Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Issues a Wake-Up Call on Vaccines: Time to Question, Not Blindly Follow Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a respected voice in medical critique, is urging a deeper examination of vaccines, challenging the mantra that they are universally safe, effective, and necessary. Her powerful testimony highlights critical issues that...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

307,102 subscribers

22,554 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikHaberler & PolitikaEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 Yorum

Camus profil fotoğrafı
Camus1 yıl önce

Credit: @DrSuzanneH7

So.Gay profil fotoğrafı
So.Gay1 yıl önce

This rising health concern is alarming

johanna profil fotoğrafı
johanna1 yıl önce

I will never take another vaccine, ever.... And I used to administer them Never I have lost all trust in a medical community I once revered

Stephen Feher profil fotoğrafı
Stephen Feher1 yıl önce

Doctors who accept "bonuses" paid by Pharma for vaccinating are unlikely to be objective about the vaccine's risks.

BelannF profil fotoğrafı
BelannF1 yıl önce

She is absolutely right - There have been many people hurt because they took vaccines.

Conspiracist©️ profil fotoğrafı
Conspiracist©️1 yıl önce

It's too late for some people anyway.

Ton fosh profil fotoğrafı
Ton fosh1 yıl önce

Pause the guidelines the all schools follow while the deeper examination is conducted.

Benzer Videolar

📣 Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers the TRUTH about whooping cough and the DTaP vax: “The people that have been primed with this acellular vaccine are the ones that are going to continue to interrupt herd immunity until that population is gone.” “What we see is that those children that are the most susceptible in terms of dying or hospitalization are now the most susceptible to the actual bacteria because we have skewed the immunity in the population.” “... older children that were vaccinated will develop whooping cough again. Or if they're vaccinated a lot, they might not cough, but they'll colonize their lung surfaces and be able to spread the bacteria asymptomatically.” “We have created an absolute disaster situation with these vaccines.” Dr Suzanne Humphries
1:50

📣 Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers the TRUTH about whooping cough and the DTaP vax: “The people that have been primed with this acellular vaccine are the ones that are going to continue to interrupt herd immunity until that population is gone.” “What we see is that those children that are the most susceptible in terms of dying or hospitalization are now the most susceptible to the actual bacteria because we have skewed the immunity in the population.” “... older children that were vaccinated will develop whooping cough again. Or if they're vaccinated a lot, they might not cough, but they'll colonize their lung surfaces and be able to spread the bacteria asymptomatically.” “We have created an absolute disaster situation with these vaccines.” Dr Suzanne Humphries

Children’s Health Defense

56,646 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.
4:09

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

Camus

23,556 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🔥What’s the best way to protect a baby from measles? Parents are lining up to get their 6-month-olds an MMR vaccine because they are so terrified of the current measles “outbreak.” However, according to Dr Suzanne Humphries, the reason we’re in the situation we’re in today is because of the vaccines themselves… “And today, we have to worry about it simply because we invited vaccines into our world and have honored them in a way that they don't deserve and are unwilling to face the truth that the vaccines are the actual reason that we're in the horrible situation that we're in today.” For decades, Dr. Suzanne Humphries has been a beacon of truth when it comes to vaccines. Make sure to watch her whole interview only on CHDTV ⬇️
1:10

🔥What’s the best way to protect a baby from measles? Parents are lining up to get their 6-month-olds an MMR vaccine because they are so terrified of the current measles “outbreak.” However, according to Dr Suzanne Humphries, the reason we’re in the situation we’re in today is because of the vaccines themselves… “And today, we have to worry about it simply because we invited vaccines into our world and have honored them in a way that they don't deserve and are unwilling to face the truth that the vaccines are the actual reason that we're in the horrible situation that we're in today.” For decades, Dr. Suzanne Humphries has been a beacon of truth when it comes to vaccines. Make sure to watch her whole interview only on CHDTV ⬇️

Children’s Health Defense

22,401 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Joe Rogan and Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the Covid vaccine and the propaganda behind it. "You know that they're giving COVID vaccines to 6 month old children now. We know how bad it is - we know it ruins stem cells in pregnant women - they don't give stem cells to their baby - the placentas no longer have stem cells." "Nothing bad about the COVID shot is being talked about when we got Kevin McKernan and all these people looking at it (listing off ingredients in the COVID vaccine) - it's a definite gain of function - but nope - we gotta definitely put it on the baby vaccine schedule." "BECAUSE ANY DOUBTS WHETHER OR NOT WELL FUNDED ABOUT THE VACCINATION MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO EXIST." Joe: "That sounds like a religion. It sounds like a crazy cult that the whole world's been sucked into. Giving a COVID shot to a baby today is insane." Dr. Humphries: "Three of them." Joe: "Are doctors really recommending this?" Dr. Humphries: "There's a group of people called ACIP - doctors usually with vaccine interests in their bank accounts that make the recommendations for the vaccines." "So if your doctor follows the ACIP program you have to be offered that vaccine - and now that doctor is likely to lose $250,000 a year if they don't do that because there's incentive given to hospitals and doctors."
1:59

Joe Rogan and Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the Covid vaccine and the propaganda behind it. "You know that they're giving COVID vaccines to 6 month old children now. We know how bad it is - we know it ruins stem cells in pregnant women - they don't give stem cells to their baby - the placentas no longer have stem cells." "Nothing bad about the COVID shot is being talked about when we got Kevin McKernan and all these people looking at it (listing off ingredients in the COVID vaccine) - it's a definite gain of function - but nope - we gotta definitely put it on the baby vaccine schedule." "BECAUSE ANY DOUBTS WHETHER OR NOT WELL FUNDED ABOUT THE VACCINATION MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO EXIST." Joe: "That sounds like a religion. It sounds like a crazy cult that the whole world's been sucked into. Giving a COVID shot to a baby today is insane." Dr. Humphries: "Three of them." Joe: "Are doctors really recommending this?" Dr. Humphries: "There's a group of people called ACIP - doctors usually with vaccine interests in their bank accounts that make the recommendations for the vaccines." "So if your doctor follows the ACIP program you have to be offered that vaccine - and now that doctor is likely to lose $250,000 a year if they don't do that because there's incentive given to hospitals and doctors."

Barbie True Blue

192,185 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Exposing the tetanus vaccine myth: It’s not a guarantee! Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals a shocking truth about tetanus and the vaccine narrative in this eye-opening discussion. The reality? Even with a tetanus shot, stepping on a rusty nail could still lead to tetanus. Here’s why parents and patients deserve the complete story—because informed consent is critical. The Vaccine Fallacy: Dr. Humphries explains that the tetanus vaccine is not a guaranteed shield. Tetanus immune globulin (TIG), often used for deep wounds, comes from donors—some of whom contracted tetanus despite multiple vaccines. Yes, the shot doesn’t always protect, and severe tetanus remains a risk. Wound Care Wisdom Ignored: Why aren’t parents taught how to properly clean wounds to prevent tetanus? Dr. Humphries emphasizes that simple steps—like thorough cleaning and avoiding premature stitching—can be lifesaving. Tetanus thrives in dead tissue, and closing a wound too soon can trap infection, creating a breeding ground. Secondary healing, where wounds are left open to heal from the inside out, is a proven method to avoid this. (Open-heart surgery patients are sometimes left open to heal—it’s real!) The Bigger Picture: Tetanus is rare, but the fear-driven narrative overshadows practical prevention. Dr. Humphries argues that instead of pushing vaccines as the only solution, medical professionals should empower people with knowledge: clean wounds properly, monitor them, and understand how tetanus spreads. Why This Matters: The medical establishment isn’t sharing the full truth. From historical cases involving soldiers to modern examples, tetanus can strike even the vaccinated. Parents deserve to know how to protect their families without relying solely on a shot that might not work.
1:39

Exposing the tetanus vaccine myth: It’s not a guarantee! Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals a shocking truth about tetanus and the vaccine narrative in this eye-opening discussion. The reality? Even with a tetanus shot, stepping on a rusty nail could still lead to tetanus. Here’s why parents and patients deserve the complete story—because informed consent is critical. The Vaccine Fallacy: Dr. Humphries explains that the tetanus vaccine is not a guaranteed shield. Tetanus immune globulin (TIG), often used for deep wounds, comes from donors—some of whom contracted tetanus despite multiple vaccines. Yes, the shot doesn’t always protect, and severe tetanus remains a risk. Wound Care Wisdom Ignored: Why aren’t parents taught how to properly clean wounds to prevent tetanus? Dr. Humphries emphasizes that simple steps—like thorough cleaning and avoiding premature stitching—can be lifesaving. Tetanus thrives in dead tissue, and closing a wound too soon can trap infection, creating a breeding ground. Secondary healing, where wounds are left open to heal from the inside out, is a proven method to avoid this. (Open-heart surgery patients are sometimes left open to heal—it’s real!) The Bigger Picture: Tetanus is rare, but the fear-driven narrative overshadows practical prevention. Dr. Humphries argues that instead of pushing vaccines as the only solution, medical professionals should empower people with knowledge: clean wounds properly, monitor them, and understand how tetanus spreads. Why This Matters: The medical establishment isn’t sharing the full truth. From historical cases involving soldiers to modern examples, tetanus can strike even the vaccinated. Parents deserve to know how to protect their families without relying solely on a shot that might not work.

Camus

60,413 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Exposes the Vaccine Myth: No Such Thing as Safe Dr. Suzanne Humphries boldly asserts: “Vaccines have never been safe, nor will they ever be.” Why? Because the very process of vaccination defies the natural elegance of the human immune system. A former board-certified nephrologist and co-author of Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History, Humphries’ journey into vaccine skepticism began in hospitals, where she witnessed undeniable injuries linked to vaccinations. This drove her to challenge the medical dogma she once accepted, uncovering a troubling truth: vaccines disrupt the body’s innate defenses in ways that are neither natural nor benign. Humphries argues that injecting disease matter—mixed with chemicals, metals, and antibiotics—through an unnatural route like a needle creates chaos in the immune system. This process, often bypassing the body’s first lines of defense, triggers unpredictable responses, leaving individuals vulnerable to a host of unintended consequences. “The fixation on antibodies as proof of immunity is insanity,” she declares. Antibodies are merely one piece of the immune system’s intricate puzzle, yet vaccine manufacturers tout them as the sole measure of success, ignoring the broader, elegant cascade of natural immunity. History tells a stark story. Humphries points to the smallpox vaccine, often celebrated as a medical triumph, which left countless children with severe ulcerations, chronic diseases, or worse—death. Parents watched healthy infants suffer, only to be told these outcomes were coincidental. “If vaccines were truly miraculous,” she asks, “why have they always required mandates and coercion? Why no eager lines for a ‘lifesaving’ product?” Her research reveals that diseases like smallpox and polio were already declining due to improved sanitation and nutrition before vaccines became widespread—a inconvenient fact buried in mainstream narratives. The science, Humphries contends, doesn’t support the “safe and effective” mantra. Studies like Mawson 2017 show vaccinated children with higher rates of chronic conditions compared to unvaccinated peers. A 2012 Cowling study, using a rare saline placebo, found flu vaccines offered no significant protection and increased non-influenza infections in recipients. Humphries also highlights “original antigenic sin,” where vaccines can impair future immune responses, a phenomenon rarely acknowledged by health authorities. The medical establishment’s dismissal of dissent fuels her critique. “My colleagues never studied vaccines,” she notes, “yet they clung to soundbites, ignoring my evidence-based concerns.” This resistance, she argues, stems not from science but from a system driven by profit, power, and conformity. The result? A public coerced into compliance, gaslit when injuries occur, and denied informed choice. Dr. Humphries calls for a paradigm shift: prioritize natural immunity through nutrition, hygiene, and respect for the body’s design. “We’re not too stupid to notice the harm,” she insists, urging individuals to question the narrative. Why is dissent silenced? Why is a “miraculous” product forced? The answers, she warns, expose a system more invested in control than health. The truth is uncomfortable but undeniable: vaccines are not the saviors we’ve been sold.
4:07

Dr. Suzanne Humphries Exposes the Vaccine Myth: No Such Thing as Safe Dr. Suzanne Humphries boldly asserts: “Vaccines have never been safe, nor will they ever be.” Why? Because the very process of vaccination defies the natural elegance of the human immune system. A former board-certified nephrologist and co-author of Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History, Humphries’ journey into vaccine skepticism began in hospitals, where she witnessed undeniable injuries linked to vaccinations. This drove her to challenge the medical dogma she once accepted, uncovering a troubling truth: vaccines disrupt the body’s innate defenses in ways that are neither natural nor benign. Humphries argues that injecting disease matter—mixed with chemicals, metals, and antibiotics—through an unnatural route like a needle creates chaos in the immune system. This process, often bypassing the body’s first lines of defense, triggers unpredictable responses, leaving individuals vulnerable to a host of unintended consequences. “The fixation on antibodies as proof of immunity is insanity,” she declares. Antibodies are merely one piece of the immune system’s intricate puzzle, yet vaccine manufacturers tout them as the sole measure of success, ignoring the broader, elegant cascade of natural immunity. History tells a stark story. Humphries points to the smallpox vaccine, often celebrated as a medical triumph, which left countless children with severe ulcerations, chronic diseases, or worse—death. Parents watched healthy infants suffer, only to be told these outcomes were coincidental. “If vaccines were truly miraculous,” she asks, “why have they always required mandates and coercion? Why no eager lines for a ‘lifesaving’ product?” Her research reveals that diseases like smallpox and polio were already declining due to improved sanitation and nutrition before vaccines became widespread—a inconvenient fact buried in mainstream narratives. The science, Humphries contends, doesn’t support the “safe and effective” mantra. Studies like Mawson 2017 show vaccinated children with higher rates of chronic conditions compared to unvaccinated peers. A 2012 Cowling study, using a rare saline placebo, found flu vaccines offered no significant protection and increased non-influenza infections in recipients. Humphries also highlights “original antigenic sin,” where vaccines can impair future immune responses, a phenomenon rarely acknowledged by health authorities. The medical establishment’s dismissal of dissent fuels her critique. “My colleagues never studied vaccines,” she notes, “yet they clung to soundbites, ignoring my evidence-based concerns.” This resistance, she argues, stems not from science but from a system driven by profit, power, and conformity. The result? A public coerced into compliance, gaslit when injuries occur, and denied informed choice. Dr. Humphries calls for a paradigm shift: prioritize natural immunity through nutrition, hygiene, and respect for the body’s design. “We’re not too stupid to notice the harm,” she insists, urging individuals to question the narrative. Why is dissent silenced? Why is a “miraculous” product forced? The answers, she warns, expose a system more invested in control than health. The truth is uncomfortable but undeniable: vaccines are not the saviors we’ve been sold.

Camus

90,055 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a compelling case on why the measles vaccine narrative isn’t as simple as it seems. Drawing from peer-reviewed literature and CDC data, she challenges the push for 95-99% vaccination rates to achieve herd immunity, arguing the vaccine has failed to eradicate measles and may be creating new vulnerabilities. In her presentation, Dr. Humphries dissects the 2015 California measles outbreak, often cited as proof of the need for near-universal vaccination. Of 110 cases, only 49 were unvaccinated, with 12 too young for the vaccine and 9 sick when it was due. Notably, 12% of cases were vaccinated, and one case was a vaccine strain, later removed from the count. Before the vaccine, measles primarily affected children aged 3-15, who gained lifelong immunity. Natural immunity from mothers protected babies under 2, the most vulnerable group. Post-vaccination, vaccinated mothers pass limited immunity—sometimes just 3 months—leaving infants exposed. Older adults, once protected by natural immunity and boosted by circulating virus, are now at risk. In California, 56% of cases were over 20, and 11 were infants under 1. Dr. Humphries argues the vaccine shifts vulnerability to the very groups least equipped to handle measles. Citing LeBaron’s peer-reviewed study, Dr. Humphries notes that 33% of people lack protective measles antibodies 20 years post-vaccination. This secondary failure means many adults, including those over 50, may need boosters—a sign the vaccine’s protection wanes over time. Dr. Humphries highlights primary vaccine failure (2-8% of twice-vaccinated people never respond) and secondary failure (waning immunity). She also points to vaccine escape mutants, like those in China, which evade the vaccine’s protection, a growing concern in the literature. Referencing a 1998 study by Damien, Dr. Humphries notes that 22-33% of twice-vaccinated high school students showed inadequate immunity during a measles epidemic, with secondary immune responses indicating viral replication and potential contagiousness. Russian studies cited by Dr. Humphries show hospitalized patients, fully vaccinated, lacking sufficient titers during epidemics. Even with high vaccination rates, herd immunity remains elusive, and outbreaks persist, prompting experts like Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic to call for a new vaccine. Dr. Humphries urges doctors and the public to look beyond the “unvaccinated” scapegoat and consider the vaccine’s limitations. With primary and secondary failures, waning immunity, and emerging mutants, the current approach may not deliver the promised protection. For more details, Dr. Humphries offers to share peer-reviewed sources and CDC data, encouraging a deeper dive into the complex reality of measles and vaccination. This is a call for critical thinking and honest discussion about public health strategies.
6:09

Dr. Suzanne Humphries delivers a compelling case on why the measles vaccine narrative isn’t as simple as it seems. Drawing from peer-reviewed literature and CDC data, she challenges the push for 95-99% vaccination rates to achieve herd immunity, arguing the vaccine has failed to eradicate measles and may be creating new vulnerabilities. In her presentation, Dr. Humphries dissects the 2015 California measles outbreak, often cited as proof of the need for near-universal vaccination. Of 110 cases, only 49 were unvaccinated, with 12 too young for the vaccine and 9 sick when it was due. Notably, 12% of cases were vaccinated, and one case was a vaccine strain, later removed from the count. Before the vaccine, measles primarily affected children aged 3-15, who gained lifelong immunity. Natural immunity from mothers protected babies under 2, the most vulnerable group. Post-vaccination, vaccinated mothers pass limited immunity—sometimes just 3 months—leaving infants exposed. Older adults, once protected by natural immunity and boosted by circulating virus, are now at risk. In California, 56% of cases were over 20, and 11 were infants under 1. Dr. Humphries argues the vaccine shifts vulnerability to the very groups least equipped to handle measles. Citing LeBaron’s peer-reviewed study, Dr. Humphries notes that 33% of people lack protective measles antibodies 20 years post-vaccination. This secondary failure means many adults, including those over 50, may need boosters—a sign the vaccine’s protection wanes over time. Dr. Humphries highlights primary vaccine failure (2-8% of twice-vaccinated people never respond) and secondary failure (waning immunity). She also points to vaccine escape mutants, like those in China, which evade the vaccine’s protection, a growing concern in the literature. Referencing a 1998 study by Damien, Dr. Humphries notes that 22-33% of twice-vaccinated high school students showed inadequate immunity during a measles epidemic, with secondary immune responses indicating viral replication and potential contagiousness. Russian studies cited by Dr. Humphries show hospitalized patients, fully vaccinated, lacking sufficient titers during epidemics. Even with high vaccination rates, herd immunity remains elusive, and outbreaks persist, prompting experts like Dr. Gregory Poland of the Mayo Clinic to call for a new vaccine. Dr. Humphries urges doctors and the public to look beyond the “unvaccinated” scapegoat and consider the vaccine’s limitations. With primary and secondary failures, waning immunity, and emerging mutants, the current approach may not deliver the promised protection. For more details, Dr. Humphries offers to share peer-reviewed sources and CDC data, encouraging a deeper dive into the complex reality of measles and vaccination. This is a call for critical thinking and honest discussion about public health strategies.

Camus

60,248 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

California Governor Gavin Newsom says the new vaccine recommendations are dangerous. FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary explains why that claim is political and illogical. “Unfortunately, you’re going to hear this partisan rhetoric.” “Where are these mass outbreaks in Denmark and parts of Europe?” “This new core essential vaccine list… is giving parents a hierarchy of vaccines, because not all vaccines are created equal.” “We’re trying to increase vaccine uptake among children by identifying the core essential vaccines that are most important.” “A lot of dogma resulted in a loss of public health trust, and we’re trying to rebuild that trust.”
1:22

California Governor Gavin Newsom says the new vaccine recommendations are dangerous. FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary explains why that claim is political and illogical. “Unfortunately, you’re going to hear this partisan rhetoric.” “Where are these mass outbreaks in Denmark and parts of Europe?” “This new core essential vaccine list… is giving parents a hierarchy of vaccines, because not all vaccines are created equal.” “We’re trying to increase vaccine uptake among children by identifying the core essential vaccines that are most important.” “A lot of dogma resulted in a loss of public health trust, and we’re trying to rebuild that trust.”

MAHA Action

25,762 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”
1:31

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”

Children’s Health Defense

13,035 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 Dr. Suzanne Humphries just revealed that meningitis was already in decline BEFORE the vaccine was introduced. “The vaccine used against meningococcal B had not yet been evaluated in an efficacy trial and was not being used yet routinely anywhere in the world.” “Any vaccine could have made the incidence seem to decline.” “Because it was already going down.” “So where have we seen this before?” “Pertussis and measles.” “Those vaccines came in pretty much at the end of the death decline.” “The background of the person and the world that they live in makes a huge difference to susceptibility and survival.” “That’s the point that I want to make to you today.” “So that you can stop being afraid and start being proactive and get your lives together.” “You don’t have to worry about… a vaccine that may give you short-term immunity.” Dr Suzanne Humphries
3:15

🚨 Dr. Suzanne Humphries just revealed that meningitis was already in decline BEFORE the vaccine was introduced. “The vaccine used against meningococcal B had not yet been evaluated in an efficacy trial and was not being used yet routinely anywhere in the world.” “Any vaccine could have made the incidence seem to decline.” “Because it was already going down.” “So where have we seen this before?” “Pertussis and measles.” “Those vaccines came in pretty much at the end of the death decline.” “The background of the person and the world that they live in makes a huge difference to susceptibility and survival.” “That’s the point that I want to make to you today.” “So that you can stop being afraid and start being proactive and get your lives together.” “You don’t have to worry about… a vaccine that may give you short-term immunity.” Dr Suzanne Humphries

Children’s Health Defense

14,960 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes critical issues with whooping cough (pertussis) and its vaccines. Parents worldwide report babies misdiagnosed, denied testing, and given harmful drugs, only confirmed positive after insistence. Pre-vaccine, adults developed strong lung immunity, limiting spread, as shown in Warfel’s 2014 baboon study. The original whole-cell vaccine, with thimerosal and aluminum, was reactogenic, causing severe issues that bankrupted companies like Kannot. Today’s acellular vaccine is less reactogenic but creates “original antigenic sin,” per Dr. Cherry, where first exposure limits future immunity, failing to neutralize adenylate cyclase toxin. Vaccinated individuals carry high bacterial loads, spreading pertussis asymptomatically. Immunity starts in the blood, not lungs, unlike natural immunity. Warfel’s study found vaccinated baboons had bacteria in lungs upon re-exposure; naturally immune ones had none. Worse, CDC-documented mutant strains, like pertactin-deficient ones, arise in vaccinated populations, producing more toxin and causing severe disease. Humphries warns the acellular vaccine fails to stop transmission, leaving babies vulnerable.
5:17

Dr. Suzanne Humphries exposes critical issues with whooping cough (pertussis) and its vaccines. Parents worldwide report babies misdiagnosed, denied testing, and given harmful drugs, only confirmed positive after insistence. Pre-vaccine, adults developed strong lung immunity, limiting spread, as shown in Warfel’s 2014 baboon study. The original whole-cell vaccine, with thimerosal and aluminum, was reactogenic, causing severe issues that bankrupted companies like Kannot. Today’s acellular vaccine is less reactogenic but creates “original antigenic sin,” per Dr. Cherry, where first exposure limits future immunity, failing to neutralize adenylate cyclase toxin. Vaccinated individuals carry high bacterial loads, spreading pertussis asymptomatically. Immunity starts in the blood, not lungs, unlike natural immunity. Warfel’s study found vaccinated baboons had bacteria in lungs upon re-exposure; naturally immune ones had none. Worse, CDC-documented mutant strains, like pertactin-deficient ones, arise in vaccinated populations, producing more toxin and causing severe disease. Humphries warns the acellular vaccine fails to stop transmission, leaving babies vulnerable.

Camus

16,514 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just revealed how pediatricians misinform millions of parents about vaccines every year. “Pediatricians have all been taught vaccines are safe, effective, necessary and are harmless.” “Each one of those statements is false.” “Vaccines have never been proven to be safe, they don’t keep you from getting sick.” “You can have the vaccine and high antibody levels and still contract the illness.” “Every single vaccine causes a level of harm … changing the epigenetics of that child, changing little things, shaving off a few points of their IQ that you may not be able to recognize until later.” “When you have all of those toxicities in your body that your body has to take care of, you know that your body is a little bit less healthy.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark
1:37

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just revealed how pediatricians misinform millions of parents about vaccines every year. “Pediatricians have all been taught vaccines are safe, effective, necessary and are harmless.” “Each one of those statements is false.” “Vaccines have never been proven to be safe, they don’t keep you from getting sick.” “You can have the vaccine and high antibody levels and still contract the illness.” “Every single vaccine causes a level of harm … changing the epigenetics of that child, changing little things, shaving off a few points of their IQ that you may not be able to recognize until later.” “When you have all of those toxicities in your body that your body has to take care of, you know that your body is a little bit less healthy.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark

Children’s Health Defense

59,731 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 Why are doctors still pushing the Hep B vaccine for newborns despite clear evidence of harm? “So many doctors and hospitals are not following the new ACIP CDC recommendations.” “They are continuing to strongly recommend the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine.” “Why?” “You have to ask yourself why now.” “Is it corruption? Is it stupidity? Is it ignorance?” “Is it that their bank accounts can’t afford to say no to it?” “Is it because they have to exert dominance over their patients?” “You be the judge.” Dr Suzanne Humphries
0:52

🚨 Why are doctors still pushing the Hep B vaccine for newborns despite clear evidence of harm? “So many doctors and hospitals are not following the new ACIP CDC recommendations.” “They are continuing to strongly recommend the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine.” “Why?” “You have to ask yourself why now.” “Is it corruption? Is it stupidity? Is it ignorance?” “Is it that their bank accounts can’t afford to say no to it?” “Is it because they have to exert dominance over their patients?” “You be the judge.” Dr Suzanne Humphries

Children’s Health Defense

14,731 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries uncovered a system driven by financial incentive, not health—where hospitals get $40,000 bonuses for vaccinating within 24 hours of admission. A chilling account from Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the medical-industrial complex's vaccine dogma. It began with a simple, humane request: to delay vaccines for her severely ill, inflamed patients until discharge. For this, she was branded a heretic. What she uncovered should shake the world to its core. She details how the system is not driven by health, but by financial incentive. Hospitals receive massive bonuses—up to $40,000—for vaccinating patients within 24 hours of admission, turning patient beds into profit centers. Now, this machine is targeting the most vulnerable. COVID vaccines are being administered to 6-month-old children. Dr. Humphries states we know the shot damages placentas, stripping them of the stem cells vital for research. This isn't reported. Independent researchers like Kevin McKernan are finding shocking contaminants—potential SV40, staphylococcal endotoxin genes, even snake genes. Yet any doubt is heresy. This isn't science. It's a religion. A cult. An unelected panel, ACIP—doctors with "vaccine interests in their bank accounts"—mandates the schedule. Any physician who dissents faces crippling financial penalties, to the tune of $250,000 annually. This is the brutal truth: Your health is secondary to a business model designed to crush independent thought and maximize profit, all the way back to the infiltration of medicine in the early 1900s. The question is no longer about vaccine efficacy. It's about whether you can trust a system that punishes questions and pays for compliance.
3:31

Dr. Suzanne Humphries uncovered a system driven by financial incentive, not health—where hospitals get $40,000 bonuses for vaccinating within 24 hours of admission. A chilling account from Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the medical-industrial complex's vaccine dogma. It began with a simple, humane request: to delay vaccines for her severely ill, inflamed patients until discharge. For this, she was branded a heretic. What she uncovered should shake the world to its core. She details how the system is not driven by health, but by financial incentive. Hospitals receive massive bonuses—up to $40,000—for vaccinating patients within 24 hours of admission, turning patient beds into profit centers. Now, this machine is targeting the most vulnerable. COVID vaccines are being administered to 6-month-old children. Dr. Humphries states we know the shot damages placentas, stripping them of the stem cells vital for research. This isn't reported. Independent researchers like Kevin McKernan are finding shocking contaminants—potential SV40, staphylococcal endotoxin genes, even snake genes. Yet any doubt is heresy. This isn't science. It's a religion. A cult. An unelected panel, ACIP—doctors with "vaccine interests in their bank accounts"—mandates the schedule. Any physician who dissents faces crippling financial penalties, to the tune of $250,000 annually. This is the brutal truth: Your health is secondary to a business model designed to crush independent thought and maximize profit, all the way back to the infiltration of medicine in the early 1900s. The question is no longer about vaccine efficacy. It's about whether you can trust a system that punishes questions and pays for compliance.

Camus

40,449 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

"In Medical School, This Is What I Learned About Vaccination. Dr Suzanne Humphries, MD #1 Smallpox Vaccines Eradicated Smallpox. #2 Polio Vaccines Eradicated Polio. #3 Here's The Vaccine Schedule & Here's When to Give It. They Are Safe, Effective & Necessary...End of Story." We naively entrust our most precious gift...our children...to the "all knowing experts who happen to wear a white coat." They have not read the package inserts. They have not looked at the ingredient lists. They have neither researched nor read ANYTHING to give parents informed consent. Our children pay the ultimate price with the loss of their health & even the loss of their very life. Take your power back...all it takes is a google search to download each & every package insert. All it takes is searching for someone like me, who loves to research, & I will gladly provide you with data & studies to build your knowledge in order to confidently say "NO" to every vaccine offered to you or coerced or pressured upon your child. Don't expect any more education or knowledge from Pharmacists, concerning vaccines, either. They are taught drug names, what the drug is for & if you're lucky, they know a few common side effects, but that is all. Ask any pharmacist to list the ingredients in any vaccine & they cannot answer you...because they do not know the ingredients. Ask any pharmacist any question from vaccine package inserts & they cannot answer you...because they have not read the package inserts. Don't stay in the dark...come into the light of truth. What do doctors learn in medical school regarding vaccines? NOTHING! Dr Larry Palevsky--I was taught in medical school residency, that vaccines are safe & effective. That there is absolutely no reason to question it. Dr. Cammy Benton--We were told on our rotations that vaccines were safe & effective. Here's the schedule, ignore the inserts, that's lawyer jargon. We assumed the science was settled, so you just didn't question it. Dr. Toni Bark--We were not taught anything about vaccines, other than this is the schedule & this is how you give them & this is when you give them. Dr. Daniel Neides--There is no education in medical school around vaccine...their contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. 👇What Doctors Learn In School About Vaccines👇 👇Lack Of Vaccine Education In Medical School👇 👇Lack Of Vaccine Eduacation In Pharmacists👇 Video Credit: TITUS UNLIMITED
0:57

"In Medical School, This Is What I Learned About Vaccination. Dr Suzanne Humphries, MD #1 Smallpox Vaccines Eradicated Smallpox. #2 Polio Vaccines Eradicated Polio. #3 Here's The Vaccine Schedule & Here's When to Give It. They Are Safe, Effective & Necessary...End of Story." We naively entrust our most precious gift...our children...to the "all knowing experts who happen to wear a white coat." They have not read the package inserts. They have not looked at the ingredient lists. They have neither researched nor read ANYTHING to give parents informed consent. Our children pay the ultimate price with the loss of their health & even the loss of their very life. Take your power back...all it takes is a google search to download each & every package insert. All it takes is searching for someone like me, who loves to research, & I will gladly provide you with data & studies to build your knowledge in order to confidently say "NO" to every vaccine offered to you or coerced or pressured upon your child. Don't expect any more education or knowledge from Pharmacists, concerning vaccines, either. They are taught drug names, what the drug is for & if you're lucky, they know a few common side effects, but that is all. Ask any pharmacist to list the ingredients in any vaccine & they cannot answer you...because they do not know the ingredients. Ask any pharmacist any question from vaccine package inserts & they cannot answer you...because they have not read the package inserts. Don't stay in the dark...come into the light of truth. What do doctors learn in medical school regarding vaccines? NOTHING! Dr Larry Palevsky--I was taught in medical school residency, that vaccines are safe & effective. That there is absolutely no reason to question it. Dr. Cammy Benton--We were told on our rotations that vaccines were safe & effective. Here's the schedule, ignore the inserts, that's lawyer jargon. We assumed the science was settled, so you just didn't question it. Dr. Toni Bark--We were not taught anything about vaccines, other than this is the schedule & this is how you give them & this is when you give them. Dr. Daniel Neides--There is no education in medical school around vaccine...their contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. 👇What Doctors Learn In School About Vaccines👇 👇Lack Of Vaccine Education In Medical School👇 👇Lack Of Vaccine Eduacation In Pharmacists👇 Video Credit: TITUS UNLIMITED

Valerie Anne Smith

33,559 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a courageous medical voice, has revealed startling observations about the Pfizer vaccine under a dark field microscope. Unlike older vaccines like measles or flu shots, she initially saw particles—circles and squares—floating in the liquid. When left overnight, these morphed into long, wire-like structures, later resembling what she described as a "circuit board." Wary of the implications, Dr. Humphries pointed to images on the Odysee channel "Life of the Blood" showcasing these disturbing findings. Frightened by the potential consequences, she admitted to stepping back, citing death threats and the influence of vaccine companies. "This is the kind of thing that could get me killed," she said, highlighting the risks of challenging the narrative. Drawing on insights from Catherine Austin Fitts and the Solari Report, Dr. Humphries warns of next-generation technologies—transmitters capable of influencing mood and brain function—and implantable devices. She questions the trajectory of these developments, stating, "Things keep getting worse. They don’t keep getting better." Regardless of who holds office or what promises are made, the rise of artificial intelligence and new contracts signals a troubling future. Dr. Humphries calls for urgent action: "People need to mobilize now. People need to take back their own power. If everyone during the COVID epidemic had said no, we wouldn’t be in this position." Her message is a rallying cry for individuals to resist and reclaim control before it’s too late.
2:16

Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a courageous medical voice, has revealed startling observations about the Pfizer vaccine under a dark field microscope. Unlike older vaccines like measles or flu shots, she initially saw particles—circles and squares—floating in the liquid. When left overnight, these morphed into long, wire-like structures, later resembling what she described as a "circuit board." Wary of the implications, Dr. Humphries pointed to images on the Odysee channel "Life of the Blood" showcasing these disturbing findings. Frightened by the potential consequences, she admitted to stepping back, citing death threats and the influence of vaccine companies. "This is the kind of thing that could get me killed," she said, highlighting the risks of challenging the narrative. Drawing on insights from Catherine Austin Fitts and the Solari Report, Dr. Humphries warns of next-generation technologies—transmitters capable of influencing mood and brain function—and implantable devices. She questions the trajectory of these developments, stating, "Things keep getting worse. They don’t keep getting better." Regardless of who holds office or what promises are made, the rise of artificial intelligence and new contracts signals a troubling future. Dr. Humphries calls for urgent action: "People need to mobilize now. People need to take back their own power. If everyone during the COVID epidemic had said no, we wouldn’t be in this position." Her message is a rallying cry for individuals to resist and reclaim control before it’s too late.

Camus

58,645 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the shocking truth behind MMR vaccine safety studies on children deemed "expendable" by the medical establishment, in an era when ethical oversight was shockingly absent In a stunning revelation, Dr. Andrew Wakefield has uncovered deeply troubling details about the safety studies conducted for the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine—studies that raise profound ethical and scientific concerns. These studies, which form the foundation of public confidence in the vaccine, were conducted on small, vulnerable populations under conditions that would never meet the rigorous standards required for FDA drug trials. Dr. Wakefield’s investigation has led him to a chilling conclusion: the safety of the MMR vaccine was tested on children who were deemed "expendable" by the medical establishment, in an era when ethical oversight was shockingly absent. Dr. Wakefield was staggered to learn that many of these studies took place at the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, New York—a facility that housed children with severe mental and physical disabilities. These children, whose lives were tragically undervalued at the time, were subjected to experimentation without any semblance of fully informed consent. "I couldn’t believe it," Dr. Wakefield recounts. "This is staggeringly unethical on every level. These children were used as experimental subjects, their vulnerabilities exploited in the name of science." The moral implications are undeniable. Conducting medical experiments on children who cannot consent—children already marginalized and neglected—violates the most fundamental principles of medical ethics. But beyond the ethical outrage lies a critical practical issue that undermines the validity of these studies. One of the primary concerns about the MMR vaccine is its potential to cause brain injury, a risk that has been debated for decades. Dr. Wakefield poses a searing question: "If you’re looking for evidence of brain injury in children who are already brain-injured, how can you possibly find it? How can you extrapolate findings from a population of severely debilitated children to a healthy population of children? The answer is simple: you can’t." These studies, Dr. Wakefield argues, were not controlled trials. They were not conducted on representative populations. They were not designed to meet the rigorous standards we expect from modern medical research. Instead, they were carried out on a small, highly specific group of children whose pre-existing conditions made it impossible to accurately assess the vaccine’s safety. This flawed methodology casts a long shadow over the claims of the MMR vaccine’s safety, raising questions that demand answers. Dr. Wakefield’s discoveries have only strengthened his resolve to pursue this issue to its natural conclusion. "When I uncovered the truth about these studies," he says, "I became more convinced than ever that we must challenge the narrative surrounding vaccine safety. The public deserves transparency. Parents deserve the truth. And above all, our children deserve protection—not experimentation." This is not a call to dismiss vaccines outright but a demand for accountability. The use of vulnerable children as test subjects, the absence of informed consent, and the reliance on flawed studies to justify widespread vaccination policies are issues that cannot be ignored. Dr. Wakefield’s findings compel us to ask: How can we trust a system that built its foundation on such shaky ground? How can we move forward without revisiting the past and ensuring that such ethical breaches never happen again? The time for complacency is over. Dr. Wakefield’s revelations are a wake-up call to demand better science, stronger ethics, and a commitment to the well-being of all children—not just those deemed "worthy" by a flawed system.
1:25

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the shocking truth behind MMR vaccine safety studies on children deemed "expendable" by the medical establishment, in an era when ethical oversight was shockingly absent In a stunning revelation, Dr. Andrew Wakefield has uncovered deeply troubling details about the safety studies conducted for the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine—studies that raise profound ethical and scientific concerns. These studies, which form the foundation of public confidence in the vaccine, were conducted on small, vulnerable populations under conditions that would never meet the rigorous standards required for FDA drug trials. Dr. Wakefield’s investigation has led him to a chilling conclusion: the safety of the MMR vaccine was tested on children who were deemed "expendable" by the medical establishment, in an era when ethical oversight was shockingly absent. Dr. Wakefield was staggered to learn that many of these studies took place at the Willowbrook State School in Staten Island, New York—a facility that housed children with severe mental and physical disabilities. These children, whose lives were tragically undervalued at the time, were subjected to experimentation without any semblance of fully informed consent. "I couldn’t believe it," Dr. Wakefield recounts. "This is staggeringly unethical on every level. These children were used as experimental subjects, their vulnerabilities exploited in the name of science." The moral implications are undeniable. Conducting medical experiments on children who cannot consent—children already marginalized and neglected—violates the most fundamental principles of medical ethics. But beyond the ethical outrage lies a critical practical issue that undermines the validity of these studies. One of the primary concerns about the MMR vaccine is its potential to cause brain injury, a risk that has been debated for decades. Dr. Wakefield poses a searing question: "If you’re looking for evidence of brain injury in children who are already brain-injured, how can you possibly find it? How can you extrapolate findings from a population of severely debilitated children to a healthy population of children? The answer is simple: you can’t." These studies, Dr. Wakefield argues, were not controlled trials. They were not conducted on representative populations. They were not designed to meet the rigorous standards we expect from modern medical research. Instead, they were carried out on a small, highly specific group of children whose pre-existing conditions made it impossible to accurately assess the vaccine’s safety. This flawed methodology casts a long shadow over the claims of the MMR vaccine’s safety, raising questions that demand answers. Dr. Wakefield’s discoveries have only strengthened his resolve to pursue this issue to its natural conclusion. "When I uncovered the truth about these studies," he says, "I became more convinced than ever that we must challenge the narrative surrounding vaccine safety. The public deserves transparency. Parents deserve the truth. And above all, our children deserve protection—not experimentation." This is not a call to dismiss vaccines outright but a demand for accountability. The use of vulnerable children as test subjects, the absence of informed consent, and the reliance on flawed studies to justify widespread vaccination policies are issues that cannot be ignored. Dr. Wakefield’s findings compel us to ask: How can we trust a system that built its foundation on such shaky ground? How can we move forward without revisiting the past and ensuring that such ethical breaches never happen again? The time for complacency is over. Dr. Wakefield’s revelations are a wake-up call to demand better science, stronger ethics, and a commitment to the well-being of all children—not just those deemed "worthy" by a flawed system.

Camus

51,259 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Dr. Mark Hyman makes clear RFK Jr. is not anti-vaccine. “He's clearly in support of vaccines. He's been vaccinated himself. He's vaccinated all of his children.” “He's not anti-vaccine. He's simply asking for us to look at the data and look at the questions that need to be looked at scientifically to assess the effects.” “He's not getting rid of the polio or MMR vaccines.” “I believe this is just a trope that the opposition puts forth to try to discredit him.”
1:39

Dr. Mark Hyman makes clear RFK Jr. is not anti-vaccine. “He's clearly in support of vaccines. He's been vaccinated himself. He's vaccinated all of his children.” “He's not anti-vaccine. He's simply asking for us to look at the data and look at the questions that need to be looked at scientifically to assess the effects.” “He's not getting rid of the polio or MMR vaccines.” “I believe this is just a trope that the opposition puts forth to try to discredit him.”

End Tribalism in Politics

59,417 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce