Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Brian Hooker’s Explosive Testimony Exposes Alarming Vaccine Safety Concerns In a powerful Senate testimony, Dr. Brian Hooker, Chief Scientific Officer at Children’s Health Defense and father of a severely vaccine-injured son, laid bare the unchecked expansion of the CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule and its devastating consequences. His data-driven...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

451,190 subscribers

49,072 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von Camus
Camusvor 1 Jahr

Credit: @BrianHookerPhD

Profilbild von GS
GSvor 1 Jahr

The reality will be worse because even if the marketing of the latest self-replicating vaccine has been stopped in the USA, this does not protect US citizens because in the EU or in other countries where the use of the vaccine has been approved it will cause a global pandemic due to the characteristics of the vaccine.

Profilbild von Jane Tran
Jane Tranvor 1 Jahr

Bottom line, Congress is the problem

Profilbild von Dear Adele
Dear Adelevor 1 Jahr

None. Zero. Ever. Period.

Profilbild von Katy Do
Katy Dovor 1 Jahr

Praying for me to heed these warnings

Ähnliche Videos

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.
10:01

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

578,261 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

It's time we REMOVE liability shields that protect vaccine manufacturers who are harming our babies. Dr. Brian Hooker, who is a vaccine safety scientist with Children's Health Defense, gives an alarming study regarding vaccines in babies / children. He says that AFTER laws were changed to protect vaccine makers from lawsuits, the number of required vaccines INCREASED dramatically to 73 doses by 2023. According to Dr. Hooker, the FDA only tests these vaccines individually with what he calls "minimal" safety testing, and the CDC hasn't studied how all these vaccines might affect children's health when given together. He points to research comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, suggesting that vaccinated kids are twice as likely to have developmental delays, ear infections, and stomach problems. The research he mentions indicates vaccinated children have 4.5 times more asthma and between 4 to 20 times higher rates of autoimmune and brain development problems than unvaccinated children. It's time to slay the dragon that is the Medical Industrial Complex and stop these monsters from DELIBERATELY harming our babies!
1:14

It's time we REMOVE liability shields that protect vaccine manufacturers who are harming our babies. Dr. Brian Hooker, who is a vaccine safety scientist with Children's Health Defense, gives an alarming study regarding vaccines in babies / children. He says that AFTER laws were changed to protect vaccine makers from lawsuits, the number of required vaccines INCREASED dramatically to 73 doses by 2023. According to Dr. Hooker, the FDA only tests these vaccines individually with what he calls "minimal" safety testing, and the CDC hasn't studied how all these vaccines might affect children's health when given together. He points to research comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, suggesting that vaccinated kids are twice as likely to have developmental delays, ear infections, and stomach problems. The research he mentions indicates vaccinated children have 4.5 times more asthma and between 4 to 20 times higher rates of autoimmune and brain development problems than unvaccinated children. It's time to slay the dragon that is the Medical Industrial Complex and stop these monsters from DELIBERATELY harming our babies!

Bridgett Fertig

12,734 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dr. McCullough: It’s Time to Put a Pause on the Childhood Vaccine Schedule After the ACIP Committee recommended the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the childhood schedule. Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® wondered what else the ACIP Committee got wrong. After a little investigation, he discovered studies from Mawson, Thomas, Hooker, Miller, et cetera that showed that unvaccinated children have healthier outcomes. “They [unvaccinated kids] have lower rates of atopic dermatitis, asthma, need for tympanostomy tubes, lower rates of neuropsychiatric disorders that I’ve mentioned. So, we can look at it on both sides of the coin. Right now, I’m in line with the World Council for Health, which, in September of 2023, came out with a recommendation to actually pause on the childhood vaccine schedule.”
0:57

Dr. McCullough: It’s Time to Put a Pause on the Childhood Vaccine Schedule After the ACIP Committee recommended the COVID-19 “vaccines” on the childhood schedule. Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® wondered what else the ACIP Committee got wrong. After a little investigation, he discovered studies from Mawson, Thomas, Hooker, Miller, et cetera that showed that unvaccinated children have healthier outcomes. “They [unvaccinated kids] have lower rates of atopic dermatitis, asthma, need for tympanostomy tubes, lower rates of neuropsychiatric disorders that I’ve mentioned. So, we can look at it on both sides of the coin. Right now, I’m in line with the World Council for Health, which, in September of 2023, came out with a recommendation to actually pause on the childhood vaccine schedule.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

562,179 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.
1:55

A powerful claim from pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas. After decades in medicine, the evidence is clear: the risk of death from a childhood vaccine is greater than the risk of death from the disease it targets. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a statistical reality, supported by research the medical establishment has tried to suppress. Dr. Thomas’s own study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children, was retracted on a questionable technicality—not because of flawed data. Why silence this? Because the results are undeniable: Unvaccinated children are consistently healthier. They show significantly lower rates of: - Autism - ADHD - Asthma - Cancer - Autoimmune disorders - Chronic infections The CDC has never conducted a large-scale study comparing long-term health outcomes. Why? Many believe it’s because they already know what the data would show. It’s time for transparency. It’s time for informed consent. It’s time to move vaccines to Schedule B.

Camus

73,855 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Attorney Aaron Siri exposes that not one childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed with a true placebo-controlled trial, as chronic diseases skyrocket in kids. Is this why over 50% of children now face a health crisis? Attorney Aaron Siri’s explosive testimony exposes a critical gap in vaccine safety research that demands attention. As Siri detailed in his 66-page submission to Congress, not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC’s current schedule (except COVAXIN for ages 12+) was licensed based on a clinical trial using a true placebo control group. If a control group received another vaccine, that vaccine also lacked a placebo-controlled trial. These claims are backed by FDA clinical trial documents—undeniable evidence that challenges the narrative of “settled science.” Siri’s testimony raises a pressing question: Why haven’t we studied the safety of childhood vaccines with the rigor they deserve? He points to a pandemic of chronic disease plaguing America’s children. In the early 1980s, less than 13% of kids had a chronic illness. Today, over 50% suffer from conditions like asthma, allergies, and autoimmune disorders—many rooted in immune dysregulation. What’s changed? Siri notes the CDC’s vaccine schedule has ballooned from 3 injections in 1986 to 29 by age one today, including in utero shots. This staggering increase, coupled with the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielding manufacturers from design defect liability, raises red flags. Siri argues we must investigate all environmental factors—including vaccines—driving this crisis. The absence of long-term, placebo-controlled trials leaves a gaping hole in our understanding of vaccine safety. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pressed Dr. Anthony Fauci for such studies, none were produced. CDC and FDA officials, when questioned, have similarly failed to provide evidence. Siri’s call to action is clear: we need transparent, unbiased research to rule out vaccines as a contributor to the chronic disease epidemic. “We’re in a pandemic right now,” he warns, urging HHS Secretary nominee Kennedy to prioritize this issue. The health of our children hangs in the balance. Will we have the courage to demand answers, or will we ignore the data staring us in the face?
3:03

Attorney Aaron Siri exposes that not one childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule was licensed with a true placebo-controlled trial, as chronic diseases skyrocket in kids. Is this why over 50% of children now face a health crisis? Attorney Aaron Siri’s explosive testimony exposes a critical gap in vaccine safety research that demands attention. As Siri detailed in his 66-page submission to Congress, not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC’s current schedule (except COVAXIN for ages 12+) was licensed based on a clinical trial using a true placebo control group. If a control group received another vaccine, that vaccine also lacked a placebo-controlled trial. These claims are backed by FDA clinical trial documents—undeniable evidence that challenges the narrative of “settled science.” Siri’s testimony raises a pressing question: Why haven’t we studied the safety of childhood vaccines with the rigor they deserve? He points to a pandemic of chronic disease plaguing America’s children. In the early 1980s, less than 13% of kids had a chronic illness. Today, over 50% suffer from conditions like asthma, allergies, and autoimmune disorders—many rooted in immune dysregulation. What’s changed? Siri notes the CDC’s vaccine schedule has ballooned from 3 injections in 1986 to 29 by age one today, including in utero shots. This staggering increase, coupled with the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act shielding manufacturers from design defect liability, raises red flags. Siri argues we must investigate all environmental factors—including vaccines—driving this crisis. The absence of long-term, placebo-controlled trials leaves a gaping hole in our understanding of vaccine safety. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pressed Dr. Anthony Fauci for such studies, none were produced. CDC and FDA officials, when questioned, have similarly failed to provide evidence. Siri’s call to action is clear: we need transparent, unbiased research to rule out vaccines as a contributor to the chronic disease epidemic. “We’re in a pandemic right now,” he warns, urging HHS Secretary nominee Kennedy to prioritize this issue. The health of our children hangs in the balance. Will we have the courage to demand answers, or will we ignore the data staring us in the face?

Camus

347,306 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Brian Hooker revealed a new study showing vaccinated children are far more likely to die than unvaccinated children. “We’ve been working with the state of Louisiana and we were able to get their infant mortality data for the last 10 years… and we cross-referenced the vaccination data for those infants who died.” “We looked specifically at the two-month vaccines… the more vaccines that these children got, the worse off they were.” “The worst offender was a six-in-one vaccine used in the United States called Vaxelis.” “In the third month following those vaccines, the rate of infant death was two times higher in those infants that got the Vaxelis vaccine versus those that didn’t get the Vaxelis vaccine.” Brian Hooker, PhD
1:56

Dr. Brian Hooker revealed a new study showing vaccinated children are far more likely to die than unvaccinated children. “We’ve been working with the state of Louisiana and we were able to get their infant mortality data for the last 10 years… and we cross-referenced the vaccination data for those infants who died.” “We looked specifically at the two-month vaccines… the more vaccines that these children got, the worse off they were.” “The worst offender was a six-in-one vaccine used in the United States called Vaxelis.” “In the third month following those vaccines, the rate of infant death was two times higher in those infants that got the Vaxelis vaccine versus those that didn’t get the Vaxelis vaccine.” Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

44,871 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨ALARMING HARM: HPV Vaccine INCREASES HPV Rates & Ovarian Damage in Girls – Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD The Gardasil HPV vaccine doesn’t even prevent HPV. Florida’s Medicaid database was analyzed, comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated girls. The results are alarming: - Vaccinated girls showed much higher rates of ovarian dysfunction and female reproductive disorders. - They also had a greater risk/level of HPV infection itself compared to the unvaccinated group. Dr. Hooker: “We see much, much higher levels of these issues in the individuals that received the vaccine…” Why are we giving this to our children? A vaccine that fails to prevent the very infection it targets — and increases serious reproductive risks instead? Parents, this is from the actual data. Do your research before the next “routine” shot. The HPV rollout continues… but the science from this comparison demands answers. Share this. Question everything. Protect our children.
1:56

🚨ALARMING HARM: HPV Vaccine INCREASES HPV Rates & Ovarian Damage in Girls – Dr. Brian Hooker, PhD The Gardasil HPV vaccine doesn’t even prevent HPV. Florida’s Medicaid database was analyzed, comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated girls. The results are alarming: - Vaccinated girls showed much higher rates of ovarian dysfunction and female reproductive disorders. - They also had a greater risk/level of HPV infection itself compared to the unvaccinated group. Dr. Hooker: “We see much, much higher levels of these issues in the individuals that received the vaccine…” Why are we giving this to our children? A vaccine that fails to prevent the very infection it targets — and increases serious reproductive risks instead? Parents, this is from the actual data. Do your research before the next “routine” shot. The HPV rollout continues… but the science from this comparison demands answers. Share this. Question everything. Protect our children.

Valerie Anne Smith

185,899 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Dr. Pierre Kory, Renowned Critical Care Expert: **Unvaccinated Children Are FAR Healthier** Than Vaccinated Ones. "I would dismantle the whole vaccine apparatus...They're destroying the health of our children & our country." The evidence & truth is astounding.... - **Mawson et al. (2017)**: Survey of 666 homeschooled U.S. children (ages 6-12) found vaccinated kids had **higher** allergic rhinitis (30X), ADHD (4X), autism (4X), eczema (3X), learning disabilities (5X) & neurodevelopmental disorders (4X) compared to unvaccinated. - **Hooker & Miller (2020)**: Analysis of pediatric practice records showed vaccinated children (by age 1) had **higher** developmental delays (2.2X), asthma (4.5X) & ear infections (2.1X). - **Hooker (2021)**: Fully vaccinated kids had dramatically **higher** allergies (4X), autism (5X), asthma (18X), ADHD (21X) & chronic ear infections (28X). The explosion in chronic illness—asthma, allergies, ADHD, autism—tracks the expanding vaccine schedule. Shielded by no-liability laws, this system prioritizes profits over safety. Parents: Demand answers. Protect your kids—question the schedule!
3:32

🚨Dr. Pierre Kory, Renowned Critical Care Expert: **Unvaccinated Children Are FAR Healthier** Than Vaccinated Ones. "I would dismantle the whole vaccine apparatus...They're destroying the health of our children & our country." The evidence & truth is astounding.... - **Mawson et al. (2017)**: Survey of 666 homeschooled U.S. children (ages 6-12) found vaccinated kids had **higher** allergic rhinitis (30X), ADHD (4X), autism (4X), eczema (3X), learning disabilities (5X) & neurodevelopmental disorders (4X) compared to unvaccinated. - **Hooker & Miller (2020)**: Analysis of pediatric practice records showed vaccinated children (by age 1) had **higher** developmental delays (2.2X), asthma (4.5X) & ear infections (2.1X). - **Hooker (2021)**: Fully vaccinated kids had dramatically **higher** allergies (4X), autism (5X), asthma (18X), ADHD (21X) & chronic ear infections (28X). The explosion in chronic illness—asthma, allergies, ADHD, autism—tracks the expanding vaccine schedule. Shielded by no-liability laws, this system prioritizes profits over safety. Parents: Demand answers. Protect your kids—question the schedule!

Valerie Anne Smith

16,367 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Dr. Kat Lindley is sounding the alarm on the devastating impacts of COVID mRNA vaccines in children and pregnant women. With 9.5 million kids aged 6 months to 17 years vaccinated, the data is staggering: a 620% surge in myocarditis among young men post-vaccination, per CDC reports. Pfizer’s own safety data reveals increased miscarriage rates, and a shocking study shows a 33% drop in successful conception among vaccinated women. These are not just numbers—they’re our children, our future. Yet, parents are being silenced, intimidated in pediatricians’ offices, and coerced into vaccinating their kids despite rising injuries and new illnesses that should never be seen in healthy children. Dr. Lindley is urging immediate action: “The ACIP meets next week, but we need HHS and CDC to act NOW. Remove COVID mRNA vaccines from the childhood vaccine schedule and protect pregnant women. Lipid nanoparticles cross the placenta, exposing unborn babies to risks we cannot ignore. A child’s health begins in the womb—let’s safeguard it.”
1:22

Dr. Kat Lindley is sounding the alarm on the devastating impacts of COVID mRNA vaccines in children and pregnant women. With 9.5 million kids aged 6 months to 17 years vaccinated, the data is staggering: a 620% surge in myocarditis among young men post-vaccination, per CDC reports. Pfizer’s own safety data reveals increased miscarriage rates, and a shocking study shows a 33% drop in successful conception among vaccinated women. These are not just numbers—they’re our children, our future. Yet, parents are being silenced, intimidated in pediatricians’ offices, and coerced into vaccinating their kids despite rising injuries and new illnesses that should never be seen in healthy children. Dr. Lindley is urging immediate action: “The ACIP meets next week, but we need HHS and CDC to act NOW. Remove COVID mRNA vaccines from the childhood vaccine schedule and protect pregnant women. Lipid nanoparticles cross the placenta, exposing unborn babies to risks we cannot ignore. A child’s health begins in the womb—let’s safeguard it.”

Camus

56,551 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇
17:52

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,527 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

1986: The year that fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood vaccines in America. A deep dive into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Under Ronald Reagan, vaccine manufacturers made an unprecedented move. They told Congress they would stop producing vaccines altogether unless they were granted immunity from all liability. Parents were beginning to sue over children injured by vaccines, and the industry demanded protection. What does this "liability shield" mean in practice? Imagine a faulty car seat causes harm to a child. The manufacturer can be sued for damages. But if a child is injured or killed by a vaccine, that same legal recourse is gone. The manufacturer is untouchable. So, what replaced it? A system funded by a $0.75 tax on every vial of vaccine. This fund is tied to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Parents must file a VAERS report (a system with known, drastic underreporting) and then plead their case in a special "vaccine court" for a limited settlement. The result? The only consumer product in the U.S. with zero liability for its makers. Here’s the critical twist: Once the liability vanished in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule began to explode. It jumped from a handful of shots to the current schedule of up to 72 doses by age 18. Simultaneously, the requirement for comprehensive safety studies for this new, crowded schedule evaporated. There are no studies demonstrating the safety of administering so many vaccines in combination, often as multi-dose shots. The tetanus shot is rarely just a tetanus shot. It's a package deal. The 1986 deal removed accountability and opened the floodgates. The question remains: Who truly bears the risk when a product's makers are immune from lawsuit?
2:38

1986: The year that fundamentally changed the landscape of childhood vaccines in America. A deep dive into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Under Ronald Reagan, vaccine manufacturers made an unprecedented move. They told Congress they would stop producing vaccines altogether unless they were granted immunity from all liability. Parents were beginning to sue over children injured by vaccines, and the industry demanded protection. What does this "liability shield" mean in practice? Imagine a faulty car seat causes harm to a child. The manufacturer can be sued for damages. But if a child is injured or killed by a vaccine, that same legal recourse is gone. The manufacturer is untouchable. So, what replaced it? A system funded by a $0.75 tax on every vial of vaccine. This fund is tied to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). Parents must file a VAERS report (a system with known, drastic underreporting) and then plead their case in a special "vaccine court" for a limited settlement. The result? The only consumer product in the U.S. with zero liability for its makers. Here’s the critical twist: Once the liability vanished in 1986, the childhood vaccine schedule began to explode. It jumped from a handful of shots to the current schedule of up to 72 doses by age 18. Simultaneously, the requirement for comprehensive safety studies for this new, crowded schedule evaporated. There are no studies demonstrating the safety of administering so many vaccines in combination, often as multi-dose shots. The tetanus shot is rarely just a tetanus shot. It's a package deal. The 1986 deal removed accountability and opened the floodgates. The question remains: Who truly bears the risk when a product's makers are immune from lawsuit?

Camus

37,323 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Aaron Siri exposes a staggering 38-year failure in vaccine safety oversight mandated by Congress. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act provided liability protection to vaccine manufacturers. In exchange, the law placed the entire responsibility for ensuring vaccine safety squarely on the government, specifically the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The act had three core mandates for HHS: 1. The Requirement: To actively work to make vaccines safer. 2. The Reporting: To submit a biannual report to Congress detailing how its agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH) had improved vaccine safety over the previous two years. 3. The Task Force: To convene a task force of the heads of NIH, CDC, and FDA to recommend further safety improvements to the HHS Secretary. The results? A complete abdication of duty. ➡️ The Biannual Reports: The legal requirement for biannual safety reports to Congress has existed since 1986. The total number of reports ever submitted? ZERO. ➡️ The Task Force: This key safety committee was formed but made only one set of recommendations in 1998 before being disbanded. It was only recently reconstituted, missing in action for most of its mandated existence. This isn't just a bureaucratic oversight; it's a fundamental breach of a public trust. Congress removed the market incentive for safety by shielding manufacturers from liability, trusting HHS to be the backstop. If HHS can’t even perform the simple, transparent tasks of reporting and convening a task force, how can the public have confidence it is doing the hard work of actively ensuring safety? The law was a bargain. The industry got protection. The American people were promised unparalleled safety oversight in return. They are still waiting.
1:45

Aaron Siri exposes a staggering 38-year failure in vaccine safety oversight mandated by Congress. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act provided liability protection to vaccine manufacturers. In exchange, the law placed the entire responsibility for ensuring vaccine safety squarely on the government, specifically the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The act had three core mandates for HHS: 1. The Requirement: To actively work to make vaccines safer. 2. The Reporting: To submit a biannual report to Congress detailing how its agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH) had improved vaccine safety over the previous two years. 3. The Task Force: To convene a task force of the heads of NIH, CDC, and FDA to recommend further safety improvements to the HHS Secretary. The results? A complete abdication of duty. ➡️ The Biannual Reports: The legal requirement for biannual safety reports to Congress has existed since 1986. The total number of reports ever submitted? ZERO. ➡️ The Task Force: This key safety committee was formed but made only one set of recommendations in 1998 before being disbanded. It was only recently reconstituted, missing in action for most of its mandated existence. This isn't just a bureaucratic oversight; it's a fundamental breach of a public trust. Congress removed the market incentive for safety by shielding manufacturers from liability, trusting HHS to be the backstop. If HHS can’t even perform the simple, transparent tasks of reporting and convening a task force, how can the public have confidence it is doing the hard work of actively ensuring safety? The law was a bargain. The industry got protection. The American people were promised unparalleled safety oversight in return. They are still waiting.

Camus

42,962 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

"Every Single Vaccine That You Inject...Every Single One Causes Harm." Dr Sherri Tenpenny "Every Single One Is Poisonous & Injecting Poison Into Your Body Causes Harm. None Of Them Are Necessary." "Vaccines Have Not Been Proven Safe & They Don't Protect You From Getting Sick." We now know, because of vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies, unvaccinated children are always healthier & experience little to no chronic conditions compared to those who are vaccinated. Groundbreaking research studies by Dr Brian S Hooker, Neil Z Miller, Anthony R Mawson & Dr Paul Thomas reveal the insurmountable & devastating harms from vaccination. Health Condition-- Vaccinated / Unvaccinated: • All Chronic Conditions -- 60% / 5% • ADD -- 5% / 1% • Allergic Rhinitis -- 10.4% / 0.4% • Diabetes -- 10% / 0% • Asthma -- 7.7% / 0% • Autism -- 3.2% / 0% • ADHD -- 9.4% / 0.47% • Cancer -- 6.0% / 0% Vaccinated children have: *⃣ 14X the rate of gastrointestinal disorders. *⃣ 21X the rate of ADD/ADHD. *⃣ 28X the rate of ear infections. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS occurs in 97% of infants within the first 7 days after a vaccine is given. Health Authorities Removed 'Post Vaccine' As An Official Cause Of Death, So Medical Examiners Must Label The 'Vaccine Induced Fatalities' As SIDS. The Vaccine Aluminum adjuvants used that are injected directly into the system, 97% is absorbed into the bloodstream & in infants, shuts down the breathing center in the brain. Coined "Aluminum Adjuvant Apnea" where infants, without warning, just stop breathing. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speakers: Dr Sherri Tenpenny & PaulThomas Video: Children’s Health Defense
1:12

"Every Single Vaccine That You Inject...Every Single One Causes Harm." Dr Sherri Tenpenny "Every Single One Is Poisonous & Injecting Poison Into Your Body Causes Harm. None Of Them Are Necessary." "Vaccines Have Not Been Proven Safe & They Don't Protect You From Getting Sick." We now know, because of vaccinated vs unvaccinated studies, unvaccinated children are always healthier & experience little to no chronic conditions compared to those who are vaccinated. Groundbreaking research studies by Dr Brian S Hooker, Neil Z Miller, Anthony R Mawson & Dr Paul Thomas reveal the insurmountable & devastating harms from vaccination. Health Condition-- Vaccinated / Unvaccinated: • All Chronic Conditions -- 60% / 5% • ADD -- 5% / 1% • Allergic Rhinitis -- 10.4% / 0.4% • Diabetes -- 10% / 0% • Asthma -- 7.7% / 0% • Autism -- 3.2% / 0% • ADHD -- 9.4% / 0.47% • Cancer -- 6.0% / 0% Vaccinated children have: *⃣ 14X the rate of gastrointestinal disorders. *⃣ 21X the rate of ADD/ADHD. *⃣ 28X the rate of ear infections. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS occurs in 97% of infants within the first 7 days after a vaccine is given. Health Authorities Removed 'Post Vaccine' As An Official Cause Of Death, So Medical Examiners Must Label The 'Vaccine Induced Fatalities' As SIDS. The Vaccine Aluminum adjuvants used that are injected directly into the system, 97% is absorbed into the bloodstream & in infants, shuts down the breathing center in the brain. Coined "Aluminum Adjuvant Apnea" where infants, without warning, just stop breathing. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speakers: Dr Sherri Tenpenny & PaulThomas Video: Children’s Health Defense

Valerie Anne Smith

41,982 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.
14:19

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.
7:58

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.

Camus

52,491 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.
3:03

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

Camus

96,137 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr