Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Disparate Impact

Playteaux

113,722 subscribers

28,829 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Disparate impact prioritizes equity over equality, and produces DEI practices such as affirmative action. U.S. Department of Justice concluded disparate impact analysis is NOT consistent with SCOTUS precedent. DOJ Civil Rights Division will continue to protect and defend our color-blind Constitution!

Disparate impact prioritizes equity over equality, and produces DEI practices such as affirmative action. U.S. Department of Justice concluded disparate impact analysis is NOT consistent with SCOTUS precedent. DOJ Civil Rights Division will continue to protect and defend our color-blind Constitution!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

32,352 views • 2 months ago

“Disparate impact” was created by a court, not Congress. The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division and U.S. Department of Justice will continue ignoring the noise and doubling down on protecting ALL Americans.

“Disparate impact” was created by a court, not Congress. The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division and U.S. Department of Justice will continue ignoring the noise and doubling down on protecting ALL Americans.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

57,403 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING: We’re back in court challenging Boston’s scheme to achieve race-based admissions by proxy, now with evidence of disparate impact. Justice Alito called dismissing our previous case, “a glaring constitutional error.” We're looking to correct this mistake.

BREAKING: We’re back in court challenging Boston’s scheme to achieve race-based admissions by proxy, now with evidence of disparate impact. Justice Alito called dismissing our previous case, “a glaring constitutional error.” We're looking to correct this mistake.

Pacific Legal 🗡⚖️

44,899 views • 5 months ago

🚨NEW: Trump signs an Executive Order abolishing Disparate Impact Theory which they say is the underlying theory behind DEI. The EO asks agencies to no longer reference it when making decisions and instead focus on merit based decisions.

🚨NEW: Trump signs an Executive Order abolishing Disparate Impact Theory which they say is the underlying theory behind DEI. The EO asks agencies to no longer reference it when making decisions and instead focus on merit based decisions.

Autism Capital 🧩

45,372 views • 1 year ago

From U.S. Department of Justice & DOJ Civil Rights Division’ perspective, disparate impact & DEI are over. We will end this discrimination in Minneapolis Public Schools, setting the example for other states & cities… before we come for them next!

From U.S. Department of Justice & DOJ Civil Rights Division’ perspective, disparate impact & DEI are over. We will end this discrimination in Minneapolis Public Schools, setting the example for other states & cities… before we come for them next!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

30,751 views • 8 months ago

A short discourse on the word "equity," which means getting one's fair share in return for one's investment, and its perversions under Woke doctrine, which comes from Soviet Union Communism. Bonus material: Why ending "disparate impact" (inequity) doctrines in law ruins Woke.

A short discourse on the word "equity," which means getting one's fair share in return for one's investment, and its perversions under Woke doctrine, which comes from Soviet Union Communism. Bonus material: Why ending "disparate impact" (inequity) doctrines in law ruins Woke.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

27,173 views • 7 months ago

The old ‘disparate impact’ rules let people sue over neutral policies with zero proof of intent. U.S. Department of Justice and DOJ Civil Rights Division Division just killed that theory. True equality of the law demands real evidence of discrimination—not quotas or assumptions.

The old ‘disparate impact’ rules let people sue over neutral policies with zero proof of intent. U.S. Department of Justice and DOJ Civil Rights Division Division just killed that theory. True equality of the law demands real evidence of discrimination—not quotas or assumptions.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

35,528 views • 8 months ago

The left has decided that if an employer administers a test and black applicants fail at higher rates than white applicants, that amounts to discrimination and the test must be thrown out. The concept of disparate impact is the greatest weapon against merit and excellence.

The left has decided that if an employer administers a test and black applicants fail at higher rates than white applicants, that amounts to discrimination and the test must be thrown out. The concept of disparate impact is the greatest weapon against merit and excellence.

Heather Mac Donald

347,096 views • 6 months ago

There’s something in America called “Disparate impact” and it’s destroying law enforcement “Disparate impact is the conceit that if there's a standard that Blacks do more poorly at, it's discriminatory” “I'll give you an example right out of the Biden administration. Maryland State Police hoping to settle a US Justice Department investigation into its alleged racial discrimination by paying almost $3 million. The Maryland state police wanted to make sure that the state troopers could read at a very basic level, because as a police officer, you're gonna need to write police reports. Black applicants failed the test at higher rates than whites. The Maryland state troopers didn't intend to exclude Black state troopers. Racism had nothing to do with it. It was a colorblind, neutral test of skills. But because it had a disparate impact on Black applicants and disqualified more Black applicants” Let me explain this in the most simple terms, If a neutral (colorblind) test or rule has worse results for Black people than White people, it can be ruled discriminatory. Even if no one was trying to be racist This is actually racist towards white people

There’s something in America called “Disparate impact” and it’s destroying law enforcement “Disparate impact is the conceit that if there's a standard that Blacks do more poorly at, it's discriminatory” “I'll give you an example right out of the Biden administration. Maryland State Police hoping to settle a US Justice Department investigation into its alleged racial discrimination by paying almost $3 million. The Maryland state police wanted to make sure that the state troopers could read at a very basic level, because as a police officer, you're gonna need to write police reports. Black applicants failed the test at higher rates than whites. The Maryland state troopers didn't intend to exclude Black state troopers. Racism had nothing to do with it. It was a colorblind, neutral test of skills. But because it had a disparate impact on Black applicants and disqualified more Black applicants” Let me explain this in the most simple terms, If a neutral (colorblind) test or rule has worse results for Black people than White people, it can be ruled discriminatory. Even if no one was trying to be racist This is actually racist towards white people

Wall Street Apes

67,638 views • 2 months ago

⭐ SCOTUS JUST EXPOSED IT: North Carolina Democrats like Cooper, Stein & Anita Earls pushed NO-MONEY BAIL during BLM. Why? They said charging bail “disparately impacts” black people so it’s “racist,” even though most violent crime victims are black! Result? Murderers treated like mental patients, walking free before they see a judge. SCOTUS just ruled disparate impact UNCONSTITUTIONAL. These dangerous policies are now EXPOSED! #ncpol

⭐ SCOTUS JUST EXPOSED IT: North Carolina Democrats like Cooper, Stein & Anita Earls pushed NO-MONEY BAIL during BLM. Why? They said charging bail “disparately impacts” black people so it’s “racist,” even though most violent crime victims are black! Result? Murderers treated like mental patients, walking free before they see a judge. SCOTUS just ruled disparate impact UNCONSTITUTIONAL. These dangerous policies are now EXPOSED! #ncpol

Margo

13,818 views • 3 months ago

Tucker Carlson says institutional discrimination against white men isn't just a feeling, it's documented, and it's been proven in court. CARLSON: "If you're a white man, it's harder to get a job, a federal contract, or college admission. And that's factually true. It's proven, not just statistically proven by disparate impact, but proven by document requests delivered in lawsuits." Alex Jones backed up Carlson’s claim with a staggering statistic. JONES: "During Biden, 94% of hires were not white men."

Tucker Carlson says institutional discrimination against white men isn't just a feeling, it's documented, and it's been proven in court. CARLSON: "If you're a white man, it's harder to get a job, a federal contract, or college admission. And that's factually true. It's proven, not just statistically proven by disparate impact, but proven by document requests delivered in lawsuits." Alex Jones backed up Carlson’s claim with a staggering statistic. JONES: "During Biden, 94% of hires were not white men."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

115,149 views • 1 month ago

David Sacks: The AI Regulatory Frenzy at the State Level is “Very Concerning” “Let me give you some stats on this.” “All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025.” “There's been over 1,000 bills in state legislatures.” “118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “And there's no real agreement on what all these AI regulations are supposed to do, or what the risks are, so they're just making things up.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups because they've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “And if you wanna see where this is going, look at Colorado.” “This has already been passed into law, SB 24-205, Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It bans something they call ‘algorithmic discrimination.’” “Algorithmic discrimination is defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics. So things like age, race, sex, disability.” “If any of those factors drive an AI decision and it results in a disparate impact, then both the developer of the AI model and the deployer, which means the business that's using it, can be in violation of this law and they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.” “The only way that I see for model developers to comply with this law, is to build in a new DEI layer into the models, to basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have a disparate impact on protected groups.” “So we're back to Woke AI again, and I think that's the whole point.”

David Sacks: The AI Regulatory Frenzy at the State Level is “Very Concerning” “Let me give you some stats on this.” “All 50 states have introduced AI bills in 2025.” “There's been over 1,000 bills in state legislatures.” “118 AI laws have already been passed across the 50 states.” “Everyone just seems to be motivated by the imperative to ‘do something’ on AI, even though no one's really sure what that something should be.” “And there's no real agreement on what all these AI regulations are supposed to do, or what the risks are, so they're just making things up.” “So you've got 50 different states each with their own reporting regime, which is going to be a trap for startups because they've all gotta figure this out about what they're supposed to report on, what the deadlines are, who to report to.” “And if you wanna see where this is going, look at Colorado.” “This has already been passed into law, SB 24-205, Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence. It bans something they call ‘algorithmic discrimination.’” “Algorithmic discrimination is defined as unlawful differential treatment or disparate impact based on protected characteristics. So things like age, race, sex, disability.” “If any of those factors drive an AI decision and it results in a disparate impact, then both the developer of the AI model and the deployer, which means the business that's using it, can be in violation of this law and they can be prosecuted by the Colorado Attorney General.” “The only way that I see for model developers to comply with this law, is to build in a new DEI layer into the models, to basically somehow prevent models from giving outputs that might have a disparate impact on protected groups.” “So we're back to Woke AI again, and I think that's the whole point.”

The All-In Podcast

186,860 views • 10 months ago

Is the retard right dead? What is disparate impact? What does the Karmelo Anthony case say about American race relations? I explore these and other questions on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (1:27) The Trump administration cracks down on disparate impact (18:17) Karmelo Anthony is found guilty, yet the black community still defends him (36:47) Howard University professor defends Karmelo, blames the Metcalfs In the second half of the show, I watch a few clips of a Candace Owens fan who went on Financial Audit. This leads to a discussion on the retard right. Is it dead? I explain how Lucas Gage disavowing anti-Semitism is a hilarious metapolitical rug pull. He sold the top of internet anti-Semitism. Did you? I talk about the various divisions within the retard right, taking a look at Sneako vs Andrew Tate, explaining that infighting and schism are signs of a subculture or "movement" that has lost the energy that fueled its rise. Toward the end of the show, I remind the audience that 2026 is the year of the patriot, and that, as such, you had best show the president some respect.

Is the retard right dead? What is disparate impact? What does the Karmelo Anthony case say about American race relations? I explore these and other questions on the latest episode of Restoring Order. (1:27) The Trump administration cracks down on disparate impact (18:17) Karmelo Anthony is found guilty, yet the black community still defends him (36:47) Howard University professor defends Karmelo, blames the Metcalfs In the second half of the show, I watch a few clips of a Candace Owens fan who went on Financial Audit. This leads to a discussion on the retard right. Is it dead? I explain how Lucas Gage disavowing anti-Semitism is a hilarious metapolitical rug pull. He sold the top of internet anti-Semitism. Did you? I talk about the various divisions within the retard right, taking a look at Sneako vs Andrew Tate, explaining that infighting and schism are signs of a subculture or "movement" that has lost the energy that fueled its rise. Toward the end of the show, I remind the audience that 2026 is the year of the patriot, and that, as such, you had best show the president some respect.

Patrick Casey

45,567 views • 2 months ago

The anarchy in America’s big cities is out of control. Mentally ill psychotics with criminal records six feet long are shoving people into subways and down subway stairs, sometimes fatally, as happened a week ago in New York. These repeat criminals are not being confined to avoid disparate impact. As a previous victim of the latest subway murderer said in declining to press charges: she did not want to "put another black man in jail." And so we put everyone else at risk. My latest interview on the Joe Piscopo Show:

The anarchy in America’s big cities is out of control. Mentally ill psychotics with criminal records six feet long are shoving people into subways and down subway stairs, sometimes fatally, as happened a week ago in New York. These repeat criminals are not being confined to avoid disparate impact. As a previous victim of the latest subway murderer said in declining to press charges: she did not want to "put another black man in jail." And so we put everyone else at risk. My latest interview on the Joe Piscopo Show:

Heather Mac Donald

18,371 views • 3 months ago

The Left Declared Competence a Civil-Rights Violation The left has reached the point where requiring a police officer to read is considered racial discrimination. Maryland State Police used a neutral examination to determine whether applicants possessed the basic skills needed to write reports and perform police work. Black applicants failed at higher rates. The Biden Justice Department responded by attacking the examination and helping produce a settlement approaching $3 million. The test did not ask anyone’s race. The department did not exclude anyone because of race. Applicants were measured against the same standard. Under disparate-impact ideology, equality itself became the offense because equality failed to manufacture the desired result. This doctrine requires society to abolish every standard that exposes a disparity. Police examinations become discriminatory. Teacher examinations become discriminatory. Academic requirements become discriminatory. Any measurement of competence remains acceptable only until it measures competence. The humiliation imposed on black Americans is difficult to overstate. The same people who call themselves anti-racists have constructed an ideology based on the assumption that black applicants cannot be expected to meet ordinary standards. They then demand that the standards disappear and congratulate themselves for their compassion. A sane civil-rights movement would insist that every child receive the education required to meet high expectations. The modern left protects failing institutions, lowers the expectations and accuses anyone who notices the decline of racism. How are normal people expected to share a functioning civilization with ideologues who believe that the ability to read should become negotiable when hiring police officers? Roads, hospitals, schools, courts and public-safety agencies depend on competence. Reality does not accept an equity exemption. A police report filled with errors does not become accurate because the officer was hired through a socially approved process. Disparate-impact ideology has converted failure into evidence against the test, incompetence into victimhood and standards into contraband. Every bad result produces the same administrative solution... lower the requirement, punish the institution and invoice the taxpayer. The left would rather abolish qualification than admit that anyone failed to qualify. The public will eventually discover the cost while depending on the people they declared competent by eliminating the evidence that they were not.

The Left Declared Competence a Civil-Rights Violation The left has reached the point where requiring a police officer to read is considered racial discrimination. Maryland State Police used a neutral examination to determine whether applicants possessed the basic skills needed to write reports and perform police work. Black applicants failed at higher rates. The Biden Justice Department responded by attacking the examination and helping produce a settlement approaching $3 million. The test did not ask anyone’s race. The department did not exclude anyone because of race. Applicants were measured against the same standard. Under disparate-impact ideology, equality itself became the offense because equality failed to manufacture the desired result. This doctrine requires society to abolish every standard that exposes a disparity. Police examinations become discriminatory. Teacher examinations become discriminatory. Academic requirements become discriminatory. Any measurement of competence remains acceptable only until it measures competence. The humiliation imposed on black Americans is difficult to overstate. The same people who call themselves anti-racists have constructed an ideology based on the assumption that black applicants cannot be expected to meet ordinary standards. They then demand that the standards disappear and congratulate themselves for their compassion. A sane civil-rights movement would insist that every child receive the education required to meet high expectations. The modern left protects failing institutions, lowers the expectations and accuses anyone who notices the decline of racism. How are normal people expected to share a functioning civilization with ideologues who believe that the ability to read should become negotiable when hiring police officers? Roads, hospitals, schools, courts and public-safety agencies depend on competence. Reality does not accept an equity exemption. A police report filled with errors does not become accurate because the officer was hired through a socially approved process. Disparate-impact ideology has converted failure into evidence against the test, incompetence into victimhood and standards into contraband. Every bad result produces the same administrative solution... lower the requirement, punish the institution and invoice the taxpayer. The left would rather abolish qualification than admit that anyone failed to qualify. The public will eventually discover the cost while depending on the people they declared competent by eliminating the evidence that they were not.

Apple Lamps

29,374 views • 1 month ago

🚨 MOSTLY PEACEFUL PHONE HEIST: Black 'Youth' Savagely Beats Defenseless White Woman for Her Cellphone – FBI + NCVS Data Expose the Ignored Epidemic: BLACK ON WHITE & BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE! 🔥 Surveillance footage doesn’t lie. Watch a young Black male storm a cellphone store and unleash a ferocious, unprovoked assault on an older White woman — dragging her down, pummeling her on the floor, stomping her while she’s helpless, then snatching her phone and bolting. “Procuring himself a new cellphone,” in the bitterly ironic words of one poster. One of the most sickening things you’ll see this week. Prayers for this poor woman. This isn’t random chaos. It’s a microcosm of a macro pattern criminologists have documented for decades, but polite society refuses to name. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (latest detailed tables) show African Americans — 13% of the U.S. population — account for 51–55% of murder offenders and ~33% of all violent crime arrests. Expanded Homicide Data: Black-on-White murders outnumber White-on-Black by more than 2-to-1 (566 vs. 246 in the 2019 snapshot; the ratio holds across years). The gold-standard National Crime Victimization Survey (BJS/NCVS), which bypasses police “bias” by asking victims directly who attacked them, confirms the same asymmetry: Black offenders commit the overwhelming majority of interracial violent crimes against Whites — robberies and assaults at rates 8–15 times higher per capita than the reverse. Intra-racial crime dominates overall, as it does in every group. But when violence crosses racial lines, the skew is not even close to symmetric. That is empirical reality, not narrative. Elites lecture endlessly about “systemic” this and “disparate impact” that — yet the data show the real disparate impact lands hardest on innocent victims of all races when we pretend group behavioral patterns don’t exist. We don’t solve problems by lying about them. We don’t have to live like this. Demand color-blind justice, relentless policing of violent predators, and cultural honesty that refuses excuses. The woman on the floor deserved better. So does every American tired of the euphemisms. Face the data. Enforce the law. Protect the vulnerable. #BlackOnWhiteCrimeReality #FBIStatsDontLie #NCVSVictimData #EndTheSilence #LawAndOrderNow #CrimeByTheNumbers #WakeUpAmerica

🚨 MOSTLY PEACEFUL PHONE HEIST: Black 'Youth' Savagely Beats Defenseless White Woman for Her Cellphone – FBI + NCVS Data Expose the Ignored Epidemic: BLACK ON WHITE & BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE! 🔥 Surveillance footage doesn’t lie. Watch a young Black male storm a cellphone store and unleash a ferocious, unprovoked assault on an older White woman — dragging her down, pummeling her on the floor, stomping her while she’s helpless, then snatching her phone and bolting. “Procuring himself a new cellphone,” in the bitterly ironic words of one poster. One of the most sickening things you’ll see this week. Prayers for this poor woman. This isn’t random chaos. It’s a microcosm of a macro pattern criminologists have documented for decades, but polite society refuses to name. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (latest detailed tables) show African Americans — 13% of the U.S. population — account for 51–55% of murder offenders and ~33% of all violent crime arrests. Expanded Homicide Data: Black-on-White murders outnumber White-on-Black by more than 2-to-1 (566 vs. 246 in the 2019 snapshot; the ratio holds across years). The gold-standard National Crime Victimization Survey (BJS/NCVS), which bypasses police “bias” by asking victims directly who attacked them, confirms the same asymmetry: Black offenders commit the overwhelming majority of interracial violent crimes against Whites — robberies and assaults at rates 8–15 times higher per capita than the reverse. Intra-racial crime dominates overall, as it does in every group. But when violence crosses racial lines, the skew is not even close to symmetric. That is empirical reality, not narrative. Elites lecture endlessly about “systemic” this and “disparate impact” that — yet the data show the real disparate impact lands hardest on innocent victims of all races when we pretend group behavioral patterns don’t exist. We don’t solve problems by lying about them. We don’t have to live like this. Demand color-blind justice, relentless policing of violent predators, and cultural honesty that refuses excuses. The woman on the floor deserved better. So does every American tired of the euphemisms. Face the data. Enforce the law. Protect the vulnerable. #BlackOnWhiteCrimeReality #FBIStatsDontLie #NCVSVictimData #EndTheSilence #LawAndOrderNow #CrimeByTheNumbers #WakeUpAmerica

Tony Seruga

45,733 views • 3 months ago