Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Robert Malone slammed a recent court decision freezing changes to the childhood vaccine schedule and pausing the ACIP committee. “Friends, something happened this week that every American who cares about health freedom, transparency, and democratic accountability needs to know about.” “A single federal judge in Boston… has single-handedly...

MAHA_Action's profile picture

MAHA Action

97,089 subscribers

75,852 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessNachrichten & PolitikBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Dr. Robert Malone says next week’s ACIP meeting will include a discussion on the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule. “There has been a lot of interest in revisiting the childhood vaccine schedule.” “You’re going to see this taken up as an issue in this upcoming meeting next week.” “You’re going to see that there is a very active discussion and some votes about the hepatitis B vaccine.” “You’re going to see that there’s presentations comparing the American childhood vaccine schedule with the world’s childhood vaccine schedules.” “And it makes it clear that the U.S. schedule is really not consistent with international norms.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)
0:44

Dr. Robert Malone says next week’s ACIP meeting will include a discussion on the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule. “There has been a lot of interest in revisiting the childhood vaccine schedule.” “You’re going to see this taken up as an issue in this upcoming meeting next week.” “You’re going to see that there is a very active discussion and some votes about the hepatitis B vaccine.” “You’re going to see that there’s presentations comparing the American childhood vaccine schedule with the world’s childhood vaccine schedules.” “And it makes it clear that the U.S. schedule is really not consistent with international norms.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)

MAHA Action

11,846 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

A Federal Judge appointed under Joe Biden has just BLOCKED the new childhood vaccine schedule put out by RFK Jr “Massachusetts Judge has ruled in favor of medical organizations in litigation against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Over his changes to federal vaccine policy. The judge temporarily blocked changes to the childhood vaccine schedule after the number of recommended shots were slashed from 17 to 11 at the beginning of the year” “This is really a sweeping blow to the President's attempt to reshape vaccine policy. The federal judge here saying that the attempt to change these recommendations was arbitrary and capricious and violated a federal law known as the Administrative Procedures Act. The judge saying that RFK Jr. does have the authority to make these changes”
1:41

A Federal Judge appointed under Joe Biden has just BLOCKED the new childhood vaccine schedule put out by RFK Jr “Massachusetts Judge has ruled in favor of medical organizations in litigation against HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Over his changes to federal vaccine policy. The judge temporarily blocked changes to the childhood vaccine schedule after the number of recommended shots were slashed from 17 to 11 at the beginning of the year” “This is really a sweeping blow to the President's attempt to reshape vaccine policy. The federal judge here saying that the attempt to change these recommendations was arbitrary and capricious and violated a federal law known as the Administrative Procedures Act. The judge saying that RFK Jr. does have the authority to make these changes”

Wall Street Apes

19,659 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In January, ACIP announced they were reducing the number of injections on the childhood vaccine schedule. People were celebrating. And then a federal judge named Brian Murphy stepped in and said no. He cancelled the recommendations, disbanded the advisory panel, and said the people on it weren't qualified. The case was brought by the American Academy of Pediatrics, an organization that takes funding from pharma. So what we're really watching is a pharma-funded trade group asking a federal court to restore a pharma-friendly committee, and a judge who obliged them. Start with standing. For a case to even be in a courtroom, the party bringing it has to demonstrate injury. The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade group. It doesn't vaccinate children. It doesn't bear any personal injury if the schedule changes. So why aren't the children they claim to be protecting the plaintiffs? I don't know how this case survives on that question alone, certainly not if it reaches the Supreme Court. Then there's the ACIP argument itself. The judge ruled that Kennedy didn't have the authority to change the schedule without an ACIP vote. But ACIP votes are recommendations. The CDC is not bound by them. It can override them completely. So the judge is saying Bobby needed to go through a process that the agency he oversees doesn't actually have to follow. Think about that for a second. And then the judge disbanded ACIP for being unbalanced. The irony is almost too much. ACIP has never been balanced. It has had conflicts of interest running through it for decades, documented by multiple investigations, with members voting on vaccines they had a direct financial stake in. The most cited example is Paul Offit, who voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while he was actively developing his own rotavirus vaccine. He went on to make tens of millions of dollars from it. So when this judge says ACIP needs to be more balanced, what he means, functionally, is it needs more people like that. Dr Mark Trozzi MD
3:16

In January, ACIP announced they were reducing the number of injections on the childhood vaccine schedule. People were celebrating. And then a federal judge named Brian Murphy stepped in and said no. He cancelled the recommendations, disbanded the advisory panel, and said the people on it weren't qualified. The case was brought by the American Academy of Pediatrics, an organization that takes funding from pharma. So what we're really watching is a pharma-funded trade group asking a federal court to restore a pharma-friendly committee, and a judge who obliged them. Start with standing. For a case to even be in a courtroom, the party bringing it has to demonstrate injury. The American Academy of Pediatrics is a trade group. It doesn't vaccinate children. It doesn't bear any personal injury if the schedule changes. So why aren't the children they claim to be protecting the plaintiffs? I don't know how this case survives on that question alone, certainly not if it reaches the Supreme Court. Then there's the ACIP argument itself. The judge ruled that Kennedy didn't have the authority to change the schedule without an ACIP vote. But ACIP votes are recommendations. The CDC is not bound by them. It can override them completely. So the judge is saying Bobby needed to go through a process that the agency he oversees doesn't actually have to follow. Think about that for a second. And then the judge disbanded ACIP for being unbalanced. The irony is almost too much. ACIP has never been balanced. It has had conflicts of interest running through it for decades, documented by multiple investigations, with members voting on vaccines they had a direct financial stake in. The most cited example is Paul Offit, who voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while he was actively developing his own rotavirus vaccine. He went on to make tens of millions of dollars from it. So when this judge says ACIP needs to be more balanced, what he means, functionally, is it needs more people like that. Dr Mark Trozzi MD

Del Bigtree

24,930 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Very disappointing… 🚨 Dr. Robert Malone Reveals RFK Jr.-Appointed a Mole, a Saboteur who Undermined the CDC's entire ACIP Overhaul In his recent interview on The HighWire, Dr. Robert Malone detailed internal sabotage at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and CDC as a key factor in his full resignation from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). He stated that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had personally appointed someone to be operationally responsible for ACIP and several other aspects within the CDC. Malone described this individual as appearing to have been a mole, noting that the word saboteur was used and that it is now clear from this person's actions that they have caused a lot of damage. This alleged mole or saboteur was presented as the final piece of evidence that internal reform efforts were doomed, which is why he declined Kennedy's personal request to stay on even for a potential relaunched panel. Malone has not publicly named the individual.
3:16

Very disappointing… 🚨 Dr. Robert Malone Reveals RFK Jr.-Appointed a Mole, a Saboteur who Undermined the CDC's entire ACIP Overhaul In his recent interview on The HighWire, Dr. Robert Malone detailed internal sabotage at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and CDC as a key factor in his full resignation from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). He stated that HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had personally appointed someone to be operationally responsible for ACIP and several other aspects within the CDC. Malone described this individual as appearing to have been a mole, noting that the word saboteur was used and that it is now clear from this person's actions that they have caused a lot of damage. This alleged mole or saboteur was presented as the final piece of evidence that internal reform efforts were doomed, which is why he declined Kennedy's personal request to stay on even for a potential relaunched panel. Malone has not publicly named the individual.

MJTruthUltra

50,090 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

“I just want to acknowledge the elephant in the room. And the specific elephant in this case has to do with cumulative risk across the entire childhood vaccine schedule. And that is a risk for which we do not have adequate data. I think we can all agree on that.” - Robert W Malone, MD
2:37

“I just want to acknowledge the elephant in the room. And the specific elephant in this case has to do with cumulative risk across the entire childhood vaccine schedule. And that is a risk for which we do not have adequate data. I think we can all agree on that.” - Robert W Malone, MD

Aaron Siri

73,600 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Dr. Robert Malone resigned as vice chair of ACIP, stepping down from a committee he had helped reshape, citing a desire to avoid drama. Before he left, he was finally asking the kind of questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and testing that the committee had gone years without asking. His read on the judge's ruling that threw out RFK Jr.'s realignment of the vaccine schedule is direct. The ruling asserts that any vaccine decisions made at the executive branch must consult ACIP, and Malone calls that contrived. By congressional statute, ACIP is meant to serve as a fully independent outside voice, free from industry capture, professional organizations, and bureaucratic influence, providing advice to the CDC director, who is the only person who actually makes decisions. ACIP does not create vaccine policy. Its output is recommendations, nothing more. The argument that the schedule realignment was invalid because ACIP didn't weigh in on it, Malone says, is spurious logic that is not consistent with the facts. His conclusion is that a group of lawyers constructed another form of lawfare specifically to undermine Kennedy, using ACIP as the vehicle and a contrived legal argument as the weapon.
2:21

Dr. Robert Malone resigned as vice chair of ACIP, stepping down from a committee he had helped reshape, citing a desire to avoid drama. Before he left, he was finally asking the kind of questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and testing that the committee had gone years without asking. His read on the judge's ruling that threw out RFK Jr.'s realignment of the vaccine schedule is direct. The ruling asserts that any vaccine decisions made at the executive branch must consult ACIP, and Malone calls that contrived. By congressional statute, ACIP is meant to serve as a fully independent outside voice, free from industry capture, professional organizations, and bureaucratic influence, providing advice to the CDC director, who is the only person who actually makes decisions. ACIP does not create vaccine policy. Its output is recommendations, nothing more. The argument that the schedule realignment was invalid because ACIP didn't weigh in on it, Malone says, is spurious logic that is not consistent with the facts. His conclusion is that a group of lawyers constructed another form of lawfare specifically to undermine Kennedy, using ACIP as the vehicle and a contrived legal argument as the weapon.

The HighWire

39,580 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A few days ago a judge decided he knows more about children's health than Robert Kennedy Jr. and every member of the ACIP committee... And everyone at HHS, the CDC, and other.. This is a judge with no medical degree, no pediatric expertise, and a lifetime appointment... and with one ruling, he erased the most meaningful attempt to protect American children this government has ever made. Reuters called it "upending Kennedy's overhaul of childhood vaccine policies." Here's what actually happened. RFK Jr. looked at peer nations (like Denmark and Germany) with healthy kids and functioning societies, and said let's see if there's a smarter schedule. What he found was that we give 54 shots of 72 vaccine doses. Denmark gives roughly half that. And Denmark has not seen measles come back, or polio come back, or smallpox come back. None of the fear porn the American Academy of Pediatrics has been selling you has actually happened. Meanwhile we went from 12% of American children with chronic disease in the 1980s to nearly 50% today. In 48 years, we have seen the greatest collapse of children's health in the history of this country, happening in perfect parallel with a vaccine schedule that grew from 12 vaccines to 54 shots. You cannot look at the health of American children and call that program a success. You simply cannot. So what did the judge do? He said RFK Jr. didn't run it by ACIP, the advisory committee that by everyone's understanding has always been advisory only. No binding authority, just an opinion, not a mandate. At least that's what they always told us when the committee was captured... And then when Kennedy moved to satisfy that requirement, the judge said he didn't recognize the current ACIP either. There is no committee he recognizes. According to him there are no changes allowed in either direction, no new vaccines can be added, there can be no modifications for any reason, including a bioweapon attack. One judge has put the entire country in limbo to protect a rubber-stamp committee that has never once had a genuine skeptic in the room. A committee where members like Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while personally developing a rotavirus vaccine and didn't recuse himself. That's the balance they're defending. The American Academy of Pediatrics, a trade organization funded by the pharmaceutical industry, went to court to make sure your doctor has no say in your child's vaccine schedule. They don't want pediatricians in the conversation. They want the government to decide. This is what happens when you try to clean the swamp. The swamp has judges. This case is not over. It's an injunction, not a final ruling. The Trump administration will appeal. And we will keep fighting. Because the children of this country deserve better than what 40 years of this program has given them.
11:44

A few days ago a judge decided he knows more about children's health than Robert Kennedy Jr. and every member of the ACIP committee... And everyone at HHS, the CDC, and other.. This is a judge with no medical degree, no pediatric expertise, and a lifetime appointment... and with one ruling, he erased the most meaningful attempt to protect American children this government has ever made. Reuters called it "upending Kennedy's overhaul of childhood vaccine policies." Here's what actually happened. RFK Jr. looked at peer nations (like Denmark and Germany) with healthy kids and functioning societies, and said let's see if there's a smarter schedule. What he found was that we give 54 shots of 72 vaccine doses. Denmark gives roughly half that. And Denmark has not seen measles come back, or polio come back, or smallpox come back. None of the fear porn the American Academy of Pediatrics has been selling you has actually happened. Meanwhile we went from 12% of American children with chronic disease in the 1980s to nearly 50% today. In 48 years, we have seen the greatest collapse of children's health in the history of this country, happening in perfect parallel with a vaccine schedule that grew from 12 vaccines to 54 shots. You cannot look at the health of American children and call that program a success. You simply cannot. So what did the judge do? He said RFK Jr. didn't run it by ACIP, the advisory committee that by everyone's understanding has always been advisory only. No binding authority, just an opinion, not a mandate. At least that's what they always told us when the committee was captured... And then when Kennedy moved to satisfy that requirement, the judge said he didn't recognize the current ACIP either. There is no committee he recognizes. According to him there are no changes allowed in either direction, no new vaccines can be added, there can be no modifications for any reason, including a bioweapon attack. One judge has put the entire country in limbo to protect a rubber-stamp committee that has never once had a genuine skeptic in the room. A committee where members like Paul Offit voted to add rotavirus vaccines to the childhood schedule while personally developing a rotavirus vaccine and didn't recuse himself. That's the balance they're defending. The American Academy of Pediatrics, a trade organization funded by the pharmaceutical industry, went to court to make sure your doctor has no say in your child's vaccine schedule. They don't want pediatricians in the conversation. They want the government to decide. This is what happens when you try to clean the swamp. The swamp has judges. This case is not over. It's an injunction, not a final ruling. The Trump administration will appeal. And we will keep fighting. Because the children of this country deserve better than what 40 years of this program has given them.

Del Bigtree

171,737 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

MAHA: Everything is on the line this week. Fired CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez is about to testify before the Senate. This is part of a coordinated Pharma attack to get RFK Jr. ousted. Why? Because MAHA is about to reform the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Dr. Robert Malone just revealed that “EVERYTHING is on the table.” “The mission space that we have … includes revisiting the entire pediatric schedule, insisting on data for vaccine-vaccine interactions, insisting on control data, addressing the appropriateness of immediate after-birth vaccination with hepatitis B [and] the appropriateness of the current human papilloma virus vaccine.” Now, Kennedy and Dr. Malone need all hands on deck to defend them against an onslaught of Pharma propaganda so that they can deliver the SWEEPING reforms that America voted for.
1:33

MAHA: Everything is on the line this week. Fired CDC Director Dr. Susan Monarez is about to testify before the Senate. This is part of a coordinated Pharma attack to get RFK Jr. ousted. Why? Because MAHA is about to reform the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Dr. Robert Malone just revealed that “EVERYTHING is on the table.” “The mission space that we have … includes revisiting the entire pediatric schedule, insisting on data for vaccine-vaccine interactions, insisting on control data, addressing the appropriateness of immediate after-birth vaccination with hepatitis B [and] the appropriateness of the current human papilloma virus vaccine.” Now, Kennedy and Dr. Malone need all hands on deck to defend them against an onslaught of Pharma propaganda so that they can deliver the SWEEPING reforms that America voted for.

Children’s Health Defense

85,970 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

#BREAKING: Hayes: “In just a few days, 2025 will end with the most confirmed #measles cases this country has recorded since we officially eliminated the disease in 2000…None of this is an accident. For the past year, our public health system has been led by an anti-vaccine activist and zealot who has been working every day to bring back vaccine-preventable diseases like Measles. There’s really no other way to say it, and now Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr is reportedly considering MORE changes to the childhood vaccine schedule including the removal of 7 of the 17 vaccines American kids currently get under that schedule.”🤦‍♀️
10:37

#BREAKING: Hayes: “In just a few days, 2025 will end with the most confirmed #measles cases this country has recorded since we officially eliminated the disease in 2000…None of this is an accident. For the past year, our public health system has been led by an anti-vaccine activist and zealot who has been working every day to bring back vaccine-preventable diseases like Measles. There’s really no other way to say it, and now Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr is reportedly considering MORE changes to the childhood vaccine schedule including the removal of 7 of the 17 vaccines American kids currently get under that schedule.”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

381,880 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The staggering financial conflict of interest at the heart of America's vaccine schedule. Dr. Paul Offit, a frequent CNN medical analyst and leading voice for vaccines, sat on the very committee (ACIP) that voted to add a rotavirus vaccine to the childhood schedule. Here’s the scandal: While on the committee, Offit had his own rotavirus vaccine in development. By voting to mandate the entire category, he virtually guaranteed a market for his own product—a competitive lock-in. The vaccine the committee approved (which he voted for) was so dangerous it had to be withdrawn FROM THE MARKET WITHIN A YEAR. It was causing intussusception in babies—a lethal condition where the intestines telescope, causing agonizing pain. And what happened next? His vaccine, developed with partners Stanley Plotkin et al., replaced the failed one. He remained on the committee. He and his partners then sold that vaccine to Merck for $186 MILLION DOLLARS. He told Newsweek he had "won the lottery." He didn't win the lottery. He voted himself rich. This isn't just a conflict of interest; it's a catastrophic breach of public trust. The very experts tasked with safeguarding our children's health were making decisions that directly led to a massive personal windfall, after a voted-on product HARMED children. This is the rot at the core of the system. Follow the money. Always follow the money.
1:41

The staggering financial conflict of interest at the heart of America's vaccine schedule. Dr. Paul Offit, a frequent CNN medical analyst and leading voice for vaccines, sat on the very committee (ACIP) that voted to add a rotavirus vaccine to the childhood schedule. Here’s the scandal: While on the committee, Offit had his own rotavirus vaccine in development. By voting to mandate the entire category, he virtually guaranteed a market for his own product—a competitive lock-in. The vaccine the committee approved (which he voted for) was so dangerous it had to be withdrawn FROM THE MARKET WITHIN A YEAR. It was causing intussusception in babies—a lethal condition where the intestines telescope, causing agonizing pain. And what happened next? His vaccine, developed with partners Stanley Plotkin et al., replaced the failed one. He remained on the committee. He and his partners then sold that vaccine to Merck for $186 MILLION DOLLARS. He told Newsweek he had "won the lottery." He didn't win the lottery. He voted himself rich. This isn't just a conflict of interest; it's a catastrophic breach of public trust. The very experts tasked with safeguarding our children's health were making decisions that directly led to a massive personal windfall, after a voted-on product HARMED children. This is the rot at the core of the system. Follow the money. Always follow the money.

Camus

97,500 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨 Jeffrey Tucker: RFK Jr.’s vaccine reforms were overturned days before the CDC was going to address vaccine injuries. “The week before the committee was planning to [discuss vaccine injuries], a judge in Massachusetts said… ‘your ACIP committee is no good.’” “RFK inherited an ACIP committee that was fully conflicted.” “They would just rubber stamp every shot that came in front of them.” “ So RFK's new ACIP committee [was] making substantial changes the week before this judgment.” “You have to weigh the injuries against the benefits.” “Many of these shots simply don't pass that test.” “The injuries are things that undermine the industry.” “So, of course, they don't want to talk about the injuries.” “Within a day of that decision, the CDC schedule reverted back, deleting an entire year of work by the ACIP committee.” “The childhood schedule for vaccinations [are] ‘recommended,’ but actually mandates in many states.” “[It] exploded from just a few shots to… as many as 76 today after the 1986 liability shield for Big Pharma.” “That became a gold rush.” “ACIP had been trimming the schedule gradually for each meeting.” “[They were] looking at the science, looking at the data such as they could find it, and making a judgment.” “They had made some substantial changes in the schedule to move about five shots from seemingly required to… ‘shared decision making.’” “Meaning that parents are advised to talk to their doctors about them." “It's actually a huge change in the schedule that's stuck in stone and worth probably hundreds of billions of dollars to the industry that is indemnified against any harm." Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute Bobbie Anne Cox
4:18

🚨 Jeffrey Tucker: RFK Jr.’s vaccine reforms were overturned days before the CDC was going to address vaccine injuries. “The week before the committee was planning to [discuss vaccine injuries], a judge in Massachusetts said… ‘your ACIP committee is no good.’” “RFK inherited an ACIP committee that was fully conflicted.” “They would just rubber stamp every shot that came in front of them.” “ So RFK's new ACIP committee [was] making substantial changes the week before this judgment.” “You have to weigh the injuries against the benefits.” “Many of these shots simply don't pass that test.” “The injuries are things that undermine the industry.” “So, of course, they don't want to talk about the injuries.” “Within a day of that decision, the CDC schedule reverted back, deleting an entire year of work by the ACIP committee.” “The childhood schedule for vaccinations [are] ‘recommended,’ but actually mandates in many states.” “[It] exploded from just a few shots to… as many as 76 today after the 1986 liability shield for Big Pharma.” “That became a gold rush.” “ACIP had been trimming the schedule gradually for each meeting.” “[They were] looking at the science, looking at the data such as they could find it, and making a judgment.” “They had made some substantial changes in the schedule to move about five shots from seemingly required to… ‘shared decision making.’” “Meaning that parents are advised to talk to their doctors about them." “It's actually a huge change in the schedule that's stuck in stone and worth probably hundreds of billions of dollars to the industry that is indemnified against any harm." Jeffrey A Tucker Brownstone Institute Bobbie Anne Cox

Children’s Health Defense

71,128 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

President Trump signed an executive order week directing the CDC and ACIP to review the latest clinical data and align the US childhood vaccine schedule with best practices from peer developed nations. The order also requires all federal departments and agencies to ensure their actions fulfill legal obligations with respect to parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations, and equal protection under law. Dr. Robert Malone, former co-chair of ACIP who recently stepped down, published a Substack analysis describing it as the executive order that may change the vaccine debate forever. His reading of the key language, "to the extent permitted by law," is that it pulls authority over vaccination policy, medicine, and research back under the executive branch and returns ACIP to its original function as an advisory body. For decades, ACIP has operated as a de facto policymaking authority. This order tells them that role is over. The next ACIP meeting will be the first real test of whether that line holds. It is also worth noting that this executive order was signed as the Department of Justice filed a brief at the Supreme Court urging it not to hear the case of New York healthcare workers fired for refusing the COVID vaccine on religious grounds. One hand of this administration is expanding parental authority and religious protections around vaccines. The other is working to establish a legal precedent that says firing someone for their religious beliefs is perfectly acceptable. Groups inside this administration are not on the same page...
1:44

President Trump signed an executive order week directing the CDC and ACIP to review the latest clinical data and align the US childhood vaccine schedule with best practices from peer developed nations. The order also requires all federal departments and agencies to ensure their actions fulfill legal obligations with respect to parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations, and equal protection under law. Dr. Robert Malone, former co-chair of ACIP who recently stepped down, published a Substack analysis describing it as the executive order that may change the vaccine debate forever. His reading of the key language, "to the extent permitted by law," is that it pulls authority over vaccination policy, medicine, and research back under the executive branch and returns ACIP to its original function as an advisory body. For decades, ACIP has operated as a de facto policymaking authority. This order tells them that role is over. The next ACIP meeting will be the first real test of whether that line holds. It is also worth noting that this executive order was signed as the Department of Justice filed a brief at the Supreme Court urging it not to hear the case of New York healthcare workers fired for refusing the COVID vaccine on religious grounds. One hand of this administration is expanding parental authority and religious protections around vaccines. The other is working to establish a legal precedent that says firing someone for their religious beliefs is perfectly acceptable. Groups inside this administration are not on the same page...

The HighWire

34,525 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."
0:42

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."

Camus

69,827 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A few weeks ago an activist judge wiped out the changes Robert Kennedy Jr. had made to the vaccine program and abolished his Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A lot of people saw that as a devastating loss. We saw a window. ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network submitted a letter to Secretary Kennedy, drafted by our attorney Aaron Siri , laying out exactly what he could still do. Expand the ACIP membership criteria. Bring in people who specialize in vaccine safety and injury, not just the people who make vaccines and promote them. Add liaison representatives so that injured people and the organizations fighting for them actually have a seat at the table, instead of leaving it entirely to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Days after receiving that letter, Robert Kennedy Jr. made exactly those changes to the ACIP charter. When I was a kid I was taught that when something looks dark, you look for the window. That's what we did. That's what Kennedy did. I want to thank him. These are the changes we have been fighting for. This is what it looks like when it starts to work.
2:04

A few weeks ago an activist judge wiped out the changes Robert Kennedy Jr. had made to the vaccine program and abolished his Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A lot of people saw that as a devastating loss. We saw a window. ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network submitted a letter to Secretary Kennedy, drafted by our attorney Aaron Siri , laying out exactly what he could still do. Expand the ACIP membership criteria. Bring in people who specialize in vaccine safety and injury, not just the people who make vaccines and promote them. Add liaison representatives so that injured people and the organizations fighting for them actually have a seat at the table, instead of leaving it entirely to the American Academy of Pediatrics. Days after receiving that letter, Robert Kennedy Jr. made exactly those changes to the ACIP charter. When I was a kid I was taught that when something looks dark, you look for the window. That's what we did. That's what Kennedy did. I want to thank him. These are the changes we have been fighting for. This is what it looks like when it starts to work.

Del Bigtree

104,024 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rep. Kim Schrier, D-Wash., confronted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his decision to replace a panel of vaccine experts who make key recommendations. Schrier, a pediatrician, said she found this move “deeply concerning.” The lawmaker then asked the HHS secretary if he’s treated patients, including babies, who have measles, bacterial meningitis, whooping cough, among other illnesses, to which he said no. Schrier said thankfully, doctors have not had to treat these illnesses in recent years because of vaccines that prevent all these illnesses. Schrier then mentioned how during Kennedy’s confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, also a physician, expressed his concerns about Kennedy and his stance on vaccines. Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy with the commitment that Kennedy would not change the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Schrier added. “But then 2 weeks ago, you fired all 17 experts on that very committee,” she added. “Did you lie to Sen. Cassidy when you told him you would not change this panel of experts?” Kennedy said he never made that agreement to Sen. Cassidy. Kennedy testified Tuesday on his agency’s budget request before a House panel, where he faced questioning about changes to U.S. vaccine policy, transparency actions, and his replacement of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Cassidy wrote on social Monday that while the ACIP replacements “have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology.” Schrier accused Kennedy of lying to Cassidy in order to secure the senator’s vote. “You lied to Sen. Cassidy. You have lied to the American people. You have lied to parents about vaccines for 20 years,” she said, “and I also want to be clear that I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.”
4:49

Rep. Kim Schrier, D-Wash., confronted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over his decision to replace a panel of vaccine experts who make key recommendations. Schrier, a pediatrician, said she found this move “deeply concerning.” The lawmaker then asked the HHS secretary if he’s treated patients, including babies, who have measles, bacterial meningitis, whooping cough, among other illnesses, to which he said no. Schrier said thankfully, doctors have not had to treat these illnesses in recent years because of vaccines that prevent all these illnesses. Schrier then mentioned how during Kennedy’s confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy, also a physician, expressed his concerns about Kennedy and his stance on vaccines. Cassidy ultimately voted to confirm Kennedy with the commitment that Kennedy would not change the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Schrier added. “But then 2 weeks ago, you fired all 17 experts on that very committee,” she added. “Did you lie to Sen. Cassidy when you told him you would not change this panel of experts?” Kennedy said he never made that agreement to Sen. Cassidy. Kennedy testified Tuesday on his agency’s budget request before a House panel, where he faced questioning about changes to U.S. vaccine policy, transparency actions, and his replacement of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Cassidy wrote on social Monday that while the ACIP replacements “have scientific credentials, many do not have significant experience studying microbiology, epidemiology or immunology.” Schrier accused Kennedy of lying to Cassidy in order to secure the senator’s vote. “You lied to Sen. Cassidy. You have lied to the American people. You have lied to parents about vaccines for 20 years,” she said, “and I also want to be clear that I will lay all responsibility for every death from a vaccine-preventable illness at your feet.”

PBS News

14,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NO VACCINE IS SAFE: RFK’s NEW APPOINTEE TO KEY VACCINE REVIEW BOARD SAYS ALL VACCINES COULD BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW Physician, Scientist, Author of and newly appointed member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Robert W Malone, MD explains to Matt Gaetz that this committee has the authority to “look at and revisit past decisions concerning vaccine safety, effectiveness, and whether or not they really make sense given the current status of knowledge about the disease in question and about the SIDE EFFECTS associated with these products. So, I think it’s all on the table.”
2:24

NO VACCINE IS SAFE: RFK’s NEW APPOINTEE TO KEY VACCINE REVIEW BOARD SAYS ALL VACCINES COULD BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW Physician, Scientist, Author of and newly appointed member of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Robert W Malone, MD explains to Matt Gaetz that this committee has the authority to “look at and revisit past decisions concerning vaccine safety, effectiveness, and whether or not they really make sense given the current status of knowledge about the disease in question and about the SIDE EFFECTS associated with these products. So, I think it’s all on the table.”

One America News

411,631 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ohhh my god. Look at the ‘Like Count’ on this video On mainstream media CBS, over 620,000 Likes in 24 hours on Elon Musk telling reporters: This time, the American People are going to get what they voted for Support is MASSIVE for Elon Musk and DOGE “They say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non-transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?” Elon Musk “Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump won the house and won the Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally the people voted for, for major government reform and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And, and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.”
0:58

Ohhh my god. Look at the ‘Like Count’ on this video On mainstream media CBS, over 620,000 Likes in 24 hours on Elon Musk telling reporters: This time, the American People are going to get what they voted for Support is MASSIVE for Elon Musk and DOGE “They say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non-transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?” Elon Musk “Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump won the house and won the Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally the people voted for, for major government reform and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And, and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.”

Wall Street Apes

10,469,739 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RFK Jr. Exposes Systemic Corruption on the Vaccine Advisory Board In a stunning revelation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. detailed the profound corruption that led to the dismissal of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). For decades, this board—tasked with regulating the vaccine industry—acted as a "sock puppet" for the very corporations it was supposed to oversee. The rot was exposed as far back as 2002, when a Congressional hearing found that 97% of the board members had undisclosed conflicts of interest. Kennedy highlighted a glaring example: the approval of the rotavirus vaccine. Of the five members who voted to add it to the childhood schedule, four had direct financial ties to the vaccine's manufacturers. One member, Dr. Paul Offit, voted to mandate a competitor's rotavirus vaccine while he had his own version in development. His vote guaranteed a future market for his product. The approved vaccine was pulled within a year for causing a lethal bowel obstruction in children. Offit's vaccine later replaced it, and he and his partners sold it to Merck for $186 million—a deal he reportedly called "winning the lottery." This was not an isolated incident. An Office of Inspector General investigation condemned the board's practices, yet no meaningful reforms were made. ACIP routinely approved vaccines without rigorous, placebo-based safety trials, creating a gold rush for manufacturers. Adding a vaccine to the schedule can guarantee $1 billion in annual sales, creating perverse incentives. The result? An explosion from 11 childhood vaccines in 1986 to as many as 72 today, many for non-contagious diseases, mandated for all children despite highly individualized risks. This is a story of agency capture, failed oversight, and the prioritization of profit over public health.
7:19

RFK Jr. Exposes Systemic Corruption on the Vaccine Advisory Board In a stunning revelation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. detailed the profound corruption that led to the dismissal of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). For decades, this board—tasked with regulating the vaccine industry—acted as a "sock puppet" for the very corporations it was supposed to oversee. The rot was exposed as far back as 2002, when a Congressional hearing found that 97% of the board members had undisclosed conflicts of interest. Kennedy highlighted a glaring example: the approval of the rotavirus vaccine. Of the five members who voted to add it to the childhood schedule, four had direct financial ties to the vaccine's manufacturers. One member, Dr. Paul Offit, voted to mandate a competitor's rotavirus vaccine while he had his own version in development. His vote guaranteed a future market for his product. The approved vaccine was pulled within a year for causing a lethal bowel obstruction in children. Offit's vaccine later replaced it, and he and his partners sold it to Merck for $186 million—a deal he reportedly called "winning the lottery." This was not an isolated incident. An Office of Inspector General investigation condemned the board's practices, yet no meaningful reforms were made. ACIP routinely approved vaccines without rigorous, placebo-based safety trials, creating a gold rush for manufacturers. Adding a vaccine to the schedule can guarantee $1 billion in annual sales, creating perverse incentives. The result? An explosion from 11 childhood vaccines in 1986 to as many as 72 today, many for non-contagious diseases, mandated for all children despite highly individualized risks. This is a story of agency capture, failed oversight, and the prioritization of profit over public health.

Camus

113,507 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“This isn't about informed consent.” “This isn't about parental rights.” 💰 “It's about money.” CHD General Counsel Kim Mack BLASTS the AAP for trying to overrule RFK Jr.’s changes to vaccine policy: “They use the phrase ‘safe and effective’ over and over, but the science isn't there to back it up.” “There's a case going on in Massachusetts right now.” “The American Academy of Pediatrics has sued HHS and Secretary Kennedy.” “The judge has issued an injunction staying the changes to the vaccine schedule and to the shared decision-making [and] how ACIP members are chosen.” “There are moves afoot to try to stymie what has been happening.” “Children's Health Defense and other plaintiffs are actually suing the American Academy of Pediatrics under the federal racketeering statute, RICO.” “What AAP is doing is really not looking out for the health of children.” “The AAP is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry.” “They’re the governing body for most of this nation’s pediatricians.” “For a state like Maryland to say that it's not going to rely on federal guidance and [will] look to the AAP… for the ‘science,’ the science isn't there.” “Our RICO complaint lays out all the ways in which AAP and other organizations and entities have failed to do the science.” Kim Mack Rosenberg Emerald Robinson ✝️
2:09

“This isn't about informed consent.” “This isn't about parental rights.” 💰 “It's about money.” CHD General Counsel Kim Mack BLASTS the AAP for trying to overrule RFK Jr.’s changes to vaccine policy: “They use the phrase ‘safe and effective’ over and over, but the science isn't there to back it up.” “There's a case going on in Massachusetts right now.” “The American Academy of Pediatrics has sued HHS and Secretary Kennedy.” “The judge has issued an injunction staying the changes to the vaccine schedule and to the shared decision-making [and] how ACIP members are chosen.” “There are moves afoot to try to stymie what has been happening.” “Children's Health Defense and other plaintiffs are actually suing the American Academy of Pediatrics under the federal racketeering statute, RICO.” “What AAP is doing is really not looking out for the health of children.” “The AAP is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry.” “They’re the governing body for most of this nation’s pediatricians.” “For a state like Maryland to say that it's not going to rely on federal guidance and [will] look to the AAP… for the ‘science,’ the science isn't there.” “Our RICO complaint lays out all the ways in which AAP and other organizations and entities have failed to do the science.” Kim Mack Rosenberg Emerald Robinson ✝️

Children’s Health Defense

11,216 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten