Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Robert Malone slammed a recent court decision freezing changes to the childhood vaccine schedule and pausing the ACIP committee. “Friends, something happened this week that every American who cares about health freedom, transparency, and democratic accountability needs to know about.” “A single federal judge in Boston… has single-handedly...

75,927 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

30 Kommentare

Profilbild von @RealEricBeck
@RealEricBeckvor 6 Monaten

"If you don’t impeach the corrupt judges, you CANNOT fix the country. They will form a cartel (a judicial dictatorship) and block all reforms, protecting the systemic corruption that put them in their seats. So we impeached them and then proceeded to fix the country." El Salvador’s President Bukele

Profilbild von Mariner
Marinervor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward Impeach these rogue judges @SpeakerJohnson

Profilbild von katie wright
katie wrightvor 6 Monaten

I have watched a dozen ACIP mtgs. This judge should’ve done the same.⭐️ Until recently, ACIP mtg went as follows: pharma makes product recommendation, @CDCgov echoes product recommendation, ACIP panel (many w/ pharma COIs) unanimously approves new vaccine. ⭐️⭐️ I don’t believe that fmr ACIP members ever rejected a pharma /@CDCgov vax recommendation. New ACIP panel composed of experts in toxicology, epidemiology, pediatrics, infectious disease & a few stakeholders. New ACIP allowed for respectful and robust discussion & questions from stakeholders!!⭐️⭐️⭐️ It’s tragic that this federal judges believes medical discussions should be made by pharma surrogates, rather than independent physicians, researchers & stakeholders. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ @NIHDirector_Jay @maryhollandnyc @BrianHookerPhD @lifebiomedguru @SecKennedy @CHD

Profilbild von Grace Costello
Grace Costellovor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward This is a Judge that was recommended by the Big Pharma Vaccine pusher Elizabeth Warren. Warren took $830 K from Big Pharma in 2020. Whatever else she gets from Big Pharma is disguised well.

Profilbild von Eagles Rule
Eagles Rulevor 6 Monaten

I thought that the Supreme Court ruled that a district judge cannot order a nation-wide injunction?

Profilbild von cathyf123
cathyf123vor 6 Monaten

If the judge forces my child to get a vaccine that ACIP tried to take off the vaccine schedule, then I can’t sue the vaccine manufacturer. Can I sue the judge?

Profilbild von AlTahoe7
AlTahoe7vor 6 Monaten

Let’s lower the suggested LDL levels again, again … & again. Soon they’ll suggest statins for unborn, still in the womb. More Tom-Fu*kery! $$$$$$$

Profilbild von Jean Turner
Jean Turnervor 6 Monaten

We want a review and action on vaccine issues, particularly as related to the wellbeing of our children. Our President, the Secretary and ACIP have been responding! well! It is damning of the "Court" to assume it has the knowledge and authority to block the progress we voted for!

Profilbild von Edward Davignon
Edward Davignonvor 6 Monaten

You are part of the Trump administration. I have never heard Trump obeying a low-level federal judge. It sounds like a poor excuse.

Profilbild von Paul Andrews ✌️🤔⛵️🐊🇺🇸
Paul Andrews ✌️🤔⛵️🐊🇺🇸vor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward How is it that one judge, can do this? Can’t you just ignore this ruling? Can’t you get another judge to say the opposite? This is insane! @realDonaldTrump , this is where you need to be fighting! Not Iran, America first!

Profilbild von Cap'n Tater
Cap'n Tatervor 6 Monaten

"The Republifats aren't getting anything done!" Bro, that's not news. It's their top priority.

Profilbild von Jeanne Moore RN BSN MBA
Jeanne Moore RN BSN MBAvor 6 Monaten

So what are we going to do about it?????

Profilbild von Rudy Wolf
Rudy Wolfvor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward @RWMaloneMD Great interview with @AaronSiriSG and @RetsefL -the Situation is “hard to believe” as actually happening with a single Boston judge’s decision. But my “belief” doesn’t manipulate reality. What specifically is the call to action?

Profilbild von Katherine Frederick
Katherine Frederickvor 6 Monaten

💔

Profilbild von edmcclung
edmcclungvor 6 Monaten

Nullification

Profilbild von American_wife27
American_wife27vor 6 Monaten

Trump has every right to get rid of these judges and he doesn’t. He has the power to rid the country if every single one

Profilbild von Tom Perkins
Tom Perkinsvor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward He’s right. But he’s still an ass.

Profilbild von Martin Collins
Martin Collinsvor 6 Monaten

Impeach them

Profilbild von Robert
Robertvor 6 Monaten

Heard about you guys and your mission to kill Americans.

Profilbild von akyoon@himaari
akyoon@himaarivor 6 Monaten

世界はすっかり上から下まで洗脳教育で思考が乗っ取られています。裁判官と言えども同じ穴にあります。 我々は自らイエスや釈迦になるしかありません。 難しいことでない、医学が偽だと分かるだけですから。

Profilbild von Unknown Girl
Unknown Girlvor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward Are we even sure that's Robert Malone in the video??

Profilbild von Dan
Danvor 6 Monaten

Under what law is the judge authorized to edit the recommended vaccine schedule?

Profilbild von Sandramaffett
Sandramaffettvor 6 Monaten

🙏🙏🙏

Profilbild von Rubin
Rubinvor 6 Monaten

⏰⏰⏰Wake up America

Profilbild von Mercury Miko and Me
Mercury Miko and Mevor 6 Monaten

💔

Profilbild von Raewyn Hutchins
Raewyn Hutchinsvor 6 Monaten

The judiciary thru activist judges are part of the problem. There must be oversight on their decisions. No one should be unaccountable or above the law - including judges. They are not God and shouldn’t be treated as such.

Profilbild von Clara Driebe
Clara Driebevor 6 Monaten

@DowdEdward AMEN!! THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE SHOULD BE OURS!! NOT SOME FLIM FLAM ARTIST!

Profilbild von Sheryl
Sherylvor 6 Monaten

Hang in there, Dr Malone! This will be overturned. You will be vindicated!

Profilbild von LAD
LADvor 6 Monaten

Time to ignore corrupt judges…

Profilbild von Mike Casey
Mike Caseyvor 6 Monaten

“Vaccines are essential for health” they scream. But what if good health and wellness could be achieved by a preventative approach. You have been led to believe that illness is unavoidable. Most people hope to get sick only once or twice a year — maybe a cold in the summer and the flu in the winter. We are conditioned to accept illness as part of life, even if we sleep well, eat right, exercise, and take vitamins. Modern medicine is built on a reactionary model: you get sick, and pharmaceuticals help you recover. That model is profitable, so it persists. But there is another reality — one that becomes obvious when you embrace ozone water as part of your daily routine. Illness doesn’t have to be inevitable. Ozone water is the world’s most effective and rapidly acting disinfectant. That isn’t my claim; both the FDA and EPA recognize ozone as a powerful, organic disinfectant in food safety and water treatment. The Contradiction The FDA permits ozone and ozone water to be used throughout the culinary environment. It can disinfect meats, fish, lettuce, fruit, countertops, utensils, floors, walls, and drains. It is recognized as safe and effective for food processing and purification. Yet the moment the conversation shifts toward human health or personal use, ozone is suddenly treated as unsafe or unacceptable. Why would a substance considered safe for everything we eat become “unsafe” the instant it touches anything related to healthcare? The only explanation that makes sense is economic: Long-term medical profits rely on illness. Vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and over-the-counter products are only needed if you become infected. A prevention-first approach would fundamentally disrupt that system. A Different Approach: Total Body Disinfection Ozone water safely and organically disinfects nearly anything — including the surfaces of the human body. If you routinely eliminate pathogens before they can take hold, you drastically reduce the likelihood of infection. This is not complicated: •Drink ozone water to disinfect the mouth and throat, where most infectious diseases begin.

 •Spray it on the skin to prevent surface-level infections and support cleaner, clearer skin.

 •Breathe a light mist from ozone-infused water (not ozone gas) to help keep the respiratory tract clean.

 A body that is routinely disinfected is far less likely to become infected. Many conditions we accept as “inevitable” may simply be preventable with ozone water. Nothing in life is 100% — but when an infection does occur, ozone water may help reduce symptom severity by preventing secondary infections like sore throat or pneumonia from developing. Examples •My wife and I have been drinking ozone water for over eight years. In all that time, we have each been ill once. Neither of us has had a sore throat in eight years, nor any respiratory infections.

 •A friend undergoing radiation therapy for lip cancer suffered from severe blistering and soreness. After applying ozone water to her lips and mouth, she experienced dramatic relief within a day. The redness subsided, the blistering disappeared, and the pain diminished noticeably.

 My Advice Purchase an inexpensive ozone generator for water and learn to use it daily. Incorporating ozone water into your life gives you control over your own health in a way most people have never experienced. I wake up every day feeling great — and that feeling is priceless. But if you’re satisfied being sick once or twice a year, then feel free to disregard everything I’ve said.

Ähnliche Videos

In January, ACIP announced they were reducing the number of injections on the childhood vaccine schedule. People were celebrating. And then a federal judge named Brian Murphy stepped in and said no. He cancelled the recommendations, disbanded the advisory panel, and said the people on it weren't qualified. The case was brought by the American Academy of Pediatrics, an organization that takes funding from pharma. So what we're really watching is a pharma-funded trade group asking a federal court to restore a pharma-friendly committee, and a judge who obliged them. Start with standing. For a case to even be in a courtroom, the party bringing it has to demonstrate injury. The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade group. It doesn't vaccinate children. It doesn't bear any personal injury if the schedule changes. So why aren't the children they claim to be protecting the plaintiffs? I don't know how this case survives on that question alone, certainly not if it reaches the Supreme Court. Then there's the ACIP argument itself. The judge ruled that Kennedy didn't have the authority to change the schedule without an ACIP vote. But ACIP votes are recommendations. The CDC is not bound by them. It can override them completely. So the judge is saying Bobby needed to go through a process that the agency he oversees doesn't actually have to follow. Think about that for a second. And then the judge disbanded ACIP for being unbalanced. The irony is almost too much. ACIP has never been balanced. It has had conflicts of interest running through it for decades, documented by multiple investigations, with members voting on vaccines they had a direct financial stake in. The most cited example is Paul Offit, who voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while he was actively developing his own rotavirus vaccine. He went on to make tens of millions of dollars from it. So when this judge says ACIP needs to be more balanced, what he means, functionally, is it needs more people like that. Dr Mark Trozzi MD

Del Bigtree

24,992 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A few days ago a judge decided he knows more about children's health than Robert Kennedy Jr. and every member of the ACIP committee... And everyone at HHS, the CDC, and other.. This is a judge with no medical degree, no pediatric expertise, and a lifetime appointment... and with one ruling, he erased the most meaningful attempt to protect American children this government has ever made. Reuters called it "upending Kennedy's overhaul of childhood vaccine policies." Here's what actually happened. RFK Jr. looked at peer nations (like Denmark and Germany) with healthy kids and functioning societies, and said let's see if there's a smarter schedule. What he found was that we give 54 shots of 72 vaccine doses. Denmark gives roughly half that. And Denmark has not seen measles come back, or polio come back, or smallpox come back. None of the fear porn the American Academy of Pediatrics has been selling you has actually happened. Meanwhile we went from 12% of American children with chronic disease in the 1980s to nearly 50% today. In 48 years, we have seen the greatest collapse of children's health in the history of this country, happening in perfect parallel with a vaccine schedule that grew from 12 vaccines to 54 shots. You cannot look at the health of American children and call that program a success. You simply cannot. So what did the judge do? He said RFK Jr. didn't run it by ACIP, the advisory committee that by everyone's understanding has always been advisory only. No binding authority, just an opinion, not a mandate. At least that's what they always told us when the committee was captured... And then when Kennedy moved to satisfy that requirement, the judge said he didn't recognize the current ACIP either. There is no committee he recognizes. According to him there are no changes allowed in either direction, no new vaccines can be added, there can be no modifications for any reason, including a bioweapon attack. One judge has put the entire country in limbo to protect a rubber-stamp committee that has never once had a genuine skeptic in the room. A committee where members like Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while personally developing a rotavirus vaccine and didn't recuse himself. That's the balance they're defending. The American Academy of Pediatrics, a trade organization funded by the pharmaceutical industry, went to court to make sure your doctor has no say in your child's vaccine schedule. They don't want pediatricians in the conversation. They want the government to decide. This is what happens when you try to clean the swamp. The swamp has judges. This case is not over. It's an injunction, not a final ruling. The Trump administration will appeal. And we will keep fighting. Because the children of this country deserve better than what 40 years of this program has given them.

Del Bigtree

172,161 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 Jeffrey Tucker: RFK Jr.’s vaccine reforms were overturned days before the CDC was going to address vaccine injuries. “The week before the committee was planning to [discuss vaccine injuries], a judge in Massachusetts said… ‘your ACIP committee is no good.’” “RFK inherited an ACIP committee that was fully conflicted.” “They would just rubber stamp every shot that came in front of them.” “ So RFK's new ACIP committee [was] making substantial changes the week before this judgment.” “You have to weigh the injuries against the benefits.” “Many of these shots simply don't pass that test.” “The injuries are things that undermine the industry.” “So, of course, they don't want to talk about the injuries.” “Within a day of that decision, the CDC schedule reverted back, deleting an entire year of work by the ACIP committee.” “The childhood schedule for vaccinations [are] ‘recommended,’ but actually mandates in many states.” “[It] exploded from just a few shots to… as many as 76 today after the 1986 liability shield for Big Pharma.” “That became a gold rush.” “ACIP had been trimming the schedule gradually for each meeting.” “[They were] looking at the science, looking at the data such as they could find it, and making a judgment.” “They had made some substantial changes in the schedule to move about five shots from seemingly required to… ‘shared decision making.’” “Meaning that parents are advised to talk to their doctors about them." “It's actually a huge change in the schedule that's stuck in stone and worth probably hundreds of billions of dollars to the industry that is indemnified against any harm." Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute Bobbie Anne Cox

Children’s Health Defense

71,128 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

President Trump signed an executive order week directing the CDC and ACIP to review the latest clinical data and align the US childhood vaccine schedule with best practices from peer developed nations. The order also requires all federal departments and agencies to ensure their actions fulfill legal obligations with respect to parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations, and equal protection under law. Dr. Robert Malone, former co-chair of ACIP who recently stepped down, published a Substack analysis describing it as the executive order that may change the vaccine debate forever. His reading of the key language, "to the extent permitted by law," is that it pulls authority over vaccination policy, medicine, and research back under the executive branch and returns ACIP to its original function as an advisory body. For decades, ACIP has operated as a de facto policymaking authority. This order tells them that role is over. The next ACIP meeting will be the first real test of whether that line holds. It is also worth noting that this executive order was signed as the Department of Justice filed a brief at the Supreme Court urging it not to hear the case of New York healthcare workers fired for refusing the COVID vaccine on religious grounds. One hand of this administration is expanding parental authority and religious protections around vaccines. The other is working to establish a legal precedent that says firing someone for their religious beliefs is perfectly acceptable. Groups inside this administration are not on the same page...

The HighWire

34,525 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rep. Kim Schrier, D-Wash., confronted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his decision to replace a panel of vaccine experts who make key recommendations. Schrier, a pediatrician, said she found this move “deeply concerning.” The lawmaker then asked the HHS secretary if he’s treated patients, including babies, who have measles, bacterial meningitis, whooping cough, among other illnesses, to which he said no. Schrier said thankfully, doctors have not had to treat these illnesses in recent years because of vaccines that prevent all these illnesses. Schrier then mentioned how during Kennedy’s confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, also a physician, expressed his concerns about Kennedy and his stance on vaccines. Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy with the commitment that Kennedy would not change the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Schrier added. “But then 2 weeks ago, you fired all 17 experts on that very committee,” she added. “Did you lie to Sen. Cassidy when you told him you would not change this panel of experts?” Kennedy said he never made that agreement to Sen. Cassidy. Kennedy testified Tuesday on his agency’s budget request before a House panel, where he faced questioning about changes to U.S. vaccine policy, transparency actions, and his replacement of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Cassidy wrote on social Monday that while the ACIP replacements “have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology.” Schrier accused Kennedy of lying to Cassidy in order to secure the senator’s vote. “You lied to Sen. Cassidy. You have lied to the American people. You have lied to parents about vaccines for 20 years,” she said, “and I also want to be clear that I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.”

PBS News

14,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RFK Jr. Exposes Systemic Corruption on the Vaccine Advisory Board In a stunning revelation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. detailed the profound corruption that led to the dismissal of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). For decades, this board—tasked with regulating the vaccine industry—acted as a "sock puppet" for the very corporations it was supposed to oversee. The rot was exposed as far back as 2002, when a Congressional hearing found that 97% of the board members had undisclosed conflicts of interest. Kennedy highlighted a glaring example: the approval of the rotavirus vaccine. Of the five members who voted to add it to the childhood schedule, four had direct financial ties to the vaccine's manufacturers. One member, Dr. Paul Offit, voted to mandate a competitor's rotavirus vaccine while he had his own version in development. His vote guaranteed a future market for his product. The approved vaccine was pulled within a year for causing a lethal bowel obstruction in children. Offit's vaccine later replaced it, and he and his partners sold it to Merck for $186 million—a deal he reportedly called "winning the lottery." This was not an isolated incident. An Office of Inspector General investigation condemned the board's practices, yet no meaningful reforms were made. ACIP routinely approved vaccines without rigorous, placebo-based safety trials, creating a gold rush for manufacturers. Adding a vaccine to the schedule can guarantee $1 billion in annual sales, creating perverse incentives. The result? An explosion from 11 childhood vaccines in 1986 to as many as 72 today, many for non-contagious diseases, mandated for all children despite highly individualized risks. This is a story of agency capture, failed oversight, and the prioritization of profit over public health.

Camus

113,507 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr