Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Does AI have a plausibility problem? Or rather, do we have a problem with AI's plausibility? Watch Terry Tao's full Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture (supported by XTX Markets) as he suggests new ways of doing mathematics in an artificial intelligence future.

Oxford Mathematics

78,459 subscribers

31,830 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 Yorum

Jayansh Singh profil fotoğrafı

Jayansh Singh2 yıl önce

@xtxmarkets I shall watch this; thanks for posting.

Paul H, PharmD, RPH profil fotoğrafı

Paul H, PharmD, RPH2 yıl önce

@xtxmarkets The guiding principle in Medicine and Pharmacy remain unchanged- Primum non nocere. Patients are always Humans. AI or not

David Simon profil fotoğrafı

David Simon2 yıl önce

@xtxmarkets Tao his mind is faster than he speaking

Benzer Videolar

In her Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture Erica Thompson focused on the inevitable biases and subjectivity of mathematical models. Which is a bit of a problem when you have audiences only too willing to not believe those models. Watch the full lecture:

In her Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture Erica Thompson focused on the inevitable biases and subjectivity of mathematical models. Which is a bit of a problem when you have audiences only too willing to not believe those models. Watch the full lecture:

Oxford Mathematics

12,498 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Probability. Easy isn't it. You knock up a few equations and voilà, an exact number. Except there's a problem. A big problem. One with which we are all very familiar. Watch David Spiegelhalter's Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture, Wed 11 Dec, 5pm & any time after:

Probability. Easy isn't it. You knock up a few equations and voilà, an exact number. Except there's a problem. A big problem. One with which we are all very familiar. Watch David Spiegelhalter's Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture, Wed 11 Dec, 5pm & any time after:

Oxford Mathematics

33,889 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

How sophisticated is the maths in AI? Go on, have a guess. Because guessing is what AI itself would do. Terry Tao introduces his Oxford Mathematics London Lecture, a journey through the potential for AI in science & maths. Watch from 5pm BST, Wed 7 August:

How sophisticated is the maths in AI? Go on, have a guess. Because guessing is what AI itself would do. Terry Tao introduces his Oxford Mathematics London Lecture, a journey through the potential for AI in science & maths. Watch from 5pm BST, Wed 7 August:

Oxford Mathematics

62,121 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

At what age do we learn to count? Or more importantly, have a notion of number? Not that being good at counting makes a good mathematician as Hugo Duminil-Copin, self-proclaimed poor counter & Fields Medallist, explains in his Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture:

At what age do we learn to count? Or more importantly, have a notion of number? Not that being good at counting makes a good mathematician as Hugo Duminil-Copin, self-proclaimed poor counter & Fields Medallist, explains in his Oxford Mathematics Public Lecture:

Oxford Mathematics

21,228 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The list of all the problems in mathematics that Terence Tao *could* solve is absolutely enormous. The problem is we can't make copies of him, dump millions of dollars of inference compute into each copy, and have them each tackle a different Millennium Prize Problem for a hundred subjective years. But we can do that with AI. So in that way, we may be underrating how significant it will be when we have AIs that are not superintelligent but rather simply as good as the best humans today. It’s actually an extremely powerful property of AI that by just running copies in parallel, you can immediately fill in the waterline of accomplishments that are feasible with a given level of capabilities.

The list of all the problems in mathematics that Terence Tao could solve is absolutely enormous. The problem is we can't make copies of him, dump millions of dollars of inference compute into each copy, and have them each tackle a different Millennium Prize Problem for a hundred subjective years. But we can do that with AI. So in that way, we may be underrating how significant it will be when we have AIs that are not superintelligent but rather simply as good as the best humans today. It’s actually an extremely powerful property of AI that by just running copies in parallel, you can immediately fill in the waterline of accomplishments that are feasible with a given level of capabilities.

Dwarkesh Patel

99,378 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Erik Voorhees explaining the importance of preserving AI as an institution not controlled by government "I would start by just conveying that important institutions of civilization shouldn't be under the control of any group of people" "when i started getting into the AI space, I realized that we have this additional new institution, which is machine intelligence, and this is becoming very quickly as important as money or as mathematics" "and if it is served to the world by a few tech companies who do whatever the government tells them to do, then that's a big problem and I see that would lead to a very dystopian kind of future" "the whole reason we started Venice was to create an antidote to that, to basically allow anyone access to unrestricted machine intelligence"

Erik Voorhees explaining the importance of preserving AI as an institution not controlled by government "I would start by just conveying that important institutions of civilization shouldn't be under the control of any group of people" "when i started getting into the AI space, I realized that we have this additional new institution, which is machine intelligence, and this is becoming very quickly as important as money or as mathematics" "and if it is served to the world by a few tech companies who do whatever the government tells them to do, then that's a big problem and I see that would lead to a very dystopian kind of future" "the whole reason we started Venice was to create an antidote to that, to basically allow anyone access to unrestricted machine intelligence"

Ansem 🐂🀄️

102,075 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is currently searching for a new enemy. As long as Israel—or any other actor—acts in ways that conflict with our national and regional interests, we have no reason to fear anyone, hesitate, or back down. We have no problem with confrontation. If it comes to that, it is not an issue for us. Israel is not just my problem; it is the world's problem.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: Israel is currently searching for a new enemy. As long as Israel—or any other actor—acts in ways that conflict with our national and regional interests, we have no reason to fear anyone, hesitate, or back down. We have no problem with confrontation. If it comes to that, it is not an issue for us. Israel is not just my problem; it is the world's problem.

Clash Report

168,146 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨CRAZY. 40% of NEW HOME earmarked for Migrants Property shortage in the UK directly a result of immigration WE DO NOT HAVE A HOUSING SHORTAGE WE HAVE AN IMMIGRATION NUMBERS PROBLEM

🚨CRAZY. 40% of NEW HOME earmarked for Migrants Property shortage in the UK directly a result of immigration WE DO NOT HAVE A HOUSING SHORTAGE WE HAVE AN IMMIGRATION NUMBERS PROBLEM

Basil the Great

15,568 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🔬 New Science pod with CuspAI! We are entering a new era where materials science and discovery is transitioning from slow, manual experimentation, to a high-speed search problem powered by generative AI and "physics processing units." Max Welling argues that the foundation of all modern technology—from GPUs to climate solutions—is a materials problem, and that unifying the mathematics of stochastic thermodynamics with generative AI will unlock a new paradigm of automated scientific discovery.

🔬 New Science pod with CuspAI! We are entering a new era where materials science and discovery is transitioning from slow, manual experimentation, to a high-speed search problem powered by generative AI and "physics processing units." Max Welling argues that the foundation of all modern technology—from GPUs to climate solutions—is a materials problem, and that unifying the mathematics of stochastic thermodynamics with generative AI will unlock a new paradigm of automated scientific discovery.

Latent.Space

20,343 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Today, we share a breakthrough on the planar unit distance problem, a famous open question first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946. For nearly 80 years, mathematicians believed the best possible solutions looked roughly like square grids. An OpenAI model has now disproved that belief, discovering an entirely new family of constructions that performs better. This marks the first time AI has autonomously solved a prominent open problem central to a field of mathematics.

Today, we share a breakthrough on the planar unit distance problem, a famous open question first posed by Paul Erdős in 1946. For nearly 80 years, mathematicians believed the best possible solutions looked roughly like square grids. An OpenAI model has now disproved that belief, discovering an entirely new family of constructions that performs better. This marks the first time AI has autonomously solved a prominent open problem central to a field of mathematics.

OpenAI

13,721,467 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

“We have no problem with Gachagua impeachment as long as he is replaced by another from our region,” A section of Mt. Kenya MPs say

“We have no problem with Gachagua impeachment as long as he is replaced by another from our region,” A section of Mt. Kenya MPs say

Citizen TV Kenya

265,105 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,949 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 FULL CONVERSATION Fields medalist Terry Tao sits down with Math Inc's Jesse Michael Han and Jared Duker Lichtman for a conversation on the future of mathematics. "I got convinced that this was the future of mathematics [...] It's a different style of writing proofs that actually is in some ways easier to read—harder to check by humans, but you see more clearly the inputs and outputs of a proof, which traditional writing often conceals [...] I think the definition of a mathematician will broaden."

🚨 FULL CONVERSATION Fields medalist Terry Tao sits down with Math Inc's Jesse Michael Han and Jared Duker Lichtman for a conversation on the future of mathematics. "I got convinced that this was the future of mathematics [...] It's a different style of writing proofs that actually is in some ways easier to read—harder to check by humans, but you see more clearly the inputs and outputs of a proof, which traditional writing often conceals [...] I think the definition of a mathematician will broaden."

Math, Inc.

335,177 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

MP Nelson Koech: We have become a society that embraces goonism, finding pride in walking around with an entourage, which is considered by politicians as a display of power. Leaders must agree that we have a problem, and we need to drop these goons #CitizenDayBreak

MP Nelson Koech: We have become a society that embraces goonism, finding pride in walking around with an entourage, which is considered by politicians as a display of power. Leaders must agree that we have a problem, and we need to drop these goons #CitizenDayBreak

Citizen TV Kenya

71,894 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

An exciting update and another problem statement to work on: We have created a new incubator repo where we will publish problem statements and seek discussion and prototypes. We have a problem that we need your help. Please find the link to the problem statement here: Additionally, here’s an update on the center-randomize project - we have received 355 forks, 64 pull requests with 18 users whose contributions have already been merged to the codebase. We started with a basic script and now collaborators have built an intuitive UI, significantly improved code organization and quality. Thank you for bringing in lots of new ideas and contributing to the project. #github #coding #nepal

An exciting update and another problem statement to work on: We have created a new incubator repo where we will publish problem statements and seek discussion and prototypes. We have a problem that we need your help. Please find the link to the problem statement here: Additionally, here’s an update on the center-randomize project - we have received 355 forks, 64 pull requests with 18 users whose contributions have already been merged to the codebase. We started with a basic script and now collaborators have built an intuitive UI, significantly improved code organization and quality. Thank you for bringing in lots of new ideas and contributing to the project. #github #coding #nepal

Sumana

40,666 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Discussed the future of AI with Professor Zhang Weiwei: “We need to think ahead. We need to think about what we should do right now with artificial intelligence. When young children interact with their AI assistant, and it becomes closer to them than their parents, their friends, their nannies, preschool, or daycare. And this artificial intelligence keeps learning. And as its subject of study, as the textbooks for its own training, it uses Western platforms, which means it uses Western narratives. And very soon, we will have a completely different history of the world in their heads.”

Discussed the future of AI with Professor Zhang Weiwei: “We need to think ahead. We need to think about what we should do right now with artificial intelligence. When young children interact with their AI assistant, and it becomes closer to them than their parents, their friends, their nannies, preschool, or daycare. And this artificial intelligence keeps learning. And as its subject of study, as the textbooks for its own training, it uses Western platforms, which means it uses Western narratives. And very soon, we will have a completely different history of the world in their heads.”

Margarita Simonyan

33,431 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Kenyan leader William Samoei Ruto, PhD: “How is the M23 Kagame’s problem?” It’s a Congolese problem” “As heads of state, during a meeting, we asked: the M23, are the members of this group Rwandan or Congolese? And the DRC told us: “They are Congolese.’ End of debate. If they are Congolese, how does this become a Rwandan problem?” He made those remarks in Kigali, a capital seen as hostile by Kinshasa during an interview with Jeune Afrique and The Africa Report.

Kenyan leader William Samoei Ruto, PhD: “How is the M23 Kagame’s problem?” It’s a Congolese problem” “As heads of state, during a meeting, we asked: the M23, are the members of this group Rwandan or Congolese? And the DRC told us: “They are Congolese.’ End of debate. If they are Congolese, how does this become a Rwandan problem?” He made those remarks in Kigali, a capital seen as hostile by Kinshasa during an interview with Jeune Afrique and The Africa Report.

Mwangi

101,278 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce