正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Dr. Sabine Hazan: "When we started looking at Bifidobacteria, we realized that Bifidobacteria was absent in kids with autism. That Bifidobacteria was absent in Alzheimer's. Bifidobacteria was absent in long haulers, vaccine injured, Lyme patients, Crohn's patients, invasive cancer." "So and then when you look at who has Bifidobacteria,...

179,672 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Camus 的头像
Camus1 年前

Credit: @SabinehazanMD;

Naveen Sankar S 的头像
Naveen Sankar S1 年前

Children exposed to prenatal steroids may face modestly higher risks of autism, ADHD, and mood disorders. Check out the latest research at #PregnancyCare 🍼 #Neurodevelopment 🧠 #MedicalResearch #ADHD #Autism

FartingCows&Airplanes 的头像
FartingCows&Airplanes1 年前

How do you get it back?

Peter B 的头像
Peter B1 年前

Humans are 43% human DNA, 57% microbe DNA. Cell-wise that works out to 10% human cells to 90% microbe cells. Your microbiome is easily destroyed by every day exposure to toxins and persistent toxic residues in your bloodstream. The average human has 20k of the 85k+ manmade residues in their bloodstream.

$Immortality 的头像
$Immortality1 年前

That is clear and also the same hold true for covid vaxers and long haulers. Just replacing it, does not fix the condition alone. You need to take care of the source of the deficiancy of the bigidobacteria in this case as otherwise they keep dying and the gut keeps beeing in disbiosis. With covid we know the problem is the spike protein, but we dont know exactly what the cause is with Autism/Add. I think cause is heavy metals and parasites and removing this improves the condition...

Bob Campbell 的头像
Bob Campbell1 年前

Another covid hero

DBsBestTickles 的头像
DBsBestTickles1 年前

@grok how do spike proteins or the Covid vaccines interact with bifidobacteria ? Is there anything that the vaccines or virus itself impacted in people that would also be impacting the levels in people?

Gina Beana Fofina 的头像
Gina Beana Fofina1 年前

Interesting research

Abolish Israel 的头像
Abolish Israel1 年前

And now you know why the FDA wants us to take 100 shots and not drink any RAW milk. They even made up fake statements like they did during the plandemic

Ken Milne MD 的头像
Ken Milne MD1 年前

I agree that Bifidobacteria are important gut microbes. Their role in conditions like cancer and ASD is far from established. We should be skeptical of claims based on low-level evidence like animal or observational data.

相关视频

Dr. Sabine Hazan: "I kept collecting stools of patients and noticed that patients with severe Covid had a certain bacteria that was missing compared to people that were highly exposed to Covid, but never got Covid. That bacteria is called Bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria is an important and key microbe for immunity. It represents your trillion Dollar industry of probiotics... It is present in newborns, this is why your newborns did not get a problem from Covid at the beginning and it is absent in old people. The process of aging is loss of Bifidobacteria. We published this paper: The lost microbes of Covid-19. It took 8 months to publish. If you follow the Bifidobacteria like I did, you will notice that vitamin C actually increases Bifidobacteria. This is why vitamin C is important, when you take care of viruses... We published this data where we showed vitamin C, if we give it to patients before and after, it increased the Bifidobacteria. Ivermectin was also and interesting drug. Because Ivermectin we noticed also increased the Bifidobacteria within 24 hours of taking it. Why ivermectin? If you look at what ivermectin is, it is a fermented product of a bacteria that is similar to Bifidobacteria. In fact they're in the same continent of microbes. They live, they're like sisters, brothers in the microbiome. I knew that ivermectin increased Bifidobacteria, but I said: "I can't go out there and start publishing that, that's gonna be too controversial", so I published a hypothesis that my be what I was observing on the front line treating patients with Covid, noticing that their oxygen saturation was increasing from Ivermectin was basically, maybe ivermectin increased Bifidobacteria. The hypothesis on ivermectin was the most read hypothesis in the pandemic and was retracted after 8 months of being on. When we cannot make a hypothesis, this is not science."

Camus

1,963,724 次观看 • 1 年前

Very powerful testimony by dr. Sabine Hazan "Thank you, senator. It's an honor to be here. The microbiome, our microbes in our guts, is our immunity and tells the story and will tell the story of COVID nineteen. And this is why as a gastroenterologist, I stepped into the pandemic. Through my experience, I will show you how difficult it was to conduct research and publish when the research goes against the national public health narrative." "Interference and delay in research happened and affects all of us. In early twenty twenty, my research genetic sequencing laboratory was the first lab to document the entire sequence of the virus in the stools as opposed to the PCR which is just a little piece of the virus." "We discovered that the virus lingered in the stools for up to forty five days. It took six months to publish this publication at a time where everybody needed to know that it was in your stools. My lab also showed that COVID nineteen in the stools was killed by hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin." "But unfortunately, azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine killed the microbiome. So therefore, vitamin c, d, and zinc was added. Three protocols were submitted to the FDA from our findings. Three studies were also put into in full transparencies to help doctors more effectively treat COVID because I knew data that nobody knew. 04/02/2020, FDA gave us an exempt letter for doing a clinical trial." "In other words, we did not need to do a clinical trial on hydroxychloroquine, z pack, vitamin c, d, and zinc as treatment or hydroxychloroquine, vitamin c, d, and zinc as prophylaxis. April 4, somebody must have called the FDA and said, I got another letter saying, I'm sorry, doctor Hazan. Exemption is denied. You must do a full on clinical trial. Here's the letter." "System pressures delayed us, and we got a green light to start recruiting by May 2020. By then, the media created fear around hydroxychloroquine. It was impossible to recruit. This drug was safely given for years for arthritis and lupus with no problems. My clinical trials companies were also banned and censored from advertising on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter." "Remember, I do clinical trials for a living and never as a clinical trial doctor have I not been able to advertise to recruit for a trial on social media. I kept collecting stools of patients and noticed that patients with severe COVID had a certain bacteria that was missing compared to people that were highly exposed to COVID but never got COVID. That bacteria is called bifidobacteria. Bifidobacteria is an important and key microbe for immunity. It represents your trillion dollar industry of probiotics." "In fact, when you turn the bottle and you see the ingredient, it says bifidobacteria. It is present in newborns. This is why your newborns did not get a problem from COVID at the beginning, and it is absent in old people. The process of aging is loss of bifidobacteria. We published this paper, the lost microbes of COVID nineteen." "It took eight months to publish. If you follow the bifidobacteria like I did, you will notice, and we did notice anyways, that vitamin c actually increases bifidobacteria. This is why vitamin c is important when you take when you take care of viruses and, you know, you've all experienced taking vitamin c for a cold." "Well, we published this data where we showed vitamin c, if we give it to patients before and after, it increased the bifidobacteria. Ivermectin was also an interesting drug because Ivermectin, we noticed, also increased the bifidobacteria within twenty four hours of taking it." "Why Ivermectin? If you look at what Ivermectin is, it is a fermented product of a bacteria that is similar to bifidobacteria. In fact, they're in the same continent of microbes. They live. They're like sisters, brothers in the microbiome." "So I published. I knew that ivermectin increased bifidobacteria, but I said, nah. I can't go out there and start publishing that. That's gonna be too controversial. So I published a hypothesis that maybe what I was observing on the frontline treating patients with COVID, noticing that their oxygen saturation was increasing from ivermectin, was basically maybe ivermectin increased bifidobacteria." "The hypothesis on ivermectin was the most read hypothesis in the pandemic and was retracted after eight months of being on. When we cannot make a hypothesis, this is not science. December twenty twenty, at the same time that I was treating patients with COVID, I began collecting stools of my colleagues that were at home and started going into the hospital. And I said, can I get your stools before and after you get vaccinated? Because to me, this new technology of vaccines, I wanted to see what it was doing on the microbiome." "I discovered that messenger RNA vaccines killed the bifidobacteria. I knew I would never be able to publish this because it goes against the narrative. So I submitted it to my college, the American College of Gastroenterology, and presented it in October 2022. This abstract won a research award at the American College of Gastro beating 6,000 abstracts. That's from academic centers like Harvard and Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson." "This abstract got the attention of 18,000 GI doctors who all of a sudden started realizing maybe killing bifidobacteria is why I got COVID after my vaccine to begin with. Worse than that, and another abstract we presented, was the persistent damage of bifidobacteria from the vaccine." "What is going on here that the vaccine continues to kill the bifidobacteria? At the same time, we presented a link between loss of bifidobacteria and Crohn's disease, loss of bifidobacteria in Lyme disease, and loss of bifidobacteria in invasive cancer. It is nearly impossible to publish data that goes against the national public health narrative." "If doctors cannot publish the data, they cannot find solution to fix the problems. So in conclusion, I will finish with showing this. This represents clinical trials that I've done for pharmaceutical companies prior to COVID. Amongst them are vaccine studies. Yes." "I brought vaccines to the market. Proton pump inhibitors, cardiac drugs, biologics for all sorts of conditions. First, postpartum depression drug, drugs that never made it to the market because they killed people. Clinical trials doctors follow guidelines that allows the industry to provide safe drugs. These guidelines were not followed during the pandemic." "And because of that, everyone is affected. COVID should have been a time where humanity joined forces together and doctors needed to come together. It's a shame that it didn't happen. Interference with research affects all of us. This should not be political." "Science is a story that evolves. It's a multitude of experiments that allow us to see medicine, to give hopes to patients. Skepticism, challenging the current state of knowledge. Having an open mind must be allowed if we have any hope of moving science forward. What I saw this pandemic was not science. Thank you."

Camus

127,765 次观看 • 1 年前

Microbiome Restoration via Fecal Transplant: A Case Study by Dr. Sabine Hazan on Improving Autism Symptoms and Microbial Diversity in a 19-Year-Old Male "It's definitely put me on stage with autism. This is a 19 year old who we did fecal transplant on. And, if you go down on the paper, you're gonna notice that we gave him his sister's microbiome. So the first column is the kid with, he had no Bifidobacteria. He had Lactobacillus animalis. I didn't even know lactobacillus animalis was a bad microbe." "And then his sister, you could see and he had low diversity. See his diversity, Shannon diversity 2.24 and then you could see the Shannon of the sister is 6.69. And the column after is the brother matching the sister. This is called engraftment, when you can match the sister. But look at that. He retained the engraftment up to, like, sixteen months." "And the last Shannon diversity, lower I mean, zoom out a little bit. Zoom out. The last Shannon diversity is 6.53, almost matching his sister. Look at the microbes, how different he is from the beginning and how similar he is to his sister. So first column to the last column here. That's right. See the difference? You see by the way, on a clinical picture, the kid improved his ATAC scores, his CARS testing, his which are the testing for autism." "He also started speaking saying, mama, baba. He's doing spell, like, with a board, so he's communicating. He went to prom with a girl. He's growing. He's you know? Remember, this is a 19 year old that's restarting back from two years old. So we have godsend. I mean, this was a miracle during the pandemic to see that." "And and it's one thing to say, well, the kid improved. But then nobody believes me. It's another thing to see the color graphs that shows the matching of the sister's microbiome, that shows the disappearance of the lactobacillus animalis. You can keep going down. So this blue one here, when he first showed up bad microbe. Bad microbe. It's got go down. And then look. He had a lot of proteobacteria." "Those are your bad microbes. Keep going down. And look how it disappeared. Wait. Go back up. Right there. See how it disappeared? Kind of like was trying to go up at six months, but then go went back down. I do. Now it's pretty much low. Now go down again. And by the way, E. Coli is in the proteobacteria file, if you didn't know. Actinobacteria is where your Bifidobacteria lives." "It's the phylum of Bifidobacteria. He had zero. Zero. Zero. This kid kill his whole entire phylum. He killed it. So his sister had a lot, and look how he's slowly growing it. And with each growth, he's getting better and better and better. So this was an amazing case that kinda shows where we need to go, and the importance of Bifidobacteria."

Camus

21,606 次观看 • 1 年前

Uncharted Territory: The Rise of Turbo Cancers, Their Potential Connection to COVID Vaccines, and the Challenge to Conventional Oncology - Insights from Dr. William Makis "We're not we're not dealing with just cancers that are more aggressive. We're dealing with something brand new, something that has a new mechanism by which it's arising. And I believe, you again, this is where the pathologists come in, like Doctor. Ryan Cole, Professor Burkhart, where they're trying to look at these tumors and see what's different about these tumors, what's different about the patients, who develop these cancers. And so we are dealing with something new." "And another marker or another feature of these, turbo cancers that I find fascinating that has come up over and over and really no one talks about it is that oncologists tend to be very good at giving you a proper prognosis. And so when you come in and you're a certain type of breast cancer patient, let's say stage four, you know, we know that you are, you know, hormone positive, for example, the oncologist is very good at giving you a prognosis." "Saying, look, if if you follow, you know, the the the conventional treatments, we we know you're gonna live another five years or ten years or three years, whatever the case may be. And so the prognostication in oncology is quite good. My oncology colleagues are really quite good." "And this is based on studies of hundreds of thousands of people. Usually these are the large trials that they look at, when they offer conventional treatments to patients. Well, this is where they've been completely off, and you will see this you will see this thousands of cases on GoFundMe where families of cancer patients are raising funds, and they will share the medical story of the persons who's who's been affected by by a turbo cancer. And they will say, the oncologist told us we had five years, and our loved one died within two, three months. I have never seen my oncology colleagues be off by a factor of 10 in prognostication." "I have never seen that. You you don't get it that wrong. You know, or colon cancer, for example, where you could live another five years, and then the person again dies two, three months later after diagnosis. And it catches the oncologist off guard. It it and it catches the family off guard, because because they've told the family, you know, we we we can with conventional treatments, you'll have at least another two years, three years, five years, and the person dies a few months later." "That that that shocks everybody. And and and that throws everybody off. And so why are my colleagues now off in their prognostication by a factor of five to 10. There's something wrong here. We I I believe we are dealing with a brand new pathophysiology. I believe it's something that should be seriously looked at. And and and unfortunately, we're stuck in the situation where some of my colleagues who are seeing this, like professor Dalgleish, for example, we will look at the literature." "We will look at the published literature and understand that there are dozens of papers that are looking at aggressive cancers and and, you know, the manner by which they may be arising, and there are case reports and so on. And yet, on the other hand, when, you know, you'll have, doctors in in in the mainstream and in academia saying, well, there's no such thing as turbo cancer. And when you put it in the search engine and no literature comes up, and you have Wikipedia, which will say turbo cancer is a conspiracy theory." "It's, alternative medicine, fringe medicine. It's it doesn't exist. Right? It it it it's it's not a thing. It doesn't exist. And that's not science. You know, that that's not science. When when you have a phenomenon in front of you, to say, this doesn't exist, this is not happening, and this is not real, and cancers are not increased, and, you know, cancers are unchanged. To deny a phenomenon, you know, that's right in front of your face and where you have thousands of cases with families coming to social media saying, yes, this happened to us, that's not that that's not science. That's not how science should work."

Camus

38,540 次观看 • 1 年前

Austen Allred on Gauntlet AI: "We're very up front that we're 80 to 100 hours a week. If you think that that's a terrible idea, please don't come." "We're in Austin, all right? That's a sacrifice for a lot of people. If you don't think like coming to Austin for 100 hours a week and jamming on AI unpaid and just building stuff to figure out how much you can learn and hopefully getting a job on the other side... if you don't think that's awesome, that's totally fine. Please don't come." "There are some psychos out there that think that that's a good time. We wanna collect all those psychos. So come all, come all ye crazy people. And if that's not for you, that's okay." "There are companies that come to us and say, "Hey, we want, you know, 100 engineers that are going to sit in our division of printer drivers and sit there." And I'm like, "They would kill themselves." The people that are coming to Gauntlet would not do that. And so we turn companies down too." So we know who we are, we know what we stand for. You know, it helps that I'm one of those people that would've loved that. So is Ash Tilawat, and so is everybody else that works at Gauntlet. "So it's not hard for us to find other crazy people like ourselves. And that doesn't have to be you. That's okay." "We're not trying to empire build or solve all of humanity's greatest problems. We know that there's a limit to who we're addressing and what we're addressing at any given time." "So our goal is to be the best thing we can possibly be for that weird island of misfits. And for the companies that need a weird island of misfits, we'll be that all day long."

Ben Averbook

12,146 次观看 • 8 个月前