Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish has raised alarming concerns about deliberate misinformation campaigns surrounding COVID-19 treatments. He alleges that Pfizer, prior to the vaccine rollout, funded charities to spread false claims that vitamin D was harmful and had serious side effects, discouraging its use for COVID-19. According to Dalgleish, this was... a strategic move to suppress effective, low-cost treatments like vitamin D and ivermectin, which he claims could have cured most curable cases, rendering vaccines unnecessary. He further asserts that this manipulation extended to influential figures in the UK, including Chris Whitty and Matt Hancock, who initially expressed cautious views but later became staunch vaccine advocates, suggesting external pressures. Dalgleish accuses Pfizer of orchestrating a broader scheme, leveraging its history of paying billions in fines for withholding safety data, misrepresenting information, and bribing clinicians and regulators. He claims this time, the corruption was even more extensive, encompassing politicians and organizations to ensure the vaccine's dominance. These allegations point to a disturbing pattern of prioritizing profit over public health, undermining trust in institutions meant to protect us. The public deserves transparency and accountability.show more

Camus

308,496 subscribers

18,970 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Camus1 year ago

Credit: @HeartsofOakUK

Altright? Alright.1 year ago

The level of evil of Pfizer (and Moderna) is hard to grasp... a planned, multi-decade campaign of lying and bribing everyone they could think of (and probably blackmailing those who resisted). All while ignoring/hiding/falsifying data showing how much damage they were doing.

GailTheWales 🍍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🍍1 year ago

It's not good fining them - they need to start jailing them for their crimes

Drew's D Notices1 year ago

We have to get on top of this!

Doc Savage1 year ago

The criminal enterprise known as Pfizer. Worse than the mafia.

R. Lee1 year ago

An insurance executive presented compelling evidence (see video link) of a global genocide, yet no Nuremberg-style trials have emerged. Why? The elites implicated in the Epstein files—corrupt judges, politicians, and top decision-makers controlling society—are the culprits, colluding to suppress the truth. Tainted by Epstein’s influence, these figures silence or eliminate anyone threatening exposure, ensuring the crime remains hidden. Until the Epstein files are fully released and those involved are exposed, the justice system cannot function as a single tier, delivering true justice for all. Only those out of power face punishment, while the elite remain untouchable. The Trump administration shows little intent to uncover this, despite Trump not being implicated in the Epstein files. Credible evidence against him would have been weaponized to jail him before his presidency. Instead, it distracts with drug busts, financial crime probes, and public feuds. For instance, Attorney General Pam Bondi’s February 2025 release of partial Epstein files lacked new revelations and saw no follow-up. X users express frustration, noting the administration’s focus on trade and cyberattacks sidesteps deeper conspiracies. This suggests a deliberate choice to avoid disrupting elite networks, prioritizing stability over truth.

Cecelia Goodwin1 year ago

Whoa

Mally D1 year ago

Please listen....

efdavis1 year ago

I have alarming concerns about deliberate misinformation as well. That's why I'm constantly calling your posts out and trying to show why they are low-quality bs

Related Videos

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a leading oncologist, has revealed a startlingly simple yet overlooked factor in cancer treatment success: vitamin D levels. Over 15 years ago, during early immunotherapy trials using low-dose interleukin-2 and immune stimulants, Dalgleish and his team noticed a stark divide. Some patients responded remarkably well, while most did not. The burning question was: why? The answer was astonishingly straightforward. With the advent of reliable, rapid vitamin D assays, the team discovered that patients with robust vitamin D levels responded brilliantly to immunotherapy, while those with low levels saw little to no benefit. By correcting vitamin D deficiencies, Dalgleish’s team dramatically improved response rates. “The data is that black and white,” he says. This revelation extended beyond immunotherapy. Dalgleish cites his colleague, Dr. Daniel Von Hoff, a renowned pancreatic cancer trialist in the U.S., who initially scoffed at the vitamin D connection. Three months later, Von Hoff called back, stunned. After reviewing records, he found that no pancreatic cancer patients responded to chemotherapy if their vitamin D was low. His team began correcting vitamin D levels, and outcomes improved. Armed with this evidence, Dalgleish and senior colleagues approached the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over 15 years ago, urging them to mandate vitamin D testing and correction before starting cancer treatments. Low vitamin D, they argued, sabotages not just immunotherapy but also chemotherapy. NICE’s response? A dismissive promise to consider it in their “five-year plan.” Fifteen years later, vitamin D testing remains a mere footnote in nutritional advice, not a standard of care. Dalgleish is scathing about this inaction. He calls NICE and similar organizations “inappropriately named” and accuses their leaders of being out of touch, more interested in costly, toxic drugs from big pharma like Pfizer than in cheap, non-toxic solutions like vitamin D. “They might as well talk to keepers at the zoo,” he quips, highlighting their disconnect from the patient-clinician interface. The implications are profound. Dalgleish sees patients who’ve failed chemotherapies and immunotherapies, only to find their vitamin D levels “in the boots.” He insists no patient should begin treatment—whether chemotherapy or immunotherapy—without first correcting vitamin D deficiency. The evidence is overwhelming, yet the system lags behind. This isn’t just a medical oversight; it’s a failure of leadership. Dalgleish argues the NHS and organizations like NICE have a duty to prioritize affordable, effective interventions that can save lives. Vitamin D is cheap, safe, and vital for immune response and treatment success. Why, then, is it ignored while expensive, marginally effective drugs dominate? It’s time for change. Patients deserve better. Clinicians should demand routine vitamin D testing and correction as a prerequisite for cancer treatment. Policymakers must stop dragging their feet and act on the evidence. As Dalgleish puts it, the data is clear: optimize vitamin D, and you optimize outcomes. How many more lives must be lost before this simple truth becomes standard practice?

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a leading oncologist, has revealed a startlingly simple yet overlooked factor in cancer treatment success: vitamin D levels. Over 15 years ago, during early immunotherapy trials using low-dose interleukin-2 and immune stimulants, Dalgleish and his team noticed a stark divide. Some patients responded remarkably well, while most did not. The burning question was: why? The answer was astonishingly straightforward. With the advent of reliable, rapid vitamin D assays, the team discovered that patients with robust vitamin D levels responded brilliantly to immunotherapy, while those with low levels saw little to no benefit. By correcting vitamin D deficiencies, Dalgleish’s team dramatically improved response rates. “The data is that black and white,” he says. This revelation extended beyond immunotherapy. Dalgleish cites his colleague, Dr. Daniel Von Hoff, a renowned pancreatic cancer trialist in the U.S., who initially scoffed at the vitamin D connection. Three months later, Von Hoff called back, stunned. After reviewing records, he found that no pancreatic cancer patients responded to chemotherapy if their vitamin D was low. His team began correcting vitamin D levels, and outcomes improved. Armed with this evidence, Dalgleish and senior colleagues approached the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) over 15 years ago, urging them to mandate vitamin D testing and correction before starting cancer treatments. Low vitamin D, they argued, sabotages not just immunotherapy but also chemotherapy. NICE’s response? A dismissive promise to consider it in their “five-year plan.” Fifteen years later, vitamin D testing remains a mere footnote in nutritional advice, not a standard of care. Dalgleish is scathing about this inaction. He calls NICE and similar organizations “inappropriately named” and accuses their leaders of being out of touch, more interested in costly, toxic drugs from big pharma like Pfizer than in cheap, non-toxic solutions like vitamin D. “They might as well talk to keepers at the zoo,” he quips, highlighting their disconnect from the patient-clinician interface. The implications are profound. Dalgleish sees patients who’ve failed chemotherapies and immunotherapies, only to find their vitamin D levels “in the boots.” He insists no patient should begin treatment—whether chemotherapy or immunotherapy—without first correcting vitamin D deficiency. The evidence is overwhelming, yet the system lags behind. This isn’t just a medical oversight; it’s a failure of leadership. Dalgleish argues the NHS and organizations like NICE have a duty to prioritize affordable, effective interventions that can save lives. Vitamin D is cheap, safe, and vital for immune response and treatment success. Why, then, is it ignored while expensive, marginally effective drugs dominate? It’s time for change. Patients deserve better. Clinicians should demand routine vitamin D testing and correction as a prerequisite for cancer treatment. Policymakers must stop dragging their feet and act on the evidence. As Dalgleish puts it, the data is clear: optimize vitamin D, and you optimize outcomes. How many more lives must be lost before this simple truth becomes standard practice?

Camus

43,293 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, renowned oncologist, challenges the COVID-19 "emergency" narrative, arguing it was a WHO-orchestrated pretext to justify mass vaccination. He cites exaggerated excess deaths, unoverwhelmed health systems, and neglected non-COVID care, leading to spikes in cardiac, stroke, and cancer deaths. Dalgleish questions the vaccine rollout, noting WHO’s own rule of thumb—per Chris Whitty—requires a 33% fatality rate to declare an infectious disease emergency. COVID’s fatality rate was 0.085%, with an average death age of 82, far below this threshold. He warns of genetic engineering and pandemic preparedness fueling crises that wouldn’t otherwise exist.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, renowned oncologist, challenges the COVID-19 "emergency" narrative, arguing it was a WHO-orchestrated pretext to justify mass vaccination. He cites exaggerated excess deaths, unoverwhelmed health systems, and neglected non-COVID care, leading to spikes in cardiac, stroke, and cancer deaths. Dalgleish questions the vaccine rollout, noting WHO’s own rule of thumb—per Chris Whitty—requires a 33% fatality rate to declare an infectious disease emergency. COVID’s fatality rate was 0.085%, with an average death age of 82, far below this threshold. He warns of genetic engineering and pandemic preparedness fueling crises that wouldn’t otherwise exist.

Camus

26,936 views • 1 year ago

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,416 views • 2 years ago

Professor Emeritus Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a renowned physician, reports a disturbing and consistent clinical observation: a dramatic rise in aggressive, late-stage "turbo cancers" in younger patients. He states these cancers are presenting at Stage 4, are highly aggressive, and respond poorly to standard treatments. In his expert opinion, the only common link he consistently finds is prior exposure to COVID-19 booster vaccines (mRNA) or multiple doses. He describes seeing six such patients in a single afternoon, all with this devastating profile. Crucially, he notes he was the only doctor to ask about their vaccine history—a fundamental part of any medical diagnostic process. He alleges a culture of silence and suppression within the system. He shares the alarming account of a colleague suspended after reporting a sudden spike (from 1-2 to 11 cases) of cervical cancer in patients who had received both the HPV and COVID vaccines. His conclusion? The claim that "there is no evidence" of a link is a direct result of doctors being discouraged from even looking for one. By not asking the question, they avoid the answer. This isn't just data; it's the lived experience of seasoned clinicians witnessing a medical emergency they feel is being ignored.

Camus

33,828 views • 10 months ago

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. passionately champions medical freedom and individual choice in the vaccine debate. Speaking out against mandatory vaccinations, he argues that the COVID-19 vaccine for children was never justified and carries significant risks. “Kids face almost no risk from COVID-19,” RFK Jr. asserts, noting that only children with severe comorbidities might have minimal vulnerability. He questions the rationale of vaccinating millions of healthy children with a medical intervention linked to serious adverse effects. Citing clinical data, RFK Jr. points to alarming associations between the COVID vaccine and myocarditis, pericarditis, strokes, and neurological injuries. He references Pfizer’s trial data, claiming a 23% higher death rate in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group, raising critical concerns about safety. “We must demand answers and hold institutions accountable,” he insists, calling for transparency in how vaccine recommendations are made. RFK Jr. emphasizes that parents deserve full, unbiased information to make informed decisions for their children. “Medical interventions should never be forced,” he declares, advocating for a healthcare system that respects individual rights and prioritizes safety. He urges the public to question dubious mandates and seek policies that truly serve the well-being of all Americans, especially the youngest.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. passionately champions medical freedom and individual choice in the vaccine debate. Speaking out against mandatory vaccinations, he argues that the COVID-19 vaccine for children was never justified and carries significant risks. “Kids face almost no risk from COVID-19,” RFK Jr. asserts, noting that only children with severe comorbidities might have minimal vulnerability. He questions the rationale of vaccinating millions of healthy children with a medical intervention linked to serious adverse effects. Citing clinical data, RFK Jr. points to alarming associations between the COVID vaccine and myocarditis, pericarditis, strokes, and neurological injuries. He references Pfizer’s trial data, claiming a 23% higher death rate in the vaccine group compared to the placebo group, raising critical concerns about safety. “We must demand answers and hold institutions accountable,” he insists, calling for transparency in how vaccine recommendations are made. RFK Jr. emphasizes that parents deserve full, unbiased information to make informed decisions for their children. “Medical interventions should never be forced,” he declares, advocating for a healthcare system that respects individual rights and prioritizes safety. He urges the public to question dubious mandates and seek policies that truly serve the well-being of all Americans, especially the youngest.

Pure Awakening

35,738 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, in an interview with Michael Knowles, exposes what he calls a deliberate cover-up by the CDC regarding the hepatitis B vaccine’s link to autism. He claims the vaccine, once containing the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, posed severe risks to infants. Wakefield alleges that thimerosal, a highly toxic mercury compound, was present in hepatitis B vaccines given to newborns in amounts far exceeding EPA safety guidelines. He says this exposure was linked to a sevenfold increased risk of autism when administered on the first day of life. According to Wakefield, the CDC conducted a study but held a secretive meeting at Simpsonwood to bury the findings. He claims they manipulated data by removing the control group—those unvaccinated—hiding the dramatic autism risk. This, he says, was fraud to protect the vaccine program. Wakefield points to persistent mothers and advocates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who uncovered what he calls the “Simpsonwood scandal.” He argues this is part of a pattern of CDC and pharmaceutical industry deception, including issues with the MMR vaccine. The truth, he says, was known all along. This is a call to question vaccine safety narratives. Wakefield’s claims demand scrutiny: Were infants harmed by thimerosal? Did the CDC hide the truth?

Dr. Andrew Wakefield, in an interview with Michael Knowles, exposes what he calls a deliberate cover-up by the CDC regarding the hepatitis B vaccine’s link to autism. He claims the vaccine, once containing the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, posed severe risks to infants. Wakefield alleges that thimerosal, a highly toxic mercury compound, was present in hepatitis B vaccines given to newborns in amounts far exceeding EPA safety guidelines. He says this exposure was linked to a sevenfold increased risk of autism when administered on the first day of life. According to Wakefield, the CDC conducted a study but held a secretive meeting at Simpsonwood to bury the findings. He claims they manipulated data by removing the control group—those unvaccinated—hiding the dramatic autism risk. This, he says, was fraud to protect the vaccine program. Wakefield points to persistent mothers and advocates like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who uncovered what he calls the “Simpsonwood scandal.” He argues this is part of a pattern of CDC and pharmaceutical industry deception, including issues with the MMR vaccine. The truth, he says, was known all along. This is a call to question vaccine safety narratives. Wakefield’s claims demand scrutiny: Were infants harmed by thimerosal? Did the CDC hide the truth?

Camus

21,712 views • 1 year ago

Big Pharma is “terrified” of Vitamin D, and Dr. Pierre Kory says he could spend a whole hour on this topic. Why so scared? Because “It threatens the DISEASE MODEL.” A meta-analysis out of Italy found what happens when people take Vitamin D, and the results are staggering: Looking at data from 19 different studies and 1.26 million individuals, the meta-analysis revealed: • Vitamin D showed about a 60% effectiveness against the incidence of COVID-19 in randomized control trials. • Vitamin D showed about 40-50% effectiveness in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 in observational studies. • For preventing severe COVID-19 cases requiring ICU care, vitamin D supplementation was about 70% effective. We didn’t need to lock ourselves inside for years, live in fear, and vilify our neighbors for not wearing a mask. That was literally the worst thing we could have done. All we ever needed was to go outside, get sunshine, and raise our vitamin D, and everything would have been so much better. But the sunshine story goes far beyond COVID. You think you’re doing your health a favor by avoiding the sun? The data tells a very different story, and it starts with 29,518 women who did exactly that. 🧵

Big Pharma is “terrified” of Vitamin D, and Dr. Pierre Kory says he could spend a whole hour on this topic. Why so scared? Because “It threatens the DISEASE MODEL.” A meta-analysis out of Italy found what happens when people take Vitamin D, and the results are staggering: Looking at data from 19 different studies and 1.26 million individuals, the meta-analysis revealed: • Vitamin D showed about a 60% effectiveness against the incidence of COVID-19 in randomized control trials. • Vitamin D showed about 40-50% effectiveness in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 in observational studies. • For preventing severe COVID-19 cases requiring ICU care, vitamin D supplementation was about 70% effective. We didn’t need to lock ourselves inside for years, live in fear, and vilify our neighbors for not wearing a mask. That was literally the worst thing we could have done. All we ever needed was to go outside, get sunshine, and raise our vitamin D, and everything would have been so much better. But the sunshine story goes far beyond COVID. You think you’re doing your health a favor by avoiding the sun? The data tells a very different story, and it starts with 29,518 women who did exactly that. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

300,143 views • 11 days ago

Radio host Charlamagne Tha God on “The Breakfast Club” Friday expressed regret for getting the COVID-19 vaccine due to chest pain he has experienced since receiving it. The mRNA vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer have reportedly been connected to increased myocarditis, especially in young men, according to studies. Charlamagne said on the show that he was not certain the vaccine was what caused his chest issues, but suggested it was a possibility because of the timing.

Radio host Charlamagne Tha God on “The Breakfast Club” Friday expressed regret for getting the COVID-19 vaccine due to chest pain he has experienced since receiving it. The mRNA vaccines produced by Moderna and Pfizer have reportedly been connected to increased myocarditis, especially in young men, according to studies. Charlamagne said on the show that he was not certain the vaccine was what caused his chest issues, but suggested it was a possibility because of the timing.

Camus

34,995 views • 10 months ago

Dr. Byram Bridle, a respected vaccinologist, has uncovered troubling evidence of health regulators concealing critical data about COVID-19 vaccine safety. In British Columbia, the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) was caught manipulating adverse event reports. Through a Freedom of Information request, lawyer Lee Turner, representing Dr. Charles Hoffe, obtained internal BCCDC data. The agency compared adverse event reports for COVID-19 vaccines to flu shots—a standard control. The findings were staggering: adverse events for COVID shots were 16x higher. Despite this, when the BCCDC went public, they stripped away this context. They hid the comparison to flu vaccines and slashed the reported number of serious adverse events by over 80%. How? By changing the definition of a "serious adverse event" just before releasing the data. Dr. Bridle, analyzing this as a scientist, was shocked. The BCCDC’s own documents showed weekly meetings where officials reviewed rising serious adverse events. Yet, they deliberately downplayed these numbers to avoid public alarm. Bridle calls this what it is: lying to the public. This deception, Bridle argues, is why trust in health regulators has crumbled. He’s been labeled an “anti-vaxxer” for raising legitimate concerns, but he insists the real issue is regulators’ lack of transparency. “When you lie, you lose people’s trust,” he says. And he’s right. Bridle’s stance on vaccines? He can’t blindly trust regulators who’ve proven untrustworthy. His advice: do your own research. He holds regulators accountable for the rise in vaccine hesitancy, not scientists like himself who demand honest data and rigorous safety studies. To rebuild trust, Bridle urges health authorities to conduct proper safety studies and share all data transparently. “You lied. You’ve driven vaccine hesitancy,” he says. If regulators want public confidence in any vaccine—COVID or otherwise—they must earn it with full honesty. This is a wake-up call. When health agencies manipulate data, they betray the public.

Dr. Byram Bridle, a respected vaccinologist, has uncovered troubling evidence of health regulators concealing critical data about COVID-19 vaccine safety. In British Columbia, the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) was caught manipulating adverse event reports. Through a Freedom of Information request, lawyer Lee Turner, representing Dr. Charles Hoffe, obtained internal BCCDC data. The agency compared adverse event reports for COVID-19 vaccines to flu shots—a standard control. The findings were staggering: adverse events for COVID shots were 16x higher. Despite this, when the BCCDC went public, they stripped away this context. They hid the comparison to flu vaccines and slashed the reported number of serious adverse events by over 80%. How? By changing the definition of a "serious adverse event" just before releasing the data. Dr. Bridle, analyzing this as a scientist, was shocked. The BCCDC’s own documents showed weekly meetings where officials reviewed rising serious adverse events. Yet, they deliberately downplayed these numbers to avoid public alarm. Bridle calls this what it is: lying to the public. This deception, Bridle argues, is why trust in health regulators has crumbled. He’s been labeled an “anti-vaxxer” for raising legitimate concerns, but he insists the real issue is regulators’ lack of transparency. “When you lie, you lose people’s trust,” he says. And he’s right. Bridle’s stance on vaccines? He can’t blindly trust regulators who’ve proven untrustworthy. His advice: do your own research. He holds regulators accountable for the rise in vaccine hesitancy, not scientists like himself who demand honest data and rigorous safety studies. To rebuild trust, Bridle urges health authorities to conduct proper safety studies and share all data transparently. “You lied. You’ve driven vaccine hesitancy,” he says. If regulators want public confidence in any vaccine—COVID or otherwise—they must earn it with full honesty. This is a wake-up call. When health agencies manipulate data, they betray the public.

Camus

57,020 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, renowned oncologist and HIV researcher, exposes shocking truths about COVID-19 vaccines, scientific suppression, and the origins of the virus. "From the start, we knew something was terribly wrong." Dr. Dalgleish reveals that his team in Norway had developed an effective HIV vaccine—proven in trials with no side effects—yet it was inexplicably ignored. When COVID-19 emerged, colleagues in Germany alerted him to alarming abnormalities in the virus’s sequence. Their analysis showed that 80% of the spike protein (used in Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines) was homologous to human proteins—a red flag for autoimmunity. They urgently warned of two critical dangers: 1️⃣ Platelet Factor 4 – Linked to clotting, myocarditis, and strokes. 2️⃣ Myelin – Known to trigger Guillain-Barré syndrome and paralysis. Their findings were submitted to the UK Cabinet Office and Sage—only to be dismissed without debate. Worse, when they attempted to publish their data in Nature, Science, The Lancet, and other top journals, all rejected it within hours with identical responses: "Not in the public interest." "The suppression was systematic." Despite clear evidence the virus had lab-engineered inserts (previously published to enhance infectivity), authorities pushed forward with spike-protein-based vaccines. When Pfizer’s hidden trial data was forced into public view via US court order, the truth emerged: - 3% risk of death from vaccine adverse events - <1% risk from COVID itself Yet, regulators (MHRA, FDA, WHO) approved it globally. "How could so many 'experts' get it so catastrophically wrong?" The scientific establishment failed humanity. Now, the consequences are undeniable.

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, renowned oncologist and HIV researcher, exposes shocking truths about COVID-19 vaccines, scientific suppression, and the origins of the virus. "From the start, we knew something was terribly wrong." Dr. Dalgleish reveals that his team in Norway had developed an effective HIV vaccine—proven in trials with no side effects—yet it was inexplicably ignored. When COVID-19 emerged, colleagues in Germany alerted him to alarming abnormalities in the virus’s sequence. Their analysis showed that 80% of the spike protein (used in Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca vaccines) was homologous to human proteins—a red flag for autoimmunity. They urgently warned of two critical dangers: 1️⃣ Platelet Factor 4 – Linked to clotting, myocarditis, and strokes. 2️⃣ Myelin – Known to trigger Guillain-Barré syndrome and paralysis. Their findings were submitted to the UK Cabinet Office and Sage—only to be dismissed without debate. Worse, when they attempted to publish their data in Nature, Science, The Lancet, and other top journals, all rejected it within hours with identical responses: "Not in the public interest." "The suppression was systematic." Despite clear evidence the virus had lab-engineered inserts (previously published to enhance infectivity), authorities pushed forward with spike-protein-based vaccines. When Pfizer’s hidden trial data was forced into public view via US court order, the truth emerged: - 3% risk of death from vaccine adverse events - <1% risk from COVID itself Yet, regulators (MHRA, FDA, WHO) approved it globally. "How could so many 'experts' get it so catastrophically wrong?" The scientific establishment failed humanity. Now, the consequences are undeniable.

Camus

44,142 views • 11 months ago

BREAKING: The Prime Minister has just attacked and lied about me in Parliament 1. I did NOT state that ‘vaccines are linked to cancer’ I was presenting information about the possible link of the covid mRNA vaccine and cancer from US HHS data and quoting oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish ‘it’s highly likely that the covid vaccines have been a significant factor in cancer of members of the royal family’ 2. Conflating legitimate safety concerns of a novel mRNA technology with all vaccines is preposterous and dangerous 3. Research reveals that behaviour such as Starmer’s today is what is fuelling the concerning reduced uptake of vital traditional vaccines. It’s no wonder trust in this Labour government is very low. We need to do better

BREAKING: The Prime Minister has just attacked and lied about me in Parliament 1. I did NOT state that ‘vaccines are linked to cancer’ I was presenting information about the possible link of the covid mRNA vaccine and cancer from US HHS data and quoting oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish ‘it’s highly likely that the covid vaccines have been a significant factor in cancer of members of the royal family’ 2. Conflating legitimate safety concerns of a novel mRNA technology with all vaccines is preposterous and dangerous 3. Research reveals that behaviour such as Starmer’s today is what is fuelling the concerning reduced uptake of vital traditional vaccines. It’s no wonder trust in this Labour government is very low. We need to do better

Dr Aseem Malhotra

1,101,737 views • 10 months ago

Breaking News🇬🇧💉: Today PM Starmer is encouraging most of Kent (for the time being), to go and get their 'safe and effective' Meningitis JABS available from Pfizer, GSK and Moderna. The Public Want Answers: Reform MPs Must Scrutinize Starmers JAB Comments: Back in 2022 PM Keir Starmer said of the CV19 JAB - 'No side effects, it's SAFE , it's EASY ....Don't listen to vaccine 'misinformation''. So did Starmer read the UK Pfizer contract details, which clearly stated that the CV19 JAB did not prevent infection or transmission? Are we to believe Keir made these claims either without reading the details that Pfizer had NO data on longer term effects, or he knew this and lied? Over to any MPs who given a damn?

Breaking News🇬🇧💉: Today PM Starmer is encouraging most of Kent (for the time being), to go and get their 'safe and effective' Meningitis JABS available from Pfizer, GSK and Moderna. The Public Want Answers: Reform MPs Must Scrutinize Starmers JAB Comments: Back in 2022 PM Keir Starmer said of the CV19 JAB - 'No side effects, it's SAFE , it's EASY ....Don't listen to vaccine 'misinformation''. So did Starmer read the UK Pfizer contract details, which clearly stated that the CV19 JAB did not prevent infection or transmission? Are we to believe Keir made these claims either without reading the details that Pfizer had NO data on longer term effects, or he knew this and lied? Over to any MPs who given a damn?

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

49,323 views • 3 months ago

Ottawa got reports of deaths following COVID vaccines while spending $46 million promoting them While Ottawa was reassuring Canadians about vaccine safety and spending millions to increase public confidence in vaccination, federal officials were simultaneously monitoring reports of deaths and serious adverse events associated with the vaccines. The federal government was receiving reports of deaths and serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination at the same time it was spending more than $46 million on advertising campaigns, influencer marketing and public messaging designed to increase vaccine uptake across Canada. The disclosures come from two recently released Order Paper responses obtained through questions submitted by Conservative MP Cathay Wagantall. Together, the responses provide new details about the government's vaccine promotion efforts and the timeline of adverse event reports received by federal health authorities. According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, officials first received a report involving a deceased Pfizer vaccine recipient in January 2021. Reports involving Moderna and AstraZeneca recipients followed in March and April 2021, respectively. The agency also received reports of spontaneous abortion, stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis and heart attacks in the early months of the vaccine rollout. Federal officials stressed that no causal relationship between the vaccines and those reported deaths or medical events had been established in the cases cited. At the same time, Ottawa was spending heavily to encourage vaccination. Government records show at least $46.7 million was spent on COVID-19 vaccine advertising and promotional campaigns between 2021 and 2023. The spending included an $11.3 million "Ripple Effect" campaign, a $5.3 million "Ask the Experts" campaign, a $4.9 million "Educate and Build Trust" campaign, a $7-million campaign aimed at children, and a taxpayer-funded social media influencer campaign costing more than $132,000. The federal government said the purpose of these campaigns was to provide Canadians with science-based information about vaccine safety, effectiveness, side effects and eligibility while promoting awareness of vaccine availability. However, when asked how much money was spent specifically investigating vaccine risks and adverse effects, Health Canada said the information is not tracked in a centralized database and could not provide a comprehensive figure. The Public Health Agency of Canada said it identified safety signals during the vaccine rollout, including myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. According to the government, those findings contributed to changes in vaccine recommendations in some provinces and updates to vaccine product monographs. The responses reveal that while Ottawa was reassuring Canadians about vaccine safety and spending millions to increase public confidence in vaccination, federal officials were simultaneously monitoring reports of deaths and serious adverse events associated with the vaccines. Whether those reports were ultimately determined to be caused by vaccination or not, they formed part of the safety data being collected and analyzed as Canada's largest mass vaccination campaign unfolded.

Ottawa got reports of deaths following COVID vaccines while spending $46 million promoting them While Ottawa was reassuring Canadians about vaccine safety and spending millions to increase public confidence in vaccination, federal officials were simultaneously monitoring reports of deaths and serious adverse events associated with the vaccines. The federal government was receiving reports of deaths and serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination at the same time it was spending more than $46 million on advertising campaigns, influencer marketing and public messaging designed to increase vaccine uptake across Canada. The disclosures come from two recently released Order Paper responses obtained through questions submitted by Conservative MP Cathay Wagantall. Together, the responses provide new details about the government's vaccine promotion efforts and the timeline of adverse event reports received by federal health authorities. According to the Public Health Agency of Canada, officials first received a report involving a deceased Pfizer vaccine recipient in January 2021. Reports involving Moderna and AstraZeneca recipients followed in March and April 2021, respectively. The agency also received reports of spontaneous abortion, stroke, myocarditis, pericarditis and heart attacks in the early months of the vaccine rollout. Federal officials stressed that no causal relationship between the vaccines and those reported deaths or medical events had been established in the cases cited. At the same time, Ottawa was spending heavily to encourage vaccination. Government records show at least $46.7 million was spent on COVID-19 vaccine advertising and promotional campaigns between 2021 and 2023. The spending included an $11.3 million "Ripple Effect" campaign, a $5.3 million "Ask the Experts" campaign, a $4.9 million "Educate and Build Trust" campaign, a $7-million campaign aimed at children, and a taxpayer-funded social media influencer campaign costing more than $132,000. The federal government said the purpose of these campaigns was to provide Canadians with science-based information about vaccine safety, effectiveness, side effects and eligibility while promoting awareness of vaccine availability. However, when asked how much money was spent specifically investigating vaccine risks and adverse effects, Health Canada said the information is not tracked in a centralized database and could not provide a comprehensive figure. The Public Health Agency of Canada said it identified safety signals during the vaccine rollout, including myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. According to the government, those findings contributed to changes in vaccine recommendations in some provinces and updates to vaccine product monographs. The responses reveal that while Ottawa was reassuring Canadians about vaccine safety and spending millions to increase public confidence in vaccination, federal officials were simultaneously monitoring reports of deaths and serious adverse events associated with the vaccines. Whether those reports were ultimately determined to be caused by vaccination or not, they formed part of the safety data being collected and analyzed as Canada's largest mass vaccination campaign unfolded.

Rebel News

18,152 views • 1 month ago

Let this sink in: The COVID shots forced on billions of people could only be authorized if there were no previously-existing treatment options. So, what did they do? According to Dr. David Martin, they let people die and suppressed treatments like HCQ and ivermectin in order to make way for a “vaccine.” The audacity of the crime was shocking: The CDC, before it became the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was the US Malaria Suppression Program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? It advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The institutions that demonized hydroxychloroquine were once its strongest believers. Watch and listen to Dr. David Martin.

Let this sink in: The COVID shots forced on billions of people could only be authorized if there were no previously-existing treatment options. So, what did they do? According to Dr. David Martin, they let people die and suppressed treatments like HCQ and ivermectin in order to make way for a “vaccine.” The audacity of the crime was shocking: The CDC, before it became the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was the US Malaria Suppression Program in Atlanta, Georgia, which did what? It advocated for the distribution of hydroxychloroquine. The institutions that demonized hydroxychloroquine were once its strongest believers. Watch and listen to Dr. David Martin.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

815,925 views • 2 years ago

9 Shocking COVID Truths They’ll Never Admit to You First and foremost, the COVID response was never about public health. It was about conditioning the population to accept “a needle in every arm.” The reason we know this to be true is because “there was a strict and forceful government response to abolish” any cheap remedy that works for COVID-19. This includes: • Hydroxychloroquine • Ivermectin • Virucidal nasal sprays and gargles • Higher-dose corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone) • Zinc • Vitamin D • Vitamin C • Quercetin • Over-the-counter famotidine • Colchicine “ALL of them work!” Dr. Peter McCullough says. It is well-established that comorbidities significantly increase the risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19. Instead of promoting a healthy lifestyle, sunshine, exercise, or early treatment, the “health experts” told Americans: • Be afraid • Stay in lockdown • Social distance • Wear a mask • Use hand sanitizer • Wait for a vaccine • When the vaccine comes, don't stop at 2 shots. Keep taking more every six months. “It was clear from the beginning: COVID-19, the illness, was actually all about getting the vaccine—a needle in every arm,” Dr. McCullough concluded. Keep reading as we go further down the rabbit hole in this next clip from The Truth About Vaccines.

9 Shocking COVID Truths They’ll Never Admit to You First and foremost, the COVID response was never about public health. It was about conditioning the population to accept “a needle in every arm.” The reason we know this to be true is because “there was a strict and forceful government response to abolish” any cheap remedy that works for COVID-19. This includes: • Hydroxychloroquine • Ivermectin • Virucidal nasal sprays and gargles • Higher-dose corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone) • Zinc • Vitamin D • Vitamin C • Quercetin • Over-the-counter famotidine • Colchicine “ALL of them work!” Dr. Peter McCullough says. It is well-established that comorbidities significantly increase the risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19. Instead of promoting a healthy lifestyle, sunshine, exercise, or early treatment, the “health experts” told Americans: • Be afraid • Stay in lockdown • Social distance • Wear a mask • Use hand sanitizer • Wait for a vaccine • When the vaccine comes, don't stop at 2 shots. Keep taking more every six months. “It was clear from the beginning: COVID-19, the illness, was actually all about getting the vaccine—a needle in every arm,” Dr. McCullough concluded. Keep reading as we go further down the rabbit hole in this next clip from The Truth About Vaccines.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

709,950 views • 1 year ago

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.

Camus

45,590 views • 1 year ago

HOLY SMOKES: Makary just called out Biden on live TV for censoring vaccine data that led to a myocarditis explosion in young men. Pandora’s box is open—and the MAHA crew is bringing a full-blown accountability revolution for what happened during Covid. Dr. Marty Makary directly named the Biden administration for covering up vaccine injury data during COVID: “It was part of the Biden medical establishment censorship complex.” He explained that any information tied to complications or injuries was immediately flagged. “Any information that related to complications of the vaccines or vaccine injuries was considered ‘Covid vaccine hesitant content’—and so it was censored, blocked, or slow-walked.” Then came the devastating admission: “We now have, tragically, this information that the heart inflammation that occurred in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been…” “And as a result, thousands of kids probably had this myocarditis complication—and didn’t have to have it.” This is a reckoning.

HOLY SMOKES: Makary just called out Biden on live TV for censoring vaccine data that led to a myocarditis explosion in young men. Pandora’s box is open—and the MAHA crew is bringing a full-blown accountability revolution for what happened during Covid. Dr. Marty Makary directly named the Biden administration for covering up vaccine injury data during COVID: “It was part of the Biden medical establishment censorship complex.” He explained that any information tied to complications or injuries was immediately flagged. “Any information that related to complications of the vaccines or vaccine injuries was considered ‘Covid vaccine hesitant content’—and so it was censored, blocked, or slow-walked.” Then came the devastating admission: “We now have, tragically, this information that the heart inflammation that occurred in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been…” “And as a result, thousands of kids probably had this myocarditis complication—and didn’t have to have it.” This is a reckoning.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

920,606 views • 1 year ago