Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨DONJON DISCLOSED LASER PASSWORD RESET TO TANGEM IN FEBRUARY, PUBLISHED JULY! Ledger’s Donjon team privately notified Tangem about the laser fault injection vulnerability back on February 10, 2026, nearly 5 months before going public. Tangem’s no-firmware-update design (immutable cards) is marketed as a security strength against supply-chain attacks… but...

crypto_banter's profile picture

Crypto Banter

440,287 subscribers

20,650 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We’re going back to the Moon on February 6, and no one is talking about it Artemis II is NASA’s first crewed Moon flyby mission in decades, sending four astronauts around the Moon and back in a ~10-day test flight before future lunar landings Who excited?
1:01

We’re going back to the Moon on February 6, and no one is talking about it Artemis II is NASA’s first crewed Moon flyby mission in decades, sending four astronauts around the Moon and back in a ~10-day test flight before future lunar landings Who excited?

Kekius Maximus

184,709 views • 8 months ago

$BTC update 30th January 2026 These video updates are for educational purposes only and should never be considered as investment or trading advice. Always do your OWN analysis and follow your own system. $BTC has rallied only 20% out of the pivot and given it all back into the mid-cycle. This is a negative occurrence and many alt coins are trading below macro pivots. The low tf patterns are suggestive of a low due in early February but any rally is 'likely' to fail and as we know a VIX trough is pending. And the supply and demand relationship is set out on video. As always, thanks to those who support the feed with a retweet or a comment. For those interested the 20% Level 2 offer ends on the 1st February 2026.
12:58

$BTC update 30th January 2026 These video updates are for educational purposes only and should never be considered as investment or trading advice. Always do your OWN analysis and follow your own system. $BTC has rallied only 20% out of the pivot and given it all back into the mid-cycle. This is a negative occurrence and many alt coins are trading below macro pivots. The low tf patterns are suggestive of a low due in early February but any rally is 'likely' to fail and as we know a VIX trough is pending. And the supply and demand relationship is set out on video. As always, thanks to those who support the feed with a retweet or a comment. For those interested the 20% Level 2 offer ends on the 1st February 2026.

venture

61,816 views • 8 months ago

🔥🚨BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Villagers in Peru have begun conducting night patrols in what they claim is an attempt to protect their loved ones from recent attacks that they are blaming on what they call “Pelacaras” or Aliens and UFOs that they alleged started in July this year. This video was posted two days ago by natives but it’s actually a live news airing in Peru on February 3, 2020. The recent videos can be found by searching “Pelacaras.” No media company is currently covering this. I will be looking into these claims of ‘children attacked with laser weapons,’ to ‘warnings of not to go to Peru from government officials.”
0:20

🔥🚨BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Villagers in Peru have begun conducting night patrols in what they claim is an attempt to protect their loved ones from recent attacks that they are blaming on what they call “Pelacaras” or Aliens and UFOs that they alleged started in July this year. This video was posted two days ago by natives but it’s actually a live news airing in Peru on February 3, 2020. The recent videos can be found by searching “Pelacaras.” No media company is currently covering this. I will be looking into these claims of ‘children attacked with laser weapons,’ to ‘warnings of not to go to Peru from government officials.”

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

726,194 views • 2 years ago

Secret Wellington Hearing: NZ Govt Admits Ignoring Vaccine Harm Data - Barry Young & Steve Kirsch Update on Whistleblower Court Case Barry Young & Steve Kirsch provide this post-Voir Dire update after the secretive Wellington District Court hearing where the public was barred, and the window in the door covered over. There will no February court appearance for Barry. The decision will be notified in documentation. In February 2026, when the judge publicises his decision, there are two choices: either Barry is deemed to be a “Whistleblower” (Data scrutiny will then possible, and the trial will end), or he will not be deemed to be a Whistleblower and the matter will proceed to full trial (that will require depositions of Health NZ officials and their paid epidemiologists, and a jury will be reminded that NO full analysis of Barry’s record level Data has been completed by Health NZ, even as it pursued this futile case against this brave Whistleblower). Checkmate either way. Ruling due February - stay tuned. Share widely & Support Barry. FreeNZ
1:17:03

Secret Wellington Hearing: NZ Govt Admits Ignoring Vaccine Harm Data - Barry Young & Steve Kirsch Update on Whistleblower Court Case Barry Young & Steve Kirsch provide this post-Voir Dire update after the secretive Wellington District Court hearing where the public was barred, and the window in the door covered over. There will no February court appearance for Barry. The decision will be notified in documentation. In February 2026, when the judge publicises his decision, there are two choices: either Barry is deemed to be a “Whistleblower” (Data scrutiny will then possible, and the trial will end), or he will not be deemed to be a Whistleblower and the matter will proceed to full trial (that will require depositions of Health NZ officials and their paid epidemiologists, and a jury will be reminded that NO full analysis of Barry’s record level Data has been completed by Health NZ, even as it pursued this futile case against this brave Whistleblower). Checkmate either way. Ruling due February - stay tuned. Share widely & Support Barry. FreeNZ

Liz Gunn

14,401 views • 8 months ago

Marcus Thompson (Marcus Thompson II) on his takeaway from the Mike Dunleavy Jr. press conference: "It sounded like we're about 6 months away from the plug being pulled on this era. Essentially the trade deadline is February 11th and the new talking point is 'Hey, we got expiring contracts, $100 million.' Those are only valuable up until February 11th, so you got 6 months. It's 6 months and really less when the season starts on October 21st, so you're really looking at 4 months to prove this team is worth keeping together. If not, you cash in them chips. It's probably 6 months left for the Draymond Green era. He's on a 1 year deal, $27.8 million, and doesn't have a no-trade clause, so that's a very tradable contract. It felt like this has been coming for a while, but this, the way Dunleavy was talking, and the way they positioned it, this feels like 'Alright, let's see where we are in February because if we're not where we need to be, then we're just going to start selling pieces off and starting over.' That's what it felt like to me. I don't know how you felt about it, but the talk about $100 million, the talk about still waiting to make a move, these are chips that have to be used by February 11th. There's no more Kuminga chip. There's no more young talent to trade. The last chips are these expiring contracts. That is Jimmy Butler. That is Draymond Green. That is Kristaps Porzingis. It's these big pieces that they can essentially cash in and if they cash in 1, they might as well cash in all of them because I don't know what 1 is giving you to make you keep the other 2."
2:16

Marcus Thompson (Marcus Thompson II) on his takeaway from the Mike Dunleavy Jr. press conference: "It sounded like we're about 6 months away from the plug being pulled on this era. Essentially the trade deadline is February 11th and the new talking point is 'Hey, we got expiring contracts, $100 million.' Those are only valuable up until February 11th, so you got 6 months. It's 6 months and really less when the season starts on October 21st, so you're really looking at 4 months to prove this team is worth keeping together. If not, you cash in them chips. It's probably 6 months left for the Draymond Green era. He's on a 1 year deal, $27.8 million, and doesn't have a no-trade clause, so that's a very tradable contract. It felt like this has been coming for a while, but this, the way Dunleavy was talking, and the way they positioned it, this feels like 'Alright, let's see where we are in February because if we're not where we need to be, then we're just going to start selling pieces off and starting over.' That's what it felt like to me. I don't know how you felt about it, but the talk about $100 million, the talk about still waiting to make a move, these are chips that have to be used by February 11th. There's no more Kuminga chip. There's no more young talent to trade. The last chips are these expiring contracts. That is Jimmy Butler. That is Draymond Green. That is Kristaps Porzingis. It's these big pieces that they can essentially cash in and if they cash in 1, they might as well cash in all of them because I don't know what 1 is giving you to make you keep the other 2."

Chef

24,216 views • 1 month ago

THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS** And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable... For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here. But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue. Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency. 🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering: - Offshore wind - Electricity grids - Battery storage - Carbon capture - Hydrogen These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**. 🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view** For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public. No press release. No ministerial statement. No scrutiny. 🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released. No announcement. No explanation. It simply appears on a government website. The timing and the silence raise immediate questions. 🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details. Across multiple interviews, he: - Dodges direct questions - Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation” - Avoids explaining what China gains - Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence - Refuses to publish the full text or annexes This is not transparency This is avoidance 🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks: - Strategic dependence - Supply‑chain vulnerability - Loss of control over critical components Miliband does not address these warnings directly. 🔹 TODAY — Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines This is the moment everything changes. Asbestos is banned in the UK. It is a known carcinogen Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**. This is no longer a theoretical risk. This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China. THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER: 1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long? A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement. 2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects? The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work. 3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components? If yes, why was the public not informed? If no, why were safety checks inadequate? 4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components? Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent. 5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans? Partial transparency is not transparency. 6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports? This is a matter of public health and national security. 7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level? The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.” **WHY THIS MATTERS** This is not about geopolitics. This is not about party politics. This is about: - Public safety - Regulatory integrity - National infrastructure - Transparency in government When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials. The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue. It is now a **public‑interest emergency** Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour. Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts. Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts. IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL
4:31

THE MILIBAND BROTHERS: CRIME SYNDICATE THE TIMELINE THAT NOW DEMANDS ANSWERS** And why today’s asbestos revelation makes Miliband’s silence untenable... For more than a year, the government has insisted that the UK–China “clean energy partnership” is nothing unusual — just routine cooperation, nothing to see here. But the timeline tells a very different story, and today’s news about asbestos found IN Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines turns this from a policy debate into a public‑safety and national‑security issue. Here is the sequence of events that now requires full transparency. 🔹 March 2025 — Ed Miliband signs a Memorandum of Understanding with China He travels to Beijing and signs a wide‑ranging MoU covering: - Offshore wind - Electricity grids - Battery storage - Carbon capture - Hydrogen These are not minor areas. These are **critical national‑infrastructure sectors**. 🔹 March 2025 – February 2026 — The MoU is kept out of public view** For almost a year, the agreement is not published, not debated in Parliament, and not disclosed to the public. No press release. No ministerial statement. No scrutiny. 🔹 27 February 2026 — The MoU is quietly released. No announcement. No explanation. It simply appears on a government website. The timing and the silence raise immediate questions. 🔹 Spring 2026 — Miliband repeatedly refuses to release the full details. Across multiple interviews, he: - Dodges direct questions - Repeats scripted lines about “normal cooperation” - Avoids explaining what China gains - Avoids explaining what UK infrastructure China may influence - Refuses to publish the full text or annexes This is not transparency This is avoidance 🔹 June 2026 — RUSI warns of deepening UK dependence on Chinese supply chains A respected defence think tank warns that the UK’s offshore‑wind expansion risks: - Strategic dependence - Supply‑chain vulnerability - Loss of control over critical components Miliband does not address these warnings directly. 🔹 TODAY — Asbestos found in Chinese‑manufactured wind turbines This is the moment everything changes. Asbestos is banned in the UK. It is a known carcinogen Its presence in imported turbine components is a **major regulatory failure**. This is no longer a theoretical risk. This is a **real‑world safety breach** involving the very sector Miliband has tied to deeper cooperation with China. THE QUESTIONS ED MILIBAND MUST NOW ANSWER: 1. Why did you refuse to release the full China MoU for so long? A year‑long delay followed by a quiet publication is not normal practice for a major international agreement. 2. Does the MoU expand Chinese involvement in UK offshore wind projects? The public deserves clarity on whether Chinese firms gain access to UK tenders, supply chains, or grid‑related work. 3. Were you aware of asbestos risks in imported turbine components? If yes, why was the public not informed? If no, why were safety checks inadequate? 4. What due‑diligence processes exist for foreign‑manufactured renewable‑energy components? Today’s revelation suggests they are either weak or non‑existent. 5. Will you now publish the full MoU, including annexes, technical notes, and implementation plans? Partial transparency is not transparency. 6. How will the government ensure that UK infrastructure is not compromised by unsafe or non‑compliant imports? This is a matter of public health and national security. 7. Why should the public trust your assurances when the supply chain has already failed at the most basic safety level? The asbestos discovery undermines every claim of “routine cooperation” and “nothing to worry about.” **WHY THIS MATTERS** This is not about geopolitics. This is not about party politics. This is about: - Public safety - Regulatory integrity - National infrastructure - Transparency in government When a minister signs an agreement with a foreign power covering critical infrastructure, the public has the right to know **exactly** what was agreed — especially when components from that same country are now found to contain banned carcinogenic materials. The refusal to release the MoU is no longer a procedural issue. It is now a **public‑interest emergency** Given The Potential Corruption of Two Brothers from the Marxist End of Labour. Ed handing out Huge Green Energy Contracts. Brother David sitting on the Board of a company seeking to make money from the same Contracts. IT IS TIME PARLIAMENT, AND THE POLICE TOOK AN INTEREST IN THE CHINESE DEAL

Pete Sanford

106,351 views • 3 months ago

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset... published through the BlackRock Investment Institute... [And] Trump's job is... to get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (David Nino Rodriguez) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Fitts: "So for 500 years, Nino, we've had an economic model in the Western world called central banking warfare. And I'll explain why, but let me just explain. The central bankers met and reviewed a plan called the Going Direct Reset in August 2019 at Jackson Hole. If you come to Solari, we have, you know, a book this thick on the whole thing and what the reset is. "Every 100 years, every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset. Okay? And, and the plan was, was, organized and published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. Remember Larry Fink, who's now the acting head of World Economic Forum? Okay, so we are in a reset, and that's what it is. Trump's job is to get whole parts of society going along with it, okay? Nino: "To make it as painless as possible?" Fitts: "To get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap."
1:23

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset... published through the BlackRock Investment Institute... [And] Trump's job is... to get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (David Nino Rodriguez) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Fitts: "So for 500 years, Nino, we've had an economic model in the Western world called central banking warfare. And I'll explain why, but let me just explain. The central bankers met and reviewed a plan called the Going Direct Reset in August 2019 at Jackson Hole. If you come to Solari, we have, you know, a book this thick on the whole thing and what the reset is. "Every 100 years, every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset. Okay? And, and the plan was, was, organized and published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. Remember Larry Fink, who's now the acting head of World Economic Forum? Okay, so we are in a reset, and that's what it is. Trump's job is to get whole parts of society going along with it, okay? Nino: "To make it as painless as possible?" Fitts: "To get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap."

Sense Receptor

119,668 views • 7 months ago

🔥 Clear Signing on Safe is here — with Ledger Multisig. Tens of billions in assets are secured by Safe, the gold standard for onchain multisig. But nearly every team using it shares the same fatal flaw: blind signing. You’re asked to approve a treasury transaction, and all you see is a random hex string. You’re forced to trust your browser. That’s not security. That’s a gamble. And a lot of people are losing at this game. Today, we’re fixing it. Introducing Ledger Multisig, built on Safe, powered by Ledger’s world-class hardware security. It’s the missing link: the security and clarity layer every multisig should have. With Ledger Multisig, Clear Signing comes to every collective operation. No more guessing. Every transaction, amount, destination, contract function, is displayed in plain English on your Ledger’s Secure Screen. What you see is what you sign. Always. For existing Safe users, the transition is instant. No migrations. No setup pain. Just connect your Ledger, your Safes appear, now protected by Ledger security and Transaction Checks. It just works. We’re launching on EVMs today, securing Safe first, and expanding fast. Support for Solana Squads and native Bitcoin multisig is already in development. Our goal: a universal security layer for all on-chain collaboration. And the best part? Ledger Multisig is free. No extra cost. No complexity. Now there’s truly no excuse to blind-sign a treasury transaction. No excuse to “trust” an interface. No excuse for compromise. Secure your collective assets, today.
0:46

🔥 Clear Signing on Safe is here — with Ledger Multisig. Tens of billions in assets are secured by Safe, the gold standard for onchain multisig. But nearly every team using it shares the same fatal flaw: blind signing. You’re asked to approve a treasury transaction, and all you see is a random hex string. You’re forced to trust your browser. That’s not security. That’s a gamble. And a lot of people are losing at this game. Today, we’re fixing it. Introducing Ledger Multisig, built on Safe, powered by Ledger’s world-class hardware security. It’s the missing link: the security and clarity layer every multisig should have. With Ledger Multisig, Clear Signing comes to every collective operation. No more guessing. Every transaction, amount, destination, contract function, is displayed in plain English on your Ledger’s Secure Screen. What you see is what you sign. Always. For existing Safe users, the transition is instant. No migrations. No setup pain. Just connect your Ledger, your Safes appear, now protected by Ledger security and Transaction Checks. It just works. We’re launching on EVMs today, securing Safe first, and expanding fast. Support for Solana Squads and native Bitcoin multisig is already in development. Our goal: a universal security layer for all on-chain collaboration. And the best part? Ledger Multisig is free. No extra cost. No complexity. Now there’s truly no excuse to blind-sign a treasury transaction. No excuse to “trust” an interface. No excuse for compromise. Secure your collective assets, today.

Charles Guillemet

183,536 views • 11 months ago

$60,000 balance seen on an EBT card “The largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. Nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.” “One of the ways that people commit food stamp fraud or SNAP fraud is you get a card and it's got a certain amount of value to it, then you sell it for less than the value of what you can buy in terms of food, but you sell it for cash. It creates incentives for people to, number one, acquire as many cards as possible, number two, to keep as high a balance on these cards as possible. I've seen cards as much as $20,000, this was on an EBT card. So how does that happen — People are just kept on the program for years, and they keep rolling these balances up and whether they're using the card or not. they're supposed to get rid of it and expunge the benefits after 9 months. But if all you go and do is buy a stick of gum once every 9 months, your balance in your card, even if you're no longer on SNAP, that card is still good. It's happening across the country. In fact, the largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. No- nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.”
1:04

$60,000 balance seen on an EBT card “The largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. Nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.” “One of the ways that people commit food stamp fraud or SNAP fraud is you get a card and it's got a certain amount of value to it, then you sell it for less than the value of what you can buy in terms of food, but you sell it for cash. It creates incentives for people to, number one, acquire as many cards as possible, number two, to keep as high a balance on these cards as possible. I've seen cards as much as $20,000, this was on an EBT card. So how does that happen — People are just kept on the program for years, and they keep rolling these balances up and whether they're using the card or not. they're supposed to get rid of it and expunge the benefits after 9 months. But if all you go and do is buy a stick of gum once every 9 months, your balance in your card, even if you're no longer on SNAP, that card is still good. It's happening across the country. In fact, the largest that I've heard about is right at around $60,000 on an EBT card. No- nobody's going hungry in that house, obviously.”

Wall Street Apes

737,232 views • 10 months ago

The MOD has launched Project PANOPTES to deliver Directed Energy weapons for C-UAS in the Land environment. Although they say they are "open" to workable alternatives, de facto the requirement calls for a laser. The project is to develop through 2 phases: P1 will be a 2-stage downselections. P2 will start from the full proposal matured through P1 and Evaluate. Phase 1 is aiming for start November - December this year and last no more than 6 months. The requirements call for a system comprising of Passive RF detection, with the weapon capable of Continuous 100 KW power, with 150 KW peak. The solution must weight no more than 1,200 kg and fit on a 463L NATO pallet (2.74 x 2.24 m). Significantly, among the Standards data/messaging systems it must be integrated with, appears the Modular Integrated Protection System (MIPS), aka the MoD proprietary system for Active Defence of armoured vehicles. As the laser is being required to be "compatible" down the line with installation on suitable Uncrewed Ground Vehicles, you can see the underlying reasoning: MIPS, with its sensors (as we have seen on the AJAX BLACKJAX demonstrator, most notably) sees the incoming drone threat and tasks the accompanying laser with defeat. The kill must happen at ranges of at least 500 meters, to 1+ km ideally. The good: they are now looking for a significantly more powerful laser. The bad: the actual deployment of a laser capability on Land is being slowed down. In December 2024, then Minister Maria Eagle was still promising that Land Directed Energy Weapons would come into service in 2027, effectively on the back of project SWINTON. In June 2025 a Preliminary Market Notice for Land DEW was published. It was supposed to go to tender soon after to field a first few land lasers but, for all i know, it went nowhere. (Unless the MoD bought something from either Raytheon or EOS in secret) Project SWINTON, you might remember, demonstrated a Raytheon laser on a WOLFHOUND during the course of 2024, on the back of contracts signed in 2021. The SWINTON laser is a 15 KW system. It killed BQ-400 target drones at distances of up to 1 km. The palletized laser mount can fit on pickups. Targeting was delivered through the use of BLIGHTER A800 3D radar. PANOPTES wants a far more powerful laser with a similar footprint (and this is by now eminently feasible) but the negative part is that the wait to actually field something will be longer. Assuming this does make it to the field.
0:38

The MOD has launched Project PANOPTES to deliver Directed Energy weapons for C-UAS in the Land environment. Although they say they are "open" to workable alternatives, de facto the requirement calls for a laser. The project is to develop through 2 phases: P1 will be a 2-stage downselections. P2 will start from the full proposal matured through P1 and Evaluate. Phase 1 is aiming for start November - December this year and last no more than 6 months. The requirements call for a system comprising of Passive RF detection, with the weapon capable of Continuous 100 KW power, with 150 KW peak. The solution must weight no more than 1,200 kg and fit on a 463L NATO pallet (2.74 x 2.24 m). Significantly, among the Standards data/messaging systems it must be integrated with, appears the Modular Integrated Protection System (MIPS), aka the MoD proprietary system for Active Defence of armoured vehicles. As the laser is being required to be "compatible" down the line with installation on suitable Uncrewed Ground Vehicles, you can see the underlying reasoning: MIPS, with its sensors (as we have seen on the AJAX BLACKJAX demonstrator, most notably) sees the incoming drone threat and tasks the accompanying laser with defeat. The kill must happen at ranges of at least 500 meters, to 1+ km ideally. The good: they are now looking for a significantly more powerful laser. The bad: the actual deployment of a laser capability on Land is being slowed down. In December 2024, then Minister Maria Eagle was still promising that Land Directed Energy Weapons would come into service in 2027, effectively on the back of project SWINTON. In June 2025 a Preliminary Market Notice for Land DEW was published. It was supposed to go to tender soon after to field a first few land lasers but, for all i know, it went nowhere. (Unless the MoD bought something from either Raytheon or EOS in secret) Project SWINTON, you might remember, demonstrated a Raytheon laser on a WOLFHOUND during the course of 2024, on the back of contracts signed in 2021. The SWINTON laser is a 15 KW system. It killed BQ-400 target drones at distances of up to 1 km. The palletized laser mount can fit on pickups. Targeting was delivered through the use of BLIGHTER A800 3D radar. PANOPTES wants a far more powerful laser with a similar footprint (and this is by now eminently feasible) but the negative part is that the wait to actually field something will be longer. Assuming this does make it to the field.

Gabriele Molinelli

22,036 views • 1 month ago

Josh Hokit confronts Alex Pereira in public 🚨😬 and Alex Pereira on Josh Hokit not having the same energy when it is just the two of them with no security 😅😬 verses Josh Hokit when he is protected by security or distance 😅. 🗣️“It’s easy to say when there is a lot of security around eh, people to stop anything that could happen.” 🗣️“Earlier on the same day I see him I say Chama he just look turn around and kept going there was no security to stop over there right so it’s easy to say when there’s a lot of people but what about when it’s just you and me 😭😬.” via Ariel Helwani & UFC
0:30

Josh Hokit confronts Alex Pereira in public 🚨😬 and Alex Pereira on Josh Hokit not having the same energy when it is just the two of them with no security 😅😬 verses Josh Hokit when he is protected by security or distance 😅. 🗣️“It’s easy to say when there is a lot of security around eh, people to stop anything that could happen.” 🗣️“Earlier on the same day I see him I say Chama he just look turn around and kept going there was no security to stop over there right so it’s easy to say when there’s a lot of people but what about when it’s just you and me 😭😬.” via Ariel Helwani & UFC

Nofanboymma

61,348 views • 3 months ago

Every time you buy a coin, someone is looking to DUMP ON YOUR HEAD. You must DRILL this into your mind as a trader: “Every coin has a team that might have bundled it and is waiting to rug. But even if there’s no bundle, there are people who got in early, they’re in profit, and they’re waiting to sell” “When you buy a token, you are the most recent person to have bought it. That means people bought before you and they’re going to sell”
0:42

Every time you buy a coin, someone is looking to DUMP ON YOUR HEAD. You must DRILL this into your mind as a trader: “Every coin has a team that might have bundled it and is waiting to rug. But even if there’s no bundle, there are people who got in early, they’re in profit, and they’re waiting to sell” “When you buy a token, you are the most recent person to have bought it. That means people bought before you and they’re going to sell”

rasmr

41,524 views • 2 months ago

Bolton: This is not quite as bad, as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan, but it certainly reminds one of that. The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow. So the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin. I have a feeling this is sliding very quickly in Russia's direction. We're not quite back at February the 28th in the oval office, when Trump told Zelenskyy, you don't have any cards. But what's happening is that Russia and the United States are discussing what terms they're going to present to Zelenskyy. And it may well be that, Zelenskyy has no choice I have to say, from the strategic perspective, from the U.S. Interests perspective, this was not good
1:46

Bolton: This is not quite as bad, as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan, but it certainly reminds one of that. The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow. So the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin. I have a feeling this is sliding very quickly in Russia's direction. We're not quite back at February the 28th in the oval office, when Trump told Zelenskyy, you don't have any cards. But what's happening is that Russia and the United States are discussing what terms they're going to present to Zelenskyy. And it may well be that, Zelenskyy has no choice I have to say, from the strategic perspective, from the U.S. Interests perspective, this was not good

Acyn

1,680,246 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk on untraceable government payment systems: The main federal payments system, known as PAM, processes nearly $5 trillion a year, roughly $1 billion every hour When it was reviewed, payments could be sent without a categorization code and without any description No clear trail. No explanation. Essentially blank, untraceable checks This is the kind of thing that if it was done as a public company, the company would be immediately delisted and the executive team would be thrown in prison But this is just normal for the government That contrast says everything about the accountability gap
0:40

Elon Musk on untraceable government payment systems: The main federal payments system, known as PAM, processes nearly $5 trillion a year, roughly $1 billion every hour When it was reviewed, payments could be sent without a categorization code and without any description No clear trail. No explanation. Essentially blank, untraceable checks This is the kind of thing that if it was done as a public company, the company would be immediately delisted and the executive team would be thrown in prison But this is just normal for the government That contrast says everything about the accountability gap

X Freeze

241,868 views • 9 months ago

🚨The sewer that is the British polling industry laid bare: JLPartners is a British polling company run by a former Theresa May staffer and a former CCHQ staffer. This pollster released a poll today claiming only 8% of the public knows who Rupert Lowe MP is. This is obviously nonsense, especially when you find out that the same pollster found that 14% of the public recognised him this time last year. They honestly expect you to believe that the number of people recognising Rupert fell by nearly half in the last 12 months. What’s also interesting is that Nigel Farage MP seemed to know about this poll early this morning at his press conference. So how did Farage get his hands on that poll before it was released publicly? As Peter Hitchens says “polls are a device for influencing public opinion, not a device for measuring it”. SW1 is a corrupt sewer. This is what we’re up against.
0:58

🚨The sewer that is the British polling industry laid bare: JLPartners is a British polling company run by a former Theresa May staffer and a former CCHQ staffer. This pollster released a poll today claiming only 8% of the public knows who Rupert Lowe MP is. This is obviously nonsense, especially when you find out that the same pollster found that 14% of the public recognised him this time last year. They honestly expect you to believe that the number of people recognising Rupert fell by nearly half in the last 12 months. What’s also interesting is that Nigel Farage MP seemed to know about this poll early this morning at his press conference. So how did Farage get his hands on that poll before it was released publicly? As Peter Hitchens says “polls are a device for influencing public opinion, not a device for measuring it”. SW1 is a corrupt sewer. This is what we’re up against.

Wolf 🐺

28,699 views • 7 months ago

🚨 IT'S GETTING WORSE Anthropic just hit a $1 TRILLION valuation on secondary markets. Before the product even has a public price. This is what late stage mania looks like. People are paying a huge premium just to get in early. But almost nobody sees the real problem. In February they were valued at $380 billion. A 300% pump in just two months. On Solana, tokenized shares surged 850% in six months, from $122 to over $1,180. The problem is what you're actually buying. Synthetic tokens only track Anthropic's price. No rights. No dividends. No ownership. One trader is sitting on $1.5 million in unrealized profit, while owning 31% of the entire token supply. When he tried to sell, the best offer was 34% below the current price. His massive profit exists only on the screen. That's a classic liquidity trap. And this is exactly the same pattern we’re seeing across the entire AI sector. Anthropic, OpenAI and others are racing toward IPOs in late 2026. The market cannot absorb trillions in new supply at these valuations. When the selling starts, there won't be enough buyers. Remember, I've called every major top and bottom for 10 years, including the exact $16K bottom three years ago and the $111K top in October. Now, I’m calling the AI peak. Turn on notifications. When the bubble pops, I'll call it here publicly, like I always do.
0:21

🚨 IT'S GETTING WORSE Anthropic just hit a $1 TRILLION valuation on secondary markets. Before the product even has a public price. This is what late stage mania looks like. People are paying a huge premium just to get in early. But almost nobody sees the real problem. In February they were valued at $380 billion. A 300% pump in just two months. On Solana, tokenized shares surged 850% in six months, from $122 to over $1,180. The problem is what you're actually buying. Synthetic tokens only track Anthropic's price. No rights. No dividends. No ownership. One trader is sitting on $1.5 million in unrealized profit, while owning 31% of the entire token supply. When he tried to sell, the best offer was 34% below the current price. His massive profit exists only on the screen. That's a classic liquidity trap. And this is exactly the same pattern we’re seeing across the entire AI sector. Anthropic, OpenAI and others are racing toward IPOs in late 2026. The market cannot absorb trillions in new supply at these valuations. When the selling starts, there won't be enough buyers. Remember, I've called every major top and bottom for 10 years, including the exact $16K bottom three years ago and the $111K top in October. Now, I’m calling the AI peak. Turn on notifications. When the bubble pops, I'll call it here publicly, like I always do.

MARMOT

124,600 views • 5 months ago

Kyle Shanahan pretty much confirmed why the 49ers draft process is flawed and broken. On the Rich Eisen Show, he explained that he only has time to watch highlight packages of draft prospects for two months before the draft. That’s not abnormal for a head coach. Their job is to coach the team and the grind is non-stop from late July through January and February. But when Shanahan has as much personnel say as he does, and he’s the one making the picks, that’s when it becomes a problem because the 49ers aren’t leaning on the GM and scouting department who are scouting these prospects year-round. This is a big reason why the 49ers have missed so often in the draft and from 2020-23, the Niners drafted 27 players total, but only four got multi-year second contracts with the team. #49ers
4:00

Kyle Shanahan pretty much confirmed why the 49ers draft process is flawed and broken. On the Rich Eisen Show, he explained that he only has time to watch highlight packages of draft prospects for two months before the draft. That’s not abnormal for a head coach. Their job is to coach the team and the grind is non-stop from late July through January and February. But when Shanahan has as much personnel say as he does, and he’s the one making the picks, that’s when it becomes a problem because the 49ers aren’t leaning on the GM and scouting department who are scouting these prospects year-round. This is a big reason why the 49ers have missed so often in the draft and from 2020-23, the Niners drafted 27 players total, but only four got multi-year second contracts with the team. #49ers

Chase Senior

129,823 views • 5 months ago