Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Does Alberta's new law permitting physician dual practice violate the Canada Health Act? Like many Alberta physicians, I'm concerned about what physician dual practice will mean for equitable access to medically necessary care. As a nephrologist and researcher here in Calgary, I see every day how much our patients... rely on a strong public system. Moreover, a formal legal opinion obtained by Cdn Health Coalition confirms the Alberta law violates the Canada Health Act. I'm joining Canadian Doctors for Medicare in calling on the federal government to take action, and I hope you'll join us. Contact your federal MP today (find them at and ask them to stand up for Canadian Medicare. #Medicare #CanadaHealthAct #CanadianHealthcareshow more

Braden Manns

1,671 subscribers

11,097 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

28 Comments

Todd4 days ago

If dual practice contravenes the CHA, then Federal Transfers for health care will be withheld... poof to at least a large portion of $6.6B per year #ableg #cdnpoli

Braden Manns3 days ago

$7B. And to be clear , if the Feds get some backbone, and decide to enforce the CHA via a section 14, then cabinet would decide how much would be withheld of that $7B. But it would be an effective tool and I suspect AB would back down

Troy Montana5 days ago

Time to dismantle the deadly monopoly ......

Braden Manns5 days ago

Yah. That’s a good idea. How’s that working in the US?

Sister Denby 🇨🇦💜🇺🇦5 days ago

👆 @LFairclo Why has no one sued the Ford gov't for what he is doing to public healthcare in Ontario or Danielle Smith for what she is doing in Alberta?

Dave Lewis5 days ago

The old system doesn’t work anywhere in Canada. What is wrong with trying something different? It’s mind boggling why people want to continue with the same idiocy.

TonPanzer5 days ago

Canadian healthcare is just killing you if you break a leg, it’s shit, dual practice healthcare allows you to not wait 2 years for an X-ray

Saltwater Cowboy5 days ago

Be nice to not have to wait on "public" healthcare anymore or having to get issues addressed in the US and Mexico.

Braden Manns5 days ago

Yes. Agreed. But we really have to fix the public system - not try work-arounds that are going to make it worse

Saltwater Cowboy4 days ago

To gain public support you would need to remove unions,chop the buerocracy,break up AHS, improve efficiency. Or create an alternative.... Otherwise we remain in the same situation as every region in Canada

Pet5 days ago

Equitable clearly means equally shitty, unavailable and unaccessible. So we'll try another way.

Braden Manns5 days ago

Sadly the other way will make it worse for those who can only access the public system. Those who can pay for their own surgery will affect access for those who can’t - and it will affect your access to urgent surgeries in hospital

Pet5 days ago

Scandinavian and many any other countries have a hybrid Healthcare system, and it works great. Try something new, you might be pleasantly surprised.

Braden Manns5 days ago

Yah. And they have twice as many docs per capita

Pet5 days ago

Docs want to work in a place that isn't a communist hellscape. A freer market will create competition and innovation, more access to care and better conditions for doctors and patients. If you build it, they will come.

Challenge yourself4 days ago

@BradenMannsYYC ComPeTiTiOn iS dA beSt, wait, we don't have enough doctors to support that? uhhhh......durrrrrrŕrrrr

Pet4 days ago

@BradenMannsYYC A large chunck of the doctors we graduate in this country go to work where? And why? Get your head out of your ass.

Braden Manns3 days ago

@AllForFantasy8 Oh this is fun. Where do they go Pet? They no longer go to the US, if that’s what you are thinking. That was 30 years ago. And I’m not that flexible

Gordo6 days ago

😆 it’s always about the lowest common denominator for socialists. Very intellectually naive. You don’t access this system.

John Zylstra5 days ago

Healthcare is provincial jurisdiction. Any agreement or federal law which contradicts that jurisdiction is basically unconstitutional and illegal.

Dave Pearson4 days ago

Sent

SpencerBeach5 days ago

You do get a legal opinion is not confirmation a violation occured. Its good to ask questions and challenge. That helps grow systems. Especially when our current HC system is failing hard.

Disgruntled Dissident4 days ago

[email protected] or [email protected] or Broader investigative unit: [email protected] Just imagine what they might reveal. The restrictions to info. seen in the AHS CEO wrongful dismissal case points to something fishy.

Alberta First5 days ago

The pilot is supported by the federal government.

Craig Farr4 days ago

You have had enough time to try and make it better. It's been shitty for a long time. Let's try something different.... the status quo is not working

Braden Manns4 days ago

Well, we agreed that the status code is not working. To be clear. “We” – if you’re meeting the health system – have had no opportunity or ability to make the needed change. Governments are the ones that need to direct evidence based change.

Pepper12454 days ago

I believe it does. Because they will always choose the easier way and still get paid the same amount of money and actually probably more because they their rates include overhead. It never should have been allowed in the first place never!

raerexton5 days ago

It’s for only 4 types of surgeries. Knee and hip, hernia, eye and ear nose and throat. Those surgeries can be done in hospitals during evening hours throughout the province

Related Videos

Pierre Poilievre confirms he is against Alberta's independence and will fight for a united Canada; Q: As an Alberta MP, what action will you try to take to keep Alberta within Canada in the face of a referendum? A: I'm a strong Canadian federalist, a proud Albertan, and a proud Canadian. I want a strong Alberta within a united Canada. And all Conservative, all Conservatives will be campaigning for Canadian unity.

Pierre Poilievre confirms he is against Alberta's independence and will fight for a united Canada; Q: As an Alberta MP, what action will you try to take to keep Alberta within Canada in the face of a referendum? A: I'm a strong Canadian federalist, a proud Albertan, and a proud Canadian. I want a strong Alberta within a united Canada. And all Conservative, all Conservatives will be campaigning for Canadian unity.

Kirk Lubimov

39,035 views • 4 months ago

Big news for all Albertans. Alberta’s government is modernizing physician participation rules to give doctors flexibility to work in both the public health care system, and private settings. This Dual Practice Model will increase the number of surgeries being done in Alberta, decrease wait times, and ensure that Albertans get the care they need in a timely manner. We stand by our Public Health Care Guarantee. No Albertan will need to pay out-of-pocket to see their family doctor or receive a medically necessary treatment.

Big news for all Albertans. Alberta’s government is modernizing physician participation rules to give doctors flexibility to work in both the public health care system, and private settings. This Dual Practice Model will increase the number of surgeries being done in Alberta, decrease wait times, and ensure that Albertans get the care they need in a timely manner. We stand by our Public Health Care Guarantee. No Albertan will need to pay out-of-pocket to see their family doctor or receive a medically necessary treatment.

Danielle Smith

295,556 views • 10 months ago

The Canada Health Act is clear: care is based on need, not on your ability to pay. The UCP's healthcare scheme is breaking that fundamental promise to Albertans and creating a system where money talks louder than medical need. The Alberta NDP will always fight for a strong public health-care system that works for everyone, regardless of what tax bracket you’re in. Albertans deserve care they can rely on, when and where they need it.

The Canada Health Act is clear: care is based on need, not on your ability to pay. The UCP's healthcare scheme is breaking that fundamental promise to Albertans and creating a system where money talks louder than medical need. The Alberta NDP will always fight for a strong public health-care system that works for everyone, regardless of what tax bracket you’re in. Albertans deserve care they can rely on, when and where they need it.

Naheed Nenshi

40,979 views • 3 months ago

As the referendum lead, my message is clear. The status quo needs to change. For the past 10 years this federal Liberal government has introduced policies that have slowed down Alberta’s economy, prevented pipeline projects and undermined our province. I believe in a strong Alberta within a united Canada. In the coming months, with my new role as referendum lead, I will listen to the concerns of Albertans and ensure that we can address the root causes of western alienation and fight for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada. I am proud to be an Albertan and a Canadian. I will continue to call on Mark Carney’s Liberal Government to listen to Albertans and to take the necessary steps to unite our country and strengthen our province. It’s time to act.

As the referendum lead, my message is clear. The status quo needs to change. For the past 10 years this federal Liberal government has introduced policies that have slowed down Alberta’s economy, prevented pipeline projects and undermined our province. I believe in a strong Alberta within a united Canada. In the coming months, with my new role as referendum lead, I will listen to the concerns of Albertans and ensure that we can address the root causes of western alienation and fight for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada. I am proud to be an Albertan and a Canadian. I will continue to call on Mark Carney’s Liberal Government to listen to Albertans and to take the necessary steps to unite our country and strengthen our province. It’s time to act.

Dane Lloyd

11,914 views • 2 months ago

The most blatant flip flop I’ve ever seen. Abdul El-Sayed today on Medicare for All: "If you would like to have a private insurer, you’re welcome to do that." This man has spent YEARS vowing the exact opposite. Here are 11 times Abdul promised to ELIMINATE private health insurance plans: 08/04/2018: “Instead of having multiple insurance companies... what you have is the state operating as your insurance company. That's what we want.” 11/18/2019: "Medicare for All guarantees you a public health care plan and eliminates your private one." 11/18/2019: "Under Medicare-for-All, the federal government is the only payer—hence single payer—for healthcare to everybody in the nation." 06/04/2020: "What does Medicare for All do? Medicare for All comes in and says, ‘No more of this insurance industry,’ which costs us far more, whose CEOs make tens of millions of dollars a year, and which creates redundancy in the healthcare system that increases the overall cost for all of us." 07/12/2020: “My issue with private health insurance is that I see it as fundamentally a middleman that we've allowed to persist and exist in our healthcare system for no added value except that a lot of people profit off of it... the best way to do that is cut out the middleman.” 09/29/2020: "The only insurer in town is Medicare" 12/16/2020: “What Medicare for All does is it does away with the private insurance market. It now has one single payer—that's why we call it single-payer, right? One insurance, and that is the government of the United States.” 03/15/2021: “We are going to create one insurer that operates on behalf of the taxpayer, on behalf of the American public, so that we can reduce prices as much as possible and collectivize as much as possible.” 04/13/2021: “Instead of having a whole bunch of payers you have one payer and that is the federal government.” 05/25/2021: “We have an entire industry — the insurance industry — that does not need to exist, that should not exist. There’s a world that’s possible where it didn’t exist. The question becomes are we willing to do the morally right thing as a society?” 04/07/2022: "I advocate for a government takeover of health insurance because health insurance offers no value in the American health care system"

The most blatant flip flop I’ve ever seen. Abdul El-Sayed today on Medicare for All: "If you would like to have a private insurer, you’re welcome to do that." This man has spent YEARS vowing the exact opposite. Here are 11 times Abdul promised to ELIMINATE private health insurance plans: 08/04/2018: “Instead of having multiple insurance companies... what you have is the state operating as your insurance company. That's what we want.” 11/18/2019: "Medicare for All guarantees you a public health care plan and eliminates your private one." 11/18/2019: "Under Medicare-for-All, the federal government is the only payer—hence single payer—for healthcare to everybody in the nation." 06/04/2020: "What does Medicare for All do? Medicare for All comes in and says, ‘No more of this insurance industry,’ which costs us far more, whose CEOs make tens of millions of dollars a year, and which creates redundancy in the healthcare system that increases the overall cost for all of us." 07/12/2020: “My issue with private health insurance is that I see it as fundamentally a middleman that we've allowed to persist and exist in our healthcare system for no added value except that a lot of people profit off of it... the best way to do that is cut out the middleman.” 09/29/2020: "The only insurer in town is Medicare" 12/16/2020: “What Medicare for All does is it does away with the private insurance market. It now has one single payer—that's why we call it single-payer, right? One insurance, and that is the government of the United States.” 03/15/2021: “We are going to create one insurer that operates on behalf of the taxpayer, on behalf of the American public, so that we can reduce prices as much as possible and collectivize as much as possible.” 04/13/2021: “Instead of having a whole bunch of payers you have one payer and that is the federal government.” 05/25/2021: “We have an entire industry — the insurance industry — that does not need to exist, that should not exist. There’s a world that’s possible where it didn’t exist. The question becomes are we willing to do the morally right thing as a society?” 04/07/2022: "I advocate for a government takeover of health insurance because health insurance offers no value in the American health care system"

Kyle Martinsen

192,690 views • 3 days ago

Sanders: I am not a great fan of the affordable care act. I believe in medicare for all. I think that health care is a human right, but I will be damned if I'm going to see people in Vermont and around this country see a doubling in their premiums. When people today can't afford housing, they can't afford health care, they can't afford child care. We can't allow that to happen.

Sanders: I am not a great fan of the affordable care act. I believe in medicare for all. I think that health care is a human right, but I will be damned if I'm going to see people in Vermont and around this country see a doubling in their premiums. When people today can't afford housing, they can't afford health care, they can't afford child care. We can't allow that to happen.

Acyn

1,034,980 views • 1 year ago

When there is a 413% increase in assaults on ICE agents—we need to take action. That’s exactly why I introduced the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act and the REMOVE Act to stand up for federal law enforcement and get criminal illegals out of our country at rapid speed.

When there is a 413% increase in assaults on ICE agents—we need to take action. That’s exactly why I introduced the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act and the REMOVE Act to stand up for federal law enforcement and get criminal illegals out of our country at rapid speed.

Sen. Marsha Blackburn

31,579 views • 1 year ago

If you’re a physician in private practice, your student debt doesn’t count. Not to the federal government. Not to PSLF. Not if you built your own clinic, serve your own patients, and operate without subsidies. But if you work for a tax-exempt system that receives billions in government support, suddenly your debt becomes “forgivable.” Here’s the absurdity: A nonprofit health system receives DSH funds, UPL subsidies, 340B drug profits, GME/IME payments, facility fee margins, and tax-exempt bonds. They pay executives $2–10M annually. They operate in commercial markets. They bill at 300–600% of Medicare for standard services. And their employed physicians qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF)—as if they’re sacrificing. Meanwhile… A private practice physician: Builds their own business Takes on risk Serves Medicaid patients at below-cost rates Hires staff, negotiates contracts, covers malpractice Receives no subsidies And is told: PSLF doesn’t apply to you. Same degree. Same training. Same patients. But only one gets financial relief—the one inside the subsidized system. This isn’t fairness. It’s punishment for independence. If the US of A was serious about equity, PSLF must be site-neutral—based on who you serve, not who you’re employed by. Independent physicians treat the underserved. They open clinics in rural and urban deserts. They take Medicaid without fanfare. They just don’t work for the health system cartel. And in today’s healthcare economy, that’s the real public service. #PSLF #PhysicianDebt #IndependentPhysicians #LoanForgiveness

If you’re a physician in private practice, your student debt doesn’t count. Not to the federal government. Not to PSLF. Not if you built your own clinic, serve your own patients, and operate without subsidies. But if you work for a tax-exempt system that receives billions in government support, suddenly your debt becomes “forgivable.” Here’s the absurdity: A nonprofit health system receives DSH funds, UPL subsidies, 340B drug profits, GME/IME payments, facility fee margins, and tax-exempt bonds. They pay executives $2–10M annually. They operate in commercial markets. They bill at 300–600% of Medicare for standard services. And their employed physicians qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF)—as if they’re sacrificing. Meanwhile… A private practice physician: Builds their own business Takes on risk Serves Medicaid patients at below-cost rates Hires staff, negotiates contracts, covers malpractice Receives no subsidies And is told: PSLF doesn’t apply to you. Same degree. Same training. Same patients. But only one gets financial relief—the one inside the subsidized system. This isn’t fairness. It’s punishment for independence. If the US of A was serious about equity, PSLF must be site-neutral—based on who you serve, not who you’re employed by. Independent physicians treat the underserved. They open clinics in rural and urban deserts. They take Medicaid without fanfare. They just don’t work for the health system cartel. And in today’s healthcare economy, that’s the real public service. #PSLF #PhysicianDebt #IndependentPhysicians #LoanForgiveness

Dutch Rojas

53,831 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING! CALGARY POLICE OFFICER MAKES HERO STATUS! "It's time to stand up. You signed up for this job. This is your job." Calgary police officers who have refused to submit to the extortion demands were put on 30 day leave in November and are now facing employment termination after passing the December 1st deadline to comply. A Calgary Police officer is making a public stand against the criminal extortion and threats being committed by police chief. He has an urgent call to action for officers of the law across Canada, declaring "It's time to stand up. You signed up for this job. This is your job." Calgary Police RCMP Alberta Lower Mainland RCMP BCRCMP The New Westminster Times The Epoch Times Canada Rise Of Alberta Alberta Prosperity Project Rod Giltaca

BREAKING! CALGARY POLICE OFFICER MAKES HERO STATUS! "It's time to stand up. You signed up for this job. This is your job." Calgary police officers who have refused to submit to the extortion demands were put on 30 day leave in November and are now facing employment termination after passing the December 1st deadline to comply. A Calgary Police officer is making a public stand against the criminal extortion and threats being committed by police chief. He has an urgent call to action for officers of the law across Canada, declaring "It's time to stand up. You signed up for this job. This is your job." Calgary Police RCMP Alberta Lower Mainland RCMP BCRCMP The New Westminster Times The Epoch Times Canada Rise Of Alberta Alberta Prosperity Project Rod Giltaca

Shareaware Canada

167,610 views • 11 months ago

.Secretary Kennedy on why CMSGov’s ACCESS Model is a game changer for Medicare patients: “Historically, we’ve paid doctors to care for people when they are sick without giving them any of the tools and incentives to keep people healthy. We have rewarded the volume of services delivered rather than improvements in health…That is exactly what we are changing with this movement today.”

.Secretary Kennedy on why CMSGov’s ACCESS Model is a game changer for Medicare patients: “Historically, we’ve paid doctors to care for people when they are sick without giving them any of the tools and incentives to keep people healthy. We have rewarded the volume of services delivered rather than improvements in health…That is exactly what we are changing with this movement today.”

HHS Rapid Response

23,332 views • 14 days ago

Michigan Democratic senatorial candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed admits Medicare for All would force Americans to pay higher taxes — but policy experts say that's just the beginning of the damage. Cato Institute health policy director Michael Cannon and Heritage Foundation's Ed Haislmaier argue the proposal would balloon costs, gut access to care, and put Americans on a path toward Canadian-style rationing where patients die waiting for treatment. Cannon says the U.S. would need to double or even triple federal taxes to maintain current access levels under a government-run system — or watch hospitals and doctors flee the market entirely. The experts' alternative: market competition that drives prices down, not government control that drives them up.

Michigan Democratic senatorial candidate Abdulrahman El-Sayed admits Medicare for All would force Americans to pay higher taxes — but policy experts say that's just the beginning of the damage. Cato Institute health policy director Michael Cannon and Heritage Foundation's Ed Haislmaier argue the proposal would balloon costs, gut access to care, and put Americans on a path toward Canadian-style rationing where patients die waiting for treatment. Cannon says the U.S. would need to double or even triple federal taxes to maintain current access levels under a government-run system — or watch hospitals and doctors flee the market entirely. The experts' alternative: market competition that drives prices down, not government control that drives them up.

Fox News Politics

64,853 views • 1 month ago

Carney and the Liberals lied to you. They voted against Canadian Sovereignty. Along with the Quebec Bloc, NDP, and Green Party. Poilievre and the Conservatives voted for the Canadian Sovereignty Act. Here is the full Act: CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY ACT That, in the interest of restoring Canadian economic sovereignty, the House call on the government to immediately introduce a Canada Sovereignty Act that: (a) re-establishes Canada as a competitive resource-producing nation by repealing federal measures that block or penalize development, including, (i) the Impact Assessment Act (formerly Bill C-69), (ii) the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act (formerly Bill C-48), (iii) the federal industrial carbon tax, (iv) the oil and gas emissions cap, (v) the federal electric vehicle sales mandate, (vi) the federal plastics manufacturing prohibitions, (vii) federal regulatory restrictions that impede communication and advocacy by Canadian energy companies; (b) rewards provinces, businesses, and workers who build and invest in Canada by, (i) introducing a Canada First Reinvestment Tax Cut to spur domestic industrial activity, (ii) providing free trade bonuses to provincial governments that remove internal trade barriers and fully open their markets to fellow Canadians; and (c) protects Canadian innovation by requiring the Minister of Industry to present plans to Parliament to keep Canada's inventions, discoveries and innovations from being sold off to other countries.

Carney and the Liberals lied to you. They voted against Canadian Sovereignty. Along with the Quebec Bloc, NDP, and Green Party. Poilievre and the Conservatives voted for the Canadian Sovereignty Act. Here is the full Act: CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY ACT That, in the interest of restoring Canadian economic sovereignty, the House call on the government to immediately introduce a Canada Sovereignty Act that: (a) re-establishes Canada as a competitive resource-producing nation by repealing federal measures that block or penalize development, including, (i) the Impact Assessment Act (formerly Bill C-69), (ii) the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act (formerly Bill C-48), (iii) the federal industrial carbon tax, (iv) the oil and gas emissions cap, (v) the federal electric vehicle sales mandate, (vi) the federal plastics manufacturing prohibitions, (vii) federal regulatory restrictions that impede communication and advocacy by Canadian energy companies; (b) rewards provinces, businesses, and workers who build and invest in Canada by, (i) introducing a Canada First Reinvestment Tax Cut to spur domestic industrial activity, (ii) providing free trade bonuses to provincial governments that remove internal trade barriers and fully open their markets to fellow Canadians; and (c) protects Canadian innovation by requiring the Minister of Industry to present plans to Parliament to keep Canada's inventions, discoveries and innovations from being sold off to other countries.

The Real Mr Bench

28,628 views • 8 months ago

In Sylvan Lake I spoke with an Iraqi Christian family who came to Canada in 2006 about what immigrants owe the country that welcomed them. Their answer was blunt: come here for a better life, obey Canadian law, work hard, care for your family and leave the conflicts of the old country behind. They told me newcomers should not come to Canada and then try to force the same politics, divisions or customs on everyone else. Canada gave their children safety and a future, and they believe immigrants have a duty to protect that. Then I told them I support Alberta independence. Their response surprised me: they support it too, and they have lawn signs in support of independence up! Support for Alberta independence is not limited to people whose families have lived here for generations. Immigrants who came here legally, worked hard and integrated can also see that Alberta is losing control over its culture, immigration and future. This is a powerful conversation. Listen to the end. Let me know what you think. Watch the full video on YouTube:

In Sylvan Lake I spoke with an Iraqi Christian family who came to Canada in 2006 about what immigrants owe the country that welcomed them. Their answer was blunt: come here for a better life, obey Canadian law, work hard, care for your family and leave the conflicts of the old country behind. They told me newcomers should not come to Canada and then try to force the same politics, divisions or customs on everyone else. Canada gave their children safety and a future, and they believe immigrants have a duty to protect that. Then I told them I support Alberta independence. Their response surprised me: they support it too, and they have lawn signs in support of independence up! Support for Alberta independence is not limited to people whose families have lived here for generations. Immigrants who came here legally, worked hard and integrated can also see that Alberta is losing control over its culture, immigration and future. This is a powerful conversation. Listen to the end. Let me know what you think. Watch the full video on YouTube:

Jon Alberta Patriot

181,559 views • 2 months ago

240 DAYS HEALTHY INCREDIBLE HERD IMMUNITY BEAUTIFUL OSTRICHES Rise Up Canada 📷 Waiting for a emergency stay order decision Why Canada’s Sovereignty Is at Risk Most people think our government makes decisions for us, especially when it comes to protecting Canadian farmers, food, and animals. But in reality, many of these decisions are no longer fully Canadian. They are being dictated by global organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH), and the United Nations (UN) under what’s called the One Health Agenda. What is “One Health”? On the surface, “One Health” sounds good — it’s about linking human health, animal health, and the environment. But here’s the catch: Countries like Canada agree to follow international rules on how to respond to disease outbreaks in animals. These rules include the “stamping out” policy — which means mass killing of animals when there’s a suspected disease, even if they’re healthy. Once Canada signs on, it’s almost impossible for us to change those rules at home, even if we know they don’t make sense for our farmers. What This Means for Farmers If a small outbreak or even a suspected outbreak happens, farmers can lose their entire herds or flocks overnight. Canadian farmers don’t get a say. Parliament doesn’t get a say. Even provinces don’t get a say. The decision is made to keep trade partners happy and Canada “in compliance.” Farmers are left powerless, and Canada loses control over its own food system. 📷 Why This Threatens Canadian Sovereignty We can’t change our own policies to reflect Canadian realities, like protecting biodiversity, family farms, or rare species.

240 DAYS HEALTHY INCREDIBLE HERD IMMUNITY BEAUTIFUL OSTRICHES Rise Up Canada 📷 Waiting for a emergency stay order decision Why Canada’s Sovereignty Is at Risk Most people think our government makes decisions for us, especially when it comes to protecting Canadian farmers, food, and animals. But in reality, many of these decisions are no longer fully Canadian. They are being dictated by global organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH), and the United Nations (UN) under what’s called the One Health Agenda. What is “One Health”? On the surface, “One Health” sounds good — it’s about linking human health, animal health, and the environment. But here’s the catch: Countries like Canada agree to follow international rules on how to respond to disease outbreaks in animals. These rules include the “stamping out” policy — which means mass killing of animals when there’s a suspected disease, even if they’re healthy. Once Canada signs on, it’s almost impossible for us to change those rules at home, even if we know they don’t make sense for our farmers. What This Means for Farmers If a small outbreak or even a suspected outbreak happens, farmers can lose their entire herds or flocks overnight. Canadian farmers don’t get a say. Parliament doesn’t get a say. Even provinces don’t get a say. The decision is made to keep trade partners happy and Canada “in compliance.” Farmers are left powerless, and Canada loses control over its own food system. 📷 Why This Threatens Canadian Sovereignty We can’t change our own policies to reflect Canadian realities, like protecting biodiversity, family farms, or rare species.

Save Our Ostriches call 250-870-8246

11,984 views • 1 year ago

Insurers take a cut of every premium dollar for overhead and profit. The question isn’t just whether they profit, but also whether we’re getting value in return. KFF’s Larry Levitt breaks down how much goes to administrative costs and profit and how that varies across private insurance markets and Medicare, and considers what a Medicare-for-all system, which would be operated by the government, would address and what might be left unresolved. 🎥 Watch more videos from our series, “Are Health Insurers to Blame for Our Health System Problems?” on This video was scripted and produced by KFF. Visuals and graphics were developed using Adobe Creative Cloud with assistance from AI tools and refined by a graphic designer.

Insurers take a cut of every premium dollar for overhead and profit. The question isn’t just whether they profit, but also whether we’re getting value in return. KFF’s Larry Levitt breaks down how much goes to administrative costs and profit and how that varies across private insurance markets and Medicare, and considers what a Medicare-for-all system, which would be operated by the government, would address and what might be left unresolved. 🎥 Watch more videos from our series, “Are Health Insurers to Blame for Our Health System Problems?” on This video was scripted and produced by KFF. Visuals and graphics were developed using Adobe Creative Cloud with assistance from AI tools and refined by a graphic designer.

KFF

14,614 views • 12 days ago

Abdul El-Sayed says healthcare providers are regularly discriminating against black and Arabic patients, and Medicare for All would stop it "Right now in our country, the vast majority of people of color are funded on government health insurance programs that do not reimburse at the same level as private health insurance. So we basically are saying that in our country, care provided for a black child, for example, is reimbursed at nearly half the rate as a white child. We're basically valuing that child's body differently." "Now, the challenge when your health care is not reimbursed at the same level is that you end up getting discriminated against at the point of care. And I've seen that with my own eyes. It is heart-wrenching. But if you have the security of Medicare in your back pocket, no matter who you are, the system doesn't discriminate against you, because your body commands the same quality of care, the same reimbursement rate as anybody else. It removes that profit incentive." "I have seen too many people from communities where they look like you or look like me being discriminated against at the point of care because of the health care that they have. I want to end that. Medicare for All would end that."

Abdul El-Sayed says healthcare providers are regularly discriminating against black and Arabic patients, and Medicare for All would stop it "Right now in our country, the vast majority of people of color are funded on government health insurance programs that do not reimburse at the same level as private health insurance. So we basically are saying that in our country, care provided for a black child, for example, is reimbursed at nearly half the rate as a white child. We're basically valuing that child's body differently." "Now, the challenge when your health care is not reimbursed at the same level is that you end up getting discriminated against at the point of care. And I've seen that with my own eyes. It is heart-wrenching. But if you have the security of Medicare in your back pocket, no matter who you are, the system doesn't discriminate against you, because your body commands the same quality of care, the same reimbursement rate as anybody else. It removes that profit incentive." "I have seen too many people from communities where they look like you or look like me being discriminated against at the point of care because of the health care that they have. I want to end that. Medicare for All would end that."

Breitbart News

107,467 views • 2 months ago

The Bishnoi Gang has been abusing our immigration system, extorting innocent business owners, and engaging in acts of terror across Canada for years. Last year, we forced the government to list them as a terrorist organization. Today the Bishnoi Gang is opening threatening police and Canadian citizens. It’s time for enforcement. I am calling on the Liberal government to deport any member of the Bishnoi Gang that is in Canada on a Visa. The RCMP and CBSA, together with the federal government, should identify these criminals and remove them from our country. This is a bi-partisan issue. I know there are members of all parties that agree with me. This is about the safety of Canadians.

The Bishnoi Gang has been abusing our immigration system, extorting innocent business owners, and engaging in acts of terror across Canada for years. Last year, we forced the government to list them as a terrorist organization. Today the Bishnoi Gang is opening threatening police and Canadian citizens. It’s time for enforcement. I am calling on the Liberal government to deport any member of the Bishnoi Gang that is in Canada on a Visa. The RCMP and CBSA, together with the federal government, should identify these criminals and remove them from our country. This is a bi-partisan issue. I know there are members of all parties that agree with me. This is about the safety of Canadians.

Brad Vis

47,995 views • 5 days ago

Doctors in Canada were required by law to report vaccine adverse events. Yet when some actually did, patients were contacted by public health officers and told their reactions didn’t count, and the physicians who reported them were investigated. Not for negligence. For reporting. Ethical clinicians who refused to look the other way were suspended, smeared, or pushed out of the system entirely. We’re not talking about a handful, there are claims this happened to well over a thousand across the country. If reporting a safety signal triggers punishment instead of investigation, that is not public health. That is coercion.

Doctors in Canada were required by law to report vaccine adverse events. Yet when some actually did, patients were contacted by public health officers and told their reactions didn’t count, and the physicians who reported them were investigated. Not for negligence. For reporting. Ethical clinicians who refused to look the other way were suspended, smeared, or pushed out of the system entirely. We’re not talking about a handful, there are claims this happened to well over a thousand across the country. If reporting a safety signal triggers punishment instead of investigation, that is not public health. That is coercion.

National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)

19,598 views • 10 months ago