Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DJ Akademiks talks about how DANGEROUS NBA YoungBoy’s home “Grave Digger Mountain” was, saying he had ex-military guards posted up with snipers, silencers on their guns, and checkpoints 👀 “..You could be killed.. Buried in snow.. Nobody would know..”

232,121 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 DJ Akademiks Reacts To Old Footage Of A Young Beyoncé Speaking With Michael Jackson On The Phone 👀📹 DJ Akademiks briefly reacted to a video that resurfaced online over the weekend showing a young Beyoncé speaking with Michael Jackson during what appears to be a 2001 studio session. In the footage, an older man can be heard offering Beyoncé a seat on his lap before putting Michael Jackson on speakerphone so she could speak with him about a music project. The clip has sparked discussion online, with some people questioning the context surrounding the interaction. Akademiks, however, said he wasn’t interested in creating conspiracy theories based solely on the footage. 🗣️ Akademiks: “Beyoncé, an amazing and beautiful girl. Not going to make up conspiracy theories about whatever.” Akademiks suggested that Beyoncé was a young artist trying to establish herself in the music industry at the time and acknowledged that young artists can potentially find themselves in uncomfortable or complicated situations while trying to advance their careers. 🗣️ Akademiks: “I’m not mad at Beyoncé.” He ultimately said he viewed the footage as an example of what the entertainment industry can look like for young artists trying to break through, while stressing that viewers don’t necessarily know the full context behind what they’re seeing. 👀 What do you make of the resurfaced footage and Akademiks reaction to it?

Cousin Tino ™️

198,907 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

🚨 DJ Akademiks Says Wayno Doesn’t Understand The Personal Experiences He & Others Claim They’ve Had With Roc Nation Questions Whether Charlamagne Tha God Could Have Faced Disclosure Obligations If He Had An Equity Stake In Jay-Z’s Casino Bid 👀 DJ Akademiks responded to Wayno’s comments by arguing that people defending Roc Nation are speaking on situations they haven’t personally experienced. According to Akademiks, his criticism isn’t based on rumors, but on what he describes as his own legal and personal experiences. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: • “We’re talking about personal experiences with them. We’re not just saying stuff.” • “They dragged me into court for eight hours. They’re outside people’s houses. They’re using proxies to file lawsuits.” Akademiks said that’s why he believes people like Wayno shouldn’t try to explain situations they weren’t involved in. ➡️ He argued that Wayno is attempting to tell him what his own experiences have been despite not being directly involved. ➡️ Akademiks compared it to someone commenting on a personal dispute they know nothing about. 🗣️ “How are you telling me what my experience is when you weren’t there?” Akademiks also questioned why Charlamagne Tha God continues responding to criticism aimed at Jay-Z. ➡️ He claimed Charlamagne frequently inserts himself into conversations that, in Akademiks’ opinion, should be addressed by Jay-Z or Roc Nation directly. 🗣️ “Charlamagne is always jumping in front of the bullet.” The discussion then shifted after Akademiks reacted to comments from Wayno, who appeared to state that Charlamagne allegedly held equity in Jay-Z’s proposed Times Square casino bid. 👀 Akademiks said that, if true, it raised questions in his mind about disclosure requirements not that any violation had occurred. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: • “I don’t want to accuse anybody of committing a crime.” • “I’m handling this on a nuanced level.” Akademiks then explained the difference between Payola and Plugola, saying many people confuse the two. ➡️ He described Payola as accepting payment to play or promote music without proper disclosure. ➡️ He described Plugola as using broadcast airtime to promote a business or product in which the broadcaster has a financial interest without appropriately disclosing that relationship. Akademiks stressed that whether any rule was violated would depend on the facts, including whether Charlamagne was simply giving an opinion or delivering what regulators would consider a promotional endorsement. 🗣️ “If he was just speaking on a topic, that’s where the gray area comes in.” ➡️ Akademiks said that if Charlamagne did have an ownership interest, any required disclosure would generally need to be made to listeners during the broadcast if applicable not just through corporate filings. ➡️ He emphasized several times that he was raising questions based on Wayno’s comments, not accusing Charlamagne of violating any law.

Cousin Tino ™️

13,038 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat