Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

116,035 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerd1 год назад

@curryja

Фото профиля NormandyRob
NormandyRob1 год назад

@curryja I say again, there is no evidence from experiments which supports the theory that CO2 at 400ppm affects temperature Feel free to challenge or fact check I'll wait.

Фото профиля FRANK E ELKINS
FRANK E ELKINS2 лет назад

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Фото профиля Why are Political people idiotic?
Why are Political people idiotic?1 год назад

They always leave out H20 which is a greater greenhouse gas than CO2 which is heavier than H2O. They leave out H20 increased emissions in their dataset that correlation with increased CO2 emissions. They also leave out the benefits of higher CO2 levels. They always leave out the non correlation of CO2 versus temps as shown in the millions of years dataset. They leave out that they substitute datasets from (man made biased temps) non rural weather stations into non working rural weather stations.

Фото профиля NotAnotherName
NotAnotherName1 год назад

@curryja It's the RATE of temperature change which is critical, is it not? Why doesn't she discuss this graph. And, if it is controversial, all the more reason to discuss it... But I agree that Climate change is, in most cases, a neat distraction from our real ecological problems.

Фото профиля Chapter 4 Travels
Chapter 4 Travels1 год назад

@curryja How dare you! How are we going to destroy Capitalism with a message like that???

Фото профиля Tonu Lukk
Tonu Lukk1 год назад

@curryja An excellent short presentation from Dr Curry, there is no climate crisis!

Фото профиля MDD
MDD1 год назад

@curryja Stopped following Prager years ago. IYKYK.

Фото профиля Chris Martz
Chris Martz1 год назад

@curryja That has nothing to do with the validity of Curry's points.

Фото профиля Peter Butlin
Peter Butlin1 год назад

@curryja Net Zero is a scam.

Фото профиля MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerd1 год назад

@curryja Posting. This on FakeBook gets an instantaneous fact check for falsehoods, yet they don't say what is false. And they wonder why people are leaving the platform.

Похожие видео

The “scientific consensus” talking point was succinctly dismantled by Dr. Judith Curry in her interview with John Stossel back in October. 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻 𝗦𝘁𝗼𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗹: “The overwhelming scientific consensus. That’s what people still believe.” 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . when you talk about ‘scientific consensus,’ like the Earth orbits the sun, you don’t need to say ‘There’s a consensus that the Earth orbits the sun,’ it’s a well-known fact. When you’re talking about consensus, it’s usually on a topic where there is disagreement, and a government has asked a group to come to some sort of an agreement on what’s what. You see it in science, you see it in. . . medical boards. . . So, it’s a manufactured consensus. It’s a consensus of scientists, which is different than a scientific consensus. . .” Dr. Curry goes on to explain that there is no consensus on the most contentious issues of climate change, such as extent of human contribution and the impacts. 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . there’s a true scientific consensus on very little of this, you know that, • The temperatures have been increasing for over a hundred years. • That burning of fossil fuels emits CO₂ into the atmosphere. • And, CO₂ has a radiation spectrum that sort of keeps the Earth’s surface warm, all other things being equal. Beyond that, there’s no real big consensus on anything. The most consequential issues we don’t have a consensus on: • How much of the recent warming is caused by fossil fuels? We still don’t know. • Is fossil fuel and is warming dangerous? This is the weakest part of the argument. There’s no agreement as to whether warming is dangerous.” 🔗 You can watch the full 40+ minute interview here:

Chris Martz

112,060 просмотров • 2 лет назад