Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
🚨 DISCLOSURE IS FOR DUMMIES - WHERE DID LOGIC & COMMON SENSE GO? It's impossible to think that humans are the only intelligent lifeform in the universe, but personally I believe we have to drop our foolish ignorance and arrogance to accept a few logical facts We are physiologically... show more
11,555 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)
32 Comments
"We have to also accept that any lifeform, based on our parameters of what that is, which may have come to Earth... has to be more advanced than ourselves, to have achieved that" A life form need merely to have access to more advanced technology or merely have had more sustained periods of unimpeded civilizational progress without regression or reset in order to have achieved interplanetary colonization, irrespective of its evolutionary rate or moral trajectory being at parity, slower, or faster. You have to accept there is a non-zero possibility the reason "we are physiologically unable to see and hear" certain bands in the regions of sound and the electromagnetic spectrum is because one or more adversarial parasitic species took direct anti-competitive control over our genome and intentionally evolutionarily enslaves, retards, and parasitizes us because our unencumbered moral, technological, and evolutionary advancement is viewed as an intolerable risk to its own supremacy. Which one is more likely? a) Something advanced that welcomes its own evolutionary replacement with open arms? b) Something that enslaves its future rival before it can becomes a an active
I love your passion for non-zero arguments 🙈😎😜
To assume ‘The Collectives’ - a multi-racial criminal cartel who cover their tracks for a living - are going to leave traces of material evidence of their clandestine criminal acts is unwise. “Disclosure” was published in 2001 for all… Bin human logic
Fundamentally incorrect. It is believing is seeing, not the other way around.
Dummie here 🖐️ 👽🦉 Probably give my last money penny to watch that movie again 🤓😂
Do forget “Hollywood” has been crafting the mind(s) with fiction(s) for decades ;) Meanwhile on a scientific note, food for thought:
Yes a good post thank you and totally supports my theories and logic,. Light is electromagnetic energy and we don't see most of the frequences that light inhabits.. like the bio electricity of embryology and our own development from a bio-electric spark as an ion crosses a cell membrane.. check out the work of @drmichaellevin
We are under “incremental mass conditioning”. See the paragraph titled “The Psychological Effect” for the reasoning.
I think you’re correct.
Wait until they tell us that the UAP's and Aliens 👽 are just our future selves traveling back in time. Time traveling tourists on a cosmic carnival cruise.
hell I'm not sure we are intelligent. Sentient sure but I see little intelligence :-)
The Curated Disclosure Cashes Are A Set Up, For A Galactic Hustle "Blue Beam" I.E. Von Braun. If Ernest We'd Get All Adm. Byrd Records, Smithsonian Hordes And The Low Down on These Gems...
Good question Miss Moneypenny, but there has since been declassified videos and documents regarding military uap sightings like the tic-tac back in 2004 that Wikileaks and Snowden didn’t disclose. They didn’t disclose information on lots of black budget ops, probably because it’s not all on file. Rumsfeld announced the pentagon had lost $2.3T in a White House press briefing the day before 9/11 but I don’t think that was ever accounted for, by anyone.
💯
We had disclosure during NASA Space shuttle missions. Public satellite livefeed in the 1990s to late 2000s revealed everything we need to know. Once Space enthusiasts began recording the livefeeds and uploading it online, NASA decided to go private.
You should go watch spileberg movie, kind of reveal little of how things might go
Loads of things wrong with this. Firstly a bunch of nations have dumped data, with more to come. It also seems that its a global event that even rivals of the US allow them to take the lead on. Finally the data dumped is a treasure trove, also with more to come. Its real
Sorry, you’re the dummy. I like you, but you’ve got no clue. See how you do on my birthday. 😂
I see your point. Generally its hard to keep something so big from leaking. BUT ...UFO UAP stories HAVE BEEN leaking out. Just not in those two formats you've chosen as examples. And those two people were probably more aware than most that it could mean death if they were to become leakers of that particular info.
Spielberg’s propaganda has been littered with alien slop and whether you believe in the Christian god or not it’s clearly about inversion. See previous and obvious example. There are no aliens but there is advanced technology (Bill Cooper knew).
Disclosure by government will never ever happen and you are right in some points.
Trumps ego - if it is true contact has been made he would want to get his name in the history books - let’s face it the peace prize has alluded him
"Aye lass, but them aliens took away all t'evidence before it war leaked"
You should check out this guy in Mozambique who films 'elementals' with his drone and pieces the videos together to show the tracks. I think disclosure will come from the public rather than governments.
Time for some pattern recognition.
You don't need to get all the way to aliens, to discover logic has failed, globally. Just in a side note is a dog or cat and organic non human body?
It has more to do with planes of existence than it does "outer space."
Its a Hollywood film......thats it, nothing more nothing less. Good marketing......
There are files and proof outside. The problem is all of it gets labeled as fake or something else. And aliens would know not to disturb the accepted chain of command to prevent global panic. Your own video shows your bias in not even accepting the possibility that they are real.
Ai&It'sDataCenters(US~5,000)=DemiseCitizens RemovaI: 1.AgriculturalLand=Starvation 2.HugeConsumptionPower,RawMaterials&CoolingWater(DrinkingQuality) Musk=PiedPiperOfFutureCull&Control ZionistUS&WesternGovs=EnslavingCitizens? ChineseGov=MANUFACTURING=Jobs?
That's because you're correct, there are no extra terrestrial beings,, unless you want to consider sun plasmoids as ET, in which i believe thats what the phenomena is.. or plasmates,lol as how you refer to them,lol.. which doesn't break laws of physics and explains alot.
Deepest corners of the Shadow government, not the deepest corrupt corners of “regular government”. It breaks the whole system apart if revealed, since it has to do with the origins of the whole system, and more!
![👽 Is The UFO Phenomenon "Attacking" Us and We Just Don't Realize It? 👽 "We're not seeing any aggression right now [from the UFO Phenomenon." ~Mellon "They might have been attacking us for centuries already...through the manipulation of consciousness." ~Levenda (IMO, this is a very limited view of things from Mellon. I'll include more from Levenda after this short transcript.) Christopher K. Mellon: "The research that I've seen - it was quite a while ago, but - makes the logical point that a great deal of the reaction [and] impact will depend on the context. So, let's assume for a moment that things continue as they have been, which is, no aggression, no hostility, surveillance, whatever. A presence, an elusive presence. "That will be received, likely fairly, with less concern and disruption, obviously, than if it was a, you know, 'Independence-Day' scenario. I mean, we don't anticipate...we're not seeing any aggression right now. We have concerns about the seeming interest in DOD facilities, but we're not seeing any kind of hostility. This has been going on for a long, long time. Chances are it'll probably continue more or less as it has, which isn't disrupting or Earth-threatening." (All of that, apparent, interest in our DOD facilities and surveillance, may be misdirection from what the phenomenon is actually doing here. That MUST be considered.) Leslie Kean: "Yeah, that's a really good point. And I think it also depends on what is actually said when the announcement is made, and also what kind of proof is presented. Because they're gonna have to offer something to really prove that this is not just...that this is the real deal." ~~~ (IMO, this is the way we SHOULD look at the phenomenon, and this essay is a big reason why I value Peter Levenda's opinion so highly. I can't recommend it enough and I'll link to the entire thing in the replies.) Levenda: "If people insist on projecting their ideas about humans and human incentives onto the 'alien' and claiming (a) that the 'alien' has no designs on us and only comes in peace, or (b) that since the 'alien' has not attacked us so far even though they could have, easily, then their intentions must be peaceful … etc etc; these are all points of view that are inconsistent with what we do know. By definition, the 'alien' should not be considered 'human' in the sense we understand that term. We have no idea what environment gave rise to the 'alien', what its values are, how it views us. We don’t know what is important to them, and we don’t know what or how they think about what is important to us. We keep projecting our (21st century North American) ideas, concepts, and conceits onto a Phenomenon about which we know virtually nothing. Ironically, the less we know about It the easier that projection becomes. We accept that their technology is somehow superior to ours, without being able to define 'superior' in that context, instead of just 'other'. Some of us assume that if the 'alien' has superior technology then it must be spiritually or morally superior as well. When has that ever been the case on this planet in all of our recorded history? Technologically advanced civilizations routinely invade, colonize, and brutalize less advanced ones. Thus, we have no expectation – based purely on our own experience as human beings of planet Earth – that another race would be benign. In fact, we would have to anticipate the worst. "A better approach might be to ascertain whether the 'alien' is hostile rather than 'evil': hostile to all humans, hostile to some humans, hostile to other life forms on our planet, etc. There are those who insist that this cannot be the case, that if they are hostile they would have wiped us out already. We have already addressed that argument above, but briefly: we can’t assume that they would act the way we have acted in our history. Their life expectancy, timelines and schedules might be extremely long compared to ours. Or extremely short. We simply don’t know and should not assume anything. "Hostility implies intent: that they 'intend' to destroy us somehow. They have not done so, the argument goes, so they must not be hostile. The problem with this argument is that we are assuming they would manifest their hostility by blowing something up, or attacking us the way we attack and invade our enemies. They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them and which further an agenda we can’t begin to imagine or understand. "What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? That sounds far-fetched, but we have been doing that ourselves for a long time. It’s called psychological warfare, and includes propaganda, disinformation, misinformation, etc. including – again ironically – using the UFO Phenomenon as a means of distracting us from our own secret weapons systems. "Many contactees report communication with the 'alien' by means of telepathy. That automatically presents us with the possibility that human consciousness may be vulnerable to direct outside interference or manipulation by the 'alien.' "We are simply not trying hard enough to understand the 'alien'. "We must proceed on the assumption that the Phenomenon is dangerous to us (perhaps in ways we can’t imagine, and I can’t stress that enough) and proceed slowly and carefully."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2066619407313535002/amplify_video_thumb/2066608049394229249/img/ooi6sxiOAQX769aG.jpg)
!["If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2030480027666747596/amplify_video_thumb/2030373285926694913/img/_-25iW0LmiKeRcjI.jpg)
