正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Does Ryan Matta seriously not see the double standard? He demands evidence from us, but never once demands evidence from Candace, his idol. Funny how skepticism only runs one direction. Since Ryan asked for proof that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie, I’ll gladly provide it below. Now your turn, ....

bren45000's profile picture

Bren

11,438 subscribers

22,730 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.
22:47

Tyler Robinson Text Messages Deep Dive These text messages must be real otherwise the defense would get the case thrown out by simply producing the phone records. The messages include; • Direct confession by Tyler Robinson • His motive • Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime • Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence • That the gun was his grandfather's • The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it • Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available • That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV • Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in • Telling his lover to not talk to the media (which he hasn't) I don't understand how delusional someone must be to not realize this is absolute proof of guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. None of this requires trust in the FBI or MSM, the texts are from the telecoms.

Ashton Forbes

175,207 次观看 • 10 个月前

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out WHY Lance Twiggs SHOULD Be The Primary Suspect NOT Tyler Robinson 🔍🕵️‍♀️ Candace Owens just made the case that there is objectively more evidence pointing to Lance Twiggs than to Tyler Robinson. Lance’s DNA is on the towel and on the rifle — and it is less degraded than Tyler’s. The Dremel used to carve the bullets belonged to Lance. His alibi for September 10 is simply “I was sleeping,” and there is no indication the feds ever seriously tested it. He claims he found a handwritten note under the keyboard, photographed it, then burned the original — an action that does not actually destroy the evidence and raises the possibility he wrote it himself. The character profiles also diverge sharply. Tyler is consistently described as quiet and kind. Lance had repeated behavioral problems serious enough that multiple family members removed him from their homes. He was deep in furry culture with a fursona named Luna, a hellhound character that wears a pentagram. That detail makes the large dog bed found in Tyler’s room far more interesting than the official story allows. Handedness is another problem. The person in the maroon shirt on the stairs appears left-handed — phone in the left hand, slipped into the left pocket. Tyler is right-handed. Public photos and a childhood video of Lance show him using his left hand as dominant or strongly ambidextrous. The feds’ handling of Lance is also unusual: after a short interview they drove him home, then moved him and his father into a paid safe house. Candace’s position is straightforward. If the evidence against Tyler is supposedly overwhelming, the evidence against Lance is stronger. He had full access, matching DNA, the tool used on the ammunition, a weak alibi, and a profile that fits someone who could have been compromised online. The fact that he was never treated as a serious suspect is one of the biggest unresolved problems in the case. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
12:48

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out WHY Lance Twiggs SHOULD Be The Primary Suspect NOT Tyler Robinson 🔍🕵️‍♀️ Candace Owens just made the case that there is objectively more evidence pointing to Lance Twiggs than to Tyler Robinson. Lance’s DNA is on the towel and on the rifle — and it is less degraded than Tyler’s. The Dremel used to carve the bullets belonged to Lance. His alibi for September 10 is simply “I was sleeping,” and there is no indication the feds ever seriously tested it. He claims he found a handwritten note under the keyboard, photographed it, then burned the original — an action that does not actually destroy the evidence and raises the possibility he wrote it himself. The character profiles also diverge sharply. Tyler is consistently described as quiet and kind. Lance had repeated behavioral problems serious enough that multiple family members removed him from their homes. He was deep in furry culture with a fursona named Luna, a hellhound character that wears a pentagram. That detail makes the large dog bed found in Tyler’s room far more interesting than the official story allows. Handedness is another problem. The person in the maroon shirt on the stairs appears left-handed — phone in the left hand, slipped into the left pocket. Tyler is right-handed. Public photos and a childhood video of Lance show him using his left hand as dominant or strongly ambidextrous. The feds’ handling of Lance is also unusual: after a short interview they drove him home, then moved him and his father into a paid safe house. Candace’s position is straightforward. If the evidence against Tyler is supposedly overwhelming, the evidence against Lance is stronger. He had full access, matching DNA, the tool used on the ammunition, a weak alibi, and a profile that fits someone who could have been compromised online. The fact that he was never treated as a serious suspect is one of the biggest unresolved problems in the case. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

22,265 次观看 • 8 天前

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk This is confusing… Kash just said they had a Text Message from Tyler to someone saying he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk… Now he’s saying there WAS a Handwritten Note, that doesn’t exist anymore, of Tyler stating he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk in Tyler’s shared home with his trans boyfriend. It was destroyed, but “verified” via interrogation and forensic evidence of said note. FBI Director Kash Patel can you clarify? Which is it? A text message? A note? Both?
0:55

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk This is confusing… Kash just said they had a Text Message from Tyler to someone saying he had an opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk… Now he’s saying there WAS a Handwritten Note, that doesn’t exist anymore, of Tyler stating he had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk in Tyler’s shared home with his trans boyfriend. It was destroyed, but “verified” via interrogation and forensic evidence of said note. FBI Director Kash Patel can you clarify? Which is it? A text message? A note? Both?

MJTruthUltra

719,719 次观看 • 11 个月前

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
7:07

‼️Candace Owens Lays Out the Fed NARRATIVE vs. What ACTUALLY Happened in the Tyler Robinson Case🧐 In her first episode back, Candace Owens broke down the official story we were fed about Tyler Robinson versus what the evidence and timeline actually show. According to the feds and their surrogates, Tyler Robinson was turned in by his own parents, confessed to them, his roommate Lance Twiggs, and on Discord. They claimed it was a politically motivated trans-related attack, that clear footage existed of him taking the shot, and that his DNA was all over the gun. Case closed. Candace laid out a very different picture. She stated that Tyler’s parents did not turn him in — that was a lie pushed from the beginning. Instead, a family friend and former undercover detective named Mike Mitchell pressured Tyler to turn himself in to avoid a violent raid on his home. She also maintained that Tyler was not political, that the gun recovered was never fired that day, and that Lance Twiggs is likely a federal asset who helped frame Tyler. She further pointed out that multiple young men matching Tyler’s description were on or around campus that day — what she called the “maroon boys” — and that Tyler Robinson himself never actually stepped foot on the UVU campus on September 10th. Two completely different stories. Only one can be true. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

11,510 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️
3:39

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 次观看 • 4 个月前

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves
1:26

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,329 次观看 • 1 个月前

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇
14:14

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?
2:03

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION CASE IN TOTAL CHAOS — THE BULLET THAT KILLED HIM DOESN’T MATCH TYLER ROBINSON’S RIFLE Seven months after the shooting at a Utah Valley University campus event… the case just took a serious turn. In a new court filing, Tyler Robinson’s defense claims the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during Charlie Kirk’s autopsy to the rifle allegedly tied to Robinson. • The bullet that killed Kirk… not forensically linked to the gun • ATF report says there wasn’t enough evidence to make a match • Defense now asking to delay the preliminary hearing • Citing a “mountain” of material that could reshape the case This is where it gets complicated: • Legal experts say bullet mismatches aren’t uncommon • Lack of markings or damage can make identification impossible • It doesn’t automatically clear the suspect But then there’s the rest of the case: • Prosecutors say Robinson confessed in text messages • Alleged message: “I am. I’m sorry.” • They claim he hid the weapon after the shooting • And told his roommate to delete incriminating texts • DNA evidence reportedly ties him to the scene • Prosecutors are still pursuing the death penalty So now you have two competing realities: A bullet that can’t be tied to the gun… and a case built on confession, DNA, and behavior after the fact. The question isn’t simple anymore. If the bullet doesn’t match Tyler Robinson’s gun… what actually happened that day?

HustleBitch

23,204 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — THEY GAVE IMMUNITY TO THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL WITNESS Authorities have reportedly granted limited immunity to Tyler Robinson's former roommate and alleged lover Lance Twiggs. The same roommate investigators say provided key evidence. The same roommate who allegedly photographed the alleged confession note before it was destroyed. The same roommate who allegedly provided investigators with Discord messages, information about the weapon, and details about what happened before the shooting. Discord previously stated its investigation found no evidence that Robinson planned the attack on its platform or used Discord to conceal evidence. And after all of that... he's reportedly been granted immunity. Now questions are being raised about the timeline, the messages, and why prosecutors don't even want him testifying in court. Why would prosecutors give immunity to someone who supposedly helped provide so much of the key evidence in this case?
8:17

🚨 CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION CASE JUST EXPLODED — THEY GAVE IMMUNITY TO THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL WITNESS Authorities have reportedly granted limited immunity to Tyler Robinson's former roommate and alleged lover Lance Twiggs. The same roommate investigators say provided key evidence. The same roommate who allegedly photographed the alleged confession note before it was destroyed. The same roommate who allegedly provided investigators with Discord messages, information about the weapon, and details about what happened before the shooting. Discord previously stated its investigation found no evidence that Robinson planned the attack on its platform or used Discord to conceal evidence. And after all of that... he's reportedly been granted immunity. Now questions are being raised about the timeline, the messages, and why prosecutors don't even want him testifying in court. Why would prosecutors give immunity to someone who supposedly helped provide so much of the key evidence in this case?

HustleBitch

44,162 次观看 • 1 个月前

EXCLUSIVE: Scene of Nancy Guthrie private lab testing. I’m outside DNA Labs International where the DNA Testing of evidence is happening right now. I traveled to Deerfield Beach, Florida where lab technicians have been testing critical evidence in the investigation — including the glove found nearly 2 miles from her home. We’ve heard a lot about the discrepancies of sending this type of DNA evidence to a private lab versus a lab used by the FBI, but the Pima County Sheriff, Chris Nanos, says this is their protocol, and a lab that they have used for years. There are only a limited number of private accredited DNA labs in the country capable of this level of forensic work. If possible, DNA Labs International will develop a DNA profile from the glove. According to independent DNA consultant Suzanna Ryan of Ryan Forensic, which is not connected to this case but can speak about how this all works, once a profile is developed it will most likely be sent to the Arizona Department of Public Safety. That’s where the quality control process begins: •A qualified DNA analyst or CODIS administrator verifies the data •The profile must meet strict standards before upload •Once approved, it is electronically transmitted through state systems to the Federal Bureau of Investigation •All systems work together within the national DNA database network CODIS This extra verification step can take time — but it’s critical to ensure the data is admissible and accurate. In this exclusive video, I take you to the scene of where this testing is being done. Because the lab sits on private property, we were asked to leave by property management — but this is where the forensic work is happening. More to come on my YouTube Channel The Ingle Edit and on NewsNation
2:02

EXCLUSIVE: Scene of Nancy Guthrie private lab testing. I’m outside DNA Labs International where the DNA Testing of evidence is happening right now. I traveled to Deerfield Beach, Florida where lab technicians have been testing critical evidence in the investigation — including the glove found nearly 2 miles from her home. We’ve heard a lot about the discrepancies of sending this type of DNA evidence to a private lab versus a lab used by the FBI, but the Pima County Sheriff, Chris Nanos, says this is their protocol, and a lab that they have used for years. There are only a limited number of private accredited DNA labs in the country capable of this level of forensic work. If possible, DNA Labs International will develop a DNA profile from the glove. According to independent DNA consultant Suzanna Ryan of Ryan Forensic, which is not connected to this case but can speak about how this all works, once a profile is developed it will most likely be sent to the Arizona Department of Public Safety. That’s where the quality control process begins: •A qualified DNA analyst or CODIS administrator verifies the data •The profile must meet strict standards before upload •Once approved, it is electronically transmitted through state systems to the Federal Bureau of Investigation •All systems work together within the national DNA database network CODIS This extra verification step can take time — but it’s critical to ensure the data is admissible and accurate. In this exclusive video, I take you to the scene of where this testing is being done. Because the lab sits on private property, we were asked to leave by property management — but this is where the forensic work is happening. More to come on my YouTube Channel The Ingle Edit and on NewsNation

Laura Ingle

202,689 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 This has to be the most damning evidence of an FBI coverup in the Charlie Kirk assassination 🚨 Candace Owens continues doing great work on this case with nothing but proof and evidence to back up her beliefs. How did a witness film a man in the same position as the alleged shooter, with a gun, covered head to toe in black, who ran at the same time as the shot went off—and he was only questioned by the FBI once? This is hard evidence of an alleged shooter, yet the persecution doesn’t reach out? Luckily an investigator testified that a jacket, gloves, and backpack were left near the library, but they didn’t test them as evidence? Candace includes his eyewitness account in her episode, along with multiple phone calls to the police about a shooter near the library. There is only one option: they don’t want the evidence. Why would that be? Well, 4K Fed sloppers demanding the evidence—were you aware the Feds and the prosecution have no interest in actual evidence?
9:18

🚨 This has to be the most damning evidence of an FBI coverup in the Charlie Kirk assassination 🚨 Candace Owens continues doing great work on this case with nothing but proof and evidence to back up her beliefs. How did a witness film a man in the same position as the alleged shooter, with a gun, covered head to toe in black, who ran at the same time as the shot went off—and he was only questioned by the FBI once? This is hard evidence of an alleged shooter, yet the persecution doesn’t reach out? Luckily an investigator testified that a jacket, gloves, and backpack were left near the library, but they didn’t test them as evidence? Candace includes his eyewitness account in her episode, along with multiple phone calls to the police about a shooter near the library. There is only one option: they don’t want the evidence. Why would that be? Well, 4K Fed sloppers demanding the evidence—were you aware the Feds and the prosecution have no interest in actual evidence?

Honest Ash

99,067 次观看 • 1 个月前

Interesting. Just thinking out loud. The waiter says he recognized Tyler’s voice on the day of the 11th when a coworker showed him Tyler accepting his college letter. There’s an issue with that. Tyler wasn’t identified and arrested until 9 pm on the 11th. The video of Tyler didn’t come out until the 12th. So him recognizing Tyler’s voice on the 11th can’t be possibly true. And the only pictures released show a grainy face. So recognizing him I guess would be possible but not really. It’s just some skinny white guy in a hat. Tyler wouldn’t even have been wearing the same clothes or hat in the picture the FBI released. He had changed outfits. So this guy wouldn’t have recognized the clothes either. So the owner is saying……No information to establish he was there? The original receipt would be evidence. Investigation on going. The timeline doesn’t fit. He couldn’t get back to Orem to have the run in with the officer at 11:30. If he left at 9:47 it would be 12:30 before he could get there if he never stopped. And they have a metadata from his phone and the highway cameras from I-15 showing his movements and the times. They would know if he was in that area. And if the defense had an indication he was there they’d have brought it up at the prelim to show he couldn’t have been looking for the gun that night when the texts happened. I think the waiter at the restaurant was mistaken. And I think the fact he said beer but the receipt says soda makes me think that even more. And his timeline is off. There’s no way on the 11th he heard Tyler’s voice and very little chance he recognized him on that day as he said. I feel bad for the owner. This waiter sent Candace this information. So now his restaurant is being bombarded. Wonder if the guy still has his job. I’d love to know what day the owner called the FBI saying his employee thought he recognized Tyler. That would tell a lot.
0:48

Interesting. Just thinking out loud. The waiter says he recognized Tyler’s voice on the day of the 11th when a coworker showed him Tyler accepting his college letter. There’s an issue with that. Tyler wasn’t identified and arrested until 9 pm on the 11th. The video of Tyler didn’t come out until the 12th. So him recognizing Tyler’s voice on the 11th can’t be possibly true. And the only pictures released show a grainy face. So recognizing him I guess would be possible but not really. It’s just some skinny white guy in a hat. Tyler wouldn’t even have been wearing the same clothes or hat in the picture the FBI released. He had changed outfits. So this guy wouldn’t have recognized the clothes either. So the owner is saying……No information to establish he was there? The original receipt would be evidence. Investigation on going. The timeline doesn’t fit. He couldn’t get back to Orem to have the run in with the officer at 11:30. If he left at 9:47 it would be 12:30 before he could get there if he never stopped. And they have a metadata from his phone and the highway cameras from I-15 showing his movements and the times. They would know if he was in that area. And if the defense had an indication he was there they’d have brought it up at the prelim to show he couldn’t have been looking for the gun that night when the texts happened. I think the waiter at the restaurant was mistaken. And I think the fact he said beer but the receipt says soda makes me think that even more. And his timeline is off. There’s no way on the 11th he heard Tyler’s voice and very little chance he recognized him on that day as he said. I feel bad for the owner. This waiter sent Candace this information. So now his restaurant is being bombarded. Wonder if the guy still has his job. I’d love to know what day the owner called the FBI saying his employee thought he recognized Tyler. That would tell a lot.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

10,150 次观看 • 26 天前

NEW — Megyn Kelly and Jack Posobiec on the video of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk, and the people still denying the "overwhelming evidence." "People who refuse to believe Tyler Robinson did this have been saying, 'Oh, but, there's no video of the actual shooting.'" "It's so convenient how they only have him running across the roof." "And then we actually find out there IS video of the actual moment the shooter drops down and pulls the trigger — and STILL they won't accept it." "We're never going to get through to them. I don't even really care about them." "The evidence is overwhelming. We never have this much evidence. It shows Tyler Robinson did not care at all about getting caught." Posobiec: "It beggars belief that he did this with his own cell phone, his own car, with shoes he's known to wear, a hat he commonly wears — the Hurley hats — that are readily identifiable." Megyn Kelly Jack Posobiec
1:37

NEW — Megyn Kelly and Jack Posobiec on the video of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk, and the people still denying the "overwhelming evidence." "People who refuse to believe Tyler Robinson did this have been saying, 'Oh, but, there's no video of the actual shooting.'" "It's so convenient how they only have him running across the roof." "And then we actually find out there IS video of the actual moment the shooter drops down and pulls the trigger — and STILL they won't accept it." "We're never going to get through to them. I don't even really care about them." "The evidence is overwhelming. We never have this much evidence. It shows Tyler Robinson did not care at all about getting caught." Posobiec: "It beggars belief that he did this with his own cell phone, his own car, with shoes he's known to wear, a hat he commonly wears — the Hurley hats — that are readily identifiable." Megyn Kelly Jack Posobiec

KanekoaTheGreat

450,842 次观看 • 1 个月前

Left: the original footage the FBI released of Tyler Robinson on the roof. Right: the same footage from the preliminary hearing. Every version people have been arguing about is the one on the right. A camera pointed at a courtroom screen. You lose enormous resolution doing that. Law enforcement has the original and always has. It doesn't show his face. It was never going to. He wore sunglasses and a hat the entire time he was on campus, and this is a wide angle camera across a parking lot. They know it's Tyler Robinson because of the corroborating evidence. He confessed to his boyfriend over text. He confessed on Discord. He confessed in a handwritten note he left under a keyboard. He confessed to his father, who called a former deputy, and then he turned himself in with his parents. Texts describing exactly how and where his rifle was hidden before that information was made public. The DNA. The car. A Google Maps route pulled off his own phone starting 23 minutes after the shot. Car wash video of his Challenger 11 minutes after that. A second route, at 1:33 in the morning, from the neighborhood beside where the rifle was found straight to his home in St. George. A dremel tool in his apartment, near a bag of .30-06 with one cartridge etched "test shot," matching the engraved casings sitting next to the rifle. And the video. A guy limping onto the roof with something bulging under his shirt at the waistband. Prone at the edge at 1222. Charlie is shot at 1223. He gets up and sprints on the same leg that couldn't bend going up the stairs minutes earlier. I hope they release all of it in the highest resolution they have. There are digital techniques to zoom in, stabilize, and sharpen footage. The people telling you this isn't Tyler Robinson also told you Charlie was killed by Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French legionnaires, Ben Shapiro, and TPUSA, without a shred of evidence. After nine months devoted to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while attacking his widow, his friends, and his organization, they're not following the evidence. They don't care about the truth or justice for Charlie. It's always been about spinning a narrative to fit their preconceived ideological bias and making as much money as possible from Charlie's murder.
1:20

Left: the original footage the FBI released of Tyler Robinson on the roof. Right: the same footage from the preliminary hearing. Every version people have been arguing about is the one on the right. A camera pointed at a courtroom screen. You lose enormous resolution doing that. Law enforcement has the original and always has. It doesn't show his face. It was never going to. He wore sunglasses and a hat the entire time he was on campus, and this is a wide angle camera across a parking lot. They know it's Tyler Robinson because of the corroborating evidence. He confessed to his boyfriend over text. He confessed on Discord. He confessed in a handwritten note he left under a keyboard. He confessed to his father, who called a former deputy, and then he turned himself in with his parents. Texts describing exactly how and where his rifle was hidden before that information was made public. The DNA. The car. A Google Maps route pulled off his own phone starting 23 minutes after the shot. Car wash video of his Challenger 11 minutes after that. A second route, at 1:33 in the morning, from the neighborhood beside where the rifle was found straight to his home in St. George. A dremel tool in his apartment, near a bag of .30-06 with one cartridge etched "test shot," matching the engraved casings sitting next to the rifle. And the video. A guy limping onto the roof with something bulging under his shirt at the waistband. Prone at the edge at 1222. Charlie is shot at 1223. He gets up and sprints on the same leg that couldn't bend going up the stairs minutes earlier. I hope they release all of it in the highest resolution they have. There are digital techniques to zoom in, stabilize, and sharpen footage. The people telling you this isn't Tyler Robinson also told you Charlie was killed by Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French legionnaires, Ben Shapiro, and TPUSA, without a shred of evidence. After nine months devoted to defending the man accused of killing Charlie while attacking his widow, his friends, and his organization, they're not following the evidence. They don't care about the truth or justice for Charlie. It's always been about spinning a narrative to fit their preconceived ideological bias and making as much money as possible from Charlie's murder.

KanekoaTheGreat

166,742 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨 UNSHAKEN FAITH: Charlie Kirk Meets Paul, Peter in Glory— RIP Charlie ~1993-2025🙏 I am setting the record straight because I am tired of TPUSA and their paid shills lying, gaslighting, and trying to taint the jury pool with completely false information. Let's talk about the FACTS of this case. 1⃣FACT: The DNA Evidence is a Mess. There was DNA from FIVE DIFFERENT PEOPLE on the rifle, besides Tyler Robinson. There is absolutely no way to prove he was the last one to handle it. They cannot link that specific gun to the murder because the bullet analysis was inconclusive. 2⃣FACT: The ATF Report is a Lie. They lied in their report, claiming they matched the spent shell casing at the scene with the murder weapon. The probable cause statement says the spent round was NEVER ejected and was still in the chamber. Furthermore, the gun itself was NOT found at the scene. It was found in a chicken coop on private property, nowhere near the roof where they claim the shot was fired. NOTHING links Tyler or that gun to the murder of Charlie. Has Turning Point USA told you any of this? NO. Have they mentioned the five different people's DNA on the gun? NO. 3⃣FACT: Tyler Robinson NEVER Confessed. He has been uncooperative with police and pled NOT GUILTY. The only reason he turned himself in was because he was afraid they would bust down his door, trash his house, and he'd be killed in the process. If he confessed, where is the written confession? Where is the interrogation video or police body cam? THERE IS NONE. In fact, we don't even have ANY video of Tyler arriving and being processed into the police station in Washington County because the police illegally destroyed that evidence. 4⃣FACT: The "Dad Turned Him In" Story is a Complete Fabrication. Unlike TPUSA and their proxies, our side has actually spoken with Tyler's family, who confirm it's a lie. They said only 2% of what the cops are saying is true. The entire story is impossible and provably FAKE. Here's why: The story claims Tyler's dad saw a picture of a "very unique antique WW1 Mauser" on the news that was released by the FBI and texted Tyler for a picture. But the problem with that is the FBI NEVER RELEASED A PICTURE OF THE ACTUAL GUN. The picture released by the media at that time was a stock photo of a completely different gun. It is physically and logically IMPOSSIBLE for his dad to have recognized a gun that was NEVER shown to the public. This ALSO proves the alleged text messages between Tyler and his furry lover Lance are also FAKED and PLANTED. They can't contain a conversation about an event that never happened. We also spoke to Tyler's grandmother, who told us Tyler was NOT a gun guy and knew nothing about guns. She said, there was NO WAY TYLER DID THIS. So stop listening to TPUSA and their paid shills trying to gaslight you. This is not an open-and-shut case. There is SOLID PROOF the feds have manufactured and destroyed evidence in this case. You have to ask yourself: WHY? Could it be because there's a much bigger, state-sponsored conspiracy afoot to murder Charlie Kirk? ▫️Because he was leaving the Israel cause. ▫️Because he wouldn't support an Iran war. ▫️Because he had access to the Epstein files and was demanding their release, even after Trump called him personally and told him to stop. ▫️Because he discovered massive fraud at TPUSA and ordered a DOGE-style audit to get to the bottom of it. Do you think the people perpetrating that fraud at TPUSA weren't scared shitless of going to prison if Charlie found out? Do you think they would have gone along with a conspiracy to kill Charlie to save their own asses? I do. I think not only is it possible, it is highly probable that is exactly what happened. They are lying to you. The evidence proves it. Share this everywhere, Do NOT let them control the narrative 🇺🇸
1:02

🚨 UNSHAKEN FAITH: Charlie Kirk Meets Paul, Peter in Glory— RIP Charlie ~1993-2025🙏 I am setting the record straight because I am tired of TPUSA and their paid shills lying, gaslighting, and trying to taint the jury pool with completely false information. Let's talk about the FACTS of this case. 1⃣FACT: The DNA Evidence is a Mess. There was DNA from FIVE DIFFERENT PEOPLE on the rifle, besides Tyler Robinson. There is absolutely no way to prove he was the last one to handle it. They cannot link that specific gun to the murder because the bullet analysis was inconclusive. 2⃣FACT: The ATF Report is a Lie. They lied in their report, claiming they matched the spent shell casing at the scene with the murder weapon. The probable cause statement says the spent round was NEVER ejected and was still in the chamber. Furthermore, the gun itself was NOT found at the scene. It was found in a chicken coop on private property, nowhere near the roof where they claim the shot was fired. NOTHING links Tyler or that gun to the murder of Charlie. Has Turning Point USA told you any of this? NO. Have they mentioned the five different people's DNA on the gun? NO. 3⃣FACT: Tyler Robinson NEVER Confessed. He has been uncooperative with police and pled NOT GUILTY. The only reason he turned himself in was because he was afraid they would bust down his door, trash his house, and he'd be killed in the process. If he confessed, where is the written confession? Where is the interrogation video or police body cam? THERE IS NONE. In fact, we don't even have ANY video of Tyler arriving and being processed into the police station in Washington County because the police illegally destroyed that evidence. 4⃣FACT: The "Dad Turned Him In" Story is a Complete Fabrication. Unlike TPUSA and their proxies, our side has actually spoken with Tyler's family, who confirm it's a lie. They said only 2% of what the cops are saying is true. The entire story is impossible and provably FAKE. Here's why: The story claims Tyler's dad saw a picture of a "very unique antique WW1 Mauser" on the news that was released by the FBI and texted Tyler for a picture. But the problem with that is the FBI NEVER RELEASED A PICTURE OF THE ACTUAL GUN. The picture released by the media at that time was a stock photo of a completely different gun. It is physically and logically IMPOSSIBLE for his dad to have recognized a gun that was NEVER shown to the public. This ALSO proves the alleged text messages between Tyler and his furry lover Lance are also FAKED and PLANTED. They can't contain a conversation about an event that never happened. We also spoke to Tyler's grandmother, who told us Tyler was NOT a gun guy and knew nothing about guns. She said, there was NO WAY TYLER DID THIS. So stop listening to TPUSA and their paid shills trying to gaslight you. This is not an open-and-shut case. There is SOLID PROOF the feds have manufactured and destroyed evidence in this case. You have to ask yourself: WHY? Could it be because there's a much bigger, state-sponsored conspiracy afoot to murder Charlie Kirk? ▫️Because he was leaving the Israel cause. ▫️Because he wouldn't support an Iran war. ▫️Because he had access to the Epstein files and was demanding their release, even after Trump called him personally and told him to stop. ▫️Because he discovered massive fraud at TPUSA and ordered a DOGE-style audit to get to the bottom of it. Do you think the people perpetrating that fraud at TPUSA weren't scared shitless of going to prison if Charlie found out? Do you think they would have gone along with a conspiracy to kill Charlie to save their own asses? I do. I think not only is it possible, it is highly probable that is exactly what happened. They are lying to you. The evidence proves it. Share this everywhere, Do NOT let them control the narrative 🇺🇸

Project Constitution

40,069 次观看 • 4 个月前

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Just Listed The Biggest Lies In The Tyler Robinson Case 😳 Candace Owens put together a running list of the major lies the public has been fed about the Tyler Robinson case — and the pattern is impossible to ignore. Here’s what we were told versus what has actually held up: ▫️Tyler’s father bravely turned him in → False. He was pressured and told he had no other option. The Bill Ackman $1 million narrative was also false. ▫️There was 4K video of Tyler taking the shot → No such video exists. ▫️Tyler and/or his lover were transgender → Both false. ▫️The motive was political hatred over LGBTQ issues → Debunked. Lance testified they never spoke about politics or Charlie Kirk. ▫️There was footage of Tyler assembling the rifle on the roof → No footage exists. ▫️Clear video of Tyler’s car on campus → Only blurry footage of a similar vehicle has been shown. ▫️Tyler was suicidal → False. ▫️His gun was tied to the bullet fragment from the autopsy → The ATF testimony showed the fragment did not match a .30-06. ▫️His DNA and prints were all over the gun → Severe omission. At least five other sets of prints were found (including Lance’s), and Tyler’s were the most degraded. Candace’s question cuts through the noise: What evidence has actually been entered into the public domain that proves Tyler Robinson did this beyond a reasonable doubt? Right now the narrative is left clinging to a text confession taken from Lance’s phone — a phone that was conveniently broken right where the timestamp would be. They call us conspiracy theorists. They’re the ones asking us to trust a story that keeps collapsing. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
10:19

‼️EXPOSED: Candace Just Listed The Biggest Lies In The Tyler Robinson Case 😳 Candace Owens put together a running list of the major lies the public has been fed about the Tyler Robinson case — and the pattern is impossible to ignore. Here’s what we were told versus what has actually held up: ▫️Tyler’s father bravely turned him in → False. He was pressured and told he had no other option. The Bill Ackman $1 million narrative was also false. ▫️There was 4K video of Tyler taking the shot → No such video exists. ▫️Tyler and/or his lover were transgender → Both false. ▫️The motive was political hatred over LGBTQ issues → Debunked. Lance testified they never spoke about politics or Charlie Kirk. ▫️There was footage of Tyler assembling the rifle on the roof → No footage exists. ▫️Clear video of Tyler’s car on campus → Only blurry footage of a similar vehicle has been shown. ▫️Tyler was suicidal → False. ▫️His gun was tied to the bullet fragment from the autopsy → The ATF testimony showed the fragment did not match a .30-06. ▫️His DNA and prints were all over the gun → Severe omission. At least five other sets of prints were found (including Lance’s), and Tyler’s were the most degraded. Candace’s question cuts through the noise: What evidence has actually been entered into the public domain that proves Tyler Robinson did this beyond a reasonable doubt? Right now the narrative is left clinging to a text confession taken from Lance’s phone — a phone that was conveniently broken right where the timestamp would be. They call us conspiracy theorists. They’re the ones asking us to trust a story that keeps collapsing. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

13,345 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.
4:44

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens's own footage — the clip she used to defend Tyler Robinson — shows recoil she claimed wasn't there, perfectly timed to the shot that killed Charlie Kirk. Thank you for solving the case, Candace. In ten months, you never produced a shred of evidence that Egyptian planes, the U.S. military, French Legionnaires, Israel, or TPUSA killed Charlie. This week, you produced footage of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk — blurry, because it's a camera recording a screen, but real. No wonder the defense fought to keep this out of the preliminary hearing. You can see him recoil as you hear the gunshot. You can see him run across the roof holding the gun wrapped in a towel. You can see him holding it as he jumps off the roof and walks across the grass. You've said footage of him assembling the rifle on that roof "does not exist." Fine — then release the full seven minutes he's up there, unedited, and let the public see for themselves. And hopefully the court eventually releases a high-resolution version. We know it's Tyler Robinson because there's more corroborating evidence here than in most murder convictions: He confessed multiple times. His parents and his boyfriend identified him in the footage, and he identified himself in one of his own confessions. Then he turned himself in. His car, his gun, his DNA, and his phone's Google Maps data all place him at the scene. He described exactly how the murder weapon was hidden — wrapped in a towel in the bushes — in texts to his boyfriend, before that detail was ever public. The list goes on. In ten months, the defense hasn't challenged any of it. If the confessions were fake, that's exactly how they'd have gotten this case thrown out. Thank you, too, for the Dairy Queen photo from that evening — showing his face in the same white-logo Hurley hat he's seen wearing on campus, a few minutes from where Charlie was shot. Ten months spent defending Charlie's accused killer, and slandering his wife, his friends, and his organization while making millions lying about his murder — and you finally produced real evidence. Unfortunately for you, it shows Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Charlie told us himself, seconds before he was murdered. A student asked him how many transgender Americans have been shooters in the last decade. Charlie's answer: "Too many." But thanks for the footage, Candace.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,160,898 次观看 • 13 天前

🚨 Candace Owens: “There is no evidence linking Tyler Robinson” to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. WRONG. Here’s the MOUNTAIN of proof that buried him in court 👇 - Parents turned him in: His own family called authorities, spilling everything. Blood doesn’t lie. - DNA slam-dunk: His genetic code all over the roof, gun, and gear—odds astronomical it’s anyone else. - His gun, his crime: The weapon used was his own, left at the scene like a signed confession. - Multiple confessions: Handwritten notes and admissions: “I did it to stop him.” No denying intent. - Texts = premeditated plot: Messages planning the hit, scouting locations, escape routes—pure calculation. - Witnesses everywhere: Eyewitnesses saw him in position; students, security, and more testified to his actions. Tyler got convicted on ALL counts—facing
0:34

🚨 Candace Owens: “There is no evidence linking Tyler Robinson” to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. WRONG. Here’s the MOUNTAIN of proof that buried him in court 👇 - Parents turned him in: His own family called authorities, spilling everything. Blood doesn’t lie. - DNA slam-dunk: His genetic code all over the roof, gun, and gear—odds astronomical it’s anyone else. - His gun, his crime: The weapon used was his own, left at the scene like a signed confession. - Multiple confessions: Handwritten notes and admissions: “I did it to stop him.” No denying intent. - Texts = premeditated plot: Messages planning the hit, scouting locations, escape routes—pure calculation. - Witnesses everywhere: Eyewitnesses saw him in position; students, security, and more testified to his actions. Tyler got convicted on ALL counts—facing

Reverend Jordan Wells

23,838 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."
1:27

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 次观看 • 1 个月前

THE NARRATIVE JUST COLLAPSED: Leaked Audio of Tyler Robinson’s Grandfather Destroys the State's Case👀 If you are still buying the official fedslop story about the Charlie Kirk assassination, you need to listen to this immediately. Candace Owens just aired exclusive, leaked courthouse audio of Tyler Robinson’s grandfather talking to reporter Elizabeth Lane during a hearing break. For months, the media has pushed the lie that Tyler’s family abandoned him and turned him in because they recognized the grandfather's gun on the news. THE REALITY: The news used fake stock photos, not the actual gun. Sheriff Brooksby admitted Tyler was coerced to surrender under threat of a massive SWAT raid on his family. And now, the grandfather—the original owner of the alleged murder weapon—is speaking out. THE BOMBSHELLS FROM THE LEAKED AUDIO: 🛑 He Knows Tyler Was Framed: When the journalist tells him point-blank that Tyler is "absolutely framed," the grandfather doesn't hesitate. He replies: "You're very right." 🛑 The Ballistics Are Bogus: This isn't someone who is easily confused. He’s a lifelong hunter whose police officer father taught him ballistics. He knows that weapon better than anyone, and he states flatly that the damage on the scene does NOT match what a .30-06 would do. 🛑 The Family Stands With Him: He was at the courthouse explicitly to support his grandson, completely shattering the media lie that his family believes he is guilty. This aligns perfectly with the independent forensic evidence we’ve been uncovering regarding the exploding transceiver and the impossible trajectory. The grandfather knows the ballistics don't add up. The family knows it's a setup. The cover-up is unraveling in real-time. The state's case is a house of cards, and we are going to keep pulling at the strings until the whole thing comes down. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch hyer FULL episode linked below. 👇
4:19

THE NARRATIVE JUST COLLAPSED: Leaked Audio of Tyler Robinson’s Grandfather Destroys the State's Case👀 If you are still buying the official fedslop story about the Charlie Kirk assassination, you need to listen to this immediately. Candace Owens just aired exclusive, leaked courthouse audio of Tyler Robinson’s grandfather talking to reporter Elizabeth Lane during a hearing break. For months, the media has pushed the lie that Tyler’s family abandoned him and turned him in because they recognized the grandfather's gun on the news. THE REALITY: The news used fake stock photos, not the actual gun. Sheriff Brooksby admitted Tyler was coerced to surrender under threat of a massive SWAT raid on his family. And now, the grandfather—the original owner of the alleged murder weapon—is speaking out. THE BOMBSHELLS FROM THE LEAKED AUDIO: 🛑 He Knows Tyler Was Framed: When the journalist tells him point-blank that Tyler is "absolutely framed," the grandfather doesn't hesitate. He replies: "You're very right." 🛑 The Ballistics Are Bogus: This isn't someone who is easily confused. He’s a lifelong hunter whose police officer father taught him ballistics. He knows that weapon better than anyone, and he states flatly that the damage on the scene does NOT match what a .30-06 would do. 🛑 The Family Stands With Him: He was at the courthouse explicitly to support his grandson, completely shattering the media lie that his family believes he is guilty. This aligns perfectly with the independent forensic evidence we’ve been uncovering regarding the exploding transceiver and the impossible trajectory. The grandfather knows the ballistics don't add up. The family knows it's a setup. The cover-up is unraveling in real-time. The state's case is a house of cards, and we are going to keep pulling at the strings until the whole thing comes down. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch hyer FULL episode linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

126,658 次观看 • 3 个月前