Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Does NCAA Lacrosse need expanded replay review after this ending? 📺🧐 Officials left the field immediately after ruling this a goal for Duke Men's Lacrosse in OT, because crease calls are NOT reviewable plays... (via ESPN2)

180,230 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Frank Bonsal III's profile picture
Frank Bonsal III3 years ago

@DukeMLAX This is a complete embarrassment for a NCAA championship weekend. No game EVER should end on a missed call that could be reviewed in a game-ending situation. This is NOT hard. Make the change, @NCAA !!!

Mage's profile picture
Mage3 years ago

@DukeMLAX I don’t blame the refs. It’s a fast game and it’s tough to see everything. These plays should 100% be reviewable if they can be and it’s stupid that they aren’t already

Connor Allen's profile picture
Connor Allen3 years ago

@DukeMLAX Have refs in every sport the last 12 months gone out of the way to ruin everything?

Travis Moran's profile picture
Travis Moran3 years ago

@DukeMLAX The ref on the far side has the best view and hesitates to call. The ref on the backside of the play runs in and calls goal. No way he should have been the one to make that call.

Chas's profile picture
Chas3 years ago

@DukeMLAX He pushed him in the back twice so who cares if he stepped in the crease

DrewStarks's profile picture
DrewStarks3 years ago

@DukeMLAX Was he in the crease sure. Was it also a push in the back? Sure. I’m not sure there would be as much uproar if this wasn’t Duke.

Brian Wilson's profile picture
Brian Wilson3 years ago

@DukeMLAX Of course not. Why would we want to get game-deciding calls like this right?

Tony Pagano's profile picture
Tony Pagano3 years ago

@DukeMLAX "Does NCAA Lacrosse need expanded replay review after this ending?" Well, this ending definitely should be a catalyst for change, but the review rule already should have been in place. No way @NCAALAX should be so far behind the modern college sports times.

Jon Curtis's profile picture
Jon Curtis3 years ago

@DukeMLAX Yes this one is bad and a great example of why you need the review. PSU got robbed

Laxdad's profile picture
Laxdad3 years ago

@DukeMLAX Absolutely awful officiating…how they can’t review this is a joke. Embarrassing on the National stage.@B1GLacrosse @NCAALAX

Related Videos

Introducing the “Get” action in basketball to lacrosse! The “Get” is a 2man action where a player passes the ball to another player and sprints to go “Get” it back on a handoff. This action has similar concepts and reads to pick and roll, but the picker is actually the ball handler! In lacrosse, we have been experimenting with Gets because it creates so many interesting situations and reads for the players. The way we teach it in small sided games is to have one offensive player declare “I’m shut” and the defense has to face-guard him. From there we pick for the shut off player trying to spring them free for the Get. The ball handler has to engage and control their defender, anticipating the shut player trying to get open. The shut player can backdoor if being overplayed towards the get (rejecting the get), receive a flip, or continue curling around the ball getting open for a late pass. The ball handler can feed the reject, flip the ball, or fake the flip to attack the goal or make a late pass to the shut payer curling to the goal. I’ve seen examples of this run in men’s and women’s DI lacrosse at Ohio State and Northwestern, respectively and I’ve run this myself when I was coaching HS girls lacrosse. You will also see on this reel a sick application for Gets vs. a common big-little invert coverage where the short stick doesn’t go behind with his man and plays “Safety” in front of the net. Gets are fun for the players, are incredible for teaching your players 2man game on and off ball, dealing with double teams, and creativity with passing, and can be used to score goals. I hope you enjoy it! Can you think of other applications for Gets?

JM3 SPORTS

12,424 views • 1 year ago