Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Dominion's ImageCast Evolution (ICE) hybrid voting machine has a built-in physical ability to mark or add votes to your paper ballot AFTER you've reviewed and cast it, and you'll never see the final version. Bidirectional paper path flaw. Scanner and printer share the same feed, allowing the device to...

11,818 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

The SCIF

39,311 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!

The SCIF

35,506 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Breaking Down Georgia's MASSIVE 2020 Election FRAUD with over 140 election laws and rules broken or violated. Watch them panic and try to shut the arguments down. Shocking Admissions from the State Election Board Hearing, board member Janice Johnston and officials reveal Fulton County's "improper procedures" and duplicative ballot images—scanned multiple times—during the presidential recount. Three separate counts yielded wildly inconsistent results, raising red flags about scanner errors and hidden ballots and potential manipulation. Yet, despite clear evidence of irregularities, no referral to the AG for prosecution? Justice is being purposely derailed because the ones at the top are also involved in the FRAUD. This isn't just a glitch; it's a systemic failure exposing potential high-level cover-ups involving the ones at the top, on the Election Board, the governors, Dominion, foreign countries, and the election officials themselves, in one massive election fraud operation just like Joe Biden said he put together. This is all the Ballot Categories and Counts from the Fulton County 2020 Presidential Election based on all of their own available data from the Georgia State Election Board hearing and related intel: Total Ballots Cast (Initial/Original Tabulation): 524,659 First Machine Count (Election Night): Total Cast Vote: Records: 528,776 Trump Votes: 137,240 Biden Votes: 381,144 Jorgensen Votes: 6,275 Hand Count Audit (Risk-Limiting Audit): Reported Total: Votes: 525,293 Trump Votes: 137,620 Biden Votes: 381,179 Jorgensen Votes: 6,494 Second Machine Count (Recount):Total Cast Vote: Records: 527,925 Trump Votes: 137,247 (+7 from first count) Biden Votes: 380,212 (-932 from first count) Jorgensen Votes: 6,320 (+45 from first count) Key Discrepancies and Irregularities are MASSIVE: Missing Ballot Images: First Machine Count: 376,863 missing images (out of 528,776 records) Second Machine Count: 17,852 missing images (out of 527,925 records) Duplicate Ballot Images/Scans (suggesting potential multiple counting): 3,075 duplicate images reported during recount 2,871 ballots/BMD printouts identified as counted 2-3 times in second machine count (sample analysis) 916 hand-marked paper ballots among duplicates 16,807 duplicate rows in hand count audit spreadsheet (out of 41,881 total rows) Other Discrepancies: Difference between original tabulation and hand count audit: 634 votes (0.12%) Adjusted error after omissions: 4,569 votes (0.87%) Cast vote records difference between first and second machine counts: 851 VIOLATIONS of election laws/rules: 140 Omitted Absentee Ballot Batch Sheets (ABBSs) in audit: 11 (depriving ~1,582 Trump votes, ~2,288 Biden votes, ~65 Jorgensen votes; total ~3,900 votes omitted) Biden's Georgia margin ~12,000 votes; Multiple different results and evidence of duplicates potentially effected tabulated results but is not "conclusive," but improper procedures are confirmed which point to potential fraud. But need the original ballots to confirm which they will not hand over. Not adding or including the potential of fake ballots, manipulated adjudication from on site or remotely, and not counting the recent 315,000 unauthenticated votes. Most IMPORTANTLY the actual physical ballots have still not been located or were given to the parties to examine for authenticity, conformation, matching signatures, etc., because they refused to hand them over to inspect which is now in a legal proceeding to hand them over. Why won't they hand the ballots over to be inspected? This should tell you everything you need to know and the most crucial aspect of the entire situation. They know they are fraudulent ballots or they already destroyed them, period.

The SCIF

40,962 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce