正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Don’t be a dumbass like sladoc - wasting Tesla engineering time and blocking real customers who actually want/need to get on an Unsupervised FSD Robotaxi - by constantly changing your destination just to ride around in it for 2.5 hours straight. That’s exactly how you get kicked out, just...

78,465 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

38 条评论

Sirk 的头像
Sirk8 个月前

@tesla2moon Going to have to disagree with you guys on this one. The guys in Austin are the sole ones who are able to find exploits and refine the service before it goes to thousands and then millions. We need people to think of all the crazy s*** so we can patch it quick

rik VDK 的头像
rik VDK8 个月前

@tesla2moon Stress testing the system can only make it better

Teslaconomics 的头像
Teslaconomics8 个月前

@tesla2moon You can change the destination when it’s required or stress test it a couple of times if needed, but for 2.5 hrs is just stupid.

Sam 🇺🇸 的头像
Sam 🇺🇸8 个月前

@rik_vdk @tesla2moon Him wasting 3 hours and paying isn't exactly a loss for Tesla there bud.

Nicky 的头像
Nicky8 个月前

@Teslaconomics @rik_vdk @tesla2moon I think he only paid $4. But I see that as an edge case opportunity for Tesla to fix anyway

rik VDK 的头像
rik VDK8 个月前

@SamSamSidyBJJ @Teslaconomics @tesla2moon Both for allowing the multiple destination resets and the inadequate charge

Teslaconomics 的头像
Teslaconomics8 个月前

If you care to watch the whole thing

Ruh-Roh Raggy 的头像
Ruh-Roh Raggy8 个月前

@tesla2moon Tesla support person was a real pro.

Robin 的头像
Robin8 个月前

@tesla2moon All i see is an edge case that is extremely valueable for @Tesla to look into, this guy did them a favor in my opinion

TechWorldInnovate 的头像
TechWorldInnovate8 个月前

@tesla2moon All I can say is that the people annoyed with @tesla2moon are clearly not engineers 😂

TechWorldInnovate 的头像
TechWorldInnovate8 个月前

@tesla2moon Hard disagree. He tested a fringe use-case that Tesla can now go back and account for in future updates. Push boundaries and break things. It leads to quick improvement.

Levi Borntreger 的头像
Levi Borntreger8 个月前

@tesla2moon This is good for it, because he’s edge testing, and he discovered something and now Tesla can fix it

Screaming Chicken 的头像
Screaming Chicken8 个月前

@tesla2moon Seems like a gift for Tesla. Minds well root out all the imperfections in the app/system before scaling

Cosmic 的头像
Cosmic8 个月前

@tesla2moon This isn't any worse than what David Moss did: ride 50+ times within 2 days to meaningless destinations. All these people are testing a system that's currently in testing. How about you stop being a dumbass and think a little longer

Psyop Neo-Glaucon Kafusi 的头像
Psyop Neo-Glaucon Kafusi8 个月前

@tesla2moon Eh no need for hate. Edge case testing is a good thing. Especially early on. Not only did Tesla fix this. They eventually saw it and called him. They’ll improve how they’re monitoring the system too.

Aaron Clark 的头像
Aaron Clark8 个月前

@tesla2moon It’s not a waste of time to identify bugs.

Matthew Valovich 的头像
Matthew Valovich8 个月前

@tesla2moon What if someone has multiple errands and trips for the day how many stops can they do? Also I was hoping Tesla gave this guy some credits for bug finding.

miro m. 的头像
miro m.8 个月前

@tesla2moon Why not, he found an exploit and Tesla can fix it now...

Sarge Enzyme 的头像
Sarge Enzyme8 个月前

@tesla2moon I'm sure Tesla will limit the number of destination changes now that they've experienced this issue.

Sean 的头像
Sean8 个月前

@tesla2moon Its not that deep 🫩

Jonathan Doeity 的头像
Jonathan Doeity8 个月前

@tesla2moon Can they not just figure out how to charge for each destination change and total time so he's free to do in exchange for $$$$

Simon P 的头像
Simon P8 个月前

@tesla2moon People need to be respectful of the technology and the mission. Testing is important, but blocking others from trying it only slows down progress. Tesla is right to set boundaries so everyone gets a fair chance to see what the future looks like.

TexasTSLA 的头像
TexasTSLA8 个月前

@tesla2moon @scotsrule08 ahhh this explains a lot 😂 how many rides did y'all end up taking trying to find one fully unsupervised?

Mike 的头像
Mike8 个月前

@tesla2moon guy paid for the entire ride right? I mean, it's a valid use case when this thing gets out to the masses. people may want to explore and enjoy the ride

Christian Vincente 的头像
Christian Vincente8 个月前

@tesla2moon

Erich Thilow 的头像
Erich Thilow8 个月前

@tesla2moon I encourage you to do exactly this. We are in a test phase. Let Tesla experience what stupid things people do, so they can prepare for it before going wide.

yidzick 的头像
yidzick8 个月前

@tesla2moon Tesla can figure this stuff out. Flip side of this is that they can use this experience to help moving forward. There will be plenty of bad actors at scale. Better figure it out now than later. I kinda get the feeling you’re just salty you weren’t in the cab instead

Lihp Llenrub 的头像
Lihp Llenrub8 个月前

@tesla2moon Korean bastard

Ren Jaecks 的头像
Ren Jaecks8 个月前

@tesla2moon Disagree, when the system is country-wide there are going to be a LOT of bad actors. Best to stress test the system now while we are still early/small scale

Tesla Pill 的头像
Tesla Pill8 个月前

@tesla2moon I think theyll end up limiting the number of times this can be done in a trip

Natarajan AV 的头像
Natarajan AV8 个月前

@tesla2moon Bill such rides with exponential charges

Sage 的头像
Sage8 个月前

@tesla2moon Tesla should charge more after the third stop, and should keep increasing the fare price, the more stops you add.

kyle 的头像
kyle8 个月前

@tesla2moon ‘High demand’ and this dork is the demand

metechlover 的头像
metechlover8 个月前

@tesla2moon Its much better that people test out the system in ways they are not intended now. Then to find all these flaws when its going big

Uttam Chauhan 的头像
Uttam Chauhan8 个月前

@tesla2moon Good message. Lets play by the rule.

Jacob 的头像
Jacob8 个月前

@tesla2moon this guy complaining it was so hard to find one…. …and then immediately hogs it for hours

🇺🇸 Farmer Ed 🚜🇺🇸 的头像
🇺🇸 Farmer Ed 🚜🇺🇸8 个月前

@tesla2moon Pure obnoxious selfishness

When To Mars 的头像
When To Mars8 个月前

@tesla2moon As long as he pay for why due you care!!! You dumbass

相关视频

Whenever I tell people when you buy a Tesla, make sure you eat the cost and buy FSD outright, a majority of people always tell me “FSD is too expensive at $8,000,” without actually looking at the data and numbers behind the true value of FSD. Well, I did. Back in 2019, Elon explained the Robotaxi economics very clearly. “What would be the probable gross profit from a single Robotaxi? We think probably something on the order of $30,000 per year.” BTW, this number also came from conservative assumptions. • ~90,000 miles per year • ~50% utilization (half the miles are non-revenue) • Operating cost around $0.18 per mile (fyi, gas cars are closer to $0.60!) • Tesla takes 25-30% of the revenue • Robotaxi designed to last ~1 million miles So after costs, after Tesla’s cut, and after conservative usage, the estimate still came out to $30,000 per year from a single Robotaxi. So let me do the simple math for you. If a Robotaxi generates $30,000 per year, and you assume just 10 years of useful Robotaxi life, even though the car is going to be designed for more: 1/ $30,000 × 10 years = $300,000 Now, let’s cut that number by 50% for uncertainty, downtime, or slower rollout… I’m being conservative here. 2/ $300,000 ÷ 2 = $150,000 That means the FSD value is NOT $8,000. It’s six figures! This is why every Tesla owner should buy FSD outright right now! And is also the reason why Tesla is ending this option in February imo. You see, this is what happens when you see FSD as an income generating business, instead of just a feature. FSD is SIGNIFICANTLY undervalued. And whenever I tell people that I’m going to be the biggest Tesla Robotaxi fleet operator one day and show the world how much $ I’m making for each Robotaxi in operation, they all still laugh at me in disbelief. (I hope Elon and Tesla will let me be one of the first owners when the time comes… 🤞) But I also know that people always doubted me my whole life… until things actually became real. That’s why I’ve never seen my Tesla as just a car that depreciates like other non-Teslas. It’s the exact opposite. And one day, when these cars are driving themselves and generating $ income for me while I’m sleeping, all of the doubters will become silent. Mark my words.

Teslaconomics

154,805 次观看 • 8 个月前

If insurance companies don’t adapt to Tesla FSD, they’re going to have a real problem. In 2024 at the Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting, Warren Buffett got asked, “Assuming Elon delivers on his fully autonomous driving goal. Elon said, if you’ve got at scale, a statistically significant amount of data that shows conclusively that the autonomous car has half the accident rate of a human driven car, I think that’s difficult to ignore. Assuming Elon succeeds in reducing accidents by 50% vs human drivers, wouldn’t auto insurance rates fall to reflect the reduced underwriting risks, thereby adversely impacting Geico’s revenues and float and perhaps margins, too?” His main response was, “Well, let’s just take the extreme example. Let’s say there are only going to be 3 accidents in the U.S. next year for some crazy reason… anything that reduces accidents is going to reduce costs… If accidents get reduced 50%, it’s going to be good for society and it’s going to be bad for insurance companies’ volume… but good for society is what we’re looking for.” I’ve followed Tesla closely for years and now the proof is impossible to ignore. Profiting from insurance is built on risk and FSD is systematically removing it. FSD has now crossed the data threshold that insurers can’t ignore. By 2026, Tesla FSD has logged over 10B+ real world miles from real human behavior, real streets, real weather, real chaos, and it’s materially more data than ANY company in the world has today. Tesla’s own safety reports show it clearly: • Human driven U.S. average: ~1M miles per accident • Tesla Autopilot: ~4.5M miles per accident • Tesla FSD engaged: ~7.5M miles per accident That’s a 7.5x safety improvement over human driving! If the risk is 7.5x lower, and your premiums you’re charging customers don’t change, something is wrong. Insurance pricing is supposed to reflect this risk. This is why today’s Lemonade announcement is a wake up call to insurance providers. When Lemonade announced it’s offering a 50% insurance discount when FSD is steering, they’re reacting to Tesla FSD data. Fewer crashes results in fewer payouts, period. This is what adaptive insurance looks like and thus why Tesla & Lemonade insurance has an advantage. They are adapting to real FSD data and real time risk, and adjusting the prices. All while traditional insurance companies are still using broad historical averages, falling behind and losing customers. Companies like GEICO, State Farm, and Allstate were built for a world where humans are driving, risk is random, and prices update slowly. I believe this era of insurance is ending. Even Warren admitted it in this video, saying cutting accidents in half is great for society, but BAD for insurance volume. Bc less risk means lower premiums and lower premiums mean less float and less float is the core of traditional insurance profits! If FSD adoption hits even 50% of Tesla’s fleet, I bet accident rates could drop 30-50% industry wide. That alone puts massive pressure on a ~$300B U.S. auto insurance market today. This is also why I believe Tesla insurance has a MAJOR advantage. Your premium is solely based on data. It uses real time vehicle telemetry, scores you based on actual driving behavior, and rewards your FSD usage directly and right away. In places like California, Tesla Insurance premiums for FSD users are already 20-30% cheaper than competitors. In some cases, safe drivers see up to 60% discounts. And in Texas, claims for FSD users are 40% lower than non-FSD drivers. The long term outcome is becoming obvious to me. Insurance companies that DO NOT adapt prices dynamically, use real time data, and recognize FSD’s safety advantage will most likely lose their best customers to companies that do. For Tesla owners, this is great news bc safer driving, esp using FSD will result in cheaper insurance, but for legacy insurers, this is an existential moment. You either adapt or risk getting left behind.

Teslaconomics

141,052 次观看 • 8 个月前

When Elon Musk and Tesla let me, and millions of other owners, add our own cars to the Tesla Robotaxi network via a software update, it’s going to be the greatest wealth CREATION in human history. I get it. For the first time ever, a Tesla will become an $ income producing asset bc your Tesla will be able to drive itself while you’re sleeping, working, or even on vacation. This is NOT a sci-fi idea anymore. Elon has been clear for years. The hardware is already in the cars and the thing that will unlock this is going to be software. Here’s a simple version of how it’s going to work imo: 1/ A software update turns your Tesla into a robotaxi 2/ You opt in with one tap in the Tesla app 3/ Your car gives rides when you’re not using it 4/ Tesla takes a cut, you keep the rest 5/ You can pull your car out anytime, you have full control Think Airbnb, but for cars. Now on the $ generation side, this is where it can get a bit wild. Elon has said a high use robotaxi could generate ~$30,000 per year per car, and even more in busy cities. That means, 1/ A car payment pays for itself 2/ A car can become your own business 3/ And for some people, this can allow them to become financially free Elon even said robotaxi earnings should far exceed monthly car payments... this will completely flip how we think about owning a vehicle. A lot of long time Tesla investors call this the “greatest wealth transfer in history”… Elon corrected that and said something important: “Not transfer of wealth, CREATION of wealth. The pie gets much bigger.” And I believe he’s right. Autonomy makes transportation cheaper, safer, and available 24/7. This saves time, reduces accidents, lowers costs for everyone, and unlocks $ trillions of dollars in new economic value that NEVER existed before. Elon has also said: “The day FSD (w/ this Robotaxi feature) goes to wide release will be one of the biggest asset value increases in history.” That will be the day when cars are viewed as an appreciating asset instead of a depreciating asset! The scale is hard to wrap my head around tbh bc: • There are already millions of Teslas on the road • Even a small % opt-in rate creates massive fleets overnight, Waymo is screwed imo with their peanut sized 2,500 fleet • No new factories are needed • No new drivers needed Just pure AI software. Bro… this moment is going to be REALLY big. This could be the first time in human history where regular people like you and me get access to automation and making $ at scale, instead of only the big players and corporations. And when this switch flips, the way we view a car, specifically a Tesla will never look the same again. (FYI, once Elon and Tesla give me the green light, I plan on buying ~25 Teslas outright and put them into the Robotaxi network to show the world exactly what I mean)

Teslaconomics

58,488 次观看 • 8 个月前

Biggest warning I’ll give Tesla shorts right now. This time, you’re probably not going to get fucked by some classic short squeeze. You’re going to get fucked by being wrong about what Tesla becomes next. Look at the latest short-interest tape. As of the Aug 14 settlement: • 69,196,896 $TSLA shares short • ~2.2% of the float • 2.15 days to cover • ~$23.7 BILLION worth of stock short And the important part is that… Short interest peaked at 79.1M shares on June 30. So roughly 12.5% of those shorts had already been covered by August 14. So no… I’m NOT sitting here telling you that shorts are trapped. That’s not my thesis. My thesis is actually much more dangerous for a long-term Tesla short. What if they’re simply wrong? Wrong about autonomy. Wrong about Robotaxi. Wrong about Cybercab. And ultimately wrong about what Tesla’s earnings power could look like if this scales. Bc I’ve now watched this story go from something people laughed at… to something I personally rode in. My first Tesla Robotaxi ride in Austin was on launch day, June 22, 2025. Then I came back for the Cybercab launch on September 3, 2026. And it changed the way I look at Tesla. Cybercab isn’t something with Elon standing on a stage telling you what might happen five years from now. You can literally hail one. Pay for a ride. Get inside. There’s no steering wheel. No accelerator. No brake pedal. And it takes paying passengers through real Austin streets. Tesla itself now describes Cybercab as a fully autonomous, purpose-built two-seater in its Robotaxi fleet. That matters... Bc Tesla is no longer trying to prove that Robotaxi can exist bc it does exist. The next question is whether Tesla can scale it safely, economically and fast enough. And THAT is where I think shorts are massively underestimating the company. As of the latest Texas registry data, Tesla has 437 authorized vehicles in Texas - 388 Model Ys/49 Cybercabs It shows how quickly the fleet Tesla is preparing for commercial autonomy is growing. Now zoom out a bit. Tesla already lists more than 125,000 units of installed annual Cybercab manufacturing capacity in Texas. This is INSTALLED capacity. And Tesla calls Cybercab the “workhorse” of its Robotaxi fleet. Tesla spent most of its history making $ by building a vehicle and selling it once. Robotaxi opens a completely different model. Build the vehicle once. Then potentially monetize that same asset again. and again. and again. every time somebody takes a ride. Instead of only asking: “How many cars can Tesla sell this quarter?” You start asking: “How many autonomous miles can Tesla sell every day?” That is a MASSIVE change in the business model. And Cybercab is built specifically for that job. Not around a driver. Around the rider. If Tesla can bring those pieces together at scale, it has the potential to build a transportation network where the machine itself replaces THE largest costs in traditional ride-hailing: the human driver. Then there’s the flywheel. More Cybercabs. More geographic coverage. Shorter wait times. More rides. Higher fleet utilization. More recurring revenue. More capital to deploy even more vehicles. Tesla itself has told investors it expects hardware profits over time to be joined by accelerating AI, software and fleet-based profits. Does Tesla still have to execute? Absolutely. Regulation matters. Safety matters. Utilization matters. Manufacturing ramp matters. The economics have to work at scale. Those are legitimate risks, and anyone pretending otherwise isn’t being serious. But the serious Tesla short thesis can’t just be: “Elon promised autonomy before.” An actual bear now has to explain why a steering-wheel-free vehicle that is already carrying paying passengers won’t scale into a meaningful business. Tesla shorts are still betting against a car company, but I bet Cybercab is about to prove they’re shorting a transportation network.

Teslaconomics

34,223 次观看 • 26 天前