Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

116,035 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerdvor 1 Jahr

@curryja

Profilbild von NormandyRob
NormandyRobvor 1 Jahr

@curryja I say again, there is no evidence from experiments which supports the theory that CO2 at 400ppm affects temperature Feel free to challenge or fact check I'll wait.

Profilbild von FRANK E ELKINS
FRANK E ELKINSvor 2 Jahren

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Profilbild von Why are Political people idiotic?
Why are Political people idiotic?vor 1 Jahr

They always leave out H20 which is a greater greenhouse gas than CO2 which is heavier than H2O. They leave out H20 increased emissions in their dataset that correlation with increased CO2 emissions. They also leave out the benefits of higher CO2 levels. They always leave out the non correlation of CO2 versus temps as shown in the millions of years dataset. They leave out that they substitute datasets from (man made biased temps) non rural weather stations into non working rural weather stations.

Profilbild von NotAnotherName
NotAnotherNamevor 1 Jahr

@curryja It's the RATE of temperature change which is critical, is it not? Why doesn't she discuss this graph. And, if it is controversial, all the more reason to discuss it... But I agree that Climate change is, in most cases, a neat distraction from our real ecological problems.

Profilbild von Chapter 4 Travels
Chapter 4 Travelsvor 1 Jahr

@curryja How dare you! How are we going to destroy Capitalism with a message like that???

Profilbild von Tonu Lukk
Tonu Lukkvor 1 Jahr

@curryja An excellent short presentation from Dr Curry, there is no climate crisis!

Profilbild von MDD
MDDvor 1 Jahr

@curryja Stopped following Prager years ago. IYKYK.

Profilbild von Chris Martz
Chris Martzvor 1 Jahr

@curryja That has nothing to do with the validity of Curry's points.

Profilbild von Peter Butlin
Peter Butlinvor 1 Jahr

@curryja Net Zero is a scam.

Profilbild von MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerdvor 1 Jahr

@curryja Posting. This on FakeBook gets an instantaneous fact check for falsehoods, yet they don't say what is false. And they wonder why people are leaving the platform.

Ähnliche Videos

The “scientific consensus” talking point was succinctly dismantled by Dr. Judith Curry in her interview with John Stossel back in October. 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹: “The overwhelming scientific consensus. That’s what people still believe.” 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . when you talk about ‘scientific consensus,’ like the Earth orbits the sun, you don’t need to say ‘There’s a consensus that the Earth orbits the sun,’ it’s a well-known fact. When you’re talking about consensus, it’s usually on a topic where there is disagreement, and a government has asked a group to come to some sort of an agreement on what’s what. You see it in science, you see it in. . . medical boards. . . So, it’s a manufactured consensus. It’s a consensus of scientists, which is different than a scientific consensus. . .” Dr. Curry goes on to explain that there is no consensus on the most contentious issues of climate change, such as extent of human contribution and the impacts. 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . there’s a true scientific consensus on very little of this, you know that, • The temperatures have been increasing for over a hundred years. • That burning of fossil fuels emits CO₂ into the atmosphere. • And, CO₂ has a radiation spectrum that sort of keeps the Earth’s surface warm, all other things being equal. Beyond that, there’s no real big consensus on anything. The most consequential issues we don’t have a consensus on: • How much of the recent warming is caused by fossil fuels? We still don’t know. • Is fossil fuel and is warming dangerous? This is the weakest part of the argument. There’s no agreement as to whether warming is dangerous.” 🔗 You can watch the full 40+ minute interview here:

Chris Martz

112,060 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren