees will speak, the stones will speak and they will say 'oh Muslim, oh believer, there is a Yahud (Jew) behind me, come and kill him'.' This is the same "peaceful" Muslim scholar who declared that saying 'Merry Christmas' is "more severe and hated by Allah" than congratulating someone for drinking alcohol, committing murder, committing adultery, or gambling Read more about Abu Ousayd here and see his other video sermons:

Amy Mek

340,027 views • 2 years ago

New: Joe Rogan was left completely stunned after devout Christian Joe Eszterhas exposed who Jesus Christ really was: ROGAN: “If you live your life by the teachings of Jesus Christ you will be a better person.” ESZTERHAS: “We’ve created this narrative that Jesus was just this nice, non violent guy. That wasn’t the case. He’s the man who said I come not to bring peace, but a sword.” ROGAN: “That’s the problem with human beings adding their own interpretations to an ancient story.” ESZTERHAS: “Church gospels get all their information from secondhand accounts. They don’t know who actually saw Jesus firsthand so they just took the names like Luke, John, and Matthew.” ROGAN: “No way, I had no idea.” ESZTERHAS: “Absolutely 100%. The churches even admit it at this point.”
4:15

New: Joe Rogan was left completely stunned after devout Christian Joe Eszterhas exposed who Jesus Christ really was: ROGAN: “If you live your life by the teachings of Jesus Christ you will be a better person.” ESZTERHAS: “We’ve created this narrative that Jesus was just this nice, non violent guy. That wasn’t the case. He’s the man who said I come not to bring peace, but a sword.” ROGAN: “That’s the problem with human beings adding their own interpretations to an ancient story.” ESZTERHAS: “Church gospels get all their information from secondhand accounts. They don’t know who actually saw Jesus firsthand so they just took the names like Luke, John, and Matthew.” ROGAN: “No way, I had no idea.” ESZTERHAS: “Absolutely 100%. The churches even admit it at this point.”

Fan Commentary: Joe Rogan Recaps

3,191,560 views • 1 month ago

This is for the rival fans calling us useless for backing Bruno Fernandes over Roy Keane; For Chelsea fans, imagine John Terry or Frank Lampard publicly saying they were never really Chelsea fans, that they actually support Arsenal, and Chelsea results don’t affect their weekend. Then imagine them coming online every few days to constantly attack your beloved “average” Enzo Fernández. For Arsenal fans, imagine Ian Wright saying on The Overlap that he never truly loved Arsenal, only played there for the money, and the club he actually supports is Chelsea or Tottenham then spending every week criticising your “average” Bukayo Saka. How would you lot feel?
0:55

This is for the rival fans calling us useless for backing Bruno Fernandes over Roy Keane; For Chelsea fans, imagine John Terry or Frank Lampard publicly saying they were never really Chelsea fans, that they actually support Arsenal, and Chelsea results don’t affect their weekend. Then imagine them coming online every few days to constantly attack your beloved “average” Enzo Fernández. For Arsenal fans, imagine Ian Wright saying on The Overlap that he never truly loved Arsenal, only played there for the money, and the club he actually supports is Chelsea or Tottenham then spending every week criticising your “average” Bukayo Saka. How would you lot feel?

𝔭𝔞𝔭𝔦𝔠𝔥𝔲𝔩𝔬!

112,829 views • 2 months ago

"Infinity Foundation is 30 years old, which means that Rajiv's work started way, way before the present awakening that's happened in India. So he was clearly one of the precursors of all of this happening. He has a depth to understand things in detail, but he's also able to step back and look at things from a 50,000-foot perspective to see where everything is going, where everything is working its way to. He loved putting all his time and attention into things that affected our dharma, that affected our people, whether they were people living in the US or they were living in India, he really cares about all of us."- Sri Krishnan Ramaswamy, Scientist, Vedanta & Sanskrit Scholar
39:52

"Infinity Foundation is 30 years old, which means that Rajiv's work started way, way before the present awakening that's happened in India. So he was clearly one of the precursors of all of this happening. He has a depth to understand things in detail, but he's also able to step back and look at things from a 50,000-foot perspective to see where everything is going, where everything is working its way to. He loved putting all his time and attention into things that affected our dharma, that affected our people, whether they were people living in the US or they were living in India, he really cares about all of us."- Sri Krishnan Ramaswamy, Scientist, Vedanta & Sanskrit Scholar

Rajiv Malhotra

17,170 views • 11 months ago

Are the biblical gospels anonymous? In one sense, yes. But that doesn’t mean we don’t know who wrote them or can’t trust the attributed titles we now find attached to them. The evidence is 3-fold: 1. We have the fact that whenever a manuscript has an inscription we have unanimity across the board on the text matching the name. For example we never find a manuscript with the text of John’s Gospel but attrited to Mathew, or Matthew’s attributed to Thomas, etc. The idea that the Gospels were circulating anonymously around the Roman empire with no authorial attribution is highly improbable. It means that we have to suppose that for over 100 years there was no official author mentioned and then suddenly all the scribes, at the exact same time, throughout the world, with no trace of disagreement in any manuscripts, all decided to ascribe the same author. And that this happened not just once, but with each one of the four Gospels. And we actually have an example of this type of disagreement with authorship with an actual anonymous New Testament document: Hebrews. Hebrews has a series of manuscripts that ascribe authorship and there is disagreement, not so with the Gospels. 2. Of between 90-100 biographical-type writings we have in all of ancient antiquity only 2 identify themselves formally within the writing:Historia Augusta - Life of Aelius and Lucian’s Passing of Peregrinus. All the rest are “formally anonymous.” Formal anonymity was the norm and rarely if ever compromises our ability to attach the namesake to the text. Not to mention that Caesar, Xenophon, Julius Caesar, Polybius, Josephus, and Lucian, all frequently wrote in the third person, not unlike the Gospel of John. 3. This combined with the patristic evidence: Papias as recorded by Eusebius in Eccelesiastical History, speaks at length about Mark being the author and his connection with the source information to Peter. If we’re going for established credibility why not just link it with Peter directly? Why not just call this Gospel the Gospel of Peter and be done with it? Because even though Peter was the source of the content, Mark was the author, and there is no reason to consistently and without exception ascribe it to Mark unless it was in fact Mark who wrote it. And the earliest mentions of the Gospels all ascribe them these names. Clement of Alexandria names all four Gospels by their traditional authorial names, the Muratorian Fragment, Irenaus, Theophilus of Antioch, all at the end of the 2nd century and all agree on a four-fold Gospel canon that matches in content and named attribution. Dan Paterson
1:56

Are the biblical gospels anonymous? In one sense, yes. But that doesn’t mean we don’t know who wrote them or can’t trust the attributed titles we now find attached to them. The evidence is 3-fold: 1. We have the fact that whenever a manuscript has an inscription we have unanimity across the board on the text matching the name. For example we never find a manuscript with the text of John’s Gospel but attrited to Mathew, or Matthew’s attributed to Thomas, etc. The idea that the Gospels were circulating anonymously around the Roman empire with no authorial attribution is highly improbable. It means that we have to suppose that for over 100 years there was no official author mentioned and then suddenly all the scribes, at the exact same time, throughout the world, with no trace of disagreement in any manuscripts, all decided to ascribe the same author. And that this happened not just once, but with each one of the four Gospels. And we actually have an example of this type of disagreement with authorship with an actual anonymous New Testament document: Hebrews. Hebrews has a series of manuscripts that ascribe authorship and there is disagreement, not so with the Gospels. 2. Of between 90-100 biographical-type writings we have in all of ancient antiquity only 2 identify themselves formally within the writing:Historia Augusta - Life of Aelius and Lucian’s Passing of Peregrinus. All the rest are “formally anonymous.” Formal anonymity was the norm and rarely if ever compromises our ability to attach the namesake to the text. Not to mention that Caesar, Xenophon, Julius Caesar, Polybius, Josephus, and Lucian, all frequently wrote in the third person, not unlike the Gospel of John. 3. This combined with the patristic evidence: Papias as recorded by Eusebius in Eccelesiastical History, speaks at length about Mark being the author and his connection with the source information to Peter. If we’re going for established credibility why not just link it with Peter directly? Why not just call this Gospel the Gospel of Peter and be done with it? Because even though Peter was the source of the content, Mark was the author, and there is no reason to consistently and without exception ascribe it to Mark unless it was in fact Mark who wrote it. And the earliest mentions of the Gospels all ascribe them these names. Clement of Alexandria names all four Gospels by their traditional authorial names, the Muratorian Fragment, Irenaus, Theophilus of Antioch, all at the end of the 2nd century and all agree on a four-fold Gospel canon that matches in content and named attribution. Dan Paterson

Wes Huff

48,642 views • 11 months ago

Just to be clear, not only did I never "straight up say" this, but hasanabi (with the blessings of Twitch and TwitchSupport, because they have remained totally silent and idle on this issue) and his streaming buddies have either greenlit or directly made death/assault threats against me multiple times. 1. First death threat is from Mike from PA, I remember this one because the FBI actually visited to ask questions about it lol. 2. Second threat is from Mike from PA actually threatening to assault me at the TwitchCon event itself(!!!) 3. Third threat is from Austin MacNamara watching the second threat against me, also saying he would attack me at TwitchCon. 4. Fourth threat is from another socialist/Hasan orbiter, Sean, claiming I should be shot and killed (he bleeps it) and then lamenting that my entire family wasn't murdered in the past. There are more examples, but these were a few of the most egregious. None of these people were ever punished for making threats against me.
0:31

Just to be clear, not only did I never "straight up say" this, but hasanabi (with the blessings of Twitch and TwitchSupport, because they have remained totally silent and idle on this issue) and his streaming buddies have either greenlit or directly made death/assault threats against me multiple times. 1. First death threat is from Mike from PA, I remember this one because the FBI actually visited to ask questions about it lol. 2. Second threat is from Mike from PA actually threatening to assault me at the TwitchCon event itself(!!!) 3. Third threat is from Austin MacNamara watching the second threat against me, also saying he would attack me at TwitchCon. 4. Fourth threat is from another socialist/Hasan orbiter, Sean, claiming I should be shot and killed (he bleeps it) and then lamenting that my entire family wasn't murdered in the past. There are more examples, but these were a few of the most egregious. None of these people were ever punished for making threats against me.

Destiny | Steven Bonnell II

320,723 views • 9 months ago

Everyone and their mom is using claude code, so how do you stand out? Well, you learn how to use claude code like a senior software engineer. John Lindquist (AI DX Vercel) joins this week at How I AI to walk us through his flows, hooks, and tools that supercharge his cc instance. You'll learn how to - use mermaid diagrams for context - alias your favorite AI commands - write hooks for code quality We also debate TUI vs IDE, discuss esoteric file formats, and build a couple things live. Whether you're an advanced user or CC or wanting to get there, this is the ep for you. ty ty ty to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS- Make your app enterprise-ready today 🔀 Tines - start building intelligent workflows today Watch it here:
1:06

Everyone and their mom is using claude code, so how do you stand out? Well, you learn how to use claude code like a senior software engineer. John Lindquist (AI DX Vercel) joins this week at How I AI to walk us through his flows, hooks, and tools that supercharge his cc instance. You'll learn how to - use mermaid diagrams for context - alias your favorite AI commands - write hooks for code quality We also debate TUI vs IDE, discuss esoteric file formats, and build a couple things live. Whether you're an advanced user or CC or wanting to get there, this is the ep for you. ty ty ty to our awesome sponsors 💼 WorkOS- Make your app enterprise-ready today 🔀 Tines - start building intelligent workflows today Watch it here:

claire vo 🖤

26,050 views • 6 months ago

Former Bulls teammate of Jordan, BJ Armstrong was asked about Michael he said: “I really wish.. people could have actually seen him in practice. Because the best of him we didn’t really see. You see the games and highlights, But when you see someone and behind the curtain they are actually better than advertised. That’s what we didn’t see (In the Last Dance documentary). He was really that good, more importantly he put in the work, he didn’t cheat the game” Really insightful information from BJ—this is EXACTLY why I criticize today’s game so much. Guys just don’t have that same FIRE like Mike did. He pushed himself to the point of exhaustion in practice and made those practices hell for his teammates. Many former Bulls have said the games felt easy compared to the intensity of practice. So when I mock LeBron or Kawhi for missing practices or games due to load management, or when I’m critical of LeBron, KD, and others for taking the easy route by forming super teams—this is why. I’ve heard the stories about Kobe and Mike. They gave everything in practice, not just to improve themselves, but to push their teammates to get better too. Like BJ said, Mike “never cheated the game” ✌🏻 (creativo official YT)
1:09

Former Bulls teammate of Jordan, BJ Armstrong was asked about Michael he said: “I really wish.. people could have actually seen him in practice. Because the best of him we didn’t really see. You see the games and highlights, But when you see someone and behind the curtain they are actually better than advertised. That’s what we didn’t see (In the Last Dance documentary). He was really that good, more importantly he put in the work, he didn’t cheat the game” Really insightful information from BJ—this is EXACTLY why I criticize today’s game so much. Guys just don’t have that same FIRE like Mike did. He pushed himself to the point of exhaustion in practice and made those practices hell for his teammates. Many former Bulls have said the games felt easy compared to the intensity of practice. So when I mock LeBron or Kawhi for missing practices or games due to load management, or when I’m critical of LeBron, KD, and others for taking the easy route by forming super teams—this is why. I’ve heard the stories about Kobe and Mike. They gave everything in practice, not just to improve themselves, but to push their teammates to get better too. Like BJ said, Mike “never cheated the game” ✌🏻 (creativo official YT)

