正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Secret Wellington Hearing: NZ Govt Admits Ignoring Vaccine Harm Data - Barry Young & Steve Kirsch Update on Whistleblower Court Case Barry Young & Steve Kirsch provide this post-Voir Dire update after the secretive Wellington District Court hearing where the public was barred, and the window in the door... show more
14,401 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![Steve Kirsch Calls NZ Vax Data Whistleblower a Hero: "He Was Willing to Sacrifice Himself to Save Lives" "He [Barry Young] knew he would be sentenced to seven years in jail for this. And the reason he did it is because this guy has courage, and he's a hero. He's the first person on the planet ever to basically say, hey, I'm going to do this come hell or high water. And if they put me in jail for seven years, I will not see my family for seven years. And he was willing to sacrifice himself to save lives." Steve Kirsch Barry is indeed a hero. Please share this post to rally support behind him and spread the word about his data.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1732822737540858345/ext_tw_video_thumb/1732822394585153536/pu/img/2_Bk6IXFessW7jE1.jpg)
![If Barry Young Isn’t a Whistleblower, No One in New Zealand Ever Will Be In this critical clip, the discussion centres on the single most important question in Barry Young’s Barry Young case: is he a whistleblower under New Zealand’s Protected Disclosures Act? If the court says yes, the case ends, he is protected, and the people’s own data can finally be examined by independent epidemiologists around the world. If the court says no, the Act itself is effectively gutted - reduced to another hollowed-out piece of legislation, just as the Bill of Rights was overridden by vaccine mandates, financial coercion and the constant use of “emergency” powers. Barry is the archetype whistleblower. The outcome will either empower future truth-tellers or send a chilling message that no one who challenges the government will ever be protected. A clear warning about the erosion of civil liberties and why this ruling matters far beyond one man’s court case. Clip Transcript: [Liz Gunn] "If you don't qualify as a whistleblower Barry Young, no one in New Zealand will ever qualify as a whistleblower. [Barry Young] It'll be a game changer. [Liz] You are the archetype whistleblower. [Barry] It will be a game changer because this has never been tried before under this new Act. It's a unique case. It's a very nuanced case, but essentially it just boils down to: Am I a Whistleblower or not? It's a very simple question. [Liz] If you are a whistleblower, the case is over. You're no longer in court. You are protected. So from that point you can then put out to the People the People's own data. And it can go around the world for epidemiologists of integrity to examine that data and say, hey, what's going on in New Zealand, shows also what's happening in the UK or Canada or Australia. Same thing. So it's crucial that you are designated a whistleblower. What happens if the court says, no, we're going to go with the corruption. We're going to go with the government's instructions. We're not going to designate Barry Young a whistleblower. What happens then? [Barry] Well, if they say no, they essentially hollow out the purpose of the Act. They basically just destroy it. And it becomes another legacy Act that they've just gutted. Along with the Bill of Rights, who I think is that is just, yeah, it's just paper. It's not worth anything now, what they've done to that. Because we had all these these Rights about vaccinations and stuff like that. We were allowed to decide whether or not to put a substance in our body. We've got that freedom. It went to Nuremberg as well - right! That was the whole purpose of the Nuremberg trials. You should not put an unknown substance into your body. You've got that fundamental right as a human being to say NO, however, with... the Bill of Rights didn't apply. Oh, now you've got to have the vaccine or you don't work. We will cut you off from your finances. You will not be allowed to feed your children if you don't have this vaccine. Now, hang on. What happened to the Bill of Rights there? And so if they do that with this, it'll just [be] another erosion of our civil liberties and our rights. [Liz] And the way Ardern got around the Bill of Rights was saying this is emergency. This is an emergency. And they keep on bringing emergency. They're trying to ramp up the bird flu scam here. Under emergency, we will do it. We must never let the government do anything to us under emergency. The government is not our friend. It's not trustworthy."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2081726909755560200/amplify_video_thumb/2081725410459709440/img/c0byiZf3T-SlJmyS.jpg)
![“Like a Crucifix to a Vampire” - Crown Refuses to Show NZ Vaccine Data to the Court New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young Barry Young describes how the Crown continues to refuse to show the Court the vaccine database evidence. The judge ordered the data to be produced, yet while the Crown gave the spreadsheet to their own expert witness (Professor Robert Scragg of Auckland University - the same expert who claimed the vaccine was so safe he didn’t even need to look at it), they refused to provide it to the court. When challenged on proper procedure, they initially agreed, then backtracked weeks later claiming it was “too hard,” and are now actively refusing to show the evidence to the judge. Barry suggests that the only logical reason is that they are terrified of what the data actually shows. Clip Transcript: "It's like a crucifix to a vampire. They cannot look at it because they're just terrified of it. And that's been apparent throughout, even with this latest hearing. The judge said, to the court, to his credit, said, "I want to see the data." They [The Crown] gave the spreadsheet to their professor, their expert witness, they gave the data to him. The one who said, "It's such a safe vaccine... that I don't need to look at it." Yep... Professor [Robert] Scragg, Auckland University. And the judge said, as a matter of procedure, if you show the evidence to the expert, the court expects to see it as well. That's process 101. And the Crown said, "Oh, yes, if it would benefit the court, we will produce the data. We will give it to the court." However, they backtracked a couple of weeks later on that statement, which they made at the voir dire. They backtracked on it and said, "We've had a look and it's too hard. So we're not going to give the court that evidence, that data. So we're not going to show it to them." They just denied it. And so it goes round and round, but they are absolutely refusing to look at it. They are refusing to show it to the judge. And the reason why they're refusing to look at it is clearly because they're terrified of it."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2080468903793434948/amplify_video_thumb/2080468316397961218/img/oe5pgjgyk-mVm19Q.jpg)
