Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Does anyone else think that Alexa Bliss & Lilly STOLE The Fiend’s powers prior to this moment? ‼️ The Fiend assumed he still had his powers but when Alexa came out of the box with the crown on The Fiend then realized that his powers were no longer with...

437,613 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Blissful Fiend profil fotoğrafı
Blissful Fiend1 yıl önce

What happened here was Alexa was possessed by Lilith, who is about independence and who is also married to Samael, aka The Fiend. Alexa always had The Fiend within her, and I think she possessed The Fiend like she did to others later. They both left with each other remember.

Alexander Boldizar profil fotoğrafı
Alexander Boldizar1 yıl önce

Preble Jefferson can see 5 seconds into the future. When government agencies become aware of his skill, he'll do whatever it takes to protect his family. “Calling this a thriller is a bit reductive...The most interesting novel I’ve read in a long time.” --JDC

The Wyatt OG | Wyatt Sicks ⭕️ profil fotoğrafı
The Wyatt OG | Wyatt Sicks ⭕️1 yıl önce

Interesting thought process. I hope if they do it they do it right so they don’t mess up the legacy of the storyline. ⭕️

Kirby profil fotoğrafı
Kirby1 yıl önce

Agreed ⭕️

James Grant⭕️Follower of The Wyatt Sick6 profil fotoğrafı
James Grant⭕️Follower of The Wyatt Sick61 yıl önce

Well do you happen to remember during a episode of firefly funhouse we did see a small little doll of Alexa with Fiend mask on the face. @SOAismyReligion 😏😏

Blissful Fiend profil fotoğrafı
Blissful Fiend1 yıl önce

Alexa Bliss was going to bring back The Fiend again, and she still can in another form by becoming The Fiend herself.

Wrestling Daze profil fotoğrafı
Wrestling Daze1 yıl önce

Good theory bud. Alexa explained that she realized she'd become as powerful as 'the darkness' on her own. So she used what she had been taught to destroy 'the darkness'. I don't think this means she took the Fiend's power, more she potentially became as powerful. It's the following RAW we get this and the intro of Lilly. 👍👍👍

Spooky80’s⭕️ profil fotoğrafı
Spooky80’s⭕️1 yıl önce

And she opens the door for the new Fiend to return

Paultheawesome profil fotoğrafı
Paultheawesome1 yıl önce

It was right there in ur face the entire time

Wink Champman profil fotoğrafı
Wink Champman1 yıl önce

Fuck Vince McMahon for this being the last time we see the Fiend

Benzer Videolar

“My ecclesiology does not allow me to sit there and look at what that church has done and judge them, because I don’t know all the details.” ~James White (𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡) Then proceeds to spend 8 minutes doing the following: ~Repeats internet gossip by unnamed randos saying that Joel Webbon’s Vineyard ministry was pre-conversion, and he seems to operate off this assumption for the duration of the clip ~Casts doubt on Joel’s claims that he was LARPing as a pastor and seems to equate this with Joel saying he was unconverted at the time, which he never did ~Affirms for some reason that the “church” Joel planted was and still is a real church and that he was ordained by the Vineyard “Church,” which is a ridiculous claim to anyone familiar with the Vineyard movement ~Claims that Joel’s spiritual growth from Vineyard to Reformed Baptist is no different than his recent growth in secondary and tertiary areas (e.g., eschatology) ~Questions why Joel continued to pastor after getting saved, post-repentance of sexual sin (Joel never claimed he was unconverted while working on the Vineyard church plant) ~Ignores the fact that Joel did stop pastoring to go through a 9-month ordination program with Acts 29 ~Says it’s not his role to judge how this situation was adjudicated, then continues to judge how this situation was adjudicated ~Compares Joel’s fornication with his girlfriend with that of Robert Morris’ abuse of minor(!), as if there’s a double standard on the part of those that say that Joel is still qualified ~Says he can’t argue with those that say that Joel is disqualified over this ~Says that his concern is only for the two churches involved (San Diego Reformed Church and Covenant Bible Church), both of which knew of Joel’s past and still believe him to be qualified to this day ~Finishes by saying that we will find out the real story soon enough, which to me indicates that he knows more than he lets on James White likes to say that Joel Webbon’s audience will eventually turn on him when he doesn’t go far enough for their tastes, but James literally just stuck a knife in Joel’s back with this struggle session. Absolutely satanic stuff here.

Defiant Baptist

35,996 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

WATCH: Victor Davis Hanson drops what might be the clearest, most damning explanation yet for Epstein’s real role.....and why those files still aren’t public. Victor Davis Hanson has a gift for cutting through the noise. In this conversation with Glenn Beck, he laid out exactly what he thinks Epstein was really doing, and why the files remained buried. Beck asked him: “What do you think this is really about?” Hanson replied: “I think it's pretty clear now that Epstein had no talent other than blackmail. And he was not a financier, he a captain of finance at all.” “What he did is he invited very powerful people to his island or his New York home, filmed them and then he bribed them.” Beck pressed: “So why isn't it being exposed?” That’s when Hanson delivered the single most likely—and explosive—explanation. “I think there are people within the establishment—I don't know if they partook in the his sick things he was doing—but they have some association with him and they gave him money to invest when there was no reason to hire someone like that.” “He got a half a billion dollars somehow, from people who were mainstream establishmentarians on the basis that he was going to blackmail them.” “I think those names are numerous and I think the Trump administration thought, well we're going to release this and there's some crazy people that we don't care about, are going to be embarrassed....and then all the sudden, they got a lot of calls.” “Said, why are you doing this? I didn't do this, I went down to the island once, I was on a plane, I didn't touch anybody.” “There's a lot of people who were very powerful who were giving him money or were trafficking with him, not necessarily all them engaging in what he was doing, but just the association with him.” “And I think they're putting pressure on people. I really do.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

496,559 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?

Dixie Normus

33,418 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce