正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Digital Foundry Confirms: The Switch 2 Display is complete Dog Shit, from beginning to end. They claim: "SWITCH 2 Display is Worst than Base SWITCH 1 Display " "Display easily scratches due to plastic coating" " LCD Blur is very apparent and creates ghosting like images compared to the...

51,985 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

WolverinePS5 的头像
WolverinePS51 年前

This is what Nintendo fanboys caused by cheering for Nintendo’s profit margins. Nintendo clearly cheaped out on this display despite charging $450.

Andrés Gutiérrez 🇻🇪 的头像
Andrés Gutiérrez 🇻🇪1 年前

DOGSHIT CONSOLE!!!

Neoelli Mapping 的头像
Neoelli Mapping1 年前

Df talking completly nonesense again but Go ahead If you still belive them Not my Problem

Tripster 的头像
Tripster1 年前

DF is nonsense now? They're more reliable than you

Miller Lite 的头像
Miller Lite1 年前

“Digital foundry confirms, even though there has already been tutorials on how to toggle things such as the HDR”

Tripster 的头像
Tripster1 年前

Yes! That's me! Cool! This isn't affecting me, the less you know about me the better

The Gaming Dude 的头像
The Gaming Dude1 年前

You dont even Play games

Tripster 的头像
Tripster1 年前

Cry harder bitch

DoNotArgue 的头像
DoNotArgue1 年前

SD OLED is $560 with lower res, only 90hz, and a smaller screen despite it being OLED 💀💀

Tripster 的头像
Tripster1 年前

OLED is superior 90hz yes that's good The switch has 120hz and not a single game is using it. Smaller screen? That's a actually a good thing for me, didn't you Fanboys claimed the Steam Deck was too big ? By your own logic the Steam Deck wins

相关视频

The Galaxy S26 Ultra display looks like absolute garbage next to the iQOO 16. Honestly, it looks like shit. The S26 Ultra uses M14 OLED, while the iQOO 16 has moved on to the newer M16 OLED, so the latter already has an advantage at the panel level. But the real disaster is Samsung’s privacy display design. Look at this comparison. The moment you tilt the S26 Ultra, the woman’s skin tone starts turning yellow and green. At wider angles, she almost looks like a ghost. Meanwhile, the iQOO 16 keeps her skin tone remarkably accurate, with excellent clarity and color consistency even from extreme angles. And please pay attention to this: I did NOT enable Privacy Display. This is the S26 Ultra in its normal display mode. The privacy feature is completely off, yet the viewing angles are already this bad. That means even if you never use Privacy Display at all, you still have to live with the side effects of this optical structure every single day. Tilt the phone a little and colors shift. Skin tones collapse. A flagship display that cannot even maintain basic color consistency at normal viewing angles is simply unacceptable. The first thing I checked after getting the iQOO 16 was its viewing angle performance, because this issue matters a lot to me. And honestly, I was so happy. This finally feels like a proper flagship OLED again. Then I looked back at my S26 Ultra and almost wanted to cry. Samsung has some of the best OLED technology in the world, and M14 OLED itself is perfectly capable of looking excellent. Yet Samsung sacrificed viewing angles, transparency, and color consistency for a privacy feature that most people will only use occasionally. Ruining hours of daily viewing quality for a feature you may need for a few minutes is absurd. I really hope other smartphone brands do not blindly copy this trend. Privacy protection can be achieved with software, accessories, or other solutions. Do not destroy the fundamentals of a great display for it. And this is exactly why I am already worried about the S27 Ultra. Even if Samsung upgrades it to M16 OLED, if it keeps the same privacy display structure, I do not expect it to match the clean, transparent, and consistent color performance of the iQOO 16. A great display should first get the basics right: accurate color, clarity, and viewing angles. If a normal human face turns yellow green the moment you tilt the phone, no advanced OLED material can save it.

Ice Universe

375,944 次观看 • 10 天前

First, the conclusion: the so called Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leak from last night turned out to be a false alarm. After watching the original video over and over again, I'm convinced it isn't a Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. It's actually the blue version of the Galaxy Z Fold7. Because of the lighting and color temperature, the blue frame appeared black on camera, which led to the confusion. Here are the three biggest clues: 1. The inner display camera cutout is too large. Compared with the official Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra renders, the inner camera hole on the Fold8 Ultra is noticeably smaller. The one in the leaked video is still the larger Fold7-style cutout. 2. The rear camera housing doesn't match. The cylindrical camera housing reflects light with a bright metallic sheen, which is much more consistent with the blue Galaxy Z Fold7 than the black Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. Some of the hardware details also don't line up. 3. The inner display is still highly reflective. The device in the video shows obvious screen reflections. However, the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the first Fold to feature an anti reflective inner display film. Anyone familiar with Samsung foldables should immediately notice that the reflections don't look like this. Based on these three points, I'm confident the device in the video is a blue Galaxy Z Fold7, not the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. The confusion is understandable because the two generations are incredibly similar. They share the same overall dimensions and aspect ratio, making them very easy to mix up. The good news is that the real Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra will be even better. It will have an even less visible crease than the Fold7, along with the new anti reflective inner display film.

Ice Universe

127,679 次观看 • 2 个月前