Jacob

203,606 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Rep. Mike Lawler says a “reckoning” is coming after Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson drop a new book exposing how Democrats LIED about Biden’s mental acuity. The book claims that Biden, his family, and senior aides were so convinced that only he could prevent a second Trump presidency that they “lied to themselves, allies, and the public about his condition and limitations.” “I do believe it is a reckoning. There is a major problem that the American people have when they see with their own eyes that there is an issue, which I think was on full display this week on The View and in the BBC interview… he just was not up to the task, certainly, of another term, but frankly of completing the term that he had,” Lawler said. “I think Democrats really misled the American people. And frankly, Kamala Harris did nothing to own that, and that really did backfire on her. I feel like this has become this conventional wisdom that we all were pretending that Biden was not what he was.”
1:41

NEW: Rep. Mike Lawler says a “reckoning” is coming after Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson drop a new book exposing how Democrats LIED about Biden’s mental acuity. The book claims that Biden, his family, and senior aides were so convinced that only he could prevent a second Trump presidency that they “lied to themselves, allies, and the public about his condition and limitations.” “I do believe it is a reckoning. There is a major problem that the American people have when they see with their own eyes that there is an issue, which I think was on full display this week on The View and in the BBC interview… he just was not up to the task, certainly, of another term, but frankly of completing the term that he had,” Lawler said. “I think Democrats really misled the American people. And frankly, Kamala Harris did nothing to own that, and that really did backfire on her. I feel like this has become this conventional wisdom that we all were pretending that Biden was not what he was.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

198,695 views • 1 year ago

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Democrat Sen. John Fetterman is sending shockwaves after declaring this: "I've drunk deeply of the venom both the left and the right...the most poisonous, bitterest, is the FAR LEFT." His digital team told him BLUSKY is DEMENTED, and WAY worse than the Right. "They want me to DIE. Or 'were cheering for your next stroke.' Or 'why couldn't your depression won?'" "They even have the graphic GIF, a stroke in my head, cheering at that. And they said, 'Dr. let us down, why did they have to save his life?' 'I want him to die,' literally cheering for a stroke. I don't know where that comes from." This is truly despicable. Mr. John Fetterman, you say, "I don't know where that comes from." Well, hate to break it to you, but it comes from your many of party's politicians who egg on the far-left. That's where. I hope it stops.
1:51

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Democrat Sen. John Fetterman is sending shockwaves after declaring this: "I've drunk deeply of the venom both the left and the right...the most poisonous, bitterest, is the FAR LEFT." His digital team told him BLUSKY is DEMENTED, and WAY worse than the Right. "They want me to DIE. Or 'were cheering for your next stroke.' Or 'why couldn't your depression won?'" "They even have the graphic GIF, a stroke in my head, cheering at that. And they said, 'Dr. let us down, why did they have to save his life?' 'I want him to die,' literally cheering for a stroke. I don't know where that comes from." This is truly despicable. Mr. John Fetterman, you say, "I don't know where that comes from." Well, hate to break it to you, but it comes from your many of party's politicians who egg on the far-left. That's where. I hope it stops.

Eric Daugherty

1,512,614 views • 8 months ago

soobin & taehyun talking about them getting hit as trainees as a form of punishment for not dancing well 🐿️🐱💬wow i was really scared when we were practicing for this 🐰 taehyun said that it was really scary practicing for this song and it was really scary!!! 🐰 this was when me and taehyun had just been dancing for a week or two 🐰 we were both extremely young kids, 8th and 10th graders who couldn’t even stretch our arms out properly…the seventeen hyungs do really hard choreographies, right? and they suddenly asked us to dance to this song and it’s not even like the teacher taught us the choreography, they told us to learn it ourselves by watching the video so me and taehyun watched the video at 0.5x to learn the choreography and it seemed reallllly tough so it was a given that we wouldn’t be able to dance well to it 🐿️🐱💬 but thanks to the hyungs with us, i got hit a little less 🐰 (sighs) taehyun ended up saying it but we did get hit back then…we got hit while we learnt it… 🐰 (sighs) we…me and taehyun got hit a little less…we were really bad but there were a few people who were worse than us so… 🐿️🐱💬 ah ah those of you who want to become trainees~~ they don’t hit people these days~~ they’ll get in big trouble if they hit people~~ 🐰 that’s right, they don’t do physical punishments these days 🐰 they had physical punishments back then but if they physically punish someone now, they’d get in huge trouble
1:16

soobin & taehyun talking about them getting hit as trainees as a form of punishment for not dancing well 🐿️🐱💬wow i was really scared when we were practicing for this 🐰 taehyun said that it was really scary practicing for this song and it was really scary!!! 🐰 this was when me and taehyun had just been dancing for a week or two 🐰 we were both extremely young kids, 8th and 10th graders who couldn’t even stretch our arms out properly…the seventeen hyungs do really hard choreographies, right? and they suddenly asked us to dance to this song and it’s not even like the teacher taught us the choreography, they told us to learn it ourselves by watching the video so me and taehyun watched the video at 0.5x to learn the choreography and it seemed reallllly tough so it was a given that we wouldn’t be able to dance well to it 🐿️🐱💬 but thanks to the hyungs with us, i got hit a little less 🐰 (sighs) taehyun ended up saying it but we did get hit back then…we got hit while we learnt it… 🐰 (sighs) we…me and taehyun got hit a little less…we were really bad but there were a few people who were worse than us so… 🐿️🐱💬 ah ah those of you who want to become trainees~~ they don’t hit people these days~~ they’ll get in big trouble if they hit people~~ 🐰 that’s right, they don’t do physical punishments these days 🐰 they had physical punishments back then but if they physically punish someone now, they’d get in huge trouble

💬

3,445,906 views • 11 months ago

They silenced victims. They erased evidence. They persecuted whistleblowers, discredited survivors, buried official reports, and protected predators. They thought no one would fight back and that they had got away with what they did. They were wrong I’m not Maggie Oliver. I’m not Tommy Robinson. I’m a political campaigner. My mission is clear: to expose the cover-up, explain the mechanics of corruption, educate the nation, and show people how to fight back. That’s why they tried to imprison me. They know how dangerous my voice is. This is why they spent 3 years fabricating evidence and trying to falsely prosecute me. And when they failed, The Labour Party tried and failed to sue me. Holding those responsible to account, including those who traded children for votes, won’t happen unless many more of you stand with me. Every day I can continue to campaign, more people learn the truth. I can’t do this alone. If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. This fight is far from over. 👉 Just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most -everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 We are now so close. This is now desperation from Keir Starmer and his Pakistani Rape Clan protecting Labour party. With your help, we can finish this. - Raja 🙏
2:50

They silenced victims. They erased evidence. They persecuted whistleblowers, discredited survivors, buried official reports, and protected predators. They thought no one would fight back and that they had got away with what they did. They were wrong I’m not Maggie Oliver. I’m not Tommy Robinson. I’m a political campaigner. My mission is clear: to expose the cover-up, explain the mechanics of corruption, educate the nation, and show people how to fight back. That’s why they tried to imprison me. They know how dangerous my voice is. This is why they spent 3 years fabricating evidence and trying to falsely prosecute me. And when they failed, The Labour Party tried and failed to sue me. Holding those responsible to account, including those who traded children for votes, won’t happen unless many more of you stand with me. Every day I can continue to campaign, more people learn the truth. I can’t do this alone. If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. This fight is far from over. 👉 Just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most -everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 We are now so close. This is now desperation from Keir Starmer and his Pakistani Rape Clan protecting Labour party. With your help, we can finish this. - Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

16,133 views • 11 months ago

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
0:52

Let this sink in: We have all of the existing records of communications between the defense and the ARCCA experts, who were hired by the Feds, but we don’t have ANY of the phone records of communications for Brian Albert, the homeowner whose property John O’Keefe’s body was found on, Brian Higgins or Colin Albert. Daniel Wolfe—the ARCCA experts—were not present during nor did they have anything to do with Officer John O’Keefe’s murder. But apparently Wolfe’s communications with the defense about his report he did for the Feds, which the Commonwealth also has had in its possession, are more important than the actual evidence in the murder of John O’Keefe that could shed light on who his true killers are. Can you imagine if Wolfe came in with a packet of printed out screenshots that he claimed were real because he destroyed his phone around the time that the court ordered his communications? Oh wait, that’s what the third party culprits did. And then the Commonwealth actually entered that in as legitimate evidence in a murder trial. Go figure! Priorities. Justice? Anything but. #ARCCA #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

54,273 views • 1 year ago