Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Does anyone else think that Alexa Bliss & Lilly STOLE The Fiend’s powers prior to this moment? ‼️ The Fiend assumed he still had his powers but when Alexa came out of the box with the crown on The Fiend then realized that his powers were no longer with...

437,613 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Blissful Fiend
Blissful Fiend1 год назад

What happened here was Alexa was possessed by Lilith, who is about independence and who is also married to Samael, aka The Fiend. Alexa always had The Fiend within her, and I think she possessed The Fiend like she did to others later. They both left with each other remember.

Фото профиля Alexander Boldizar
Alexander Boldizar2 лет назад

Preble Jefferson can see 5 seconds into the future. When government agencies become aware of his skill, he'll do whatever it takes to protect his family. “Calling this a thriller is a bit reductive...The most interesting novel I’ve read in a long time.” --JDC

Фото профиля The Wyatt OG | Wyatt Sicks ⭕️
The Wyatt OG | Wyatt Sicks ⭕️1 год назад

Interesting thought process. I hope if they do it they do it right so they don’t mess up the legacy of the storyline. ⭕️

Фото профиля Kirby
Kirby1 год назад

Agreed ⭕️

Фото профиля James Grant⭕️Follower of The Wyatt Sick6
James Grant⭕️Follower of The Wyatt Sick61 год назад

Well do you happen to remember during a episode of firefly funhouse we did see a small little doll of Alexa with Fiend mask on the face. @SOAismyReligion 😏😏

Фото профиля Blissful Fiend
Blissful Fiend1 год назад

Alexa Bliss was going to bring back The Fiend again, and she still can in another form by becoming The Fiend herself.

Фото профиля Wrestling Daze
Wrestling Daze1 год назад

Good theory bud. Alexa explained that she realized she'd become as powerful as 'the darkness' on her own. So she used what she had been taught to destroy 'the darkness'. I don't think this means she took the Fiend's power, more she potentially became as powerful. It's the following RAW we get this and the intro of Lilly. 👍👍👍

Фото профиля Spooky80’s⭕️
Spooky80’s⭕️1 год назад

And she opens the door for the new Fiend to return

Фото профиля Paultheawesome
Paultheawesome1 год назад

It was right there in ur face the entire time

Фото профиля Wink Champman
Wink Champman1 год назад

Fuck Vince McMahon for this being the last time we see the Fiend

Похожие видео

WATCH: Victor Davis Hanson drops what might be the clearest, most damning explanation yet for Epstein’s real role.....and why those files still aren’t public. Victor Davis Hanson has a gift for cutting through the noise. In this conversation with Glenn Beck, he laid out exactly what he thinks Epstein was really doing, and why the files remained buried. Beck asked him: “What do you think this is really about?” Hanson replied: “I think it's pretty clear now that Epstein had no talent other than blackmail. And he was not a financier, he a captain of finance at all.” “What he did is he invited very powerful people to his island or his New York home, filmed them and then he bribed them.” Beck pressed: “So why isn't it being exposed?” That’s when Hanson delivered the single most likely—and explosive—explanation. “I think there are people within the establishment—I don't know if they partook in the his sick things he was doing—but they have some association with him and they gave him money to invest when there was no reason to hire someone like that.” “He got a half a billion dollars somehow, from people who were mainstream establishmentarians on the basis that he was going to blackmail them.” “I think those names are numerous and I think the Trump administration thought, well we're going to release this and there's some crazy people that we don't care about, are going to be embarrassed....and then all the sudden, they got a lot of calls.” “Said, why are you doing this? I didn't do this, I went down to the island once, I was on a plane, I didn't touch anybody.” “There's a lot of people who were very powerful who were giving him money or were trafficking with him, not necessarily all them engaging in what he was doing, but just the association with him.” “And I think they're putting pressure on people. I really do.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

496,969 просмотров • 1 год назад

These young ladies were claiming the owner was being rude to them and kicked them out. They even posted it on their social media with only their side of what happened. If anyone looked into it they would learn that the staff asked one of the young ladies to stop sharing her alcoholic drinks with her underage friend. They kept doing it and that’s when the owner intervened. I would have called the cops on them, I wouldn’t risk losing my liquor license for anybody. Was the owner overreacting or under reacting? Besides the mooch owner I worked for last time, I normally had pretty chill bosses but one stuck out that rubbed me the wrong way. He was always backhanded with his compliments and always was trying to come up with these wild ideas to make more money. One time he came up with the idea that the driver fee that the store normally paid to the driver was going to be pocketed by the store as a convenience fee to the driver. That would make the driver rely more and more on tips in an area that didn’t tip well anyways. What was bad about this was he knew it would create backlash so instead of telling the workers himself, he has the managers do it for him. So I had to hold a meeting with the workers and tell the drivers the store was going to be charging them to deliver for us. I also made sure I emphasized that it wasn’t my idea however I was forced to enforce this, it didn’t go over well. Most of the drivers walked out. I Calle the owner and told him we were doing pick up only and I think he should reconsider his stance on the delivery fee. After a week of slow sales he finally came to his senses and reconsidered. But this time he came in person to tell us the good news, very convenient for him being the hero.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

248,471 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is why the Colin / Allie pickup story has never sat right with me. In Trial 1, Colin Albert and Allie McCabe both seem very comfortable with the clean parts of the story12:10. Allie was there. Colin came out. It was starting to snow. But then the details that would actually make the story feel real suddenly get blurry. Colin says Allie texted him that she was there. He says he responded “come in.” He says he came out 30 seconds to a minute later. But when asked where Allie’s car was in the driveway, he does not remember. When asked what part of the car he got into, he does not remember. Front passenger seat? “Could have been.” Was anyone else in the car? He does not remember. Was anyone else in the car when she dropped him off? He does not remember. Then Allie says she believes she was in the driveway, on the left side, but she is not entirely sure. She does not remember whether she came from Chapman or Cedarcrest. She does not know which front door Colin came out of. She says “I believe” like she is saying what she is supposed to say, not what she actually remembers. So they both remember the time. They both remember it was starting to snow. But they cannot clearly remember the driveway, the route, the door, the seat, or who was in the car. Now add the new Life360 details, which raise even more questions about Allie’s movements and whether the documentary record actually supports the simple version we were told. At some point, this stops looking like a normal memory gap and starts looking like a story that was built around a timestamp. I am not saying what definitely happened. I am saying the testimony and the data do not line up cleanly enough to just wave it away. If the pickup happened exactly the way they said it did, why are the most basic details so hard to answer?

Dixie Normus

33,469 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад