Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Do Not Moan While You're Eating Her Coochie. Cause She'll Nut All Over Your Face #pussyeating #givinghead #bbc #oralsex #goingdown #squirting #pussylicking #givingtop #pussyeatinglips #suckingpussy #eatinpussyglips #headgame (Follow BootyTubeXXX🍑 🇹🇿🇺🇬🇿🇦🇰🇪 comment, like or retweet to keep this video posted)

Dirty_XoticsWeb's profile picture

🇺🇲🇳🇬🇬🇭 Pure Dirty Xotics Web 🍑💦

57,449 subscribers

79,672 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#pussyeating#givinghead#bbc#oralsex#goingdown#squirting#pussylicking#givingtop#pussyeatinglips#suckingpussy#eatinpussyglips#headgame
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Squaring The Face Controlling your golf ball is all about managing the club face. Understanding the how the arms will influence the club face is key. The lead arm will have some internal rotation in the backswing, therefore we will need to add external rotation to this arm through the release. If we fail to do this, we will leave the face open and often bring in more chicken wing/scoop patterns through contact. Learning to externally rotate the lead arm will help you keep a flat lead wrist and deliver a stronger loft. If you’re a player who tends to slice or fade the ball, this concept will help you to feel what you need to square it up. I just posted the full version of this lesson on the ProShopApp!!! Comment “SQUARE” if you’d like access to the video.
1:29

Squaring The Face Controlling your golf ball is all about managing the club face. Understanding the how the arms will influence the club face is key. The lead arm will have some internal rotation in the backswing, therefore we will need to add external rotation to this arm through the release. If we fail to do this, we will leave the face open and often bring in more chicken wing/scoop patterns through contact. Learning to externally rotate the lead arm will help you keep a flat lead wrist and deliver a stronger loft. If you’re a player who tends to slice or fade the ball, this concept will help you to feel what you need to square it up. I just posted the full version of this lesson on the ProShopApp!!! Comment “SQUARE” if you’d like access to the video.

Alex Riggs

56,881 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

American Citizen CONFIRMS Springfield Ohio Haitian Immigrants Eating People’s Pets “Carving the cat up to eat. They’ve been doing this to dogs” “These the Haitians, — some of them are literally going to parks, — They are taking ducks and cutting their heads off and taking them home to eat them” “There was a neighbor that was missing her cat. She couldn't find her cat. One day, she came home from work. As soon as she stepped out of her car, looked towards the neighbor's house where Haitians lived and saw her cat hanging from a branch like you do like a deer when you're when you're field dressing or butchering and they were covering it carving the cat up to eat.” They've been doing this to dogs. They've been doing it at Snyder Park with the ducks and the geese. This is this is Harrison Biden's, they flew these people in to Ohio. So if you're out in Ohio, please watch your animals.” “If you're anywhere, really, please watch your animals because their customs are not the same as ours, obviously. And this is just so wrong. It's disgusting, but it is in fact true. So please be safe. Keep your pets inside.” “Keep your cats inside. I see a ton of cats roaming around all the time, and then I get, like, alerts that, you know, somebody's cat's missing.”
2:11

American Citizen CONFIRMS Springfield Ohio Haitian Immigrants Eating People’s Pets “Carving the cat up to eat. They’ve been doing this to dogs” “These the Haitians, — some of them are literally going to parks, — They are taking ducks and cutting their heads off and taking them home to eat them” “There was a neighbor that was missing her cat. She couldn't find her cat. One day, she came home from work. As soon as she stepped out of her car, looked towards the neighbor's house where Haitians lived and saw her cat hanging from a branch like you do like a deer when you're when you're field dressing or butchering and they were covering it carving the cat up to eat.” They've been doing this to dogs. They've been doing it at Snyder Park with the ducks and the geese. This is this is Harrison Biden's, they flew these people in to Ohio. So if you're out in Ohio, please watch your animals.” “If you're anywhere, really, please watch your animals because their customs are not the same as ours, obviously. And this is just so wrong. It's disgusting, but it is in fact true. So please be safe. Keep your pets inside.” “Keep your cats inside. I see a ton of cats roaming around all the time, and then I get, like, alerts that, you know, somebody's cat's missing.”

Wall Street Apes

1,042,344 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Got it — here’s a clean, scroll-stopping post in the same format, but focused on earning from photos and teasing your video 👇 People Are Making Money Just By Posting Photos 📸💰 No face. No talking. Sounds fake? 👀 I’m not selling a course. No fake screenshots. No complicated setup. Don’t scroll. Watch till the end. 👇 You only need: ✔️ Phone or laptop ✔️ Internet ✔️ Photos (yours or free) This is a simple, repeatable system Anyone can copy — even beginners. I’ll break it all down in the video 🎥 ✅ Like ✅ Retweet to save this ✅ Follow for step-by-step updates 💬 Comment “Photo Income” if you want the video 🔖 Bookmark this — trust me, you’ll need it later 📘 Simple system. 📈 Consistency. 💵 Real income.
0:39

Got it — here’s a clean, scroll-stopping post in the same format, but focused on earning from photos and teasing your video 👇 People Are Making Money Just By Posting Photos 📸💰 No face. No talking. Sounds fake? 👀 I’m not selling a course. No fake screenshots. No complicated setup. Don’t scroll. Watch till the end. 👇 You only need: ✔️ Phone or laptop ✔️ Internet ✔️ Photos (yours or free) This is a simple, repeatable system Anyone can copy — even beginners. I’ll break it all down in the video 🎥 ✅ Like ✅ Retweet to save this ✅ Follow for step-by-step updates 💬 Comment “Photo Income” if you want the video 🔖 Bookmark this — trust me, you’ll need it later 📘 Simple system. 📈 Consistency. 💵 Real income.

Ram Singh Verma

11,012 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

EGYPTIAN 🇪🇬 PLANES ✈️ ‼️ Candace Owens finally brought up her DEBUNKED Egyptian planes theory again in today’s episode. She’s months LATE on delivering the flight data “EVIDENCE” on her website like she promised. She thinks the reassurances that her naysayers are “panicking” over the planes will be ENOUGH to keep her fans satisfied for now but anyone with half a brain can see how RIDICULOUS all of this sounds. She says the OBVIOUS thing to do if you don’t want your communications to be TRACKED when attempting to carry out a top secret political ASSASSINATION is to follow the target around in Egyptian planes 24/7 while hoping no one notices. Nothing says LOW KEY like parking your Egyptian military plane down the street so you can have DEVIOUS convos in private while overseeing your assassination plots in luxury. Just look at her face she doesn’t even buy the BULL 💩 that she’s selling. And I’m not talking about the merch… But speaking of merch. As you can see she’s trying to convince her fans that buying her products will help her SOLVE Charlie’s murder. She’s the most obvious insincere grifter on the internet.
1:29

EGYPTIAN 🇪🇬 PLANES ✈️ ‼️ Candace Owens finally brought up her DEBUNKED Egyptian planes theory again in today’s episode. She’s months LATE on delivering the flight data “EVIDENCE” on her website like she promised. She thinks the reassurances that her naysayers are “panicking” over the planes will be ENOUGH to keep her fans satisfied for now but anyone with half a brain can see how RIDICULOUS all of this sounds. She says the OBVIOUS thing to do if you don’t want your communications to be TRACKED when attempting to carry out a top secret political ASSASSINATION is to follow the target around in Egyptian planes 24/7 while hoping no one notices. Nothing says LOW KEY like parking your Egyptian military plane down the street so you can have DEVIOUS convos in private while overseeing your assassination plots in luxury. Just look at her face she doesn’t even buy the BULL 💩 that she’s selling. And I’m not talking about the merch… But speaking of merch. As you can see she’s trying to convince her fans that buying her products will help her SOLVE Charlie’s murder. She’s the most obvious insincere grifter on the internet.

Cinema Shogun

11,485 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I WAS FIRED FOR S*XUAL HARASSMENT. A MAN REPORT A SINGLE MOTHER TO HR. Woman: "I just got fired... at my job... for s*xually harassing someone. You know how many men I work with that make s*xual jokes, and I happen to be a part of one? And some young kid, 'cause I made a comment he didn't like that was not s*xual, I offended him. He went to HR and said that I sexually harassed him, I won't leave him alone. I'm serious, like, I cannot make this shit up. I'm a single mom... I don't get child support right now... And the thing that sucks... I didn't do anything wrong. It's a dumb kid that. I made a comment about his girlfriend not making his lunch. It was a joke. Mind you, this kid who's a f*cking weirdo, by the way always trying to be around me, always trying to talk to me. I never said anything sexual to him at all. That's... that's number one. But, I made a comment one day because we went back and forth, like, joking about stuff. I made a comment about how he... he has this little lunch box, and I didn't say he was gay or anything like that. It wasn't a sexual or a derogatory thing. I just said, 'So who... who makes your lunch? Does your girlfriend make your lunch?' And he goes, 'No.' And I like, made a face, like, I'm... I'm joking around. And he got really offended, and he... and he goes, 'My girlfriend has a master's degree, and you're making it sound like her not making my lunch means that she's not adequate.' And I go, 'Woah,' 'cause I didn't mean it that way. It was a joke. And mind you, we've been joking for like a month and a half now about different things." Anton Daniels: "Let this be a lesson, y'all. Right? Because the first lesson is, this is the environment that y'all created."
7:32

Sensitive content

I WAS FIRED FOR S*XUAL HARASSMENT. A MAN REPORT A SINGLE MOTHER TO HR. Woman: "I just got fired... at my job... for s*xually harassing someone. You know how many men I work with that make s*xual jokes, and I happen to be a part of one? And some young kid, 'cause I made a comment he didn't like that was not s*xual, I offended him. He went to HR and said that I sexually harassed him, I won't leave him alone. I'm serious, like, I cannot make this shit up. I'm a single mom... I don't get child support right now... And the thing that sucks... I didn't do anything wrong. It's a dumb kid that. I made a comment about his girlfriend not making his lunch. It was a joke. Mind you, this kid who's a f*cking weirdo, by the way always trying to be around me, always trying to talk to me. I never said anything sexual to him at all. That's... that's number one. But, I made a comment one day because we went back and forth, like, joking about stuff. I made a comment about how he... he has this little lunch box, and I didn't say he was gay or anything like that. It wasn't a sexual or a derogatory thing. I just said, 'So who... who makes your lunch? Does your girlfriend make your lunch?' And he goes, 'No.' And I like, made a face, like, I'm... I'm joking around. And he got really offended, and he... and he goes, 'My girlfriend has a master's degree, and you're making it sound like her not making my lunch means that she's not adequate.' And I go, 'Woah,' 'cause I didn't mean it that way. It was a joke. And mind you, we've been joking for like a month and a half now about different things." Anton Daniels: "Let this be a lesson, y'all. Right? Because the first lesson is, this is the environment that y'all created."

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

376,822 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨BREAKING: Newly UNEARTHED 2012 Video Of Erika Kirk (then Frantzve) Visiting Rancho Solano School As Miss Arizona – Every Clip Of Her Feels SO Scripted & Fake! 🫠🎥 Just surfaced: This bizarre 2012 video of Erika on an official Miss Arizona appearance at Rancho Solano school. She's doing the whole "beauty queen" routine – smiling, waving, speaking in that overly polished, rehearsed tone... but something's off. Every single video I've seen of her from this era feels the same: robotic, staged, like she's reading from a teleprompter in her head. No natural warmth, no real personality – just calculated perfection. It's giving "fake and gay" vibes all over again (shoutout to Candace Owens' catchphrase). Watch it and tell me I'm wrong – she doesn't come across as genuine for even a second. What do you think? Is this just pageant training gone extreme, or does it feel like something deeper – almost performative, like she's always playing a role? Drop your thoughts below – creepy or just "Miss Arizona energy"? 👇 RT if you're starting to see the pattern in every old clip of her! 🇺🇸 Shoutout ot the Amazing MIA For This Find. FOLLOW Her!
2:14

🚨BREAKING: Newly UNEARTHED 2012 Video Of Erika Kirk (then Frantzve) Visiting Rancho Solano School As Miss Arizona – Every Clip Of Her Feels SO Scripted & Fake! 🫠🎥 Just surfaced: This bizarre 2012 video of Erika on an official Miss Arizona appearance at Rancho Solano school. She's doing the whole "beauty queen" routine – smiling, waving, speaking in that overly polished, rehearsed tone... but something's off. Every single video I've seen of her from this era feels the same: robotic, staged, like she's reading from a teleprompter in her head. No natural warmth, no real personality – just calculated perfection. It's giving "fake and gay" vibes all over again (shoutout to Candace Owens' catchphrase). Watch it and tell me I'm wrong – she doesn't come across as genuine for even a second. What do you think? Is this just pageant training gone extreme, or does it feel like something deeper – almost performative, like she's always playing a role? Drop your thoughts below – creepy or just "Miss Arizona energy"? 👇 RT if you're starting to see the pattern in every old clip of her! 🇺🇸 Shoutout ot the Amazing MIA For This Find. FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

34,251 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

+773% Profit. I Didn't Place a Single Trade. Claude Did Everything. While you're losing sleep staring at candles, this bot ran overnight and printed 773%. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Trading Engine from scratch. Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "Trade" 2. Like and Retweet this post. 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you) You need: Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. You backtested your strategy once on a green week and thought you figured it out. Then the market flipped and wiped your account. Classic. This guy ran Monte Carlo simulations, stress-tested across thousands of scenarios, and used out-of-sample data to make sure the strategy actually works, not just on paper. The difference between you and him: > He runs thousands of bots across multiple coins > You run one gut-feeling trade and pray > He stress-tests for manipulation and drawdowns > You panic sell at the first red candle > His bot optimizes strategies while he sleeps > You set an alarm for London open and still miss it Your discipline is just gambling with extra steps. His bot doesn't have emotions, doesn't overtrade, doesn't revenge trade. Full video tutorial attached. Keep doing what you're doing or watch this once and never manually trade again. You Must Follow me Marry Evan, so i can send you DM.
9:48

+773% Profit. I Didn't Place a Single Trade. Claude Did Everything. While you're losing sleep staring at candles, this bot ran overnight and printed 773%. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Trading Engine from scratch. Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "Trade" 2. Like and Retweet this post. 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you) You need: Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. You backtested your strategy once on a green week and thought you figured it out. Then the market flipped and wiped your account. Classic. This guy ran Monte Carlo simulations, stress-tested across thousands of scenarios, and used out-of-sample data to make sure the strategy actually works, not just on paper. The difference between you and him: > He runs thousands of bots across multiple coins > You run one gut-feeling trade and pray > He stress-tests for manipulation and drawdowns > You panic sell at the first red candle > His bot optimizes strategies while he sleeps > You set an alarm for London open and still miss it Your discipline is just gambling with extra steps. His bot doesn't have emotions, doesn't overtrade, doesn't revenge trade. Full video tutorial attached. Keep doing what you're doing or watch this once and never manually trade again. You Must Follow me Marry Evan, so i can send you DM.

Marry Evan

27,684 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

+773% Profit. I Didn't Place a Single Trade. Claude Did Everything. While you're losing sleep staring at candles, this bot ran overnight and printed 773%. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Trading Engine from scratch. Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "Trade" 2. Like and Retweet this post. 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) You need: Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. You backtested your strategy once on a green week and thought you figured it out. Then the market flipped and wiped your account. Classic. This guy ran Monte Carlo simulations, stress-tested across thousands of scenarios, and used out-of-sample data to make sure the strategy actually works, not just on paper. The difference between you and him: > He runs thousands of bots across multiple coins > You run one gut-feeling trade and pray > He stress-tests for manipulation and drawdowns > You panic sell at the first red candle > His bot optimizes strategies while he sleeps > You set an alarm for London open and still miss it Your discipline is just gambling with extra steps. His bot doesn't have emotions, doesn't overtrade, doesn't revenge trade. Full video tutorial attached. Keep doing what you're doing or watch this once and never manually trade again. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.
18:00

+773% Profit. I Didn't Place a Single Trade. Claude Did Everything. While you're losing sleep staring at candles, this bot ran overnight and printed 773%. I've made the exact step-by-step guide to build this Claude Trading Engine from scratch. Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "Trade" 2. Like and Retweet this post. 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar (so i can DM you) You need: Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. You backtested your strategy once on a green week and thought you figured it out. Then the market flipped and wiped your account. Classic. This guy ran Monte Carlo simulations, stress-tested across thousands of scenarios, and used out-of-sample data to make sure the strategy actually works, not just on paper. The difference between you and him: > He runs thousands of bots across multiple coins > You run one gut-feeling trade and pray > He stress-tests for manipulation and drawdowns > You panic sell at the first red candle > His bot optimizes strategies while he sleeps > You set an alarm for London open and still miss it Your discipline is just gambling with extra steps. His bot doesn't have emotions, doesn't overtrade, doesn't revenge trade. Full video tutorial attached. Keep doing what you're doing or watch this once and never manually trade again. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.

Himanshu Kumar

91,006 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The funniest thing about Koromone is that she started with opening prayer and then went on a full blown lie. We will reconcile all these in heaven. Like I said before, this video was unnecessary. Every sensible person knows you're not responsible for the offences of your friend or sibling. Only reason people dragged her into it was to hold a mirror to her face as a feminist for feminists always asking people to publicly call out their friends and family. It has never made sense. Again, I don't expect you to ostracise or drag your family publicly because of an offence. Family is still family. But she chose to drag her mom and brother publicly and deny a relationship with him for public validation - a denial that was largely unnecessary and even worse, untrue. Now, her credibility lacks merit because there is no way to believe anything said in this video if half of it is proven to be a lie. Feminist Christian 😊 Having said that, she is merely a liar and clearly, she doesn’t even feel anything for the victims. It was all posturing for validation. The brother is still the abuser in all these. Whatever her brother posted ordinarily shouldn't be a problem because what she did is what family do for family. She made it a problem by trying to use family for social currency. All he did was play her fame by proving her a liar. That family needs to sit down and have a meeting.
12:01

The funniest thing about Koromone is that she started with opening prayer and then went on a full blown lie. We will reconcile all these in heaven. Like I said before, this video was unnecessary. Every sensible person knows you're not responsible for the offences of your friend or sibling. Only reason people dragged her into it was to hold a mirror to her face as a feminist for feminists always asking people to publicly call out their friends and family. It has never made sense. Again, I don't expect you to ostracise or drag your family publicly because of an offence. Family is still family. But she chose to drag her mom and brother publicly and deny a relationship with him for public validation - a denial that was largely unnecessary and even worse, untrue. Now, her credibility lacks merit because there is no way to believe anything said in this video if half of it is proven to be a lie. Feminist Christian 😊 Having said that, she is merely a liar and clearly, she doesn’t even feel anything for the victims. It was all posturing for validation. The brother is still the abuser in all these. Whatever her brother posted ordinarily shouldn't be a problem because what she did is what family do for family. She made it a problem by trying to use family for social currency. All he did was play her fame by proving her a liar. That family needs to sit down and have a meeting.

Sir Dickson

162,724 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

LOVE ISLAND USA SEASON 7 EPISODE 27 - Zak is a liar , cause you tried to kiss Olandria on the first day but she said no , so how you don’t do that in the real world ? He lied right in Amaya face . On top of that, Amaya kissing you influenced you to picked her over Olandria , but now you didn’t wanna do it ? BOO 🍅🍅 - I’m happy a lot of people went home cause the villa was starting to look like The Boys & Girls Club , it was giving summer camp . - RON STOPPABLE IS FINALLY OUT OF MY VILLA 😭 go ahead and go to Bueno Nacho , cause Buenos Noches ✌🏿 should’ve been gone - I was shocked Andreina was in the bottom but Drake is literally at the airport right now waiting to pick her up as soon as she land - I hope IRIS cuss CIERA out because she is FAKE . Ain’t that your friend ? And even if you didn’t pick Irish Spring Soap, you stand behind Shaboozey ? The guy who led your “sister” on ? Ciera was threatened that Iris & TJ was gonna win that 100K - Taylor and Shaboozey was last for everything , and I feel like Clarke getting all this hate because she attached to Shaboozey because to me she ain’t really did much and it’s kinda extra’d out - the votes were weird and you can tell people voted for their favorites and not the actual categories . - I like Pepe but he did Graceyn dirty cause he been stringing her along this whole time , and he been sprung like T-Pain over Hannah . His new name is P-Pain . - the fact that Huda wrote that note had me in tears . She couldn’t take no more backlash that night so she didn’t say it was her but I would’ve said 🤷🏾‍♂️ , it’s not like she lied . Her sitting over there pouting in the corner tho had me in tears 😭 - Chelley couldn’t believe her and Ace was that low , but baby we tired of yall playing in our face . Either yall gone be together & close off or not . We tired . #loveislandusa #loveisland #loveislandseason7 #peacock #isaiahjaay
2:59

Sensitive content

LOVE ISLAND USA SEASON 7 EPISODE 27 - Zak is a liar , cause you tried to kiss Olandria on the first day but she said no , so how you don’t do that in the real world ? He lied right in Amaya face . On top of that, Amaya kissing you influenced you to picked her over Olandria , but now you didn’t wanna do it ? BOO 🍅🍅 - I’m happy a lot of people went home cause the villa was starting to look like The Boys & Girls Club , it was giving summer camp . - RON STOPPABLE IS FINALLY OUT OF MY VILLA 😭 go ahead and go to Bueno Nacho , cause Buenos Noches ✌🏿 should’ve been gone - I was shocked Andreina was in the bottom but Drake is literally at the airport right now waiting to pick her up as soon as she land - I hope IRIS cuss CIERA out because she is FAKE . Ain’t that your friend ? And even if you didn’t pick Irish Spring Soap, you stand behind Shaboozey ? The guy who led your “sister” on ? Ciera was threatened that Iris & TJ was gonna win that 100K - Taylor and Shaboozey was last for everything , and I feel like Clarke getting all this hate because she attached to Shaboozey because to me she ain’t really did much and it’s kinda extra’d out - the votes were weird and you can tell people voted for their favorites and not the actual categories . - I like Pepe but he did Graceyn dirty cause he been stringing her along this whole time , and he been sprung like T-Pain over Hannah . His new name is P-Pain . - the fact that Huda wrote that note had me in tears . She couldn’t take no more backlash that night so she didn’t say it was her but I would’ve said 🤷🏾‍♂️ , it’s not like she lied . Her sitting over there pouting in the corner tho had me in tears 😭 - Chelley couldn’t believe her and Ace was that low , but baby we tired of yall playing in our face . Either yall gone be together & close off or not . We tired . #loveislandusa #loveisland #loveislandseason7 #peacock #isaiahjaay

3/12 🎈

42,021 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.
0:25

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

Jesus Freakin Congress

56,369 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace
0:39

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

Canellecitadelle

227,011 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sarah Wayne Callies opens up about being humiliated by a group of male coworkers while shooting the final season of ‘Prison Break’, as producers and directors stood by. Sarah Wayne Callies: We were sitting around one day, we were shooting a scene, and there was this p*rn video that was going around called 2 Chics 1 Cup that I've never seen. But we were sitting around a table, and the guys started texting it to each other and watching it and laughing. And I don't give a fuck, you know what I mean? Like, do whatever you want to do. We weren't shooting; they were setting up a shot. And then they started saying, "Oh Kelly's, that looks like you, that's you." And they went on this whole like, it was a fascinating dynamic in retrospect because every one of them individually, was a friend. But they became a wolf pack, like, immediately. And I'm looking around, I'm the only girl, right? Like, this was... Jon Bernthal: Wow. Sarah Wayne Callies: What, 2008? Jon Bernthal: Yeah. Sarah Wayne Callies: Yeah, it would have been 2008. Um, 'cause I'd just had the baby. and I was like, "No, seriously, knock it off. I don't like being called a shit-eating wh*re." and they doubled down. And one of the people at that table at the time was a very, very close friend. And I was looking over, going, "He's got the most power of anybody in this room. All he's got to do is say..." Jon Bernthal: "Shut that shit down." Sarah Wayne Callies: "...Hey, leave her alone." Yeah. That's all it would have taken. Like, no grandstanding, no fist fights, no nothing. Just, fucking leave her alone. Nothing. And I got to a point where I was like, well, I'm not going to cry. So, I'm not going to say anything. And I mean, producers, directors, 1st ADs all standing around, all seeing this, all hearing this. And I was like, "Hmm." It was a moment, and this happens as a woman walking through the world when all of a sudden you're like, "Oh, I'm way more vulnerable than I realized I was." And just emotionally, like no one was going to hurt me. But my fucking feelings were hurt! You know what I mean? I was like, "Oh, I thought we were friends." But if you can sit here and call me a shit-eating wh*re over my objections in the workplace, maybe I've misjudged this situation.
2:50

Sarah Wayne Callies opens up about being humiliated by a group of male coworkers while shooting the final season of ‘Prison Break’, as producers and directors stood by. Sarah Wayne Callies: We were sitting around one day, we were shooting a scene, and there was this p*rn video that was going around called 2 Chics 1 Cup that I've never seen. But we were sitting around a table, and the guys started texting it to each other and watching it and laughing. And I don't give a fuck, you know what I mean? Like, do whatever you want to do. We weren't shooting; they were setting up a shot. And then they started saying, "Oh Kelly's, that looks like you, that's you." And they went on this whole like, it was a fascinating dynamic in retrospect because every one of them individually, was a friend. But they became a wolf pack, like, immediately. And I'm looking around, I'm the only girl, right? Like, this was... Jon Bernthal: Wow. Sarah Wayne Callies: What, 2008? Jon Bernthal: Yeah. Sarah Wayne Callies: Yeah, it would have been 2008. Um, 'cause I'd just had the baby. and I was like, "No, seriously, knock it off. I don't like being called a shit-eating wh*re." and they doubled down. And one of the people at that table at the time was a very, very close friend. And I was looking over, going, "He's got the most power of anybody in this room. All he's got to do is say..." Jon Bernthal: "Shut that shit down." Sarah Wayne Callies: "...Hey, leave her alone." Yeah. That's all it would have taken. Like, no grandstanding, no fist fights, no nothing. Just, fucking leave her alone. Nothing. And I got to a point where I was like, well, I'm not going to cry. So, I'm not going to say anything. And I mean, producers, directors, 1st ADs all standing around, all seeing this, all hearing this. And I was like, "Hmm." It was a moment, and this happens as a woman walking through the world when all of a sudden you're like, "Oh, I'm way more vulnerable than I realized I was." And just emotionally, like no one was going to hurt me. But my fucking feelings were hurt! You know what I mean? I was like, "Oh, I thought we were friends." But if you can sit here and call me a shit-eating wh*re over my objections in the workplace, maybe I've misjudged this situation.

Emmy🧡

1,379,448 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

So over the years as a Content Creator for World of Warcraft, I've picked up a few great camera tricks that can make your footage look more professional. Not sure how widely known these are but I'll share some that I know and hopefully it will be helpful to someone! So firstly, let me show you how to do a smooth rotation shot. You're going to want to create a Macro for this with this script; /script MoveViewRightStart(0.15) To modify the direction, you can change the word "Right" to Left, In, Out, Up or Down. The number at the end indicates the speed of the rotation, the higher the number the faster the rotation. I tend to keep this fairly low for a nice non-sickening rotation. Now you can combine as many of these as you like. So if you wanted a smooth shot that zoomed in on your Character while rotating Right you would make a macro like this; /script MoveViewRightStart(0.15) /script MoveViewInStart(0.15) It is fun to play around with but you will also need to create a "Stop" macro. I go with a generic one like this which will stop all rotation in all directions; /script MoveViewLeftStop() /script MoveViewDownStop() /script MoveViewRightStop() /script MoveViewUpStop() /script MoveViewInStop() /script MoveViewOutStop() Another trick to get the best possible shots of areas or up close combat is to hide your Character model. This is done with a simple console command; /console showplayer To show your player character again just type it again. I'm sure there are easier ways to do this, but that's just the way I've always done it to get nice smooth footage of World of Warcraft for videos. Let me know if you have any questions or have any other cool tips to share!
0:46

So over the years as a Content Creator for World of Warcraft, I've picked up a few great camera tricks that can make your footage look more professional. Not sure how widely known these are but I'll share some that I know and hopefully it will be helpful to someone! So firstly, let me show you how to do a smooth rotation shot. You're going to want to create a Macro for this with this script; /script MoveViewRightStart(0.15) To modify the direction, you can change the word "Right" to Left, In, Out, Up or Down. The number at the end indicates the speed of the rotation, the higher the number the faster the rotation. I tend to keep this fairly low for a nice non-sickening rotation. Now you can combine as many of these as you like. So if you wanted a smooth shot that zoomed in on your Character while rotating Right you would make a macro like this; /script MoveViewRightStart(0.15) /script MoveViewInStart(0.15) It is fun to play around with but you will also need to create a "Stop" macro. I go with a generic one like this which will stop all rotation in all directions; /script MoveViewLeftStop() /script MoveViewDownStop() /script MoveViewRightStop() /script MoveViewUpStop() /script MoveViewInStop() /script MoveViewOutStop() Another trick to get the best possible shots of areas or up close combat is to hide your Character model. This is done with a simple console command; /console showplayer To show your player character again just type it again. I'm sure there are easier ways to do this, but that's just the way I've always done it to get nice smooth footage of World of Warcraft for videos. Let me know if you have any questions or have any other cool tips to share!

MrGM

111,442 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Earlier today I posted about the mom who said teaching her kids right from wrong, behavior, reading, and math “isn’t her job — that’s what I pay the teachers for.” Well… here’s where that attitude leads. Maryland school districts are now requiring teachers to potty-train toddlers as “Pre-K for All” expands. The woman in this video nails it: At what point do we just hand our kids over and say “Here, teachers — raise them for us”? Schools already do food assistance, clothing, mental health counseling, dental programs, health programs… and now diapering and toilet training? This isn’t “support.” It’s the state quietly becoming the parent while actual parents check out. And the legal questions are real — who’s watching the rest of the class while one teacher is in the bathroom with a toddler? Two adults present for every change? Where does that staff come from? This is the end result of treating schools like full-time daycare and surrogate parents. Parents: Potty train your own toddlers. Teach them basic life skills at home. Schools exist to educate, not raise your children. The more we outsource, the more the government steps in. This cycle has to stop.
1:03

Earlier today I posted about the mom who said teaching her kids right from wrong, behavior, reading, and math “isn’t her job — that’s what I pay the teachers for.” Well… here’s where that attitude leads. Maryland school districts are now requiring teachers to potty-train toddlers as “Pre-K for All” expands. The woman in this video nails it: At what point do we just hand our kids over and say “Here, teachers — raise them for us”? Schools already do food assistance, clothing, mental health counseling, dental programs, health programs… and now diapering and toilet training? This isn’t “support.” It’s the state quietly becoming the parent while actual parents check out. And the legal questions are real — who’s watching the rest of the class while one teacher is in the bathroom with a toddler? Two adults present for every change? Where does that staff come from? This is the end result of treating schools like full-time daycare and surrogate parents. Parents: Potty train your own toddlers. Teach them basic life skills at home. Schools exist to educate, not raise your children. The more we outsource, the more the government steps in. This cycle has to stop.

DocumentingLibs

39,897 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Brothers, husbands, fathers... listen up. Imagine this: You worked 12-14 hour days, sacrificed your youth, your health, your dreams to build a life for your family. You paid the bills, the EMIs, the kids' school fees. You stayed loyal. You loved her. Then one day, she decides the marriage is 'over.' She walks out. Files for divorce. And the court orders YOU to pay her alimony. Month after month. Year after year. Your hard-earned money. Now here's the gut punch: What if that money is funding her new lifestyle? Hotels with her boyfriend. Weekend getaways. Shopping sprees. Parties. While you're left broke, depressed, fighting suicidal thoughts, struggling to even afford a decent meal or see your own kids? Should the courts grant EVEN ONE RUPEE if she's using it to enjoy with her BF in 5-star hotels? Even the Supreme Court is now calling this out. In a recent hearing before Justice Pardiwala’s bench, a wife demanded ₹5 crore alimony after a marriage that lasted just one year. The husband offered a reasonable ₹35-40 lakh. The court was shocked. Justice Pardiwala warned: “If such is going to be the stance of the wife, we may have to pass some orders which she may not like.” He told the husband’s lawyer, “You will be making a blunder by calling her back. You won’t be able to keep her. Her dreams are very big.” This isn’t support. This is legalized extortion. Alimony was created for a different era – when women had no education, no jobs, no independence. Today? Women are CEOs, earning as much or more. Dual-income homes are normal. Yet family courts still treat men like ATM machines with no expiry date. Real stories are everywhere. Men losing everything – houses, savings, dignity. Forced to pay lifelong alimony even after she remarries or lives with someone else. Courts rarely monitor how the money is spent. No accountability. She posts luxury vacations on Instagram while you're dodging creditors. Why should a man pay if: - She's capable of working but chooses not to? - She's in a new relationship, enjoying life on your dime? - The divorce was her choice, her adultery, her abandonment? - Kids are with you, or grown up? This isn’t equality. In an equal world, alimony should be gender-neutral, time-bound (maybe 1-2 years max for rehabilitation), and STRICTLY for basic needs — not lifestyle maintenance. Receipts mandatory. New partner? Automatic stop. Misuse? Repayment and consequences. Men are dying inside. Suicide rates among divorced men are sky-high. Families destroyed. Children alienated. Society pays the price with broken homes. We need ALIMONY REFORM NOW: - Temporary and needs-based only. - Factor in her income, assets, new relationships. - Equal rights for men too. - No lifelong payments in short marriages. - Audit the spending. End the free ride. If you're a man facing this, know you're not alone. Share your story. Fight back legally. Join men's rights groups. Warn your brothers and sons before marriage — prenups, financial transparency, red flags. To the lawmakers and judges: Stop punishing men for existing. Marriage shouldn’t be a financial trap. True justice is gender-neutral. Protect families, not one side. Tag a man who needs to hear this. Share if you’ve seen the pain. Comment your thoughts — should courts fund her hotel romance with YOUR money? Even the Supreme Court said enough in the 5 crore case. This system must change. For our sons. For justice. For humanity. #MensRights #AlimonyReform #DivorceIsScam #FamilyCourtBias #StopMisuse #JusticePardiwala #SCAlimony
2:25

Brothers, husbands, fathers... listen up. Imagine this: You worked 12-14 hour days, sacrificed your youth, your health, your dreams to build a life for your family. You paid the bills, the EMIs, the kids' school fees. You stayed loyal. You loved her. Then one day, she decides the marriage is 'over.' She walks out. Files for divorce. And the court orders YOU to pay her alimony. Month after month. Year after year. Your hard-earned money. Now here's the gut punch: What if that money is funding her new lifestyle? Hotels with her boyfriend. Weekend getaways. Shopping sprees. Parties. While you're left broke, depressed, fighting suicidal thoughts, struggling to even afford a decent meal or see your own kids? Should the courts grant EVEN ONE RUPEE if she's using it to enjoy with her BF in 5-star hotels? Even the Supreme Court is now calling this out. In a recent hearing before Justice Pardiwala’s bench, a wife demanded ₹5 crore alimony after a marriage that lasted just one year. The husband offered a reasonable ₹35-40 lakh. The court was shocked. Justice Pardiwala warned: “If such is going to be the stance of the wife, we may have to pass some orders which she may not like.” He told the husband’s lawyer, “You will be making a blunder by calling her back. You won’t be able to keep her. Her dreams are very big.” This isn’t support. This is legalized extortion. Alimony was created for a different era – when women had no education, no jobs, no independence. Today? Women are CEOs, earning as much or more. Dual-income homes are normal. Yet family courts still treat men like ATM machines with no expiry date. Real stories are everywhere. Men losing everything – houses, savings, dignity. Forced to pay lifelong alimony even after she remarries or lives with someone else. Courts rarely monitor how the money is spent. No accountability. She posts luxury vacations on Instagram while you're dodging creditors. Why should a man pay if: - She's capable of working but chooses not to? - She's in a new relationship, enjoying life on your dime? - The divorce was her choice, her adultery, her abandonment? - Kids are with you, or grown up? This isn’t equality. In an equal world, alimony should be gender-neutral, time-bound (maybe 1-2 years max for rehabilitation), and STRICTLY for basic needs — not lifestyle maintenance. Receipts mandatory. New partner? Automatic stop. Misuse? Repayment and consequences. Men are dying inside. Suicide rates among divorced men are sky-high. Families destroyed. Children alienated. Society pays the price with broken homes. We need ALIMONY REFORM NOW: - Temporary and needs-based only. - Factor in her income, assets, new relationships. - Equal rights for men too. - No lifelong payments in short marriages. - Audit the spending. End the free ride. If you're a man facing this, know you're not alone. Share your story. Fight back legally. Join men's rights groups. Warn your brothers and sons before marriage — prenups, financial transparency, red flags. To the lawmakers and judges: Stop punishing men for existing. Marriage shouldn’t be a financial trap. True justice is gender-neutral. Protect families, not one side. Tag a man who needs to hear this. Share if you’ve seen the pain. Comment your thoughts — should courts fund her hotel romance with YOUR money? Even the Supreme Court said enough in the 5 crore case. This system must change. For our sons. For justice. For humanity. #MensRights #AlimonyReform #DivorceIsScam #FamilyCourtBias #StopMisuse #JusticePardiwala #SCAlimony

SK

14,710 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This girl gets some of her flirting advice right, but some is very OFF BASE. This is why you have to take dating advice for men that comes from women with a giant grain of salt 🧂 Some of women’s advice may be useful… but some of it will always be MISLEADING. If you are not already savvy enough to tell the difference, you’ll mix in the bad with the good and not know where you’re tripping up. Break down of what is useful vs. what is MISLEADING: ✅ USEFUL: do not open her with “You’re really pretty/beautiful, I wanted to meet you.” She doesn’t know what to say to that; she has also heard it before so many times you sound like a broken record. You can say pretty much ANYTHING other than this (e.g.: “Hey, how’s it going?” This is 10x better than a generic looks-based compliment). ✅ USEFUL: open her with something relevant to the situation. Situationally relevant openers can work great. For instance: “Think we’ll be in line forever?” if you’re waiting in line, or “The art here sure is interesting huh,” if there’s a weird piece of art. 🆇 MISLEADING: you should not expect a girl to take over on your opener, like this girl did with the “cute/sweet” coffee recommendation opener. Most girls are not outgoing enough that they are going to decide to “have a chat” with you immediately on the open. You are the man; you need to EXPECT to drive at least the first 2 minutes of conversation YOURSELF! ✅ USEFUL: “keep the conversation short, sweet, casual, fun”: all that, yes. The initial conversation needs to be light, playful, and engaging. Tease her within the first 30 seconds (that’s how she knows it’s a FLIRTATION and not a platonic chat). Make an observation about her or two (keep it positive and light). Tap her on the forearm on a joke or a high point. SMILE! You want your presence to be a warm, welcome, & flirtatious one. 🆇 MISLEADING: “worst thing you could possibly do is annoy her with your presence”; I mean, YES, BUT you do not need to be thinking about “I’d better not annoy her” when you are talking to girls. If you do, you will play it too safe, act very boring, get into your head, and become uninteresting and un-fun. Instead, just focus on bringing fun and good energy (not ‘avoiding annoyance’). ✅ USEFUL: what she is calling a ‘non-invasive call to action’ (is this chick a marketer? Because this is marketer speak!) we call a ‘soft close’. Yes, soft close her. Easy one-size-fits-all soft close you can use with any girl (say this on a high point): “We should grab a bite or a drink sometime.” As soon as she says “yes”, you have your green light 🟢 to grab her # 🆇 MISLEADING: “give her your number”… this is the WORST piece of advice in the video; even worse than the “don’t annoy her” bit (which will get you in your head doing things wrong). This girl has a wide face, deep voice, and high confidence, so she’s probably higher testosterone and extroverted. Girls like this are go-getters who will chase down guys on their own and make things happen sometimes (hence the “deciding to have a chat” with a guy when she liked his opener). Most women are NOT extroverted high testosterone women who will take charge and make things happen themselves. Most women are PASSIVE. The average girl who is into you will not text you first if you give her your number. She will just look at it, debate whether to text you, think about what she should text, feel self-conscious about it, feel like she shouldn’t be the first one to text, then you will simply never hear from her. You need to get HER number, so YOU can text, not give her YOURS. 🆇 MISLEADING: “sweet and endearing”, sorry to say it and pop anyone’s bubble, but women do not usually hook up with the “sweet and endearing” guys. They think the stuff these guys do is “cute”, like how little children and pets are “cute”, but they do not find them SEXY. You need to be in the lead, taking CHARGE, leading her through an interaction she enjoys, and setting the pace. Do not be “sweet and endearing.” Anyway, this girl seems really cool and it’s neat that she wants to help guys out. Well-meaning women advising you on dating though are some of the most dangerous because they believe what they are saying and just do not KNOW when the advice they’re giving is counterproductive for a man to actually use vs. productive! (That said, positive encouragement for men to approach & flirt is ALWAYS good! So hat tip to her!)
1:15

This girl gets some of her flirting advice right, but some is very OFF BASE. This is why you have to take dating advice for men that comes from women with a giant grain of salt 🧂 Some of women’s advice may be useful… but some of it will always be MISLEADING. If you are not already savvy enough to tell the difference, you’ll mix in the bad with the good and not know where you’re tripping up. Break down of what is useful vs. what is MISLEADING: ✅ USEFUL: do not open her with “You’re really pretty/beautiful, I wanted to meet you.” She doesn’t know what to say to that; she has also heard it before so many times you sound like a broken record. You can say pretty much ANYTHING other than this (e.g.: “Hey, how’s it going?” This is 10x better than a generic looks-based compliment). ✅ USEFUL: open her with something relevant to the situation. Situationally relevant openers can work great. For instance: “Think we’ll be in line forever?” if you’re waiting in line, or “The art here sure is interesting huh,” if there’s a weird piece of art. 🆇 MISLEADING: you should not expect a girl to take over on your opener, like this girl did with the “cute/sweet” coffee recommendation opener. Most girls are not outgoing enough that they are going to decide to “have a chat” with you immediately on the open. You are the man; you need to EXPECT to drive at least the first 2 minutes of conversation YOURSELF! ✅ USEFUL: “keep the conversation short, sweet, casual, fun”: all that, yes. The initial conversation needs to be light, playful, and engaging. Tease her within the first 30 seconds (that’s how she knows it’s a FLIRTATION and not a platonic chat). Make an observation about her or two (keep it positive and light). Tap her on the forearm on a joke or a high point. SMILE! You want your presence to be a warm, welcome, & flirtatious one. 🆇 MISLEADING: “worst thing you could possibly do is annoy her with your presence”; I mean, YES, BUT you do not need to be thinking about “I’d better not annoy her” when you are talking to girls. If you do, you will play it too safe, act very boring, get into your head, and become uninteresting and un-fun. Instead, just focus on bringing fun and good energy (not ‘avoiding annoyance’). ✅ USEFUL: what she is calling a ‘non-invasive call to action’ (is this chick a marketer? Because this is marketer speak!) we call a ‘soft close’. Yes, soft close her. Easy one-size-fits-all soft close you can use with any girl (say this on a high point): “We should grab a bite or a drink sometime.” As soon as she says “yes”, you have your green light 🟢 to grab her # 🆇 MISLEADING: “give her your number”… this is the WORST piece of advice in the video; even worse than the “don’t annoy her” bit (which will get you in your head doing things wrong). This girl has a wide face, deep voice, and high confidence, so she’s probably higher testosterone and extroverted. Girls like this are go-getters who will chase down guys on their own and make things happen sometimes (hence the “deciding to have a chat” with a guy when she liked his opener). Most women are NOT extroverted high testosterone women who will take charge and make things happen themselves. Most women are PASSIVE. The average girl who is into you will not text you first if you give her your number. She will just look at it, debate whether to text you, think about what she should text, feel self-conscious about it, feel like she shouldn’t be the first one to text, then you will simply never hear from her. You need to get HER number, so YOU can text, not give her YOURS. 🆇 MISLEADING: “sweet and endearing”, sorry to say it and pop anyone’s bubble, but women do not usually hook up with the “sweet and endearing” guys. They think the stuff these guys do is “cute”, like how little children and pets are “cute”, but they do not find them SEXY. You need to be in the lead, taking CHARGE, leading her through an interaction she enjoys, and setting the pace. Do not be “sweet and endearing.” Anyway, this girl seems really cool and it’s neat that she wants to help guys out. Well-meaning women advising you on dating though are some of the most dangerous because they believe what they are saying and just do not KNOW when the advice they’re giving is counterproductive for a man to actually use vs. productive! (That said, positive encouragement for men to approach & flirt is ALWAYS good! So hat tip to her!)

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

340,369 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Please retweet aggressively 🙏📣📣 On the 17th of March, a survivor of SGBV came out to speak up, calling out Kenny Olo (Kenny Olo). This is not just another story, it’s a true life event of man who does not care about consent. cc Crea8tivist Global From what has been shared publicly by himself, these are the facts that points to nothing but textbook definition of "RAPE" 1. Kenny confirms that he had unprotected sex with her while knowing fully well that she was drunk and had passed out. 2. The screenshot I shared in my video shows that he knew how intoxicated she was at the time. 3. He described himself as her “babysitter” that night, someone meant to protect her, not take advantage of her vulnerability. 4. He admitted that she didn't know who he was as at the time fo the incident and kept asking every 15 minutes. 5. He had to be the one to tell her everything that had happened, he even brought her out of the pool alongside other friends because she was clearly not okay...then still proceeded to have his way with her. 6. He had his way for almost two hours till she bled and her friends came to knock the door. Now, instead of accountability, he is threatening legal action, saying he has been defamed and that his reputation is being damaged. And honestly, this is where it becomes even more painful. Because how do we keep asking survivors to speak up… only for them to face fear, intimidation, and the weight of being silenced all over again? Should he try to delete it from his timeline, attached below this video is a compilation of all the screenshots as shared by him. I am calling on the Lagos DSVA @kikimordi Hauwa 🌟🌬 @ Mizel💞 Sugabelly 🌕 Ụlọma Spirit of Conver$ion! Z Lilyallly❤️🇬🇧 cyn🌸 hotsexymamayepa💋 and every woman out there to please stand with this survivor, support her, and keep amplifying this attempt at intimidation.
8:40

Please retweet aggressively 🙏📣📣 On the 17th of March, a survivor of SGBV came out to speak up, calling out Kenny Olo (Kenny Olo). This is not just another story, it’s a true life event of man who does not care about consent. cc Crea8tivist Global From what has been shared publicly by himself, these are the facts that points to nothing but textbook definition of "RAPE" 1. Kenny confirms that he had unprotected sex with her while knowing fully well that she was drunk and had passed out. 2. The screenshot I shared in my video shows that he knew how intoxicated she was at the time. 3. He described himself as her “babysitter” that night, someone meant to protect her, not take advantage of her vulnerability. 4. He admitted that she didn't know who he was as at the time fo the incident and kept asking every 15 minutes. 5. He had to be the one to tell her everything that had happened, he even brought her out of the pool alongside other friends because she was clearly not okay...then still proceeded to have his way with her. 6. He had his way for almost two hours till she bled and her friends came to knock the door. Now, instead of accountability, he is threatening legal action, saying he has been defamed and that his reputation is being damaged. And honestly, this is where it becomes even more painful. Because how do we keep asking survivors to speak up… only for them to face fear, intimidation, and the weight of being silenced all over again? Should he try to delete it from his timeline, attached below this video is a compilation of all the screenshots as shared by him. I am calling on the Lagos DSVA @kikimordi Hauwa 🌟🌬 @ Mizel💞 Sugabelly 🌕 Ụlọma Spirit of Conver$ion! Z Lilyallly❤️🇬🇧 cyn🌸 hotsexymamayepa💋 and every woman out there to please stand with this survivor, support her, and keep amplifying this attempt at intimidation.

Edu

28,188 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten