Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
One mistake while buying a property can cost you dearly. Before making your investment, verify the property's details using the right public resources. Check the HMDA Lakes Portal to see if the property falls within a lake boundary or FTL area. Use the Bhuvan Portal to verify whether the... show more
37,335 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
![#Hyderabad : Another Massive Operation by #HYDRAA 🚨, in #Puppalguda - #Narsingi villages, #Gandipet mandal, #Rangareddy dist, Protects another #Lake HYDRAA removes #Encroachments , #Huts and Embakment built in the middle of #MushkinCheruvu [Lake] • HYDRAA fencing around the land worth ₹5500 Crore on Saturday and check for Mushkin Cheruvu encroachments. • As per HMDA calculations 52.20 acres • Attempt to build a dam at the middle of the pond and encroach on 34.21 acres. • Attempt to encroach in the name of Lake development. • Construction company that undertook Lake development work with CSR funds. • HYDRAA actions to protect the entire 52.20 acre pond. • HYDRAA fencing for protecting the entire pond. • According to HMDA, the pond is within the FTL area of 52.20 acres. • According to village records, the lake area is 59.11 acres. •Of this, the government has 20.23 acres. •The rest is Exal Patta land. • Violation of the rules regarding any construction activities undertaken there. • Realtors who tried to build huts in the name of the poor and demolish them. •HYDRAA who gave two months time to vacate. • Hut residents who voluntarily vacated and left. • HYDRAA who is fencing the lake FTL boundaries on Saturday. • Removing the embankment built in the middle of the pond. • HYDRAA in the work of protecting the pond FTL and the rest of the government land.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2060612486202900649/ext_tw_video_thumb/2060612373057310720/pu/img/iYsvXvDhrX86yMHC.jpg)
![SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY? “People are waking up to the fact that the asset seizure tax is an elimination of private property rights, that fundamentally what you're saying [is] that private property now becomes public property. Because as soon as you give the government the right to collect your post-tax assets through a legislative vote, you are basically saying that you no longer have private property — because at any point in the future the government can vote to say I'm going to take your private property — which is different than an income tax. [An income tax] is when you earn something that you didn't have before, and they take a percentage of your earnings (of your income). The statement now is after you've made your income (it's now your private property) — they can come and take it. And so that is a distinction that has never existed in the United States. And I will make the retort right now to property tax, because people always say to me: ‘what about property tax?’ A property tax is a service fee on a particular, specific asset. The money that is collected provides services for that asset to make it more valuable. So you get roads, infrastructure, policing, fire, schools… All the stuff that comes with property tax makes that property [more valuable]. And you have the option at any point you want to sell that property and stop paying that property tax. You have the option at any point to downgrade your property and get a cheaper property and pay [a lower tax]. And here's the other important point about property tax: it’s uniform. Uniform means that everyone pays the same percentage, the same property tax rate in a county. This asset seizure tax that's being proposed is a demographic tax — meaning that the state or the legislature defines a specific group of individuals (in this case, they're saying anyone with a net worth over a billion dollars) and then they can go and take assets from only that group. That is nonuniform taxation. It means that for the first time we're saying based on the demographics of a person meaning whatever you want to use to define that person (in this case their wealth) — you are going to be treated differently. And that is different than an income tax, because remember when you have graduated income tax rates (and you say high earners get taxed more) — what you're taxing is the earnings, not the individual. You're not looking through to the individual to determine whether or not they're wealthy. All you're doing is looking at the independent earnings amount that's coming in. And so a uniformity clause is supposed to protect people from being demographically discriminated against. And you may roll your hand and be like: ‘Oh, who cares about the billionaires? Eat the rich. That's great.’ But fundamentally, you're giving the government, the legislature, the ability to in the future take any demographic definition they want and go in and take any percentage they want of after-tax property from you. That is why this is so troubling.” david friedberg The All-In Podcast](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2012558948130501004/amplify_video_thumb/2012557570549088256/img/tvspEgv_CJZyLczl.jpg)
![Ron DeSantis on ending property taxes statewide: "You buy a home, you buy land... and then, you've been taxed many times [on that]... is it your property, or not? Just for being on your property, you've got to write a check to the government every year?"](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1896350055864373606/ext_tw_video_thumb/1895642673630822400/pu/img/ZjoPzVpOHq5mtImK.jpg)
