Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Angus Dalgleish has raised alarming concerns about deliberate misinformation campaigns surrounding COVID-19 treatments. He alleges that Pfizer, prior to the vaccine rollout, funded charities to spread false claims that vitamin D was harmful and had serious side effects, discouraging its use for COVID-19. According to Dalgleish, this was...

18,970 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Camus
Camusvor 1 Jahr

Credit: @HeartsofOakUK

Profilbild von Altright? Alright.
Altright? Alright.vor 1 Jahr

The level of evil of Pfizer (and Moderna) is hard to grasp... a planned, multi-decade campaign of lying and bribing everyone they could think of (and probably blackmailing those who resisted). All while ignoring/hiding/falsifying data showing how much damage they were doing.

Profilbild von GailTheWales 🍍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🍍
GailTheWales 🍍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🍍vor 1 Jahr

It's not good fining them - they need to start jailing them for their crimes

Profilbild von Drew's D Notices
Drew's D Noticesvor 1 Jahr

We have to get on top of this!

Profilbild von Doc Savage
Doc Savagevor 1 Jahr

The criminal enterprise known as Pfizer. Worse than the mafia.

Profilbild von R. Lee
R. Leevor 1 Jahr

An insurance executive presented compelling evidence (see video link) of a global genocide, yet no Nuremberg-style trials have emerged. Why? The elites implicated in the Epstein files—corrupt judges, politicians, and top decision-makers controlling society—are the culprits, colluding to suppress the truth. Tainted by Epstein’s influence, these figures silence or eliminate anyone threatening exposure, ensuring the crime remains hidden. Until the Epstein files are fully released and those involved are exposed, the justice system cannot function as a single tier, delivering true justice for all. Only those out of power face punishment, while the elite remain untouchable. The Trump administration shows little intent to uncover this, despite Trump not being implicated in the Epstein files. Credible evidence against him would have been weaponized to jail him before his presidency. Instead, it distracts with drug busts, financial crime probes, and public feuds. For instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi’s February 2025 release of partial Epstein files lacked new revelations and saw no follow-up. X users express frustration, noting the administration’s focus on trade and cyberattacks sidesteps deeper conspiracies. This suggests a deliberate choice to avoid disrupting elite networks, prioritizing stability over truth.

Profilbild von Cecelia Goodwin
Cecelia Goodwinvor 1 Jahr

Whoa

Profilbild von Mally D
Mally Dvor 1 Jahr

Please listen....

Profilbild von efdavis
efdavisvor 1 Jahr

I have alarming concerns about deliberate misinformation as well. That's why I'm constantly calling your posts out and trying to show why they are low-quality bs

Ähnliche Videos

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a leading oncologist, has revealed a startlingly simple yet overlooked factor in cancer treatment success: vitamin D levels. Over 15 years ago, during early immunotherapy trials using low-dose interleukin-2 and immune stimulants, Dalgleish and his team noticed a stark divide. Some patients responded remarkably well, while most did not. The burning question was: why? The answer was astonishingly straightforward. With the advent of reliable, rapid vitamin D assays, the team discovered that patients with robust vitamin D levels responded brilliantly to immunotherapy, while those with low levels saw little to no benefit. By correcting vitamin D deficiencies, Dalgleish’s team dramatically improved response rates. “The data is that black and white,” he says. This revelation extended beyond immunotherapy. Dalgleish cites his colleague, Dr. Daniel Von Hoff, a renowned pancreatic cancer trialist in the U.S., who initially scoffed at the vitamin D connection. Three months later, Von Hoff called back, stunned. After reviewing records, he found that no pancreatic cancer patients responded to chemotherapy if their vitamin D was low. His team began correcting vitamin D levels, and outcomes improved. Armed with this evidence, Dalgleish and senior colleagues approached the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over 15 years ago, urging them to mandate vitamin D testing and correction before starting cancer treatments. Low vitamin D, they argued, sabotages not just immunotherapy but also chemotherapy. NICE’s response? A dismissive promise to consider it in their “five-year plan.” Fifteen years later, vitamin D testing remains a mere footnote in nutritional advice, not a standard of care. Dalgleish is scathing about this inaction. He calls NICE and similar organizations “inappropriately named” and accuses their leaders of being out of touch, more interested in costly, toxic drugs from big pharma like Pfizer than in cheap, non-toxic solutions like vitamin D. “They might as well talk to keepers at the zoo,” he quips, highlighting their disconnect from the patient-clinician interface. The implications are profound. Dalgleish sees patients who’ve failed chemotherapies and immunotherapies, only to find their vitamin D levels “in the boots.” He insists no patient should begin treatment—whether chemotherapy or immunotherapy—without first correcting vitamin D deficiency. The evidence is overwhelming, yet the system lags behind. This isn’t just a medical oversight; it’s a failure of leadership. Dalgleish argues the NHS and organizations like NICE have a duty to prioritize affordable, effective interventions that can save lives. Vitamin D is cheap, safe, and vital for immune response and treatment success. Why, then, is it ignored while expensive, marginally effective drugs dominate? It’s time for change. Patients deserve better. Clinicians should demand routine vitamin D testing and correction as a prerequisite for cancer treatment. Policymakers must stop dragging their feet and act on the evidence. As Dalgleish puts it, the data is clear: optimize vitamin D, and you optimize outcomes. How many more lives must be lost before this simple truth becomes standard practice?

Camus

43,293 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,416 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren