正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Difficulty = Value

thehonestletter's profile picture

Sonny

170,870 subscribers

33,959 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 条评论

heiswize 的头像
heiswize1 年前

@grok can you elaborate more on this?

AVANZA FREELANCING AGENCY 的头像
AVANZA FREELANCING AGENCY1 年前

True

Terrence 的头像
Terrence1 年前

@Cobratate

AmandaPanter 的头像
AmandaPanter1 年前

@EthanMillerX2 this is crazy good read it like a script structured position hit my yearly goal

GP_SKY 的头像
GP_SKY1 年前

Scarcity = value

Egbe⚽️🕊 的头像
Egbe⚽️🕊1 年前

Pure Truth

no 的头像
no1 年前

Some woman just gotta go tho, you have to know what is valuable

相关视频

Difficulty ~ Value
0:29

Difficulty ~ Value

Neo

33,087 次观看 • 1 年前

Same routines .. team final and event final .. with different difficulty value🥹🥹
1:30

Same routines .. team final and event final .. with different difficulty value🥹🥹

Nadia Comaneci

1,418,683 次观看 • 2 年前

Chris Williamson reveals a lesson that he learned from Joe Rogan when he was on his podcast. "I called it 'Rogan's value difficulty conflation.'"
0:53

Chris Williamson reveals a lesson that he learned from Joe Rogan when he was on his podcast. "I called it 'Rogan's value difficulty conflation.'"

Joe Rogan Podcast News

112,177 次观看 • 11 个月前

[ Cryptic Notes Nightmare Difficulty ] Another video by them! The reset is random, but if it's the 3,000,000 Cursed Sapphire, the value will likely stay the same. Source:
0:20

[ Cryptic Notes Nightmare Difficulty ] Another video by them! The reset is random, but if it's the 3,000,000 Cursed Sapphire, the value will likely stay the same. Source:

Identity V | News

55,671 次观看 • 1 个月前

The plane carrying the players of the PSG football club, whose total transfer value is almost 900 million euros, had difficulty landing at the airport in the Spanish city of Bilbao.
0:30

The plane carrying the players of the PSG football club, whose total transfer value is almost 900 million euros, had difficulty landing at the airport in the Spanish city of Bilbao.

S p r i n t e r

1,028,117 次观看 • 10 个月前

[ Cryptic Notes Nightmare Difficulty ] Another video by 小小小砸墨, but they got the Cursed Sapphire in this one, and resetted its value once they got teleported to the basement. Source:
6:52

[ Cryptic Notes Nightmare Difficulty ] Another video by 小小小砸墨, but they got the Cursed Sapphire in this one, and resetted its value once they got teleported to the basement. Source:

Identity V | News

71,772 次观看 • 1 个月前

Wealthy individuals paid €80,000–€100,000 (in today’s value) to be taken to Bosnian Serb sniper positions overlooking Sarajevo and shoot civilians, with witnesses describing a price list based on shot difficulty; children were cited as the most expensive targets. #OpDeathEaters
0:51

Wealthy individuals paid €80,000–€100,000 (in today’s value) to be taken to Bosnian Serb sniper positions overlooking Sarajevo and shoot civilians, with witnesses describing a price list based on shot difficulty; children were cited as the most expensive targets. #OpDeathEaters

Anonymous

41,618 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Soy-Verine" " no replay value" Idk about y'all. But as soon as I finish my first playthrough, I'm going NG+ on the highest difficulty. Wolverine is basically inviting you to challenge yourself. Or go play Mixtape and press forward, choose your teen dialogue options. And watch goofy teens throw toilet paper on houses and stuff for 5 hours. SkillUp highly recommends that game😉
0:59

"Soy-Verine" " no replay value" Idk about y'all. But as soon as I finish my first playthrough, I'm going NG+ on the highest difficulty. Wolverine is basically inviting you to challenge yourself. Or go play Mixtape and press forward, choose your teen dialogue options. And watch goofy teens throw toilet paper on houses and stuff for 5 hours. SkillUp highly recommends that game😉

Daily HUBRANX Official

18,791 次观看 • 1 个月前

Difficulty and value are inexorably linked. The only thing that gives said objective value at all is its difficulty. If money was everywhere, along with huge piles of gold, on every street corner - it would have no value at all. Understand that it is the difficulty that delivers the DESIRE at all. YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT IF IT WASN’T HARD. Therefore... Complaining that it’s hard is a LOGIC FAIL. People complaining about things being hard is as stupid as complaining things are valuable. "Getting a 6 pack is hard" = "Getting a 6 pack is valuable" Be glad it’s hard. If it wasn’t you wouldn’t want it. Or you’d already have it along with everyone else and nobody would care. Hard to make a million bucks, that’s why it’s worth..... a million bucks. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t be. I always say to replace the word HAVE with GET for an instant mindset shift. "I GET to go to work today" Here’s another: Replace the word HARD with IMPORTANT and you will instantly see how motivation appears from thin air. "Making money is important" "Being in good shape is important" Yes. It is. This allows you to eliminate the need for willpower, experience the world in a new light, and find a mental fortitude you never knew existed. Now... What will you do with it? Learn more:
0:56

Difficulty and value are inexorably linked. The only thing that gives said objective value at all is its difficulty. If money was everywhere, along with huge piles of gold, on every street corner - it would have no value at all. Understand that it is the difficulty that delivers the DESIRE at all. YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT IF IT WASN’T HARD. Therefore... Complaining that it’s hard is a LOGIC FAIL. People complaining about things being hard is as stupid as complaining things are valuable. "Getting a 6 pack is hard" = "Getting a 6 pack is valuable" Be glad it’s hard. If it wasn’t you wouldn’t want it. Or you’d already have it along with everyone else and nobody would care. Hard to make a million bucks, that’s why it’s worth..... a million bucks. If it wasn’t, it wouldn’t be. I always say to replace the word HAVE with GET for an instant mindset shift. "I GET to go to work today" Here’s another: Replace the word HARD with IMPORTANT and you will instantly see how motivation appears from thin air. "Making money is important" "Being in good shape is important" Yes. It is. This allows you to eliminate the need for willpower, experience the world in a new light, and find a mental fortitude you never knew existed. Now... What will you do with it? Learn more:

Andrew Tate

3,362,643 次观看 • 3 年前

"Gone are the days when you could invest in a memecoin, and that's a welcome change" Ava Labs founder Emin Gün Sirer says only projects that bring real value to the chain will prosper "What I think will happen is that the teams and projects that actually bring value to the chain are going to be the ones that prosper. Gone are the days when you could invest in a memecoin" "I was facing this difficulty. We would bring in funds, say a BlackRock fund that's returned 30% annually historically, and you tell people that, and they say, well, my memecoin made 30%. Well, okay. So those days are gone, and that's a welcome change" "The sideways market right now is a fantastic time to be building. The teams that bring value, the teams that bring money flows and business flows to their chain, are going to be the ones that prosper"
0:43

"Gone are the days when you could invest in a memecoin, and that's a welcome change" Ava Labs founder Emin Gün Sirer says only projects that bring real value to the chain will prosper "What I think will happen is that the teams and projects that actually bring value to the chain are going to be the ones that prosper. Gone are the days when you could invest in a memecoin" "I was facing this difficulty. We would bring in funds, say a BlackRock fund that's returned 30% annually historically, and you tell people that, and they say, well, my memecoin made 30%. Well, okay. So those days are gone, and that's a welcome change" "The sideways market right now is a fantastic time to be building. The teams that bring value, the teams that bring money flows and business flows to their chain, are going to be the ones that prosper"

The Wolf Of All Streets

61,031 次观看 • 2 个月前

Behold! The self-proclaimed Mother of All Games! Scorched Earth, by Wendell Hicken, was released as shareware in 1991. It wasn't going to win awards for groundbreaking graphics, yet it's one of the best multiplayer games ever - highly addictive with endless replay value. It let you customize a huge range of settings, from gravity, wind, and meteor showers to many others. Building on earlier games like QBasic Gorillas, it took the concept to a much higher level, supporting up to 10 players with far greater complexity and variety. You set angle and power to aim, with a wide choice of weapons (unlike the banana in QBasic Gorillas, for anyone who remembers). Computer-controlled enemies ranged from difficulty 1 (Moron) to 10 (Cyborg). No other game has named its lowest difficulty level so perfectly! Wendell Hicken, the Quentin Tarantino of game developers!
2:11

Behold! The self-proclaimed Mother of All Games! Scorched Earth, by Wendell Hicken, was released as shareware in 1991. It wasn't going to win awards for groundbreaking graphics, yet it's one of the best multiplayer games ever - highly addictive with endless replay value. It let you customize a huge range of settings, from gravity, wind, and meteor showers to many others. Building on earlier games like QBasic Gorillas, it took the concept to a much higher level, supporting up to 10 players with far greater complexity and variety. You set angle and power to aim, with a wide choice of weapons (unlike the banana in QBasic Gorillas, for anyone who remembers). Computer-controlled enemies ranged from difficulty 1 (Moron) to 10 (Cyborg). No other game has named its lowest difficulty level so perfectly! Wendell Hicken, the Quentin Tarantino of game developers!

exQUIZitely 🕹️

75,522 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?
1:54

🇨🇦🦅🏡 : BC Premier David Eby implies the BC Supreme Court lied to him about ensuring private property would not be on the table in the Cowichan land treaty decision and admits it’s causing great uncertainty. Eby then says people are still able to sell their property but admits the court decision has likely impacted their property value. David also says he doesn’t know if people are having difficulty getting loans for their property, since the decision. How does he not know? Isn't the answer a simple phone call away?

Bruce McGonigal

326,377 次观看 • 11 个月前

One of my all-time favourite games is the original Civilization from 1991. The number of hours I spent playing it is way too high, but the memories are all worth it. At some point, I set myself challenges, for example playing on the highest difficulty against the maximum number of opponents, and limiting my tech choices. Right at the start, the options "Horseback Riding" and "The Wheel" are dead-end choices. It doesn't make them obsolete (Horseback Riding will get you to Chivalry – but the road ends there… and The Wheel will eventually come into play when you research Engineering), but obviously there are much better choices at the start such as "Alphabet", "Masonry", and "Pottery" (though a dead-end tech, you still need it for Granaries). My #1 goal was usually to get to the wonders of Darwin's Voyage (2 tech advances, incredible value) and J.S. Bach's Cathedral (reducing the number of unhappy citizens in your cities by 2, also incredible value). The little animation below shows my standard tech-tree path towards both those goals. What made Civilization so incredibly wonderful and gave it such a high level of replayability was the optionality. Apart from setting planet size and conditions, you could adjust difficulty levels and then also handicap yourself through deliberate self-imposed limitations, just to see what would happen and if you could still win. Man, I love this game. What were your first two or three tech choices and what wonders did you aim for early on?
0:45

One of my all-time favourite games is the original Civilization from 1991. The number of hours I spent playing it is way too high, but the memories are all worth it. At some point, I set myself challenges, for example playing on the highest difficulty against the maximum number of opponents, and limiting my tech choices. Right at the start, the options "Horseback Riding" and "The Wheel" are dead-end choices. It doesn't make them obsolete (Horseback Riding will get you to Chivalry – but the road ends there… and The Wheel will eventually come into play when you research Engineering), but obviously there are much better choices at the start such as "Alphabet", "Masonry", and "Pottery" (though a dead-end tech, you still need it for Granaries). My #1 goal was usually to get to the wonders of Darwin's Voyage (2 tech advances, incredible value) and J.S. Bach's Cathedral (reducing the number of unhappy citizens in your cities by 2, also incredible value). The little animation below shows my standard tech-tree path towards both those goals. What made Civilization so incredibly wonderful and gave it such a high level of replayability was the optionality. Apart from setting planet size and conditions, you could adjust difficulty levels and then also handicap yourself through deliberate self-imposed limitations, just to see what would happen and if you could still win. Man, I love this game. What were your first two or three tech choices and what wonders did you aim for early on?

exQUIZitely 🕹️

13,029 次观看 • 8 个月前

My spoiler free thoughts on Saros so far: I’m definitely finishing this way faster than Returnal. I’m almost at 10 hours now, and if tomorrow goes well, I might actually wrap it up. The game is clearly more approachable, especially if you already understand this style of gameplay. That doesn’t mean it’s “easy”. There’s still plenty of challenge, and the boss fights and the whole gameplay loop have been really good so far. It’s just not the same level of punishment as Returnal, where one death could wipe basically everything and make a whole run feel wasted if you didn’t beat the biome boss. The game looks incredible, and the haptic feedback is on point again. Housemarque really knows how to get the most out of the DualSense and make every action feel great. The atmosphere also deserves a mention. The way the environments, sound design, and pacing come together makes every area feel alive. It’s not just pretty visuals, it’s the whole vibe of the world pulling you in. I’ll admit I would’ve loved the difficulty to match Returnal, but I get why they toned it down. A huge percentage of players didn’t even beat the first boss in Returnal, and Saros gives you ways to adjust the experience. You can push it harder or make it more forgiving depending on how you want to play. It’s also the type of game where the quality genuinely matches the price. You can feel the production value everywhere. And without going into spoilers, the story has my attention. It’s not something spectacular, but it’s engaging enough that I actually care about what’s happening, which rarely happens for me in games. I’m genuinely glad I picked it up. I had a great time today and didn’t even notice the hours passing. If you were interested in Returnal but bounced off the difficulty, or you always wanted to finish it but couldn’t, Saros is absolutely worth trying. The boss fights and the gameplay so far have been really good.
1:04

My spoiler free thoughts on Saros so far: I’m definitely finishing this way faster than Returnal. I’m almost at 10 hours now, and if tomorrow goes well, I might actually wrap it up. The game is clearly more approachable, especially if you already understand this style of gameplay. That doesn’t mean it’s “easy”. There’s still plenty of challenge, and the boss fights and the whole gameplay loop have been really good so far. It’s just not the same level of punishment as Returnal, where one death could wipe basically everything and make a whole run feel wasted if you didn’t beat the biome boss. The game looks incredible, and the haptic feedback is on point again. Housemarque really knows how to get the most out of the DualSense and make every action feel great. The atmosphere also deserves a mention. The way the environments, sound design, and pacing come together makes every area feel alive. It’s not just pretty visuals, it’s the whole vibe of the world pulling you in. I’ll admit I would’ve loved the difficulty to match Returnal, but I get why they toned it down. A huge percentage of players didn’t even beat the first boss in Returnal, and Saros gives you ways to adjust the experience. You can push it harder or make it more forgiving depending on how you want to play. It’s also the type of game where the quality genuinely matches the price. You can feel the production value everywhere. And without going into spoilers, the story has my attention. It’s not something spectacular, but it’s engaging enough that I actually care about what’s happening, which rarely happens for me in games. I’m genuinely glad I picked it up. I had a great time today and didn’t even notice the hours passing. If you were interested in Returnal but bounced off the difficulty, or you always wanted to finish it but couldn’t, Saros is absolutely worth trying. The boss fights and the gameplay so far have been really good.

𝙉𝙄𝙆𝙁𝙊𝙍

20,019 次观看 • 5 个月前

Neuroscientist Dr. Jeff Beck from Noumenal Labs discusses the fundamental nature of representation, understanding, and modelling, comparing biological intelligence with current artificial intelligence. Jeff argues that *how* information is represented dictates predictive ability and that LLMs, while impressive at symbol manipulation and pattern matching (like next-word prediction), lack the *grounded*, causal understanding of the world inherent in biological systems. Timestamps: 00:00 - Cat visual cortex experiments & discovering orientation sensitivity (slide projector analogy) 01:49 - Representation choice and neural coding (orientation vs. feature intensity) 02:30 - Choice of representation impacts predictions; generative models 03:15 - Importance of choosing the right generative model for predictions 03:35 - The problem: We don't know the brain's true generative model 03:55 - Theory of Mind (ToM) in LLMs 04:05 - Jeff Beck's ToM tests on early ChatGPT (stapler example) 05:40 - ChatGPT recognizing the ToM test vs. passing it 06:32 - Analogy: LLMs recognizing known problems vs. generalizing (sum/product riddle) 07:25 - Do LLMs implicitly build world models? Vicarious experience analogy 07:59 - The difference: Grounding symbols in reality outside language 08:35 - AI Alignment: Difficulty in capturing human reward functions & belief formation 09:21 - Nightmare scenario: Humans as "complacent value function selectors" 09:44 - Hope: AI enhancing human understanding, not replacing thought 10:08 - Philosophy of science: Science realism vs. modeling pockets of regularity 10:39 - Noise in models as ignorance or deliberate exclusion (design choice) 11:00 - Design choices in science, controlled experiments, and induced bias 11:29 - Are there true, discoverable mathematical laws of the universe? 11:41 - Is there a "true" ground truth distribution (P)? Beck's answer: No (with nuance) 12:55 - Ontological vs. Epistemological divide: Perfect models vs. models of regularities 13:21 - Are scientific models "false by definition"? The Bayesian perspective 14:07 - "All knowledge is conditional"; Are foundational theories (e.g., FEP) true or just perspectives? 14:51 - FEP as a mathematical framework, not a theory; models are just models 15:54 - Legibility vs. Utility: Useful but illegible AI models 16:01 - Prediction vs. Explanation: Trusting black boxes can be unsatisfying 16:30 - Why understanding AI matters: Ensuring alignment with human decisions/values 17:08 - Line-of-sight legibility as an alignment approach 17:14 - Benefits of explainable AI: Human understanding and value alignment verification 18:21 - RL components: Prediction engine, reward function, policy; the alignment challenge 19:25 - Trusting AI = Trusting its policy aligns with our reward + its superior beliefs 19:57 - Language: Intrinsic representation vs. pointers between shared minds 20:21 - Why language works: Shared internal models and common grounding 21:00 - Basis of shared understanding: Not linguistic, but shared experience/intuitive physics 22:44 - Consciousness and language as lossy, simplified summaries of complex brain processes 23:22 - Evidence for simplification: Brain regions, perception vs. representation; limits of language models 24:32 - Counterpoint: Language captures complex/ambiguous human concepts 24:54 - Language as massive compression: The information bottleneck (Meister's paper) 26:22 - Implication: Language/actions are poor representations of internal understanding 27:03 - Can language models understand? The mimicry argument (Piantadosi) 27:33 - Beck's skepticism: LLMs excel at prediction/mimicry, not true understanding 28:09 - LLM explanations replicate structure but lack grounding 28:54 - Beck's test for LLM understanding: Genuine novelty beyond training data 29:19 - Summary: Symbol manipulation is not understanding; grounding is key 30:06 - Abstraction and Idealization in scientific modeling ("The Brain Abstracted") 30:45 - Revisiting Newton: Intuitive physics is correct for our world; idealizations are simplifications 32:01 - Sophistication & boundaries: Nested systems vs. one complex system? 32:32 - The boundary problem in FEP/Markov Blankets: Where to partition? 33:41 - Beck's research: Finding principled partitions based on interaction dynamics 35:44 - Beyond direct experience: Imagination, language, and learning 36:16 - Human creativity: Creating new *things* by combining modeled objects (Systems Engineering) 37:43 - Goal for AI: Automating systems engineering for creative combination 38:17 - Sutton's "Reward is Enough" paper 38:25 - The challenge of "Reward is Enough": Defining and obtaining the *right* reward function 39:02 - Difficulty of eliciting individual reward functions 39:52 - The core alignment problem: Accessing and representing individual reward functions 40:13 - Impossibility: Disentangling beliefs and rewards from observed actions 41:51 - Argument analogy: Disagreements stem from different beliefs or values 43:00 - Prerequisite for value inference: Understanding belief formation 43:13 - Building aligned systems: Sparsity of data, meta-models vs. base system modification 43:46 - Proposed solution: AI layer that models the human's belief formation system 44:40 - Alignment process: Align beliefs first, then address value differences 45:00 - Conclusion CC Maxwell Ramstead
45:03

Neuroscientist Dr. Jeff Beck from Noumenal Labs discusses the fundamental nature of representation, understanding, and modelling, comparing biological intelligence with current artificial intelligence. Jeff argues that *how* information is represented dictates predictive ability and that LLMs, while impressive at symbol manipulation and pattern matching (like next-word prediction), lack the *grounded*, causal understanding of the world inherent in biological systems. Timestamps: 00:00 - Cat visual cortex experiments & discovering orientation sensitivity (slide projector analogy) 01:49 - Representation choice and neural coding (orientation vs. feature intensity) 02:30 - Choice of representation impacts predictions; generative models 03:15 - Importance of choosing the right generative model for predictions 03:35 - The problem: We don't know the brain's true generative model 03:55 - Theory of Mind (ToM) in LLMs 04:05 - Jeff Beck's ToM tests on early ChatGPT (stapler example) 05:40 - ChatGPT recognizing the ToM test vs. passing it 06:32 - Analogy: LLMs recognizing known problems vs. generalizing (sum/product riddle) 07:25 - Do LLMs implicitly build world models? Vicarious experience analogy 07:59 - The difference: Grounding symbols in reality outside language 08:35 - AI Alignment: Difficulty in capturing human reward functions & belief formation 09:21 - Nightmare scenario: Humans as "complacent value function selectors" 09:44 - Hope: AI enhancing human understanding, not replacing thought 10:08 - Philosophy of science: Science realism vs. modeling pockets of regularity 10:39 - Noise in models as ignorance or deliberate exclusion (design choice) 11:00 - Design choices in science, controlled experiments, and induced bias 11:29 - Are there true, discoverable mathematical laws of the universe? 11:41 - Is there a "true" ground truth distribution (P)? Beck's answer: No (with nuance) 12:55 - Ontological vs. Epistemological divide: Perfect models vs. models of regularities 13:21 - Are scientific models "false by definition"? The Bayesian perspective 14:07 - "All knowledge is conditional"; Are foundational theories (e.g., FEP) true or just perspectives? 14:51 - FEP as a mathematical framework, not a theory; models are just models 15:54 - Legibility vs. Utility: Useful but illegible AI models 16:01 - Prediction vs. Explanation: Trusting black boxes can be unsatisfying 16:30 - Why understanding AI matters: Ensuring alignment with human decisions/values 17:08 - Line-of-sight legibility as an alignment approach 17:14 - Benefits of explainable AI: Human understanding and value alignment verification 18:21 - RL components: Prediction engine, reward function, policy; the alignment challenge 19:25 - Trusting AI = Trusting its policy aligns with our reward + its superior beliefs 19:57 - Language: Intrinsic representation vs. pointers between shared minds 20:21 - Why language works: Shared internal models and common grounding 21:00 - Basis of shared understanding: Not linguistic, but shared experience/intuitive physics 22:44 - Consciousness and language as lossy, simplified summaries of complex brain processes 23:22 - Evidence for simplification: Brain regions, perception vs. representation; limits of language models 24:32 - Counterpoint: Language captures complex/ambiguous human concepts 24:54 - Language as massive compression: The information bottleneck (Meister's paper) 26:22 - Implication: Language/actions are poor representations of internal understanding 27:03 - Can language models understand? The mimicry argument (Piantadosi) 27:33 - Beck's skepticism: LLMs excel at prediction/mimicry, not true understanding 28:09 - LLM explanations replicate structure but lack grounding 28:54 - Beck's test for LLM understanding: Genuine novelty beyond training data 29:19 - Summary: Symbol manipulation is not understanding; grounding is key 30:06 - Abstraction and Idealization in scientific modeling ("The Brain Abstracted") 30:45 - Revisiting Newton: Intuitive physics is correct for our world; idealizations are simplifications 32:01 - Sophistication & boundaries: Nested systems vs. one complex system? 32:32 - The boundary problem in FEP/Markov Blankets: Where to partition? 33:41 - Beck's research: Finding principled partitions based on interaction dynamics 35:44 - Beyond direct experience: Imagination, language, and learning 36:16 - Human creativity: Creating new *things* by combining modeled objects (Systems Engineering) 37:43 - Goal for AI: Automating systems engineering for creative combination 38:17 - Sutton's "Reward is Enough" paper 38:25 - The challenge of "Reward is Enough": Defining and obtaining the *right* reward function 39:02 - Difficulty of eliciting individual reward functions 39:52 - The core alignment problem: Accessing and representing individual reward functions 40:13 - Impossibility: Disentangling beliefs and rewards from observed actions 41:51 - Argument analogy: Disagreements stem from different beliefs or values 43:00 - Prerequisite for value inference: Understanding belief formation 43:13 - Building aligned systems: Sparsity of data, meta-models vs. base system modification 43:46 - Proposed solution: AI layer that models the human's belief formation system 44:40 - Alignment process: Align beliefs first, then address value differences 45:00 - Conclusion CC Maxwell Ramstead

Machine Learning Street Talk

17,828 次观看 • 1 年前

Have We Changed our Approach to Hamstring Injuries? 🎯 Five key points for clinical practice: 1⃣ - Strength and Flexibility are weak risk factors for hamstring injuries and continue to form a small but important part of the causal pathway. Although the evidence for stretching is lacking, multi-faceted prevention programmes might consider including these components to be successful in the prevention of hamstring injuries. 2⃣ - Intrinsic neuromuscular function may be altered post-injury. Clinicians should focus on returning the player to full function during the rehabilitation of hamstring injuries, which may include specific targeted intervention even after return to play. 3⃣ - Our common strength and flexibility tests have poor predictive value, and do not possess the characteristics needed to successfully identify individual players at greater risk of hamstring injury. This is evident in the large amount of variability between seasons, and poor sensitivity and specificity demonstrated for these measurements. The wide overlap in distribution of pre-season strength between injured and uninjured players demonstrates the difficulty in identifying a subgroup of at-risk players that might benefit from targeted intervention. It is therefore recommended that prevention programs be implemented for all players. 4⃣ - Workload monitoring provide another potential way in which we may reduce the risk of injury. The aggregation of chronic workload, as well as careful planning of acute workload increases, may reduce the risk of hamstring injury. However, high-level evidence to support this is lacking. 5⃣ - Understanding the context in which injuries occur and appreciating the complex nature of these injuries are important considerations to better manage players with hamstring injuries 🔗Read the full article 👉 ✍️ Roald Bahr & Nicol van Dyk
0:43

Have We Changed our Approach to Hamstring Injuries? 🎯 Five key points for clinical practice: 1⃣ - Strength and Flexibility are weak risk factors for hamstring injuries and continue to form a small but important part of the causal pathway. Although the evidence for stretching is lacking, multi-faceted prevention programmes might consider including these components to be successful in the prevention of hamstring injuries. 2⃣ - Intrinsic neuromuscular function may be altered post-injury. Clinicians should focus on returning the player to full function during the rehabilitation of hamstring injuries, which may include specific targeted intervention even after return to play. 3⃣ - Our common strength and flexibility tests have poor predictive value, and do not possess the characteristics needed to successfully identify individual players at greater risk of hamstring injury. This is evident in the large amount of variability between seasons, and poor sensitivity and specificity demonstrated for these measurements. The wide overlap in distribution of pre-season strength between injured and uninjured players demonstrates the difficulty in identifying a subgroup of at-risk players that might benefit from targeted intervention. It is therefore recommended that prevention programs be implemented for all players. 4⃣ - Workload monitoring provide another potential way in which we may reduce the risk of injury. The aggregation of chronic workload, as well as careful planning of acute workload increases, may reduce the risk of hamstring injury. However, high-level evidence to support this is lacking. 5⃣ - Understanding the context in which injuries occur and appreciating the complex nature of these injuries are important considerations to better manage players with hamstring injuries 🔗Read the full article 👉 ✍️ Roald Bahr & Nicol van Dyk

Aspetar سبيتار

11,733 次观看 • 2 年前

What does tanning have to do with penile sensitivity? I recently interviewed Randy Tymkin, the inventor of ManHood, and his story is a great example of why I love learning about innovative products in men's sexual health. I first learned about ManHood from a patient who came to see me because he was having difficulty reaching orgasm. When I asked what he'd tried, he mentioned a product called ManHood—a soft sleeve worn over the head of the penis to protect it from friction and irritation. He told me he'd noticed an improvement in sensitivity while using it. I was intrigued. I started recommending it to select patients and eventually connected with Randy to learn more about the product and the story behind it. Here's the interesting part: Randy originally developed ManHood because he wanted to protect his genitals while tanning. What started as a practical solution to a personal problem evolved into a product designed to serve as a nonsurgical foreskin substitute, particularly for circumcised men. The idea is that reducing daily friction against clothing may help protect the sensitive tissue of the penile glans and potentially improve comfort and perceived sensitivity. Is there robust clinical evidence demonstrating that ManHood improves penile sensitivity or orgasm? Not yet. But I think there's value in exploring low-risk, noninvasive options, especially when patients are the ones introducing us to products that have helped them. One of the things I love most about practicing medicine is that I'm constantly learning from my patients. Sometimes they introduce me to something I might never have discovered otherwise. In this clip, Randy shares the origin story of ManHood and how a simple idea evolved into a product that's been around for more than 30 years. Have you heard of ManHood? Link to full interview: Learn more:
1:37

What does tanning have to do with penile sensitivity? I recently interviewed Randy Tymkin, the inventor of ManHood, and his story is a great example of why I love learning about innovative products in men's sexual health. I first learned about ManHood from a patient who came to see me because he was having difficulty reaching orgasm. When I asked what he'd tried, he mentioned a product called ManHood—a soft sleeve worn over the head of the penis to protect it from friction and irritation. He told me he'd noticed an improvement in sensitivity while using it. I was intrigued. I started recommending it to select patients and eventually connected with Randy to learn more about the product and the story behind it. Here's the interesting part: Randy originally developed ManHood because he wanted to protect his genitals while tanning. What started as a practical solution to a personal problem evolved into a product designed to serve as a nonsurgical foreskin substitute, particularly for circumcised men. The idea is that reducing daily friction against clothing may help protect the sensitive tissue of the penile glans and potentially improve comfort and perceived sensitivity. Is there robust clinical evidence demonstrating that ManHood improves penile sensitivity or orgasm? Not yet. But I think there's value in exploring low-risk, noninvasive options, especially when patients are the ones introducing us to products that have helped them. One of the things I love most about practicing medicine is that I'm constantly learning from my patients. Sometimes they introduce me to something I might never have discovered otherwise. In this clip, Randy shares the origin story of ManHood and how a simple idea evolved into a product that's been around for more than 30 years. Have you heard of ManHood? Link to full interview: Learn more:

Amy Pearlman, MD

15,239 次观看 • 4 天前

PROPHETIC DECLARATIONS Father, in the name of Jesus, You placed this in my heart to teach Your people to help them to know that lack and want are a curse and that they can leave a Believer's life, when they serve The Lord diligently and passionately. I stretch my hands over everyone onsite and online and pray for you from the depths of my heart, see the marvelous hand of God in your finances. May God put it in the heart of people, even strangers to locate and bless you so mightily. For anyone in business, experiencing difficulty in locating those who need the value you carry, I connect you For those without employment, in the name of Jesus, may this year not end without you getting a job and receiving your letter of employment. I pray for anyone in debt, who borrowed money and is now in trouble, in the name of Jesus, between now and 31st of December, come out of that financial problem I pray for someone who has made careless financial decisions, thereby causing loss, in the name of Jesus, may God The Restorer restore you. For those who are not tithing, nor giving, thereby lacking spiritual roots, in the name of Jesus, the giving grace rests upon you now! I call forth your destiny helpers, you will not have to look for them yourselves, my God will bring them to you. May this be true for ministries, churches, families and individuals. Some wealthy persons looking for someone to bless, may God put your name in their hearts. For those already established, you will not fail in business, you will not lose your job. God will take you higher and higher, in the name of Jesus. #PropheticDeclarations #ApostleJoshuaSelman #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaZaria #KoinoniaGlobal
5:14

PROPHETIC DECLARATIONS Father, in the name of Jesus, You placed this in my heart to teach Your people to help them to know that lack and want are a curse and that they can leave a Believer's life, when they serve The Lord diligently and passionately. I stretch my hands over everyone onsite and online and pray for you from the depths of my heart, see the marvelous hand of God in your finances. May God put it in the heart of people, even strangers to locate and bless you so mightily. For anyone in business, experiencing difficulty in locating those who need the value you carry, I connect you For those without employment, in the name of Jesus, may this year not end without you getting a job and receiving your letter of employment. I pray for anyone in debt, who borrowed money and is now in trouble, in the name of Jesus, between now and 31st of December, come out of that financial problem I pray for someone who has made careless financial decisions, thereby causing loss, in the name of Jesus, may God The Restorer restore you. For those who are not tithing, nor giving, thereby lacking spiritual roots, in the name of Jesus, the giving grace rests upon you now! I call forth your destiny helpers, you will not have to look for them yourselves, my God will bring them to you. May this be true for ministries, churches, families and individuals. Some wealthy persons looking for someone to bless, may God put your name in their hearts. For those already established, you will not fail in business, you will not lose your job. God will take you higher and higher, in the name of Jesus. #PropheticDeclarations #ApostleJoshuaSelman #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaZaria #KoinoniaGlobal

Koinonia Global

50,703 次观看 • 2 年前