Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇺🇸❌🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump has issued an explicit warning that another Iranian retaliation could trigger an even more devastating U.S. response, saying that if Tehran keeps escalating, “they will no longer exist.” In an interview with Fox News, Trump said the United States would strike Iran much harder if Tehran... retaliates again, accusing the Iranian leadership of refusing to stop and calling them “crazy” and “stupid.” He also claimed Iran had attempted to rebuild radar capabilities after losing much of its situational awareness, but that U.S. forces waited until the work was nearly complete before striking the system again. Trump added that he sees little value in any future agreement with Tehran, arguing that Washington has already given Iran too many opportunities. The message leaves almost no diplomatic space between the two sides. Trump is signaling that Washington intends to punish every new Iranian escalation at a higher level, while also publicly dismissing the credibility of future agreements. That combination points toward a conflict increasingly driven by military coercion rather than negotiation, with each retaliatory cycle carrying a greater risk of pushing the confrontation into a much wider war. See the latest updates with us: Visionershow more

Visioner

226,848 subscribers

22,255 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Sağlık & İyilik Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

21,146 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is signaling that Tehran is ready to end the war, arguing that Iran should seek an agreement now while, in his words, it remains in a “position of strength and dignity.” 🗣️ “It is better to end the war now, while we are in a position of strength and dignity,” Pezeshkian said. He claimed that “the entire world recognizes Iran’s victory” and accused the United States of violating international norms by striking Iranian schools, hospitals and infrastructure. “Because of this, America has become an object of hatred throughout the world,” he added. Pezeshkian’s rhetoric appears designed to frame a potential end to hostilities as a victory rather than a concession, an important distinction for Tehran domestically. After a costly confrontation, Iran’s leadership needs any negotiated exit to preserve deterrence and political credibility. The key question is whether Washington is prepared to offer terms Tehran can publicly present as an honorable settlement, particularly as the Trump administration simultaneously intensifies economic pressure. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇮🇷🇺🇸⚡️ Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian is signaling that Tehran is ready to end the war, arguing that Iran should seek an agreement now while, in his words, it remains in a “position of strength and dignity.” 🗣️ “It is better to end the war now, while we are in a position of strength and dignity,” Pezeshkian said. He claimed that “the entire world recognizes Iran’s victory” and accused the United States of violating international norms by striking Iranian schools, hospitals and infrastructure. “Because of this, America has become an object of hatred throughout the world,” he added. Pezeshkian’s rhetoric appears designed to frame a potential end to hostilities as a victory rather than a concession, an important distinction for Tehran domestically. After a costly confrontation, Iran’s leadership needs any negotiated exit to preserve deterrence and political credibility. The key question is whether Washington is prepared to offer terms Tehran can publicly present as an honorable settlement, particularly as the Trump administration simultaneously intensifies economic pressure. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

31,329 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran is signaling that any U.S. economic blockade would trigger a military response rather than force Tehran to back down. Middle East analyst Joshua Landis says recent Iranian strikes were designed to warn Washington that pressure on the Strait of Hormuz would not remain an economic contest. Instead, he argues, Tehran would expand the battlefield by targeting U.S. assets and regional infrastructure, turning sanctions into a wider kinetic conflict. His assessment is that Tehran is trying to convince Washington that economic warfare cannot remain separate from military escalation. Joshua Landis

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran is signaling that any U.S. economic blockade would trigger a military response rather than force Tehran to back down. Middle East analyst Joshua Landis says recent Iranian strikes were designed to warn Washington that pressure on the Strait of Hormuz would not remain an economic contest. Instead, he argues, Tehran would expand the battlefield by targeting U.S. assets and regional infrastructure, turning sanctions into a wider kinetic conflict. His assessment is that Tehran is trying to convince Washington that economic warfare cannot remain separate from military escalation. Joshua Landis

Mario Nawfal

86,521 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the U.S is going to “hit Iran hard,” while Tehran is warning that from now on, every American attack will be met with a response “dozens of times greater.” That's an extremely dangerous change in the rules of this war. The latest U.S strike was deliberately limited: American forces hit rocket launchers on Larak Island that CENTCOM says were preparing to deploy sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz. Iran didn't respond proportionally; it launched a much larger barrage of missiles and drones toward U.S positions in the region. And that's the part that matters. Earlier in the war, Iran largely calibrated its responses because it still believed there was a deal to be made with Washington. That calculation appears to be disappearing, because Tehran believes America no longer possesses the escalation dominance it had at the beginning of the war. And Iran is now willing to prove it by deliberately responding harder than it gets hit, meaning Trump now faces a brutal dilemma. If he doesn't respond after publicly promising to “hit them hard,” Tehran can portray it as proof that American threats have lost their force. But if he does hit Iran hard, Tehran is explicitly threatening to escalate even more, and warning that no target in the region is beyond its reach. The most dangerous assumption Trump could make now is that the U.S still gets to decide where the escalation ends. Iran's telling him it has a say in that. Brandon Weichert

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the U.S is going to “hit Iran hard,” while Tehran is warning that from now on, every American attack will be met with a response “dozens of times greater.” That's an extremely dangerous change in the rules of this war. The latest U.S strike was deliberately limited: American forces hit rocket launchers on Larak Island that CENTCOM says were preparing to deploy sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz. Iran didn't respond proportionally; it launched a much larger barrage of missiles and drones toward U.S positions in the region. And that's the part that matters. Earlier in the war, Iran largely calibrated its responses because it still believed there was a deal to be made with Washington. That calculation appears to be disappearing, because Tehran believes America no longer possesses the escalation dominance it had at the beginning of the war. And Iran is now willing to prove it by deliberately responding harder than it gets hit, meaning Trump now faces a brutal dilemma. If he doesn't respond after publicly promising to “hit them hard,” Tehran can portray it as proof that American threats have lost their force. But if he does hit Iran hard, Tehran is explicitly threatening to escalate even more, and warning that no target in the region is beyond its reach. The most dangerous assumption Trump could make now is that the U.S still gets to decide where the escalation ends. Iran's telling him it has a say in that. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

339,651 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

24,929 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Iranian academic Professor Mohammad Marandi tells Krishnan Guru-Murthy that if the United States attacks Iran, they will “harm” the US and its allies. He adds that any country that “co-operates” with the United States is an “enemy of the Iranian people”. His comments come as the US announces a new round of sanctions aimed at Tehran, after President Donald Trump pledged to unleash an “economic D-Day”.

Iranian academic Professor Mohammad Marandi tells Krishnan Guru-Murthy that if the United States attacks Iran, they will “harm” the US and its allies. He adds that any country that “co-operates” with the United States is an “enemy of the Iranian people”. His comments come as the US announces a new round of sanctions aimed at Tehran, after President Donald Trump pledged to unleash an “economic D-Day”.

Channel 4 News

85,272 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING | Kan: A senior Israeli official said the United States and Iran are not close to an agreement, and that Israel is ready to return to war in Iran with American approval. “We are all waiting for Trump, but the sides are not close to agreement,” the official said. U.S. President Trump told PBS that a deal would be signed today in Pakistan, but warned that if the ceasefire expires tomorrow evening without an agreement, “many bombs will be launched.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Americans seek Iranian submission, but Iran does not surrender to force. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 BREAKING | Kan: A senior Israeli official said the United States and Iran are not close to an agreement, and that Israel is ready to return to war in Iran with American approval. “We are all waiting for Trump, but the sides are not close to agreement,” the official said. U.S. President Trump told PBS that a deal would be signed today in Pakistan, but warned that if the ceasefire expires tomorrow evening without an agreement, “many bombs will be launched.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Americans seek Iranian submission, but Iran does not surrender to force. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

41,164 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing an expansion of its military campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🔹Following a series of strikes focused on securing the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. officials suggest that the military is now preparing for more intensive operations that could target the core of Iran’s strategic infrastructure. 🔹The atmosphere of confrontation has been punctuated by sharp warnings from regional allies. Israeli leadership has made it clear that any Iranian retaliation would be met with an overwhelming response See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Donald Trump is reportedly weighing an expansion of its military campaign against the Islamic Republic of Iran. 🔹Following a series of strikes focused on securing the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. officials suggest that the military is now preparing for more intensive operations that could target the core of Iran’s strategic infrastructure. 🔹The atmosphere of confrontation has been punctuated by sharp warnings from regional allies. Israeli leadership has made it clear that any Iranian retaliation would be met with an overwhelming response See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

43,713 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

JUST NOW: President Trump has officially declared that the ceasefire with Iran is OVER!! 🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Commander-in-Chief confirmed that while the United States remains open to continued talks with Tehran, Washington no longer considers the ceasefire to be in effect. The announcement follows a major escalation after Iranian forces critically miscalculated by targeting commercial shipping lanes.😑 With the ceasefire no longer in effect, the United States will ensure the protection of global commerce, maintain maritime security, and respond firmly to any further escalation by Iran.👏

JUST NOW: President Trump has officially declared that the ceasefire with Iran is OVER!! 🇺🇸🇮🇷 The Commander-in-Chief confirmed that while the United States remains open to continued talks with Tehran, Washington no longer considers the ceasefire to be in effect. The announcement follows a major escalation after Iranian forces critically miscalculated by targeting commercial shipping lanes.😑 With the ceasefire no longer in effect, the United States will ensure the protection of global commerce, maintain maritime security, and respond firmly to any further escalation by Iran.👏

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

245,778 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump says he now considers the Strait of Hormuz “American territory,” while acknowledging that Washington faces a more basic problem in dealing with Iran: figuring out who it can actually negotiate with. Trump reiterated his claim over the strategic waterway during remarks on Friday. 🗣️ “I view the Strait of Hormuz as American territory right now. It’s American territory,” Trump said. Turning to Iran’s leadership, he added that one of his biggest problems is not knowing whom to speak with, joking that “nobody wants to be president” in Iran and that potential candidates keep saying they do not want the job. The remarks underline Washington’s increasingly aggressive posture over Hormuz. Trump is portraying U.S. military control of shipping through the strait as a strategic victory while simultaneously signaling that the political channel with Tehran is effectively broken. With negotiations stalled and both sides continuing to pressure maritime traffic, Hormuz remains one of the central points determining whether the conflict moves toward an agreement or another round of escalation. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ Donald Trump says he now considers the Strait of Hormuz “American territory,” while acknowledging that Washington faces a more basic problem in dealing with Iran: figuring out who it can actually negotiate with. Trump reiterated his claim over the strategic waterway during remarks on Friday. 🗣️ “I view the Strait of Hormuz as American territory right now. It’s American territory,” Trump said. Turning to Iran’s leadership, he added that one of his biggest problems is not knowing whom to speak with, joking that “nobody wants to be president” in Iran and that potential candidates keep saying they do not want the job. The remarks underline Washington’s increasingly aggressive posture over Hormuz. Trump is portraying U.S. military control of shipping through the strait as a strategic victory while simultaneously signaling that the political channel with Tehran is effectively broken. With negotiations stalled and both sides continuing to pressure maritime traffic, Hormuz remains one of the central points determining whether the conflict moves toward an agreement or another round of escalation. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

12,271 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🎥 Ryan Grim and Jeremy Scahill discuss how Trump’s mounting domestic crises intersect with the U.S. escalation toward Iran — and how Tehran is signaling that any attack could trigger a wider regional war. They note Trump’s recent domestic troubles, from the ICE killing in Minnesota to renewed fallout from the Epstein files, and Grim says people close to Trump see foreign confrontation as a political release valve. Citing a new Amwaj Media report based on information from Tehran insiders, Grim outlines a shift in Iranian strategy. For years, Iran has pursued calibrated, pre-announced retaliation to de-escalate tensions. Iranian officials now believe that approach backfired, inviting more U.S. and Israeli strikes by signaling restraint. The new thinking, Grim and Scahill note, is to signal that any attack would lead to an Iranian response that would spiral into a wider, prolonged, regional conflict — not the short, choreographed strikes Trump prefers and can claim to both launch and end. University of Tehran professor Foad Izadi previously told Drop Site that Tehran views the killing of 500 U.S. troops as a threshold retaliatory response to any U.S. attack. Ryan Grim | jeremy scahill | Drop Site

🎥 Ryan Grim and Jeremy Scahill discuss how Trump’s mounting domestic crises intersect with the U.S. escalation toward Iran — and how Tehran is signaling that any attack could trigger a wider regional war. They note Trump’s recent domestic troubles, from the ICE killing in Minnesota to renewed fallout from the Epstein files, and Grim says people close to Trump see foreign confrontation as a political release valve. Citing a new Amwaj Media report based on information from Tehran insiders, Grim outlines a shift in Iranian strategy. For years, Iran has pursued calibrated, pre-announced retaliation to de-escalate tensions. Iranian officials now believe that approach backfired, inviting more U.S. and Israeli strikes by signaling restraint. The new thinking, Grim and Scahill note, is to signal that any attack would lead to an Iranian response that would spiral into a wider, prolonged, regional conflict — not the short, choreographed strikes Trump prefers and can claim to both launch and end. University of Tehran professor Foad Izadi previously told Drop Site that Tehran views the killing of 500 U.S. troops as a threshold retaliatory response to any U.S. attack. Ryan Grim | jeremy scahill | Drop Site

Drop Site

24,914 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

BREAKING: President Trump tells Trey Yingst that if Iran responds to the latest U.S. strikes, it will face a much stronger military response, warning the country could be "totally wiped out" if the conflict escalates further. The president said the strikes targeted radar systems in southwestern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz as they were being rebuilt, adding that the USS George Washington is fully equipped to continue operations if needed. Trump also dismissed the prospect of a new agreement with Iran, saying previous diplomatic efforts had failed.

BREAKING: President Trump tells Trey Yingst that if Iran responds to the latest U.S. strikes, it will face a much stronger military response, warning the country could be "totally wiped out" if the conflict escalates further. The president said the strikes targeted radar systems in southwestern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz as they were being rebuilt, adding that the USS George Washington is fully equipped to continue operations if needed. Trump also dismissed the prospect of a new agreement with Iran, saying previous diplomatic efforts had failed.

Fox News

579,580 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Trump said Israel wasn't going to strike Iran. Israel struck Iran anyway. Was Trump lying, or has Netanyahu made it clear that even the President of the United States doesn't get the final say? For all the talk of Iran being weakened, it is Israel and Washington that increasingly look stupid and unable to dictate events. Tehran has emerged with greater power and leverage than before the war, and now Trump appears eager for a deal that Israel seems determined to sabotage.

Trump said Israel wasn't going to strike Iran. Israel struck Iran anyway. Was Trump lying, or has Netanyahu made it clear that even the President of the United States doesn't get the final say? For all the talk of Iran being weakened, it is Israel and Washington that increasingly look stupid and unable to dictate events. Tehran has emerged with greater power and leverage than before the war, and now Trump appears eager for a deal that Israel seems determined to sabotage.

Bushra Shaikh

16,707 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇷 BIG | The United States has issued a stark warning that could determine the next phase of the Iran crisis. As diplomatic efforts enter a critical final window, President Donald Trump has reportedly told Gulf leaders to prepare for a major escalation if Tehran fails to reach an agreement this week. The message signals that Washington is ready to increase pressure as tensions around Iran continue to threaten regional stability. According to Israeli Channel 13, the warning is aimed at pushing Iran toward a ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes. Israeli and regional officials believe the threat is designed to force Tehran back to the negotiating table, while acknowledging that a military escalation remains a real possibility. Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is calling for restraint and urging against further attacks on Gulf states, but his push for negotiations with Washington has not gained enough support inside Iran’s leadership. The coming days could become a turning point. If diplomacy fails, the United States may move from pressure tactics to direct action, risking a wider confrontation that could reshape the security and energy landscape of the entire Middle East. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️‼️🇺🇲🇮🇷 BIG | The United States has issued a stark warning that could determine the next phase of the Iran crisis. As diplomatic efforts enter a critical final window, President Donald Trump has reportedly told Gulf leaders to prepare for a major escalation if Tehran fails to reach an agreement this week. The message signals that Washington is ready to increase pressure as tensions around Iran continue to threaten regional stability. According to Israeli Channel 13, the warning is aimed at pushing Iran toward a ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes. Israeli and regional officials believe the threat is designed to force Tehran back to the negotiating table, while acknowledging that a military escalation remains a real possibility. Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is calling for restraint and urging against further attacks on Gulf states, but his push for negotiations with Washington has not gained enough support inside Iran’s leadership. The coming days could become a turning point. If diplomacy fails, the United States may move from pressure tactics to direct action, risking a wider confrontation that could reshape the security and energy landscape of the entire Middle East. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

41,885 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

My interview CNN International #newsroom: 1. Trump’s Iran Dilemma: No Good Options The fundamental problem for President Trump is that it remains unclear what his exit strategy from the confrontation with Iran actually is. What is increasingly clear, however, is that Washington has no easy options. Destroying or overthrowing the Iranian regime cannot realistically be accomplished through airpower alone. It would require a level of military commitment, resources and potentially boots on the ground that President Trump has shown little appetite for. But diplomacy is difficult as well. Returning to an agreement would require compromises that Washington has so far been unwilling to make, while maintaining the current situation is increasingly costly. The confrontation continues, energy markets remain under pressure, and the parallel escalation between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis is adding another source of instability. So Trump faces a classic strategic dilemma: escalation carries enormous risks, but maintaining the status quo is also becoming increasingly expensive. There is no obvious military solution — and no easy diplomatic one either. 2. The Houthis Serve Iranian Interests — But They Are Not Iranian Proxies It is important to distinguish between alignment and control. The Houthis clearly serve Iranian strategic interests, particularly by increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia and threatening critical energy and maritime infrastructure. But that does not mean Tehran simply gives them orders. That distinction matters because there is now an effort to convince Iran to restrain the Houthis. Pakistan, for example, has reportedly urged Tehran to use its influence with the group. But Iranian influence should not be confused with Iranian command and control. The immediate Saudi problem is becoming increasingly serious. Houthi missile and drone attacks have targeted Saudi territory and Aramco facilities, while Riyadh has struggled to obtain direct military assistance from its partners. Saudi Arabia therefore faces a dilemma remarkably similar to Washington's dilemma with Iran: escalate and risk an even larger Houthi response, or pursue an agreement that will almost certainly require significant concessions to the Houthis. Neither option is attractive. And unless there is a political arrangement, there is little reason to assume that military escalation alone will end this confrontation. 3. How Divided Is Tehran? I would be cautious about some of the reporting regarding deep divisions inside the Iranian leadership. There are certainly disagreements within Tehran about tactics, priorities and how to manage the confrontation. That is normal in the Iranian system. But when it comes to the fundamental strategy toward the United States, I see considerably more consensus than some reports suggest. The basic Iranian position appears straightforward: Tehran is unwilling to accept a regional energy order in which Gulf states continue exporting oil while Iran itself is prevented from doing so. I am also skeptical of suggestions that major missile operations could simply be conducted outside the knowledge of the senior IRGC command structure. The Iranian system has become more decentralized in some respects, but decentralization should not be confused with the absence of command and control. That does not mean every report suggesting internal disagreement is wrong. It means we should distinguish between disagreements over tactics and a genuine breakdown in strategic decision-making. 4. Why Trump’s Meeting With Gulf Leaders Matters President Trump’s planned meeting with the leaders of the six Gulf Cooperation Council states on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly could be one of the most important diplomatic meetings of this phase of the conflict. The Gulf states have their own interests, and they are not identical. But the central question for Washington will be how they view the choice between renewed escalation and a diplomatic off-ramp. My assessment is that most Gulf governments would prefer stability to another major round of war. That does not mean they are abandoning their relationship with Washington. The United States remains their most important external security partner. But the war has also reinforced an uncomfortable lesson for the Gulf states: American power is indispensable, yet relying exclusively on Washington carries risks of its own. The Gulf states therefore increasingly have an interest in maintaining multiple channels — with Washington, but also with Tehran and other major powers. That is why this meeting matters. Trump will be listening to Gulf leaders as he considers his next move toward Iran. And the message he may hear from many of them is relatively simple: #IranWar‌ #iran

My interview CNN International #newsroom: 1. Trump’s Iran Dilemma: No Good Options The fundamental problem for President Trump is that it remains unclear what his exit strategy from the confrontation with Iran actually is. What is increasingly clear, however, is that Washington has no easy options. Destroying or overthrowing the Iranian regime cannot realistically be accomplished through airpower alone. It would require a level of military commitment, resources and potentially boots on the ground that President Trump has shown little appetite for. But diplomacy is difficult as well. Returning to an agreement would require compromises that Washington has so far been unwilling to make, while maintaining the current situation is increasingly costly. The confrontation continues, energy markets remain under pressure, and the parallel escalation between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis is adding another source of instability. So Trump faces a classic strategic dilemma: escalation carries enormous risks, but maintaining the status quo is also becoming increasingly expensive. There is no obvious military solution — and no easy diplomatic one either. 2. The Houthis Serve Iranian Interests — But They Are Not Iranian Proxies It is important to distinguish between alignment and control. The Houthis clearly serve Iranian strategic interests, particularly by increasing pressure on Saudi Arabia and threatening critical energy and maritime infrastructure. But that does not mean Tehran simply gives them orders. That distinction matters because there is now an effort to convince Iran to restrain the Houthis. Pakistan, for example, has reportedly urged Tehran to use its influence with the group. But Iranian influence should not be confused with Iranian command and control. The immediate Saudi problem is becoming increasingly serious. Houthi missile and drone attacks have targeted Saudi territory and Aramco facilities, while Riyadh has struggled to obtain direct military assistance from its partners. Saudi Arabia therefore faces a dilemma remarkably similar to Washington's dilemma with Iran: escalate and risk an even larger Houthi response, or pursue an agreement that will almost certainly require significant concessions to the Houthis. Neither option is attractive. And unless there is a political arrangement, there is little reason to assume that military escalation alone will end this confrontation. 3. How Divided Is Tehran? I would be cautious about some of the reporting regarding deep divisions inside the Iranian leadership. There are certainly disagreements within Tehran about tactics, priorities and how to manage the confrontation. That is normal in the Iranian system. But when it comes to the fundamental strategy toward the United States, I see considerably more consensus than some reports suggest. The basic Iranian position appears straightforward: Tehran is unwilling to accept a regional energy order in which Gulf states continue exporting oil while Iran itself is prevented from doing so. I am also skeptical of suggestions that major missile operations could simply be conducted outside the knowledge of the senior IRGC command structure. The Iranian system has become more decentralized in some respects, but decentralization should not be confused with the absence of command and control. That does not mean every report suggesting internal disagreement is wrong. It means we should distinguish between disagreements over tactics and a genuine breakdown in strategic decision-making. 4. Why Trump’s Meeting With Gulf Leaders Matters President Trump’s planned meeting with the leaders of the six Gulf Cooperation Council states on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly could be one of the most important diplomatic meetings of this phase of the conflict. The Gulf states have their own interests, and they are not identical. But the central question for Washington will be how they view the choice between renewed escalation and a diplomatic off-ramp. My assessment is that most Gulf governments would prefer stability to another major round of war. That does not mean they are abandoning their relationship with Washington. The United States remains their most important external security partner. But the war has also reinforced an uncomfortable lesson for the Gulf states: American power is indispensable, yet relying exclusively on Washington carries risks of its own. The Gulf states therefore increasingly have an interest in maintaining multiple channels — with Washington, but also with Tehran and other major powers. That is why this meeting matters. Trump will be listening to Gulf leaders as he considers his next move toward Iran. And the message he may hear from many of them is relatively simple: #IranWar‌ #iran

Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش

18,651 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

President Trump issued a sharp warning to Iran following the collapse of a military agreement, saying U.S. forces carried out major strikes overnight that destroyed key Iranian military equipment. “Most of their equipment is gone. Their anti-aircraft guns, we hit them very hard last night,” Trump said. He added that every Iranian drone launch is met with U.S. strikes, saying the agreement “was broken” and warning the U.S. will “keep the Strait and we’ll probably run it.”

President Trump issued a sharp warning to Iran following the collapse of a military agreement, saying U.S. forces carried out major strikes overnight that destroyed key Iranian military equipment. “Most of their equipment is gone. Their anti-aircraft guns, we hit them very hard last night,” Trump said. He added that every Iranian drone launch is met with U.S. strikes, saying the agreement “was broken” and warning the U.S. will “keep the Strait and we’ll probably run it.”

Breaking911

95,009 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be running out of military options Washington’s central objective is still restoring Hormuz to its pre-war status. Pravin's problem: Iran has no intention of allowing it. “Honestly, the only option is that he has no option.” Sawhney believes Trump cannot simply abandon the blockade without conceding the new reality Tehran is trying to impose, while further escalation risks an Iranian response Washington may struggle to contain. That leaves the U.S. in an ugly position. Too invested to leave. Too constrained to win on its original terms. Pravin Sawhney

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be running out of military options Washington’s central objective is still restoring Hormuz to its pre-war status. Pravin's problem: Iran has no intention of allowing it. “Honestly, the only option is that he has no option.” Sawhney believes Trump cannot simply abandon the blockade without conceding the new reality Tehran is trying to impose, while further escalation risks an Iranian response Washington may struggle to contain. That leaves the U.S. in an ugly position. Too invested to leave. Too constrained to win on its original terms. Pravin Sawhney

Mario Nawfal

45,865 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

PEZESHKIAN: “WE DID REACH AN AGREEMENT WITH TRUMP.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Tehran and Washington had already agreed on a framework — and Iran is still willing to move forward. He also claims Iran never closed the Strait of Hormuz and was attacked “without any legal justification.” The message from Tehran tonight: we had a deal, we kept Hormuz open, and the U.S. chose war anyway. That is Iran’s version of events — and it is now being pushed publicly as Tehran signals renewed interest in negotiations.

PEZESHKIAN: “WE DID REACH AN AGREEMENT WITH TRUMP.” Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian says Tehran and Washington had already agreed on a framework — and Iran is still willing to move forward. He also claims Iran never closed the Strait of Hormuz and was attacked “without any legal justification.” The message from Tehran tonight: we had a deal, we kept Hormuz open, and the U.S. chose war anyway. That is Iran’s version of events — and it is now being pushed publicly as Tehran signals renewed interest in negotiations.

Mossad Commentary

36,328 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

⭕️ Trump Threatens New Strikes on Iran, Says U.S. Will “Take Out Pickaxe Mountain” President Donald Trump issued a series of new threats against Iran during an interview on The Hugh Hewitt Show, saying the U.S. is preparing further attacks and dismissing the possibility of reviving the collapsed memorandum of understanding. ➤ On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site: Trump said the location is “on the list” and being closely watched. While claiming the U.S. has seen no activity there, he said Washington would “probably give Pickaxe a shot relatively soon” and later declared: “We’re going to take out Pickaxe Mountain.” ➤ Trump said the U.S. would strike Iran “very hard tonight” and again tomorrow, adding that “there’s not a damn thing they can do about it.” ➤ On the failed MOU: Trump described the agreement as a “test” rather than a deal, claiming Iran repeatedly walked away from it after negotiations had been settled. He called Iranian officials “extremely unreliable” and said agreements with them are “made to be broken.” ➤ On Iran’s leadership: Trump said the U.S. had already “knocked out” two Iranian governments and taken out “about 25%” of the current leadership. Asked whether the U.S. knew the locations of remaining senior officials, he said: “Yeah, I do,” but declined to provide details. ➤ On Iran’s nuclear program: Trump claimed Iran would use a nuclear weapon “within one day” if it obtained one and said the U.S. destroys Iranian nuclear capabilities whenever new activity is detected. ➤ On anti-government protests: Trump discouraged Iranians from returning to the streets unless they were armed, arguing that government forces would kill demonstrators. He claimed, without providing evidence, that the Iranian government has killed 52,000 people, a figure about 10 times higher than documented estimates from pro-regime change groups.

⭕️ Trump Threatens New Strikes on Iran, Says U.S. Will “Take Out Pickaxe Mountain” President Donald Trump issued a series of new threats against Iran during an interview on The Hugh Hewitt Show, saying the U.S. is preparing further attacks and dismissing the possibility of reviving the collapsed memorandum of understanding. ➤ On Iran’s Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site: Trump said the location is “on the list” and being closely watched. While claiming the U.S. has seen no activity there, he said Washington would “probably give Pickaxe a shot relatively soon” and later declared: “We’re going to take out Pickaxe Mountain.” ➤ Trump said the U.S. would strike Iran “very hard tonight” and again tomorrow, adding that “there’s not a damn thing they can do about it.” ➤ On the failed MOU: Trump described the agreement as a “test” rather than a deal, claiming Iran repeatedly walked away from it after negotiations had been settled. He called Iranian officials “extremely unreliable” and said agreements with them are “made to be broken.” ➤ On Iran’s leadership: Trump said the U.S. had already “knocked out” two Iranian governments and taken out “about 25%” of the current leadership. Asked whether the U.S. knew the locations of remaining senior officials, he said: “Yeah, I do,” but declined to provide details. ➤ On Iran’s nuclear program: Trump claimed Iran would use a nuclear weapon “within one day” if it obtained one and said the U.S. destroys Iranian nuclear capabilities whenever new activity is detected. ➤ On anti-government protests: Trump discouraged Iranians from returning to the streets unless they were armed, arguing that government forces would kill demonstrators. He claimed, without providing evidence, that the Iranian government has killed 52,000 people, a figure about 10 times higher than documented estimates from pro-regime change groups.

Drop Site

32,175 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce