Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This officer was thinking with the wrong head. This SDPD officer arrested a woman outside of a 7-11 on an outstanding warrant for her arrest. On his drive to the station as he was transporting her, the two of them were flirting with each other. Inevitably the officer pulled...

257,614 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

194,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Off duty officer had to chase shoplifter though the store only to get sprayed as the criminal makes their escape. ​An off-duty police officer working security at a department store was alerted to an active shoplifting incident. The officer confronted a female suspect near the exit doors as she attempted to leave with a large bag of unpurchased merchandise. When the officer tried to detain her, a struggle ensued. The suspect broke free, ran through the store aisles, and fled into the parking lot. ​The officer pursued the suspect to a parked white sedan. As he attempted to pull her from the driver’s seat to place her under arrest, the woman produced a can of pepper spray and sprayed the officer This allowed her to put the vehicle in reverse, navigate out of the space, and flee the scene. However, during the initial struggle, she dropped her purse, leaving her identification behind for investigators. ​Officers deployed to the address listed on her ID. Upon arrival, they witnessed the woman pulling up to drop off a young child. Spotting the police presence, she immediately took off again, initiating a secondary high-speed pursuit. During the chase, the suspect reached reckless speeds of up to 100 mph. ​The pursuit finally ended in a residential neighborhood after the suspect lost control of the vehicle, nearly driving it into a local retention pond and drainage ditch. She was quickly apprehended by responding officers in a nearby grassy area. ​While detained, the suspect admitted her actions were reckless but claimed she only used the spray because she felt the initial off-duty officer had been too rough. She was booked into custody and formally charged with Shoplifting, Felony Obstruction of Law Enforcement, and multiple traffic offenses stemming from the pursuit. How did you feel about how the officer at the end was speaking with her? Was he feeding into her story just to get her to admit more, or was he agreeing with her excuses of why she acted the way she did?

Giggling Ganon

55,358 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat