Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
“Do we need a second Thatcher?” No And we didn’t need the first one either.
192,185 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare

I’d rather have another Thatcher than you.

Well if you think Section 28 3.5 million on the dole Deciminating manufacturing areas and leaving areas full of deprivation, drug and alcohol abuse and crime The Poll Tax Letting US Presidents use our bases to bomb Libyan kids were a good thing. Then yes we need another one.

One day, you will grow up and realise how wrong you have been.

People have to ask themselves why it is that UK has worse working conditions, poorer pensions, worse infrastructure, costlier services and unhappier citizens. The answer is simple, Thatchersim sold the UK to foreign investors.

Another Thatcher would be pointless. She sold off everything in this country. Other than the NHS, we haven’t anything left to sell. (The NHS of course is already being privatised as we know)

The legacy of Thatcher

we did need her the 1st time though maybe you were not around back then to see it, she modernised the uk into the country it is now

Good grief, you come up with the worst takes.

Under Margaret Thatcher unemployment was over 3 million, public assets were sold off on the cheap, economic growth was lower than in the 1970s, oversaw two big recessions while also seeing some of the worst riots ever seen in mainland UK

Do we need a second hapless Purkiss No, we didn't need the first one There, fixed it

