Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Don’t buy any property in India until these 7 documents are verified! One missing document can turn your dream property into a legal headache. Before making any payment, make sure you check these essential property documents to avoid fraud, ownership disputes, and future complications. 🏡 Save this reel...

19,637 просмотров • 26 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Mohini Maheshwari
Mohini Maheshwari26 дней назад

PLOT — here’s the 7-document check from the reel before paying anything: 1. Sale deed — registered proof that the current seller actually owns and can transfer the property. 2. 20–30 year ownership chain — previous sale/gift/partition deeds so there is no broken title. 3. Record of Rights — Jamabandi / 7-12 / RTC / Khata showing the land is in the seller’s name in revenue records. 4. Encumbrance certificate — shows loans, mortgages, dues, or court cases on the property. 5. Mutation / latest land-record entry — name change after earlier transfers is complete. 6. Approved layout / building plan and conversion papers — construction or plot use is legal, not unauthorised. 7. Property tax receipts — all municipal taxes paid and the assessed value matches. Verify originals + certified copies at the sub-registrar and local revenue office before token money.

Фото профиля sportzwrap💥
sportzwrap💥26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Jaivir Sharma
Jaivir Sharma23 дней назад

plot

Фото профиля Celebrate India
Celebrate India26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Jaideep
Jaideep26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Retired but not Tired
Retired but not Tired26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Lyfos Vault
Lyfos Vault25 дней назад

Document chaos is how so many property dreams turn into multi-year disputes. Verifying the title chain before money moves is the unsexy step that saves families later.

Фото профиля Contendedsoul....🧘🆓🐦
Contendedsoul....🧘🆓🐦26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Digamber Singh
Digamber Singh25 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля SHAUKAT JAMAL
SHAUKAT JAMAL24 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Issaac zala
Issaac zala26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля PehchaanKaun
PehchaanKaun26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Siddhiket Joshi
Siddhiket Joshi26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Sumita dutta
Sumita dutta25 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Cricket League Predictions
Cricket League Predictions26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Ibex Warrior
Ibex Warrior25 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля samita
samita25 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Frank
Frank26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Sanjay Rawat
Sanjay Rawat26 дней назад

plot

Фото профиля PRIYARANJAN THAKUR
PRIYARANJAN THAKUR26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Kris
Kris26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Lovekesh Monga
Lovekesh Monga26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Ajay Kumar
Ajay Kumar26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Damosh
Damosh26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля SK🇮🇳
SK🇮🇳26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Market Follower
Market Follower26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Anup Khosla
Anup Khosla25 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Nature
Nature26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля PriyaD
PriyaD25 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Vipul
Vipul26 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Ravi Chandra Rajak
Ravi Chandra Rajak25 дней назад

Plot

Фото профиля Paresh Lathigra
Paresh Lathigra26 дней назад

PLOT

Фото профиля Anurag Shukla
Anurag Shukla26 дней назад

PLOT

Похожие видео

SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Ron Pragides 

258,567 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Real estate has a simple problem that people don’t always say out loud: it’s not designed for partial participation. You either have enough money to buy in properly, or you don’t. There’s usually no “in-between.” And once you do invest, your money is tied up for a long time. Selling isn’t instant and flexibility is limited. So even though real estate is seen as a solid way to build wealth, a lot of people are effectively locked out... not by lack of interest but by how the system is structured. That’s the gap APARTCHAIN is focused on. APARTCHAIN is a platform that turns real estate into something you can invest in fractionally. Instead of buying an entire property, the ownership is divided into digital shares (tokens), and investors can buy a portion that fits their budget. So rather than needing large capital, you’re able to take smaller positions in actual properties. Here’s how it works in practice: • APARTCHAIN acquires real estate • The property is split into multiple ownership shares • Investors buy those shares on-chain • Rental income from the property is distributed to shareholders • When the property is eventually sold, any profit is also shared So your return comes from two places: ongoing rental income and potential appreciation when the property is sold. Now, fractional real estate isn’t a brand-new idea. What makes APARTCHAIN different is how it’s positioned. It operates within Kazakhstan’s regulatory framework, with oversight connected to the country’s national financial authority. That’s a key detail because a lot of tokenization platforms operate without clear local regulation. Here, the structure is built to align with an existing legal system, not bypass it. On the technical side, it runs on a blockchain network designed for low fees and fast transactions. That means buying, holding or transferring your share doesn’t come with the heavy costs or delays typically associated with traditional property processes. There’s also no strict lock-in at the protocol level... you’re not forced to hold your position for a fixed period. But in reality, your ability to exit depends on the secondary market, which is still developing. So liquidity exists, but it’s not fully mature yet. It’s also worth being clear about the risks. Property values can go up or down. Rental income isn’t guaranteed and because this system relies on smart contracts, there’s a technical layer that traditional real estate doesn’t have. On top of that, the platform itself is still growing. Property inventory is limited for now and the resale market for shares is still building. That said, it’s not just an idea on paper... APARTCHAIN has already completed at least one full investment cycle... acquiring a property, generating returns, and exiting. That matters because it shows the model can actually function beyond theory. So at the core, this isn’t really about “changing real estate” in some dramatic way. It’s about removing the all-or-nothing barrier that’s always surrounded it. And that leaves a simple question: if you could start building exposure to real estate without needing to go all in from day one, would more people actually step in earlier or would they still wait until it feels “big enough” to matter? Superteam Kazakhstan || APARTCHAIN

Jessica♡🛡

105,405 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents allegedly hit a man with their vehicle, while on private property, in Oklahoma City… and when the property manager told them to get off the property, they argued with her instead. You can hear the man crying out in pain in the background. She tells ICE they can call an ambulance for him, but they need to leave the property. And she doesn’t back down. Eventually, an ambulance and stretcher arrive. Being an ICE agent does not mean you get to ignore the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. And that protection applies to everyone in the United States…regardless of immigration status. ICE cannot walk onto private property because they have badges and guns. They need consent, a proper warrant, or a legally recognized exception to enter private areas for enforcement purposes. And if the property manager is telling you to leave, and you don’t have legal authority to remain there, you don’t get to just argue your way into staying. Then there is the person we can literally hear crying in pain. If ICE agents hit someone with a vehicle, we deserve answers. Because this is what happens when federal agents start believing the rules don’t apply to them… They enter private property. They use force. They hurt people. And then they expect everyone to just stand there and accept it because they’re with ICE. Federal agents are not above the law. And the fact that a property manager had to stand there and tell armed federal agents that they need to get off private property… should be absolutely infuriating.

Jesus Freakin Congress

32,018 просмотров • 1 месяц назад