Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

116,071 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerd1 год назад

@curryja

Фото профиля NormandyRob
NormandyRob1 год назад

@curryja I say again, there is no evidence from experiments which supports the theory that CO2 at 400ppm affects temperature Feel free to challenge or fact check I'll wait.

Фото профиля FRANK E ELKINS
FRANK E ELKINS2 лет назад

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Фото профиля Why are Political people idiotic?
Why are Political people idiotic?1 год назад

They always leave out H20 which is a greater greenhouse gas than CO2 which is heavier than H2O. They leave out H20 increased emissions in their dataset that correlation with increased CO2 emissions. They also leave out the benefits of higher CO2 levels. They always leave out the non correlation of CO2 versus temps as shown in the millions of years dataset. They leave out that they substitute datasets from (man made biased temps) non rural weather stations into non working rural weather stations.

Фото профиля NotAnotherName
NotAnotherName1 год назад

@curryja It's the RATE of temperature change which is critical, is it not? Why doesn't she discuss this graph. And, if it is controversial, all the more reason to discuss it... But I agree that Climate change is, in most cases, a neat distraction from our real ecological problems.

Фото профиля Chapter 4 Travels
Chapter 4 Travels1 год назад

@curryja How dare you! How are we going to destroy Capitalism with a message like that???

Фото профиля Tonu Lukk
Tonu Lukk1 год назад

@curryja An excellent short presentation from Dr Curry, there is no climate crisis!

Фото профиля MDD
MDD1 год назад

@curryja Stopped following Prager years ago. IYKYK.

Фото профиля Chris Martz
Chris Martz1 год назад

@curryja That has nothing to do with the validity of Curry's points.

Фото профиля Peter Butlin
Peter Butlin1 год назад

@curryja Net Zero is a scam.

Фото профиля MetrologyNerd
MetrologyNerd1 год назад

@curryja Posting. This on FakeBook gets an instantaneous fact check for falsehoods, yet they don't say what is false. And they wonder why people are leaving the platform.

Похожие видео

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,087 просмотров • 2 лет назад