Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Very disappointing… 🚨 Dr. Robert Malone Reveals RFK Jr.-Appointed a Mole, a Saboteur who Undermined the CDC's entire ACIP Overhaul In his recent interview on The HighWire, Dr. Robert Malone detailed internal sabotage at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and CDC as a key factor in...

50,090 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

EXPLOSIVE MOMENT at CDC's ACIP Committee Reveals Shocking Pfizer Oversight In a stunning exchange, Dr. Robert Malone—a key inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology—publicly questioned Pfizer at the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). The focus: The biodistribution studies for the COVID-19 vaccine's Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs). Dr. Malone, leveraging his foundational expertise, confronted Pfizer on two critical failures: 1️⃣ The "Least Sensitive" Method: Pfizer confirmed they used a whole-body imaging technique (luciferase-based). Dr. Malone, who pioneered this very assay, stated they deliberately chose the least sensitive method available. The gold standard—individual tissue dissection and analysis—would have provided a far more accurate picture of where the LNPs travel in the body. He asked point-blank why they opted for the weaker science. 2️⃣ "Edited" Data: Dr. Malone dropped a bombshell, alleging that the biodistribution data submitted to the FDA was edited compared to the data submitted to other regulatory agencies. He specifically stated, "The actual images were edited," and demanded an explanation. Pfizer's response? A complete non-answer. They deflected, stating only that they worked "in close consultation with the FDA." This moment crystallizes the very reason for the public's shattered trust in our public health institutions. A core question about the fundamental safety profile of a product injected into billions was met with a corporate shrug, hiding behind a captured regulator. The takeaway is undeniable: When the architect of the technology questions the integrity of the safety data, and the manufacturer has no substantive reply, it confirms the worst suspicions about the "safe and effective" narrative. This is precisely why a systemic overhaul of the FDA, CDC, and NIH is not just a political talking point—it is a medical necessity.

Camus

124,719 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад