Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted... every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!show more

The SCIF

237,140 subscribers

35,506 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

The SCIF

39,311 views • 5 months ago

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.

The SCIF

74,294 views • 1 month ago

In Maricopa County, Arizona, during the 2020 election audit, pallets with thousands of duplicate ballots were found with NO serial numbers, which are crucial for creating a paper trail for audits, especially with duplicate ballots. If the corresponding serial numbers for the duplicated ballots are NOT on the ballots, there is NO way to determine if that ballot was tabulated and counted 1x or 1000x, which opens the door to massive ballot fraud.

In Maricopa County, Arizona, during the 2020 election audit, pallets with thousands of duplicate ballots were found with NO serial numbers, which are crucial for creating a paper trail for audits, especially with duplicate ballots. If the corresponding serial numbers for the duplicated ballots are NOT on the ballots, there is NO way to determine if that ballot was tabulated and counted 1x or 1000x, which opens the door to massive ballot fraud.

The SCIF

16,336 views • 5 months ago

SHOCKING: The Georgia State Election Board couldn't believe it when election expert Garland Favorito told them that Dominion voting machines in Georgia have a "defect" that causes in-person ballots that are accepted by scanners NOT to be counted They voted to accept Garland's petition for a new rule requiring election workers to write down vote totals from each ballot scanner to compare with what the machine ended up counting "The poll manager and two witnesses shall record the count of ballots from the tabulation tape on the recap form. If the poll manager or the witnesses have reason to believe that printed tapes are not a true and correct tabulation of the ballots scanned by the ballot scanner, the poll manager or witness shall document the reasons and evidence for that belief and inform the election superintendent, who shall take appropriate action, in his or her discretion, sot that the ballots in the ballot box associated with the ballot scanner are accurately tabulated." Garland Favorito, David Cross, Kevin Moncla, and many other Georgia patriots are doing God's work

SHOCKING: The Georgia State Election Board couldn't believe it when election expert Garland Favorito told them that Dominion voting machines in Georgia have a "defect" that causes in-person ballots that are accepted by scanners NOT to be counted They voted to accept Garland's petition for a new rule requiring election workers to write down vote totals from each ballot scanner to compare with what the machine ended up counting "The poll manager and two witnesses shall record the count of ballots from the tabulation tape on the recap form. If the poll manager or the witnesses have reason to believe that printed tapes are not a true and correct tabulation of the ballots scanned by the ballot scanner, the poll manager or witness shall document the reasons and evidence for that belief and inform the election superintendent, who shall take appropriate action, in his or her discretion, sot that the ballots in the ballot box associated with the ballot scanner are accurately tabulated." Garland Favorito, David Cross, Kevin Moncla, and many other Georgia patriots are doing God's work

George

534,405 views • 1 year ago

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

19,397 views • 24 days ago

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.

The SCIF

30,964 views • 3 months ago

Dominion's ImageCast Evolution (ICE) hybrid voting machine has a built-in physical ability to mark or add votes to your paper ballot AFTER you've reviewed and cast it, and you'll never see the final version. Bidirectional paper path flaw. Scanner and printer share the same feed, allowing the device to read and rewrite the ballot undetected. The machine can physically print additional marks or change votes on the ballot after the voter's last on-screen confirmation, the voter never sees the final printed version. Malicious software could exploit this to flip votes without leaving a trace on the voter’s review screen. Audit-destroying vulnerability. Even a full paper recount or audit would count the altered ballot as legitimate, making fraud invisible. Undermines "paper ballot" security theater. The whole "trust the paper trail" argument collapses when the machine itself can cheat after you leave. This pure design flaw or purposeful feature turns this machine into a potential election weapon to steal elections.

Dominion's ImageCast Evolution (ICE) hybrid voting machine has a built-in physical ability to mark or add votes to your paper ballot AFTER you've reviewed and cast it, and you'll never see the final version. Bidirectional paper path flaw. Scanner and printer share the same feed, allowing the device to read and rewrite the ballot undetected. The machine can physically print additional marks or change votes on the ballot after the voter's last on-screen confirmation, the voter never sees the final printed version. Malicious software could exploit this to flip votes without leaving a trace on the voter’s review screen. Audit-destroying vulnerability. Even a full paper recount or audit would count the altered ballot as legitimate, making fraud invisible. Undermines "paper ballot" security theater. The whole "trust the paper trail" argument collapses when the machine itself can cheat after you leave. This pure design flaw or purposeful feature turns this machine into a potential election weapon to steal elections.

The SCIF

11,818 views • 2 months ago

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Spencer Pratt voters are reporting that their ballots have been rejected. This is from an independent journalist in San Diego named Amy Reichert: "Multiple Spencer Pratt voters have contacted me saying their signatures were rejected and their ballots were not counted. Here is the letter they get. “More than 200,000 Californians have had their ballots rejected since 2020. This is what happens when you don’t require voter ID. If a machine can identify your party registration, people have every right to question whether the process can be manipulated." This is from a man who lives in Southern California named Russ. He said, "Today I received a letter, just like my neighbor did, informing me that my California ballot was not counted because my ‘signature verification’ supposedly didn't match the state's records. I've been voting in California for 20 years." Leftists are engaging in a series of talking points to defend the California election system. They say things like, “Well, you need to sign the ballots, so there will be signature verification” or “We check those signatures” or “It has to be postmarked by Election Day” or “Ballot harvesters have to put their signature on the ballot envelope, so it's not done anonymously. There's still a chain of custody for these ballots.” They're saying these things to try to instill confidence in voters, when none of us have any confidence in the California election system. Each and every one of their talking points is contradicted by the actual election procedure and the laws on the books that guide Los Angeles elections. So they say “You need to sign it.” OK, but does a smiley face count? Oh, it counts. And they say, “We checked these signatures.” OK, do you check them on any ballots other than Republican ballots? Because there have been reports of Los Angeles election workers telling journalists, “Actually, we don't really check these ballots.” So do you or don't you? The mail-in ballots that come in late, the left says, “They have to be postmarked by Election Day. These are not people that are casting ballots after Election Day tallies have been made public.” Actually, you don't need a postmark. If you look at California election law, you don't have to have a postmark by Election Day. You can simply handwrite any date that is either on or before Election Day, and the ballot is counted. What happens to the ballots that have been ballot-harvested and are turned in to be counted if the ballot harvester doesn't put his or her name on that ballot? Is that ballot rejected? Oh, no, it's not rejected. That ballot is still counted, even if the ballot harvester doesn't sign the ballot envelope. So all of these talking points that are thrown at us by the left are…lies.

Liz Wheeler

84,692 views • 1 month ago

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

The SCIF

790,668 views • 3 months ago

Counterfeit ballots cast in the Georgia 2020 election were identified by darker watermarks, which were also found on military ballots with machine printed selections for candidates instead of manually being filled in with a pen. Military and mail-in ballots were found to be on different paper, had no folds, the watermarks were dark grey, with statistically impossible stacks of military ballots being 100% for Joe Biden. Whoever was involved in these operations needs to be identified and prosecuted, or it will continue to happen.

Counterfeit ballots cast in the Georgia 2020 election were identified by darker watermarks, which were also found on military ballots with machine printed selections for candidates instead of manually being filled in with a pen. Military and mail-in ballots were found to be on different paper, had no folds, the watermarks were dark grey, with statistically impossible stacks of military ballots being 100% for Joe Biden. Whoever was involved in these operations needs to be identified and prosecuted, or it will continue to happen.

The SCIF

44,215 views • 1 month ago

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

157,068 views • 2 days ago

#WATCH | Congress MP Manish Tewari says, "2024 elections must be held on paper ballots." He says, "Democracy is too precious to be left to technology. The question is not that EVMs are manipulated. The question is that EVMs can be manipulated. That is reason enough to go back to paper ballots. For the simple reason, the electronic voting machine is at the end of the day, a machine. And like any machine, it can be rigged, it can be hacked, it can be interdicted, it can be played around with. I do not understand the paternalistic obsession of the Election Commission of India with Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). Even countries which had adopted Electronic Voting Machines have gone back to paper ballots for the simple reason that they can be interfered with. So, under those circumstances, the 2024 elections must be held on paper ballots..."

#WATCH | Congress MP Manish Tewari says, "2024 elections must be held on paper ballots." He says, "Democracy is too precious to be left to technology. The question is not that EVMs are manipulated. The question is that EVMs can be manipulated. That is reason enough to go back to paper ballots. For the simple reason, the electronic voting machine is at the end of the day, a machine. And like any machine, it can be rigged, it can be hacked, it can be interdicted, it can be played around with. I do not understand the paternalistic obsession of the Election Commission of India with Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). Even countries which had adopted Electronic Voting Machines have gone back to paper ballots for the simple reason that they can be interfered with. So, under those circumstances, the 2024 elections must be held on paper ballots..."

ANI

556,126 views • 2 years ago

Since the FBI just secretly seized election records from Maricopa County, Arizona, and there are allegations of over 300k fraudulent ballots, they need to investigate the never-ending amount of trucks that were delivering ballots days after the 2020 election from Runbeck. The ballots after election day did not coincide with voter rolls or have any type of chain of custody. Don't forget Runbeck verifies ballots as well. So, how did so many ballots with fraudulent signatures and other irregularities pass verification for authenticity? Runbeck also prints, marks, transports, verifies, and creates ballots, all with no oversight. The writing is on the wall.

Since the FBI just secretly seized election records from Maricopa County, Arizona, and there are allegations of over 300k fraudulent ballots, they need to investigate the never-ending amount of trucks that were delivering ballots days after the 2020 election from Runbeck. The ballots after election day did not coincide with voter rolls or have any type of chain of custody. Don't forget Runbeck verifies ballots as well. So, how did so many ballots with fraudulent signatures and other irregularities pass verification for authenticity? Runbeck also prints, marks, transports, verifies, and creates ballots, all with no oversight. The writing is on the wall.

The SCIF

62,148 views • 4 months ago

Here’s how DOMINION flipped and switched the 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in middle of the night in Antrim County, Michigan, from Trump to Biden. The Error rate permissible is 1 out of 125,000 ballots. Dominion in Antrim County's error rate was 8.3. That’s 750x the allowable limit. A Secretary of State official also told volunteers to count "multiple ballots with the very same signature" during an audit of votes in Antrim county. Since there were so many "errors" they claimed because of fake ballots, duplicate ballots running through machines, manually caught double signatures, and every other method of fraud committed during the 2020 election, ballots would then go to adjudication. Since the adjudication was programmed at an astronomically high, 750x rate, the ballot were switched in adjudication either by Dominion's programmed machines to Biden itself, or someone manually adjudicating groups of ballots at the click of a button all at once for Biden, bypassing obvious fraud, or switching votes from Trump to Biden on site in adjudication manually. This wasn't a glitch, this wasn't a clerical error, this wasn't a mechanical error. This was FRAUD. Remember, this is just ONE layer and method of fraud committed. There are multiple methods and techniques to alter elections. Now look at how high the percentage of ballots that were sent to adjudication. Adjudication is where a lot of the fraud took place, which is just one layer of the total fraud operation to flip votes and pass through fraudulent ballots when the machines fail to do so or were caught through an audit. - 68% of all ballots in Antrim County, Michigan - 94% of all ballots in Fulton County, Georgia. Georgia's adjudication is massive! Noticing a pattern? Many records were destroyed, physical evidence was never allowed to be looked at, including logs, chain of custody, you name it. Nothing was done or allowed to be done after the fraud in 2020. Trump was the actual winner of the 2020 election. All this fraud we went over was just one county. Now imagine the rest of the country... The most important thing to understand is that this happened all over the country and is happening in over 100+ countries around the world. This is the election fraud cartel and their fraudulent methods to rigging and stealing elections worldwide because Dominion, Smartmatic, Miru Systems, etc., are all different branches of the same base company.

Here’s how DOMINION flipped and switched the 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in middle of the night in Antrim County, Michigan, from Trump to Biden. The Error rate permissible is 1 out of 125,000 ballots. Dominion in Antrim County's error rate was 8.3. That’s 750x the allowable limit. A Secretary of State official also told volunteers to count "multiple ballots with the very same signature" during an audit of votes in Antrim county. Since there were so many "errors" they claimed because of fake ballots, duplicate ballots running through machines, manually caught double signatures, and every other method of fraud committed during the 2020 election, ballots would then go to adjudication. Since the adjudication was programmed at an astronomically high, 750x rate, the ballot were switched in adjudication either by Dominion's programmed machines to Biden itself, or someone manually adjudicating groups of ballots at the click of a button all at once for Biden, bypassing obvious fraud, or switching votes from Trump to Biden on site in adjudication manually. This wasn't a glitch, this wasn't a clerical error, this wasn't a mechanical error. This was FRAUD. Remember, this is just ONE layer and method of fraud committed. There are multiple methods and techniques to alter elections. Now look at how high the percentage of ballots that were sent to adjudication. Adjudication is where a lot of the fraud took place, which is just one layer of the total fraud operation to flip votes and pass through fraudulent ballots when the machines fail to do so or were caught through an audit. - 68% of all ballots in Antrim County, Michigan - 94% of all ballots in Fulton County, Georgia. Georgia's adjudication is massive! Noticing a pattern? Many records were destroyed, physical evidence was never allowed to be looked at, including logs, chain of custody, you name it. Nothing was done or allowed to be done after the fraud in 2020. Trump was the actual winner of the 2020 election. All this fraud we went over was just one county. Now imagine the rest of the country... The most important thing to understand is that this happened all over the country and is happening in over 100+ countries around the world. This is the election fraud cartel and their fraudulent methods to rigging and stealing elections worldwide because Dominion, Smartmatic, Miru Systems, etc., are all different branches of the same base company.

The SCIF

1,142,944 views • 6 months ago

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.

The SCIF

140,595 views • 5 months ago

Fulton County's own records include 22,534 more ballots cast than voters crediting with casting a ballot. Almost DOUBLE Biden's margin of "victory" in the 2020 Election of 11,779 votes. The state's own records show 148,319 absentee ballots were counted for the 2020 general election, but only 125,784 were recorded as casting a ballot. This leaves 22,534 more ballots counted than voters given credit for voting. Biden's margin of victory was only 11,779 votes. On top of this, THOUSANDS of BALLOTS unique to November 3rd and the recount were found to be off with completely different counts. The ballots counted for the original Nov. 3rd 2020 Election, should match almost perfectly with the ballots counted for the Recount as the same paper ballots are being scanned and counted by the same machines, however, THOUSANDS of ballots are unique to each, which is NOT possible by natural means or mistake.

Fulton County's own records include 22,534 more ballots cast than voters crediting with casting a ballot. Almost DOUBLE Biden's margin of "victory" in the 2020 Election of 11,779 votes. The state's own records show 148,319 absentee ballots were counted for the 2020 general election, but only 125,784 were recorded as casting a ballot. This leaves 22,534 more ballots counted than voters given credit for voting. Biden's margin of victory was only 11,779 votes. On top of this, THOUSANDS of BALLOTS unique to November 3rd and the recount were found to be off with completely different counts. The ballots counted for the original Nov. 3rd 2020 Election, should match almost perfectly with the ballots counted for the Recount as the same paper ballots are being scanned and counted by the same machines, however, THOUSANDS of ballots are unique to each, which is NOT possible by natural means or mistake.

The SCIF

69,326 views • 2 days ago

This is the FIX in ARIZONA ELECTIONS. Penske trucks full of ballots were followed to Runbeck Election Services with no observers or chain of custody. When an election audit company tried to get Runbeck's records and videos to prove chain of custody, observers, and voter roll information, an Arizona judged denied the request. Why wouldn't Runbeck just turn it over to prove their case in the first place? Another red flag is when Arizona state election officials were asked about the Penske trucks they said something completely different and that they were moving equipment and chairs, never mentioning Runbeck or what they do or ballots. There is something a lot bigger transpiring here, and it goes all the way to the top of Arizona's government. The Arizona Sheriff is said to have even been installed, not elected, by a well funded Soros-funded campaign as well. Runbeck has contracts with Dominion, ES&S, and other election involved companies. They print, mark, scan, transport, and verify ballots. The problem is that there is no chain of custody or observers. Hundreds of thousands of ballots are alleged to be fraudulent, the paper is different, the marks are all the same, along with many other indications found by data scientist and election audit specialists. If Runbeck is the one scanning and verifying the ballots authenticity and signatures, etc., before they go to the county to be counted, then this means they are letting fraudulent ballots through to be counted, especially if there is no chain of custody or observers, anyone could add thousands of inauthentic ballots anywhere within the process or Runbeck is directly involved themselves.

This is the FIX in ARIZONA ELECTIONS. Penske trucks full of ballots were followed to Runbeck Election Services with no observers or chain of custody. When an election audit company tried to get Runbeck's records and videos to prove chain of custody, observers, and voter roll information, an Arizona judged denied the request. Why wouldn't Runbeck just turn it over to prove their case in the first place? Another red flag is when Arizona state election officials were asked about the Penske trucks they said something completely different and that they were moving equipment and chairs, never mentioning Runbeck or what they do or ballots. There is something a lot bigger transpiring here, and it goes all the way to the top of Arizona's government. The Arizona Sheriff is said to have even been installed, not elected, by a well funded Soros-funded campaign as well. Runbeck has contracts with Dominion, ES&S, and other election involved companies. They print, mark, scan, transport, and verify ballots. The problem is that there is no chain of custody or observers. Hundreds of thousands of ballots are alleged to be fraudulent, the paper is different, the marks are all the same, along with many other indications found by data scientist and election audit specialists. If Runbeck is the one scanning and verifying the ballots authenticity and signatures, etc., before they go to the county to be counted, then this means they are letting fraudulent ballots through to be counted, especially if there is no chain of custody or observers, anyone could add thousands of inauthentic ballots anywhere within the process or Runbeck is directly involved themselves.

The SCIF

34,007 views • 4 months ago

🚨 PATRICK BYRNE DROPS DETROIT ELECTION BOMBSHELL 🚨 Patrick Byrne says new findings out of Detroit raise major questions about mail-in ballots, envelopes, and election machine access. According to Byrne, some precincts allegedly had more ballots than envelopes - while others had more envelopes than ballots. He also claimed up to 33% of mail-in ballots in Detroit may have had no matching request on record. “Mail-in ballots came in from people who had never asked for a mail-in ballot. What’s that sound like?” Byrne also pointed to testimony from Michigan election official Jonathan Brater, who he says acknowledged VPN access into voting machines - raising the obvious question: If there was VPN access, were the machines connected? This is why transparency matters. Paper ballots. Full audits. No black boxes.

🚨 PATRICK BYRNE DROPS DETROIT ELECTION BOMBSHELL 🚨 Patrick Byrne says new findings out of Detroit raise major questions about mail-in ballots, envelopes, and election machine access. According to Byrne, some precincts allegedly had more ballots than envelopes - while others had more envelopes than ballots. He also claimed up to 33% of mail-in ballots in Detroit may have had no matching request on record. “Mail-in ballots came in from people who had never asked for a mail-in ballot. What’s that sound like?” Byrne also pointed to testimony from Michigan election official Jonathan Brater, who he says acknowledged VPN access into voting machines - raising the obvious question: If there was VPN access, were the machines connected? This is why transparency matters. Paper ballots. Full audits. No black boxes.

LindellTV

20,813 views • 1 month ago

Up to 40,000 Republican in-person voters were disenfranchised in the 2020 Maricopa County election because of election machines not be tested and manipulated prior to Election Day, with 1 out of 2 ballots in over 125+ vote counting centers rejecting ballots in the 2020 election. Only 17,000 votes separated Governor candidates. If machines were working properly Kari Lake would have won. This is not even counting the hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots found and the 21% of failed ballot signatures. Over 74,000 ballot signatures failed in Maricopa County alone, and if you apply less than half of the 21% at 9%, over 180,000 ballots failed signature verification out of all of Arizona, which would have easily gave Donald Trump the win in Arizona. There is also that fact that there was no oversight at Runbeck with employees aloud to bring in ballots outside the chain-of-custody, and all of the election data WIPED the day before the audit. These same things happened in 2022 and the reprogramming of the memory cards on the tabulation machines with the security seals illegally removed, with the deletion of election data. Maricopa County hid this fact and only admitted this 7 months later when they were shown the security footage. Arizona elections are beyond corrupt and the 2020 and the 2022 elections should have NEVER been certified.

Up to 40,000 Republican in-person voters were disenfranchised in the 2020 Maricopa County election because of election machines not be tested and manipulated prior to Election Day, with 1 out of 2 ballots in over 125+ vote counting centers rejecting ballots in the 2020 election. Only 17,000 votes separated Governor candidates. If machines were working properly Kari Lake would have won. This is not even counting the hundreds of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots found and the 21% of failed ballot signatures. Over 74,000 ballot signatures failed in Maricopa County alone, and if you apply less than half of the 21% at 9%, over 180,000 ballots failed signature verification out of all of Arizona, which would have easily gave Donald Trump the win in Arizona. There is also that fact that there was no oversight at Runbeck with employees aloud to bring in ballots outside the chain-of-custody, and all of the election data WIPED the day before the audit. These same things happened in 2022 and the reprogramming of the memory cards on the tabulation machines with the security seals illegally removed, with the deletion of election data. Maricopa County hid this fact and only admitted this 7 months later when they were shown the security footage. Arizona elections are beyond corrupt and the 2020 and the 2022 elections should have NEVER been certified.

The SCIF

18,733 views • 29 days ago