Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Does everyone understand that we were mere hours away from being told there WAS an exit wound? Terryl effed that all up. I dont know about you, but the "no exit" was what got me involved. So Terryl trying to prove he wasnt shot from behind is actually what... show more

Nikki Rosier

1,277 subscribers

105,319 просмотров • 11 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Former Navy Seal Rob O’Neill questions the official story of Charlie Kirk’s sh**ting “That was not an entry wound that we saw. We saw an exit wound. So where’d that buIIet come from?” “An entry wound doesn’t look like that, an exit wound does.” 👀

Former Navy Seal Rob O’Neill questions the official story of Charlie Kirk’s sh**ting “That was not an entry wound that we saw. We saw an exit wound. So where’d that buIIet come from?” “An entry wound doesn’t look like that, an exit wound does.” 👀

TONY™

237,480 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Candace Owens was able to watch the footage recording from behind Charlie Kirk when he was assassinated. She says there is "nothing gorey" about this footage and that there is "no blood" from behind. Candace says she does not see any bullet exit Charlie from behind.

BREAKING: Candace Owens was able to watch the footage recording from behind Charlie Kirk when he was assassinated. She says there is "nothing gorey" about this footage and that there is "no blood" from behind. Candace says she does not see any bullet exit Charlie from behind.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

3,273,202 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

It’s too retarded for words 🙄 He was NOT shot with a high powered rifle from the left side, or from the front where the trans ”shooter” supposedly was. His body did NOT magically absorb a 30-06 round like Superman and prevent an exit wound. He was shot from the right side, which is why he fell left, with a smaller caliber pistol, and the wound we all saw WAS the exit wound. This bullshit story they’re peddling defies even being labeled as absurd. It’s a retarded and ridiculous fantastical lie.

It’s too retarded for words 🙄 He was NOT shot with a high powered rifle from the left side, or from the front where the trans ”shooter” supposedly was. His body did NOT magically absorb a 30-06 round like Superman and prevent an exit wound. He was shot from the right side, which is why he fell left, with a smaller caliber pistol, and the wound we all saw WAS the exit wound. This bullshit story they’re peddling defies even being labeled as absurd. It’s a retarded and ridiculous fantastical lie.

Brandon Lodge

28,408 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

The SCIF

60,377 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Candace Owens has claimed that she saw the video from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk. In this video, she confirms exactly what we have reported on from the beginning. There was no exit wound. The Bullet hit his spine, snapped his neck, and never exited his body.

Candace Owens has claimed that she saw the video from the camera directly behind Charlie Kirk. In this video, she confirms exactly what we have reported on from the beginning. There was no exit wound. The Bullet hit his spine, snapped his neck, and never exited his body.

RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

229,499 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

We all see this in the highway from time to time. The exit is backed up miles away. There is always that one driver that tries to cut in front of everyone. If this happens to you, would you let them in?

We all see this in the highway from time to time. The exit is backed up miles away. There is always that one driver that tries to cut in front of everyone. If this happens to you, would you let them in?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,166,959 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Man Shot in Head, Killed Instantly at Trump Rally Joseph, who was just yards away, describes what happened: “I heard several gunshots. The man beside me suffered a gunshot wound to the head, was instantly killed, fell to the bottom of the bleachers. Another woman looked like she got hit in the forearm or hand. And then at that point in time, it was rather chaotic at that point, because everyone, half the people were looking because they thought it was fireworks. “I knew it was gunshots right away, my friend, you know, hit the deck. I was kind of looking around, just trying to see where the shots were coming from. It seemed to me like the shots were coming from behind the bleachers. It seemed to me the man got hit in the head from behind. He was killed instantly, as far as I could tell.”

Man Shot in Head, Killed Instantly at Trump Rally Joseph, who was just yards away, describes what happened: “I heard several gunshots. The man beside me suffered a gunshot wound to the head, was instantly killed, fell to the bottom of the bleachers. Another woman looked like she got hit in the forearm or hand. And then at that point in time, it was rather chaotic at that point, because everyone, half the people were looking because they thought it was fireworks. “I knew it was gunshots right away, my friend, you know, hit the deck. I was kind of looking around, just trying to see where the shots were coming from. It seemed to me like the shots were coming from behind the bleachers. It seemed to me the man got hit in the head from behind. He was killed instantly, as far as I could tell.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,446,100 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Osinbajo knew there were so many people that did not like Asiwaju in that villa, but what he was trying to do was benefit from it. Betrayal is part of the game in politics. If you find a way through, you get ahead, and if you didn't, that is the end of your political career. Based on what I saw from Buhari's body language during that period, Asiwaju was never Buhari's choice, but what we don't really know why Buhari went neutral.

Osinbajo knew there were so many people that did not like Asiwaju in that villa, but what he was trying to do was benefit from it. Betrayal is part of the game in politics. If you find a way through, you get ahead, and if you didn't, that is the end of your political career. Based on what I saw from Buhari's body language during that period, Asiwaju was never Buhari's choice, but what we don't really know why Buhari went neutral.

Aneex 🌍

15,807 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Within minutes of pulling up to O Block we got pressed and were told not to film. I totally understand why and was happy we were there with Dilla so he could have a conversation about what it is that he does. We’re lucky to have a guy like ⁦Shermann Dilla Thomas⁩ in Chicago⁩

Within minutes of pulling up to O Block we got pressed and were told not to film. I totally understand why and was happy we were there with Dilla so he could have a conversation about what it is that he does. We’re lucky to have a guy like ⁦Shermann Dilla Thomas⁩ in Chicago⁩

Eddie

812,384 просмотров • 1 год назад

CLOSER LOOK: The Terryl Farnsworth segment of the Brian Harpole/Shawn Ryan discussion is full of so much alleged psychological massaging, you simply have to watch it again. Here's what I noticed, and I'm interested to know what you all notice that I may have missed: STRATEGIC OMISSION: They covered Terryl Farnsworth but completely avoided any discussion of him declaring Charlie dead in the secret video recording--which is THE PRIMARY BOMBSHELL in Farnsworth's video. MISQUOTING: They actually get Terryl's quote wrong. Farnsworth said "They shot Charlie," not "Charlie's been shot." Small, but oh-so-BIG difference. MISDIRECTION: Why did they frame his secret selfie as a kind of TikTok "clout posting" when the video wasn't streamed or posted? It's a false framing that implants an incorrect characterization into the minds of the watchers. It feels like an effort to absolve Terryl of something rather than a quest for truth. NEW REVELATIONS: Terryl Farnsworth doesn't actually work for TPUSA as everyone has assumed, rather he worked for a company called Visual Impulse (VI) that TPUSA contracted. Why did TPUSA let that false assumption stand for so long? MARGINALIZATION: They never uttered Terryl Farnsworth's name, and to listen to Brian, you'd think he barely knew who Terryl was--odd since Terryl had security clearance to be inside the "no-go" zone. Is Brian accountable for anything under his security purview?! STRAW MAN: People didn't just object to Farnsworth because he might have deleted or destroyed the footage, which is how Brian & Shawn framed it, they objected to him illegally tampering with the crime scene and possibly destroying critical forensic evidence like the camera placement. SELF-ABSOLUTION: "It's not for me to understand..." Gotcha, Brian. The stairs, the Sorenson Center, the Losee Center, the drones, the rooftops--people inside the perimeter--none of that's your job. Above your pay grade? SMH! Remember: Candace Owens reported that Terryl Farnsworth doesn't normally handle these kinds of events, and that he admitted to her "they were trying something new that day." (Indeed, Farnsworth wasn't at the follow-up Utah event on September 30th) Tell me what you see here, and leave a like and a retweet for the algo, please, so that we can crowdsource this. I feel like there is more going on here. Leave no stone unturned. (BTW: I ascribe no guilt to anyone here, I'm just looking at all the details and seeing where they lead)

CLOSER LOOK: The Terryl Farnsworth segment of the Brian Harpole/Shawn Ryan discussion is full of so much alleged psychological massaging, you simply have to watch it again. Here's what I noticed, and I'm interested to know what you all notice that I may have missed: STRATEGIC OMISSION: They covered Terryl Farnsworth but completely avoided any discussion of him declaring Charlie dead in the secret video recording--which is THE PRIMARY BOMBSHELL in Farnsworth's video. MISQUOTING: They actually get Terryl's quote wrong. Farnsworth said "They shot Charlie," not "Charlie's been shot." Small, but oh-so-BIG difference. MISDIRECTION: Why did they frame his secret selfie as a kind of TikTok "clout posting" when the video wasn't streamed or posted? It's a false framing that implants an incorrect characterization into the minds of the watchers. It feels like an effort to absolve Terryl of something rather than a quest for truth. NEW REVELATIONS: Terryl Farnsworth doesn't actually work for TPUSA as everyone has assumed, rather he worked for a company called Visual Impulse (VI) that TPUSA contracted. Why did TPUSA let that false assumption stand for so long? MARGINALIZATION: They never uttered Terryl Farnsworth's name, and to listen to Brian, you'd think he barely knew who Terryl was--odd since Terryl had security clearance to be inside the "no-go" zone. Is Brian accountable for anything under his security purview?! STRAW MAN: People didn't just object to Farnsworth because he might have deleted or destroyed the footage, which is how Brian & Shawn framed it, they objected to him illegally tampering with the crime scene and possibly destroying critical forensic evidence like the camera placement. SELF-ABSOLUTION: "It's not for me to understand..." Gotcha, Brian. The stairs, the Sorenson Center, the Losee Center, the drones, the rooftops--people inside the perimeter--none of that's your job. Above your pay grade? SMH! Remember: Candace Owens reported that Terryl Farnsworth doesn't normally handle these kinds of events, and that he admitted to her "they were trying something new that day." (Indeed, Farnsworth wasn't at the follow-up Utah event on September 30th) Tell me what you see here, and leave a like and a retweet for the algo, please, so that we can crowdsource this. I feel like there is more going on here. Leave no stone unturned. (BTW: I ascribe no guilt to anyone here, I'm just looking at all the details and seeing where they lead)

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

79,366 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Bill Gates on Epstein: Apparently Jeffrey wrote an email to himself. That email was never sent; the email is, you know, false. So I don’t know what his thinking was there — you know, was he trying to attack me in some way?

Bill Gates on Epstein: Apparently Jeffrey wrote an email to himself. That email was never sent; the email is, you know, false. So I don’t know what his thinking was there — you know, was he trying to attack me in some way?

Clash Report

31,466 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

My honest review- Gainsville Florida, FU swamp stadium Morgan Wallen concert 5-15-26 Morgan himself is an amazing performer, nonstop energy, and he sounds really good( from what i could tell). The pyrotechnics, the fireworks, the light up wristbands that we were given that go in sync to the music was phenomenal. Walking out with Tim Tebow was also top-notch! The venue in itself was quite poor to be honest with you. I paid an absorbent amount of money on Ticketmaster to sit the 2nd row off the field, and we could barely see the stage. We were only really able to see most of it from watching the Screens. When I booked the tickets, the view that was given was not the view that we were actually seeing. The stupid floor signs obstructed our view too. Quite disappointing, considering the very expensive price tag. Having to sit on bleachers for five hours like high school kids is diabolical. So uncomfortable, especially when the drunk people behind you kept spilling their drinks on you. I almost went to prison lol 😆 Secondly, the sound was extremely muffled. Anytime they were speaking and actually saying things, it was very hard to understand what they were saying. Different when he was singing because we knew the words and could understand what was being said. If you walked halfway up the stadium. The sound was much better. So I don’t know if being on the ground is always like that but quite disappointing for the price tag. I’ve seen other reviews with the same issue. The filming booths definitely blocked good views for us too. The parking situation and trying to exit the stadium was fucking insane. Gridlock traffic for 2+ hours. That town is not equipped for people to come in like that. I’m assuming during football games it’s mostly students who already lived there and don’t have to drive, but oh my God what a nightmare. All in all, Morgan was fantastic and I would definitely see him again, he is top-notch. 5 ⭐️ The venue in itself two out of five stars. ⭐️ would not repeat an event there.

My honest review- Gainsville Florida, FU swamp stadium Morgan Wallen concert 5-15-26 Morgan himself is an amazing performer, nonstop energy, and he sounds really good( from what i could tell). The pyrotechnics, the fireworks, the light up wristbands that we were given that go in sync to the music was phenomenal. Walking out with Tim Tebow was also top-notch! The venue in itself was quite poor to be honest with you. I paid an absorbent amount of money on Ticketmaster to sit the 2nd row off the field, and we could barely see the stage. We were only really able to see most of it from watching the Screens. When I booked the tickets, the view that was given was not the view that we were actually seeing. The stupid floor signs obstructed our view too. Quite disappointing, considering the very expensive price tag. Having to sit on bleachers for five hours like high school kids is diabolical. So uncomfortable, especially when the drunk people behind you kept spilling their drinks on you. I almost went to prison lol 😆 Secondly, the sound was extremely muffled. Anytime they were speaking and actually saying things, it was very hard to understand what they were saying. Different when he was singing because we knew the words and could understand what was being said. If you walked halfway up the stadium. The sound was much better. So I don’t know if being on the ground is always like that but quite disappointing for the price tag. I’ve seen other reviews with the same issue. The filming booths definitely blocked good views for us too. The parking situation and trying to exit the stadium was fucking insane. Gridlock traffic for 2+ hours. That town is not equipped for people to come in like that. I’m assuming during football games it’s mostly students who already lived there and don’t have to drive, but oh my God what a nightmare. All in all, Morgan was fantastic and I would definitely see him again, he is top-notch. 5 ⭐️ The venue in itself two out of five stars. ⭐️ would not repeat an event there.

DieselBabe🌟

11,952 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s head of security, Brian Harpole, addresses conspiracy theories on Charlie's death, calls out people suggesting Erika Kirk was involved. Harpole explained what the doctor told him about why there was no exit wound from the bullet. "The doctor told us ... the bullet came in and hit the vertebra. So it came in and then tore up everything in the wound cavity..." "Hit the vertebra, crushed it, shattered it, turned, crushed the second one ... kept going down all the way, I think they said C6." ... "I know what pain looks and sounds like ... The words that came out of [Erika's] mouth and how they came out when she walked in that room and saw him, you don't want to hear that." Video: Shawn Ryan

NEW: Charlie Kirk’s head of security, Brian Harpole, addresses conspiracy theories on Charlie's death, calls out people suggesting Erika Kirk was involved. Harpole explained what the doctor told him about why there was no exit wound from the bullet. "The doctor told us ... the bullet came in and hit the vertebra. So it came in and then tore up everything in the wound cavity..." "Hit the vertebra, crushed it, shattered it, turned, crushed the second one ... kept going down all the way, I think they said C6." ... "I know what pain looks and sounds like ... The words that came out of [Erika's] mouth and how they came out when she walked in that room and saw him, you don't want to hear that." Video: Shawn Ryan

Collin Rugg

714,334 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

A literal smoking gun is seen coming from the second row of in the audience, to Charlies right. His hands recoil and a plum of smoke is seen. What you all saw was an exit wound. I put together some clips to support this. Let me know your thoughts!

A literal smoking gun is seen coming from the second row of in the audience, to Charlies right. His hands recoil and a plum of smoke is seen. What you all saw was an exit wound. I put together some clips to support this. Let me know your thoughts!

Cory Gray

11,737 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk

Mrgunsngear

91,032 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Gabor Maté on what trauma actually is: Asked "how do you define trauma?", Gabor Maté offers a definition that reframes how most people understand the word. "Trauma is a wound. The important distinction to make is that trauma is not what happened to you. It's what happened inside of you as a result of what happened to you." He illustrates this with his own story: "My trauma wasn't that my mother gave me to a stranger. The trauma was the wound which is that I perceive myself as not wanted. I perceive myself as abandoned. Who gets abandoned? Somebody who doesn't deserve to be loved." That internal wound, he explains, then shapes an entire life: "So then I developed this sense of not being good enough, not being lovable enough. Now that means I spend much of my life trying to prove that I'm good, that I'm lovable, that I am important, which then drives all kinds of behaviors which then create more problems." Gabor draws a sharp line between the event and the wound it leaves behind: "The trauma is not the event. That's the traumatic episode. The trauma is the wound that happens inside you."

Gabor Maté on what trauma actually is: Asked "how do you define trauma?", Gabor Maté offers a definition that reframes how most people understand the word. "Trauma is a wound. The important distinction to make is that trauma is not what happened to you. It's what happened inside of you as a result of what happened to you." He illustrates this with his own story: "My trauma wasn't that my mother gave me to a stranger. The trauma was the wound which is that I perceive myself as not wanted. I perceive myself as abandoned. Who gets abandoned? Somebody who doesn't deserve to be loved." That internal wound, he explains, then shapes an entire life: "So then I developed this sense of not being good enough, not being lovable enough. Now that means I spend much of my life trying to prove that I'm good, that I'm lovable, that I am important, which then drives all kinds of behaviors which then create more problems." Gabor draws a sharp line between the event and the wound it leaves behind: "The trauma is not the event. That's the traumatic episode. The trauma is the wound that happens inside you."

Kevin Tanaka

22,025 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Senator Ron Johnson DEMANDS to know The Truth About Alex Acosta’s Claim that Jeffrey Epstein ‘Belonged to Intelligence’, as it’s Revealed He was NOT Asked About it During His Deposition: “I don’t know why we can’t get to the bottom of this… the answer that Acosta gave. We were told he was part of intelligence. What does that mean?… How did Epstein ever become Epstein? Where did he get his money from? If he was part of U.S. Intelligence, to what purpose? What was he serving? Who was he working for?”

🚨Senator Ron Johnson DEMANDS to know The Truth About Alex Acosta’s Claim that Jeffrey Epstein ‘Belonged to Intelligence’, as it’s Revealed He was NOT Asked About it During His Deposition: “I don’t know why we can’t get to the bottom of this… the answer that Acosta gave. We were told he was part of intelligence. What does that mean?… How did Epstein ever become Epstein? Where did he get his money from? If he was part of U.S. Intelligence, to what purpose? What was he serving? Who was he working for?”

Benny Johnson

75,697 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Not that the previous veterans were bad guys, but their exit from St. Louis has allowed the young Cardinals to blossom, says Ken Rosenthal. "It seems to me that they're actually benefiting from those guys not being there anymore."

Not that the previous veterans were bad guys, but their exit from St. Louis has allowed the young Cardinals to blossom, says Ken Rosenthal. "It seems to me that they're actually benefiting from those guys not being there anymore."

Foul Territory

38,203 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

@Alphafox78 Dude. This is the first video that was published.. for me that looks like the blood that comes from entry wound. I have looked the videos multible times and he is shot from behind. In this one you can actually see the hit if you look at the right spot.

@Alphafox78 Dude. This is the first video that was published.. for me that looks like the blood that comes from entry wound. I have looked the videos multible times and he is shot from behind. In this one you can actually see the hit if you look at the right spot.

Sauli.cgm

44,635 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад