Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 DOES THIS EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY PROVE THE TYLER TEXT MESSAGES ARE FABRICATED? Candace Owens If Tyler Robinson is the fugitive rooftop gunman who changed clothes in the woods—how did an eyewitness after the clothes change meet the fugitive still dressed in the all-black tactical-style outfit & face mask? And...

150,949 views • 27 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

‼️BREAKING: Resurfaced Footage Captures New SUSPECT In All Black Fleeing UVU — Looks MORE Like Lance Twiggs Than Tyler Robinson New video has resurfaced showing a man running from the UVU crime scene on 9/10, filmed by a witness who believed he was the real suspect. The man is seen wearing all black, with a black backpack and long dark hair — matching multiple descriptions from that day. Construction worker Dylan Hope previously described coming into contact with a man right after the shooting who said “someone’s been shot.” He described him as wearing a black trench coat, black cargo pants, black COVID mask, black sunglasses, and having long greasy black hair while carrying a small backpack. That description also closely matches what was broadcast over police dispatch that day: a suspect wearing all black, black mask, and carrying a long gun. The only known footage of a person on the roof also shows someone dressed entirely in black in a prone position on the Losee building. This new video does not appear to show Tyler Robinson — however, the man in the video bears a noticeable resemblance to Lance Twiggs — particularly in hair length, color, and profile, though the footage is too blurry to make a positive identification. If this is the same person seen on the roof and the same individual who approached the construction crew, it raises serious questions about who was actually at the scene that day. The descriptions of the person seen running, the person on the roof, and the individual who approached the construction crew are all consistent with each other… and inconsistent with Tyler Robinson. Watch the video. Does this look like Lance Twiggs to you… or someone else? More questions than answers. Watch the video and tell me what you see. CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

446,463 views • 1 month ago

🚨BREAKING: FBI CAUGHT LYING About Tyler Robinson As Shooter? Eyewitness BOMBSHELL & Damning 911 Dispatch Audio PROVES It! Why is the FBI LYING to us about Tyler Robinson being the shooter at the Charlie Kirk event? The ONLY eyewitness who filmed the shooter on the roof says he was in ALL BLACK TACTICAL GEAR—mask, helmet, vest—not jeans & a T-shirt like the FBI claims. He reported it to police THAT DAY, and I pulled the dispatch audio: "all black, black long gun, black tactical helmet, black mask, possibly tactical vest & jeans." LISTEN YOURSELF (audio attached). But the media got a totally different story. Why the switcheroo? This witness—a firearms instructor—says Tyler DOESN'T MATCH the guy he saw, AND the FBI's alleged rifle ISN'T the one used. Candace Owens confirmed after speaking to him directly. BOMBSHELL: FBI's publicly "investigating" concerns (like shots from BEHIND Kirk, not front)... but behind scenes? Pressuring state/local PD to CLOSE the case & declare Tyler guilty. No video of him firing. Bullets too fragmented to match his gun. No confession. Discord "evidence"? Sounds like fed fanfic. What are they covering up? Who REALLY pulled the trigger? Tyler might've just been a patsy dropping off a gun. I Encourage you all to watch Candace's FULL Video, I'll link it in the comments below. It's Very Informative on Not Just The Charlie Kirk Case But She Drops A Bombshell About Thomas Crooks, The Alleged Attempted Trump Assassin. SHARE if you want TRUTH!

Project Constitution

732,918 views • 11 months ago

🚨FBI IGNORED Eyewitnesses Who Saw Shooter In ALL-BLACK Up Close—Construction Worker Dylan Hope Speaks Out 🕵️‍♂️👀 The "official" story of the Charlie Kirk assassination looks less like a federal investigation and more like a poorly engineered cover up. Picture this: On September 10, 2025 in the early hours of the chaos, the description was crystal clear. Police dispatchers were broadcasting this suspect description: A male wearing all black, a black tactical helmet and a black mask. But wait, there’s more. Dylan Hope, a construction worker on-site, saw him too. A man in a black trench coat and black cargo pants, and long greasy hair. Matching that exact "tactical" description. And then there’s the only video evidence we have—filmed an hour before the hit—showing a person in a prone position on that roof. What were they wearing? You guessed it. All black. But then the feds stepped in. And suddenly, the man in the black mask vanished into the "fed-slop" ether. In his place, they gave us Tyler Robinson. A kid in a T-shirt and jeans who (allegedly) "dropped" onto a roof with a rifle that nobody saw him carry. As Candace Owens revealed, the eyewitness who filmed the shooter says definitively: "Tyler Robinson is NOT the guy." The gun doesn't match. The outfit doesn't match. The ballistic fragments don't even match Tyler’s rifle. So how did we get here? Tyler didn't confess. His father’s "sheriff friend" just pointed a finger, and the feds ran with it. Why? Because the feds don't want you looking for the man in the black trench coat. They want a "Patsy" to close the case. They want you to believe a "Discord fan-fiction" script instead of the dispatch audio recorded in the heat of the moment. They abandonment of the original evidence isn't a mistake—it’s a pivot. They ignored the tactical professional on the roof to frame the kid they told to "drop off a gun" at a neighboring house. We are 7 months removed from that day, and the truth is finally outrunning the lies. They think we’ve forgotten the man with the greasy hair and the black mask. They think we’ve stopped listening to the dispatch tapes. They are wrong. Watch the footage. Listen to the witnesses. Make your own informed decision. Because we don't do "scripts." We do facts. 🇺🇸⚖️

Project Constitution

40,816 views • 4 months ago

🚨 NEW SUSPECT IN CHARLIE KIRK’S MURDER?? 🚨 Why has the FBI been hiding this from us? Multiple eyewitnesses describe a man who looks nothing like Tyler Robinson — dressed head to toe in all black, long greasy black hair, trench coat, black mask, black cargo pants, backpack. 🧵 Here’s what we know: 1️⃣ Eyewitness Account: Dylan Hope, an electrician, says his colleague operating an excavator at a UVU construction site spoke with this man immediately after the shooting. The suspect asked if he could walk through the site, claiming he was “just trying to get home safe after a shooting.” 2️⃣ Description: - Black trench coat - Black cargo pants - Black mask & sunglasses - Long greasy black hair - Small backpack He went through the construction site that the FBI claim The shooter did as they were fleeing and was the ONLY person to do so. The guy was already trying to leave. And so, he -- we were then shown a picture by the sheriff at the time, and the excavator said that it matched. The man admitted someone had been shot before sirens even started wailing. 3️⃣ Police Tracking: Officers later showed up with a canine and tracked this man through the site to an adjacent property. No unusual cars were spotted nearby — was he on foot the whole time? 4️⃣ The FBI Problem: Workers on site say the photo shown to them by sheriffs DID NOT MATCH the image the FBI released publicly. Dylan Hope himself says it didn’t line up. So here’s the question — why is the FBI withholding evidence of this possible second suspect? Why push a narrative that doesn’t match eyewitness testimony? This story has more holes than Swiss cheese, and every new witness makes the official line look worse. Please FOLLOW JaneDoeUKnow Who is the one who sent this to me.

Project Constitution

35,661 views • 10 months ago

‼️PART 2: Candace Owens Breaks Down the MOST Damaging EXCULPATORY Evidence From Tyler Robinson’s Hearing — DNA Forensics & Firearm Ballistics 🔍👀 In tonight’s episode, Candace Owens highlighted two major pieces of testimony from the ATF that directly undermine the claim that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. First, ATF forensic biologist Caitlin Oliver testified that Tyler Robinson’s DNA was the most degraded of all the samples found on the gun. She also confirmed there were multiple DNA contributors on the weapon — including Lance Twiggs and even Tyler’s father. Candace explained that if Tyler had recently fired the rifle, his DNA should have been among the freshest, not the most degraded. This strongly suggests his DNA was left on the gun long before September 10th. Even more explosive was the testimony from ATF ballistics expert Samantha Carner. Of the seven bullet fragments removed from Charlie Kirk’s body, only one was usable for analysis. That single fragment had a diameter too small to have come from Tyler Robinson’s .30-06 rifle. Additionally, Something HUGE Candace missed was that the ATF Analyst that performed the tesiting admitted the recovered rifle had dust inside the barrel — when it was recovered, which PROVES it had NOT been recently fired. This is not the overwhelming case they’ve been selling. The forensic evidence actually points away from Tyler Robinson as the shooter. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

14,453 views • 1 month ago

‼️Candace Owens On The Shawn Ryan Podcast: "Tyler Robinson Is Total Patsy" — He Was Set Up By Lance Twiggs In the interview, Candace said she’s confident Tyler Robinson did not murder Charlie Kirk. At most, she believes he may have been an accessory — but she strongly suspects he was set up. She pointed directly at Tyler’s roommate and boyfriend, Lance Twiggs, calling him a likely federal asset. Candace noted that it’s “bonkers” the police never even questioned Lance, despite him being central to the official story they’re pushing. Her reasoning: If they were in a relationship, Lance would have had easy access to Tyler’s guns. It would have been simple for Lance to set Tyler up. She suggested Tyler may have been blackmailed, possibly through “weird stuff online” — the easiest way for the feds to control someone. This lines up with what many of us have been saying for months: Tyler Robinson doesn’t fit the profile of a lone gunman. The speed at which the “official story” was locked in, combined with the lack of scrutiny on Lance Twiggs, has always been one of the biggest red flags. If Lance Twiggs really is a federal asset who set Tyler up, then this wasn’t just a random act of violence — it was a coordinated operation. The more we learn, the clearer it becomes that the public is not being told the full story about what happened at UVU. FOLLOW Candace Owens and Shawn Ryan RT this. The truth is starting to come out.

Project Constitution

25,769 views • 2 months ago

‼️BOMBSHELL: Cops Recovered a BACKPACK, Jacket, and Gloves on the ESCAPE Route — Then Told the FBI NOT to Test Them🤯 Candace Owens just highlighted one of the most disturbing moments from the Tyler Robinson preliminary hearing. Sergeant Jennifer Faumuina of UVU Public Safety testified that officers recovered a backpack, jacket, gloves, and other abandoned items along the route the alleged shooter took after jumping off the Losee Center. These items were found near the Fulton Library — the same area where multiple 911 callers reported an armed man in a black shirt, black mask, and long rifle. The items were initially sent to the FBI for DNA and analysis… and then the decision was made to stop testing them. When asked who made that call and why, the sergeant suddenly couldn’t remember. Even more shocking: the only person who both saw and filmed the individual on the roof — describing him as wearing full black tactical gear, a face mask, and possibly a helmet — has never been called by the prosecution. He immediately told police on scene that they had the wrong person in custody. His description matched the early scanner reports, not the “jeans and t-shirt” story that came later. They found abandoned tactical-style items on the escape route, multiple people reported an armed man near the library, and the only real eyewitness was ignored. Why? FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

72,887 views • 1 month ago

🚨MUST WATCH: An ANGRY Candace Owens Sets The Recod Straight And CALLS OUT All Those Parroting The LIES About Tyler Robinson Turning Himself In And Confessing🤬🔥 Candace Owens just systematically dismantled the entire establishment narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson on her podcast, and it is absolutely infuriating how many people are still parroting these lies. If you still believe Tyler Robinson "turned himself in" or "confessed" to shooting Charlie Kirk, you have been severely manipulated by the Feds. Candace just set the record straight, and here are the undeniable facts: LIE #1: TYLER CONFESSED AND TURNED HIMSELF IN This never happened. If you walk into a police station and confess to a high-profile assassination, the very first thing they do is make you sign a sworn, written confession. No such document exists. Tyler Robinson has maintained his innocence from day one and has officially plead NOT GUILTY. LIE #2: HIS DAD TURNED HIM IN Another complete fabrication. Tyler's father never claimed his son was the shooter. In fact, sources close to the family confirm his father explicitly stated that the blurry surveillance footage of the shooter on the stairs did not look like Tyler (and let’s be honest, we all know it looked exactly like Robbie Hill). LIE #3: TYLER WAS SUICIDAL This was a narrative planted to make him look unstable and guilty. So, how did Tyler actually end up at the station? Enter Mike Mitchell, a former sheriff's deputy with a highly suspicious background who happened to be Tyler's old Boy Scout leader. Mitchell went to Tyler’s house and essentially threatened him: He told Tyler the Feds were going to raid his house with a SWAT team, put guns in his parents' faces, and likely shoot him dead unless he came down to the station "peacefully" to clear his name. Tyler went to the station because he was terrified of being murdered by the state, not because he was guilty. THE FED COVER-UP: The local police, the SWAT teams, and the Washington County sheriffs all know the Feds set Tyler up as a patsy. The Feds lied about the gun location. They kept bomb-sniffing dogs away from specific areas. And who was the one aggressively pushing the fake "confession" narrative to the public? Governor Spencer Cox and Kash Patel. They stood on stage, repeated the Masonic "33" signaling, and lied to the American people to shut down the investigation. Candace said it best: She is 99.9% sure Tyler Robinson did not shoot Charlie Kirk. The people pushing this narrative are protecting the real killers, and they are doing it for money. We are not going to let them railroad an innocent kid to protect the deep state. 🛡️👺 FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked down below.👇

Project Constitution

110,416 views • 5 months ago

🚨 BOMBSHELL: Tyler Robinson's FAMILY Speaks Out—Say's Only 2% Of What YOU Are Hearing In The Mainstream Media Is TRUE😳 The establishment media narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson is completely unravelling. Brandi and Billie, hosts of the Brandi and Billie ShowZ, just dropped massive new information after speaking directly with a member of Tyler Robinson’s family inside the courtroom—and what they revealed changes everything. Here are the critical takeaways from their courtroom discussion: When asked why the family hasn't spoken out to independent journalists to clear the air, the family member stated that it doesn't matter who they talk to because the media will misconstrue it. She then dropped this bombshell: Only 2% of what the public is hearing about Tyler is true. The mainstream media has relentlessly pushed the story that Tyler’s own family (specifically his father) turned him in. But when Brandi and Billie asked the family member point-blank if Tyler was capable of carrying out this assassination, her answer was an immediate, definitive "NO." As Brandi pointed out, if the family truly believed he was a lone-wolf assassin and actively turned him in to the authorities, they would not be sitting in a courtroom telling independent podcasters that he is completely incapable of the crime and that the media is lying about him. The narrative of the "guilty family turning in their radicalized son" appears to be a total fabrication. Even the UVU eyewitness sitting next to them in the courtroom—who initially argued Tyler was the shooter—eventually admitted after looking at the photos that the bone structure and chin of the man in the stairwell do not match the real-life photos of Tyler Robinson. If Tyler didn't pull the trigger, and his family knows he isn't capable of it... who is the man in the stairwell photos? And why is the media working so hard to pin this entirely on Tyler? The setup is becoming obvious. Tyler may have been involved in some capacity, but he did not act alone, and he did not pull that trigger. 🚩🇺🇸 FOLLOW brandiandbillieshow and watch their FULL episoe linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

275,019 views • 5 months ago