Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Dumb mutt getting trained to be even more needy Its learning to choose masters BBC over breathing #dumbmutt #ragdoll #cocksleeve #bbc #meathole #cnc #freeuse #throatslave #fucktoy #training

28,506 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🌟Quilibrium’s AI Breakthrough: Encrypted Training on CPUs In her latest live stream ( - minute 14) Cassie unveiled a groundbreaking AI training method that allows models to be trained on encrypted data using CPUs while achieving performance comparable to Nvidia’s A100 GPU (blue line in the graph below). Traditionally, AI training requires expensive GPUs because matrix multiplications—the core of deep learning—are highly computational. Running these calculations on CPUs is painfully slow, often taking hours or days for even small models. The problem worsens when trying to train AI on encrypted data, as standard encryption methods add a massive computational burden. Quilibrium’s breakthrough removes this bottleneck. Instead of relying on traditional matrix multiplication, their method uses a completely different mathematical approach, allowing AI models to be trained securely and efficiently without exposing the raw data. Cassie didn’t reveal the exact technique, only hinting that it’s inspired by existing AI research and will be detailed in a future open-source AGPL-licensed paper. The key advantage? AI can now be trained at GPU speeds on standard CPUs, making privacy-preserving machine learning far more accessible. This innovation has major implications. It slashes AI infrastructure costs, allowing organizations to train powerful models without investing in expensive hardware. It also enables private AI training on personal or corporate data without revealing sensitive information, a game-changer for industries like healthcare and finance. If Quilibrium’s method delivers on its promise, it could reshape AI development, making privacy-first computing the new standard. $QUIL $wQUIL

Quilibrium Community

18,919 просмотров • 1 год назад

People often say that we need immigration because without it, the NHS would collapse. This just is not true. At the moment, we're not training enough medics in this country - but this is a choice. We do not need to rely on staff from overseas. The NHS has a deeply unusual setup when it comes to its workforce. The Government sets the rules for who can qualify as a medical professional, decides how many medical training places to offer, and controls the flow of medical graduates into the NHS. It decides how much to charge students, and under what conditions. And because the NHS is by far the country's main employer of medical professionals, the Government also has effective control over the pay and conditions of those who qualify, and is responsible for deciding where medical trainees go, and when. So the Health Service isn't subject to the same labour market forces as other organisations. The Government controls both the supply *and* the demand of its own workforce. In 2025, we had 15,723 British-trained doctors competing for 12,833 NHS training posts. Those British-trained doctors had already been whittled down from the thousands of people who apply to train as doctors every year, of whom only half are accepted. Hundreds of those rejected each year have three A* grades at A Level. The reason that we don't offer more medical degrees is because, at the moment, the NHS doesn't have enough training places for British-trained doctors. But at the same time, under the current system, British-trained doctors aren't given priority when it comes to the training places that we *do* have. So not only were those 15,723 British-trained doctors competing with each other for just 12,833 training places, they were also competing with 25,257 doctors trained overseas. This is rubbish for those British doctors, and a colossal waste of money for the rest of us, because it costs taxpayers about a quarter of a million pounds to educate each doctor to the point of graduating. But perhaps this means the NHS gets the very best doctors? No. In fact, doctors trained overseas are 2.5 times more likely to be referred to the GMC, the regulator responsible for maintaining standards in the medical profession. The GMC hears cases relating to professional misconduct and medical malpractice. Exchanging British-trained doctors for those trained overseas is not always a like-for-like swap. But here’s the craziest twist of all. The training places we do have are *randomly allocated*. No priority for British doctors, despite the fact we’ve paid to teach them. And no priority for the best graduates, despite the fact we need their skills. Top performing students have no choice over where they go, and aren't given priority when allocating new training places. They often have to wait months to find out where they're being posted, and will often receive very little notice before being asked to pick up sticks and relocate to another part of the country. Last summer, one of my constituents qualified as a doctor. He graduated with one of the very highest marks in the year, in the top three, from one of the most competitive medical schools in the country. He is clearly an outstanding student and will make an incredible doctor. In any sane system he would have been placed immediately, and been able to choose his location and specialism to keep him incentivised and happy within the NHS, and to make the most of his obviously considerable talents. Instead, because of the mismanagement of places and the lottery system, he wasn’t placed in the first round of allocations. He wasn’t placed in the second round. He wasn’t even placed in the third round, or even the fourth. With less than four weeks to go he still had no placement and no sense of where he would be spending the next few years of his life, including whether he might be able to live close to his partner, another doctor qualifying at the same time as him. He might not have got a training placement at all. Fortunately, the Government is looking to change the system, so that British-trained doctors are prioritised for training places. This is a great change. We need to train more medical professionals in this country, including doctors. The Health Service does not need to rely on overseas doctors - there is plenty of talent right here. But we also need a system which prizes excellence, and provides clarity for medical trainees. The most talented, British-trained graduate doctors should clearly get top priority, and should be able to operate within a system that makes it possible to plan their lives and build a career here. Both medical trainees and patients would benefit from such a system. The alternative is more talented British doctors going abroad, and more reliance on migration.

Katie Lam

187,108 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

In a world of PPO everything for reinforcement learning, I've been tinkering with SAC for training a quadruped gait. This gait is trained purely on CPU (training on one of the Dell GB10s) on a single environment. Training any particular run is obviously slower than PPO on an RTX Pro 6000 with 8092 envs, if you already know the exact hyperparams/rwd function for your PPO algo... but, if we're honest with ourselves, then we know we usually spend days tuning our PPO algo and fighting it to do what we want. In contrast, SAC has kind of been a breath of fresh air, very amenable to changing the reward function to tune behavior. So far, my first attempts to tune things have consistently just worked immediately rather than 15 different variations of reward hacking only to find previous tuned behaviors got lost in the process. There is also FastSAC, which I've not yet tried, but can speed things up potentially and introduce scale back into the equation. My main painpoint in getting SAC to work for gait was actually getting it to learn to step. It seems as though SAC is not as good as PPO at significant exploration on its own. I ended up starting with a sinusoidal gait (basically just a rule to make legs swing) as training wheels then blended it out through training as phase 1, then began working on smoothing things out after this. I think if we look at end to end dev time rather than any particular run that finally managed to work, SAC may actually be the "faster" algorithm to train. Quadruped gaits are inherently easier than bipedal and maybe there are areas where SAC falls short, but I'll definitely be spending more time with SAC.

Harrison Kinsley

26,758 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад