Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains in this short video why there is no “climate crisis.” She also explains what scientists actually agree on when it comes to the “consensus,” and what they disagree on.

116,071 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

11 Yorum

MetrologyNerd profil fotoğrafı
MetrologyNerd1 yıl önce

@curryja

NormandyRob profil fotoğrafı
NormandyRob1 yıl önce

@curryja I say again, there is no evidence from experiments which supports the theory that CO2 at 400ppm affects temperature Feel free to challenge or fact check I'll wait.

FRANK E ELKINS profil fotoğrafı
FRANK E ELKINS2 yıl önce

“Science doesn’t tell us why the Big Bang happened, how the singularity occurred in the first place, or why it exploded when it did. It tells us there is objective scientific evidence that it occurred. So, what exactly was the Big Bang?” – Book III The Enigmatic Mystery

Why are Political people idiotic? profil fotoğrafı
Why are Political people idiotic?1 yıl önce

They always leave out H20 which is a greater greenhouse gas than CO2 which is heavier than H2O. They leave out H20 increased emissions in their dataset that correlation with increased CO2 emissions. They also leave out the benefits of higher CO2 levels. They always leave out the non correlation of CO2 versus temps as shown in the millions of years dataset. They leave out that they substitute datasets from (man made biased temps) non rural weather stations into non working rural weather stations.

NotAnotherName profil fotoğrafı
NotAnotherName1 yıl önce

@curryja It's the RATE of temperature change which is critical, is it not? Why doesn't she discuss this graph. And, if it is controversial, all the more reason to discuss it... But I agree that Climate change is, in most cases, a neat distraction from our real ecological problems.

Chapter 4 Travels profil fotoğrafı
Chapter 4 Travels1 yıl önce

@curryja How dare you! How are we going to destroy Capitalism with a message like that???

Tonu Lukk profil fotoğrafı
Tonu Lukk1 yıl önce

@curryja An excellent short presentation from Dr Curry, there is no climate crisis!

MDD profil fotoğrafı
MDD1 yıl önce

@curryja Stopped following Prager years ago. IYKYK.

Chris Martz profil fotoğrafı
Chris Martz1 yıl önce

@curryja That has nothing to do with the validity of Curry's points.

Peter Butlin profil fotoğrafı
Peter Butlin1 yıl önce

@curryja Net Zero is a scam.

MetrologyNerd profil fotoğrafı
MetrologyNerd1 yıl önce

@curryja Posting. This on FakeBook gets an instantaneous fact check for falsehoods, yet they don't say what is false. And they wonder why people are leaving the platform.

Benzer Videolar

The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC) was not created by a group of scientists in the late-1980s with the intention of studying both natural and man-made impacts on the global climate system. That did not happen. Period. Why would the IPCC be needed on the scientific front when there were already government agencies like the BoM, Met Office, NASA, NCAR and NOAA working on this? The IPCC was created by bureaucrats with a vested financial and political interest to use the scientific community to build a case to regulate oil companies and control energy, in hopes they could convince the public that consumption of coal, oil and natural gas were causing harmful anthropogenic climate change. Climate change became the Goldilocks issue to move that agenda along, as it would otherwise have little support. Dr. Judith Curry (Judith Curry) explains this in her interview with John Stossel from October. 🎙️ Here’s a snippet. ✂️ 𝗗𝗿. 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: “. . . The origins go back to the 1980s, and the U.N. environmental program had this big environmental agenda, anti-capitalism. They hated the oil companies and they seized on the climate change issue as one to move their policies along. . . the policy cart was way out in front of the scientific horse from the very beginning. So, the IPCC’s mandate was to look for dangerous human-caused climate change. The IPCC wasn’t supposed to focus on any benefits of warming. They weren’t supposed to focus on natural climate variability. They were just supposed to look for the signal of dangerous human-caused climate change.” 🔗 You can watch the full interview here:

Chris Martz

88,087 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce