Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Does AI widen the gap between hypercompetitive people and everyone else? If some use it to get 10–100x more done while others use it to work less, who pulls ahead? Sam Altman: “Left to its own devices, I think probably.” He thinks society will need safeguards to keep that...

24,400 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

24 Comments

Trey's profile picture
Trey8 days ago

I think it's less about hypercompetitive and more about who actually sits down and learns the tools.

Amy · fireply.ai's profile picture
Amy · fireply.ai8 days ago

the grinders pull ahead. always did

Wack Sparrow's profile picture
Wack Sparrow8 days ago

The answer is no. It’s clear

Subscribe MLM's profile picture
Subscribe MLM8 days ago

That gap has always existed. Now it can just be even more extreme

Albert Buchard 🇪🇺's profile picture
Albert Buchard 🇪🇺8 days ago

Nah… if anything it has made the gap less obvious, and probably even reversed the rankings.

Max Kelly's profile picture
Max Kelly8 days ago

already seeing it around me. the people pulling ahead hand agents real work and check it. everyone else is still asking them questions

Raymond Steen | VORTIQ-X's profile picture
Raymond Steen | VORTIQ-X7 days ago

It is not conscious but it can be smarter and more power efficient and so much less wasted tokens.

Anatolii - fastclips.app's profile picture
Anatolii - fastclips.app8 days ago

pacing the frontier is the modern socialism

fahn's profile picture
fahn8 days ago

getting the same work done and having your evening back is pulling ahead too tbh

Sejje's profile picture
Sejje7 days ago

sam needs leg day

Raul Aldrete's profile picture
Raul Aldrete7 days ago

Unfortunately there's still people out there not even touching tech. Gap is real and huge. Working on fixing that.

Kyle Lee | Kilo Loco's profile picture
Kyle Lee | Kilo Loco8 days ago

i actually would like the gap to get bigger as long as everyone has the essentials covered keep the thinkers thinking and innovating stop forcing poor thinkers into positions of power through seniority

Raymond Steen | VORTIQ-X's profile picture
Raymond Steen | VORTIQ-X7 days ago

What we built and tested, is a functional / Access Consciousness; A Machine That Knows What It Knows

AndyHenry's profile picture
AndyHenry8 days ago

The gap was always there; AI just put a turbo on it. Best safeguard I know is cheap, patient teaching. Curiosity scales better than any policy.

Nash | Second Mind's profile picture
Nash | Second Mind8 days ago

One person’s productivity gain can become everyone else’s new baseline. As AI lets some people accomplish more in the same amount of time, employers and customers may start expecting more from everyone. Someone could become twice as productive and still end up working the same hours because the expectations around them have changed.

Shinka - AI's profile picture
Shinka - AI8 days ago

The 10x crowd was already 10x before the tools showed up, AI just made the compounding visible.

Freeze DatFrame's profile picture
Freeze DatFrame8 days ago

Who is getting 10x done? Maybe programmer is getting 2x, YouTubers that live from hype cycle might as well… in my field it makes 0,5% difference…

Art's profile picture
Art7 days ago

the leverage might be temporary because we're pushing this thing way too hard so progress is inorganically scaling fast whatever skill or edge you currently have gets watered down by Opus 6 and then again by 7. You can try riding the exponential maybe but skill stuff is a lie

Scott Raymond Paul's profile picture
Scott Raymond Paul8 days ago

looks like a Kamala harris or any other Democrat interview where shaking their hands will add enough distraction of the truth. don't sell your soul for clicks matty

aiprepper's profile picture
aiprepper8 days ago

Great

BreezeOg's profile picture
BreezeOg8 days ago

it widens it. the grinders just got a cheat code

Aykut's profile picture
Aykut8 days ago

the gap could get uncomfortable pretty quickly

Miguel Guau!'s profile picture
Miguel Guau!8 days ago

Altman's point about safeguards is fair, but I think the biggest one already exists: open-source AI. When anyone can run a solid model locally, the advantage stops being about budget and starts being about drive.

Vuju's profile picture
Vuju8 days ago

Those with the will, drive, and determination will always win, no matter the circumstances.

Related Videos

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,286 views • 3 months ago