正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

During Estimates, I tabled a graph from the ABS, showing that electricity prices surged by 23% over two years. While the Government used temporary subsidies to mask the pain, those subsidies have now ended, leaving millions of Australians to face the brutal reality of a 16% "catch-up" spike in...

MRobertsQLD's profile picture

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

168,536 subscribers

18,796 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

17 条评论

TC 的头像
TC5 个月前

You need to call out her bullshit that Ukraine invasion is the cause of electricity price rises, this is total nonsense.

Grant.moffat 的头像
Grant.moffat5 个月前

Given Labor, Bowen and Albanese keep spouting that renewables are the cheapest form of power, can they explain this graph for me? France >75% electricity from nuclear. Germany got rid of nuclear for renewables. Anyone?? When is Labor going to table a forecast cost to complete?

A 的头像
A5 个月前

Why is Australias electric prices got anything to do with Ukraine Australia has so many options via natural resources that Australia should be entirely independent of anything outside Australia.

Jack Barnes 的头像
Jack Barnes5 个月前

She doesn’t understand or is not willing to explain what inflation is.

Sam Tannous 的头像
Sam Tannous5 个月前

She is so full of ahit. First she says the rise was due to supply shock and then later she says that prices have risen significantly. She can’t even keep her lies straight

Mark Fredrickson 的头像
Mark Fredrickson5 个月前

Isn't Australia rich in natural resources? What the hell are you people doing with all those riches? Keeping them from being used?

chris jadhav 的头像
chris jadhav5 个月前

The RBA is a Joke. It seems to be looking after the Profits of the big Banks. Nationalise the Banks and fix the fraudulent banking Industry.

louise 的头像
louise5 个月前

Maybe the Treasurer is confused about the population? ? Does he think the average australia receives the “strong real wages” that public servants receive ???. These people need to go back and work in the real world and receive real wages not the inflated payment they receive

Shandy Bourbon 的头像
Shandy Bourbon5 个月前

If you set a new level of electricity prices then surely the 16% real increase in electricity costs is hidden when the subsidies are removed we will be paying alot more for electricity than is shown in the CPI Am I wrong?

Bernie Mac 的头像
Bernie Mac5 个月前

She is 💯 correct. Nations like Australia have seen a multi-decade decline in dynamism, marked by lower job turnover and reduced business entry rates. Govts have become reactionary, risk adverse, reducing funding in R&D (read CSIRO and medical funding). All impacts Productivity.

Rich Lives Matter 的头像
Rich Lives Matter5 个月前

Not a scientist I guess we can add Not a statistician Not good with maths Not a logician The list grows. The mind shrinks.

Mimama 🐕🐝🦋🦉 的头像
Mimama 🐕🐝🦋🦉5 个月前

My Feb bill is lower than last year.

Justin Berger 的头像
Justin Berger5 个月前

I love how it relates to the Ukraine war....

Mick Taylor 的头像
Mick Taylor5 个月前

Keep up your great work Malcolm.

jo 的头像
jo5 个月前

Bro, instead of screwing around on X today, you need to be calling @MoiraDeemingMP and doing everything you can to get her on board!!! This could be the power move that changes everything!!! Make Australia Great Again!!

Swampdonkey 的头像
Swampdonkey5 个月前

Why is the only lever to tackle inflation, is to hit mortgage holders with higher rates. Making people poorer and banks wealthy ? I dont believe its mortgage holders who are the ones overspending. The .25 increases should be put on the mortgage holders principle & not touched.

Allen J. Handel 的头像
Allen J. Handel5 个月前

And the same will happen after the 3 month excise cut. This government aren't going to give away anything. They're takers

相关视频

“They (the bureaucrats) are doing things that aren’t in the country’s best interests - we are rewarding offshore ownership instead of rewarding onshore ownership.” No bureaucracy has rewarded offshore ownership more than the RBA which has outsourced control of credit to foreign banks. This along with reckless government spending has caused inflation to spike. So it’s ironic watching RBA staff complain about inflation in regard to their own pay rises which is well above average to begin with. 👇 Surely the RBA executives at least, should have their wages inversely linked to inflation to encourage them to lower it. ••••••••••••••• “Reserve Bank staff have rejected a proposed 9.5 per cent pay rise, sending governor Michele Bullock back to the bargaining table as she urges wage restraint across the economy and grapples with mounting cost pressures at the central bank. The union is demanding the RBA enshrine work-from-home rights in the central bank’s enterprise bargaining agreement. It has also called for a 12.5 per cent pay increase over three years, and an inflation-protection mechanism that would have triggered additional pay rises if prices rose faster than wages. FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said RBA employees had sent a resounding message that they would not accept an agreement that left their wages falling “dangerously behind” inflation or comparable employers.”
1:55

“They (the bureaucrats) are doing things that aren’t in the country’s best interests - we are rewarding offshore ownership instead of rewarding onshore ownership.” No bureaucracy has rewarded offshore ownership more than the RBA which has outsourced control of credit to foreign banks. This along with reckless government spending has caused inflation to spike. So it’s ironic watching RBA staff complain about inflation in regard to their own pay rises which is well above average to begin with. 👇 Surely the RBA executives at least, should have their wages inversely linked to inflation to encourage them to lower it. ••••••••••••••• “Reserve Bank staff have rejected a proposed 9.5 per cent pay rise, sending governor Michele Bullock back to the bargaining table as she urges wage restraint across the economy and grapples with mounting cost pressures at the central bank. The union is demanding the RBA enshrine work-from-home rights in the central bank’s enterprise bargaining agreement. It has also called for a 12.5 per cent pay increase over three years, and an inflation-protection mechanism that would have triggered additional pay rises if prices rose faster than wages. FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said RBA employees had sent a resounding message that they would not accept an agreement that left their wages falling “dangerously behind” inflation or comparable employers.”

Gerard Rennick

13,907 次观看 • 2 个月前

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”
1:53

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”

Wall Street Apes

77,528 次观看 • 11 个月前

The real tax on the american people is government spending. When government spends more than it takes in, deficits are paid indirectly through hidden taxation on the people via inflation and currency devaluation. And historically, few things have been more destructive to civilizations than inflation. Milton Friedman explained that inflation occurs because people ask government to do something impossible. They want government to spend other people’s money on them, while protecting their own money from being spent on others. They want the prices of what they sell to rise, but the prices of what they buy to fall. This inevitably creates a vicious cycle where politicians promise benefits today and pass the hidden costs into the future and onto future generations through a steadily weakening dollar.
1:08

The real tax on the american people is government spending. When government spends more than it takes in, deficits are paid indirectly through hidden taxation on the people via inflation and currency devaluation. And historically, few things have been more destructive to civilizations than inflation. Milton Friedman explained that inflation occurs because people ask government to do something impossible. They want government to spend other people’s money on them, while protecting their own money from being spent on others. They want the prices of what they sell to rise, but the prices of what they buy to fall. This inevitably creates a vicious cycle where politicians promise benefits today and pass the hidden costs into the future and onto future generations through a steadily weakening dollar.

Rothmus 🏴

14,078 次观看 • 3 个月前

I’ve been keeping a very close eye on the Reserve Bank’s moves toward a digital future. During this exchange with Governor Bullock, I pressed for clarity on exactly where they are headed with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) and the "unified digital currency" the big banks have been whispering about. I asked about developments in both domestic and international settlements. The Governor admitted that while they ran a pilot back in 2023, the focus has shifted. They aren't looking at a "retail CBDC" right now, which would be digital cash for everyday shopping. Instead, their focus is firmly on looking at how to settle "tokenised assets." Tokenised financial products, also called asset tokens, are a way to turn traditional money-related things into digital versions that live on blockchain technology, the same as that used by Bitcoin and Ethereum. These could include shares, real estate, artworks and precious metals. Normally these are hard to buy and/or sell quickly, especially in small amounts, and often involve lots of paperwork, middlemen and high minimum investments. Tokenisation changes that by creating a digital token that acts like a certificate of ownership for a piece (or all) of that real thing. The token is recorded on a blockchain, which is theoretically secure. You would be able to buy a share of a home, business, art or precious metals within minutes, allowing small investments to grow your savings more than bank interest would do. Note: This technology is not there yet! The RBA is scoping it out - as many institutions are. I will continue to monitor these experiments to ensure that this doesn't come at the cost of our financial privacy or sovereignty. — Senate Estimates
2:51

I’ve been keeping a very close eye on the Reserve Bank’s moves toward a digital future. During this exchange with Governor Bullock, I pressed for clarity on exactly where they are headed with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) and the "unified digital currency" the big banks have been whispering about. I asked about developments in both domestic and international settlements. The Governor admitted that while they ran a pilot back in 2023, the focus has shifted. They aren't looking at a "retail CBDC" right now, which would be digital cash for everyday shopping. Instead, their focus is firmly on looking at how to settle "tokenised assets." Tokenised financial products, also called asset tokens, are a way to turn traditional money-related things into digital versions that live on blockchain technology, the same as that used by Bitcoin and Ethereum. These could include shares, real estate, artworks and precious metals. Normally these are hard to buy and/or sell quickly, especially in small amounts, and often involve lots of paperwork, middlemen and high minimum investments. Tokenisation changes that by creating a digital token that acts like a certificate of ownership for a piece (or all) of that real thing. The token is recorded on a blockchain, which is theoretically secure. You would be able to buy a share of a home, business, art or precious metals within minutes, allowing small investments to grow your savings more than bank interest would do. Note: This technology is not there yet! The RBA is scoping it out - as many institutions are. I will continue to monitor these experiments to ensure that this doesn't come at the cost of our financial privacy or sovereignty. — Senate Estimates

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

32,686 次观看 • 6 个月前

Government subsidies and regulations are only part of the reason why the costs of healthcare and college keep rising. Some jobs can’t get more efficient because labor itself is the product, according to Baumol. This “cost disease” explains why, for example, the price of a haircut, adjusted for inflation, has increased over the years, while things like TVs get cheaper. Wages still have to rise to compete with jobs that did get more productive. Add subsidies into the mix, like in tuitions, and prices will keep rising since third parties absorb the increases. That is until human time can be sped up or automated.
0:30

Government subsidies and regulations are only part of the reason why the costs of healthcare and college keep rising. Some jobs can’t get more efficient because labor itself is the product, according to Baumol. This “cost disease” explains why, for example, the price of a haircut, adjusted for inflation, has increased over the years, while things like TVs get cheaper. Wages still have to rise to compete with jobs that did get more productive. Add subsidies into the mix, like in tuitions, and prices will keep rising since third parties absorb the increases. That is until human time can be sped up or automated.

Rothmus 🏴

19,290 次观看 • 1 个月前

Labor has killed a Christmas rate cut millions of Australians were hoping for. The decision by the RBA to keep rates on hold is another reminder that Labor’s cost-of-living crisis is nowhere near over. No rate cut, no relief, and Australians are still paying more for everything - electricity up 40%, insurance up 37% and food up 15%. Everyday Australians are footing the bill for Labor’s spending spree in their tax returns, electricity bills, mortgage statements and their growing difficulty in finding a job.
0:29

Labor has killed a Christmas rate cut millions of Australians were hoping for. The decision by the RBA to keep rates on hold is another reminder that Labor’s cost-of-living crisis is nowhere near over. No rate cut, no relief, and Australians are still paying more for everything - electricity up 40%, insurance up 37% and food up 15%. Everyday Australians are footing the bill for Labor’s spending spree in their tax returns, electricity bills, mortgage statements and their growing difficulty in finding a job.

Sussan Ley

24,207 次观看 • 10 个月前

The RBA is colluding with global banks against our national interest. In Estimates I asked the RBA how much it costs to store our gold with the Bank of England. They of course had to take it on notice. I asked if it would be worth storing our gold in the vaults of the RBA building, which is currently incurring a billion dollar bill to remove asbestos. At the bottom of the building are vaults which used to hold cash but given the decline in its usage they are now empty. They would be perfect to store gold bars. Notice how Chris Kent the RBA Deputy Governor literally chokes on his own anxiety as he argues it would cost too much to bring it home. Funny that. It didn’t cost to much to send it the Bank of England. And apparently it wouldn’t be able to be lent out if it was in Sydney. Yet again why is the RBA lending gold which works to lower the price received by Australian gold miners? The answer of course is because the RBA is a puppet of the International banking regime. Previously I’ve been told by the RBA the gold bars don’t move when they are lent out so what difference does it make as to where the gold bars are stored. The reality is that the International Banking regime has to keep the price of gold suppressed by manipulating its supply through artificial selling. Bankers rely on the creation of paper money to generate an income. As the paper market becomes more and more fragile with ever increasing amounts of debt, people and governments turn to gold to protect their wealth. The bankers are trying to protect their racquet for as long as possible before it all collapses. And I quote: “Renovating the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) headquarters is increasingly looking like a disastrous episode of home-building show Grand Designs. The key difference? The budget for the horror reno is now north of $1 billion. Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information (FOI) process detail the difficulty and unexpected expense of renovating the central bank's flagship office at 65 Martin Place in Sydney, built in 1964.” Quote from: #auspol
1:51

The RBA is colluding with global banks against our national interest. In Estimates I asked the RBA how much it costs to store our gold with the Bank of England. They of course had to take it on notice. I asked if it would be worth storing our gold in the vaults of the RBA building, which is currently incurring a billion dollar bill to remove asbestos. At the bottom of the building are vaults which used to hold cash but given the decline in its usage they are now empty. They would be perfect to store gold bars. Notice how Chris Kent the RBA Deputy Governor literally chokes on his own anxiety as he argues it would cost too much to bring it home. Funny that. It didn’t cost to much to send it the Bank of England. And apparently it wouldn’t be able to be lent out if it was in Sydney. Yet again why is the RBA lending gold which works to lower the price received by Australian gold miners? The answer of course is because the RBA is a puppet of the International banking regime. Previously I’ve been told by the RBA the gold bars don’t move when they are lent out so what difference does it make as to where the gold bars are stored. The reality is that the International Banking regime has to keep the price of gold suppressed by manipulating its supply through artificial selling. Bankers rely on the creation of paper money to generate an income. As the paper market becomes more and more fragile with ever increasing amounts of debt, people and governments turn to gold to protect their wealth. The bankers are trying to protect their racquet for as long as possible before it all collapses. And I quote: “Renovating the Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) headquarters is increasingly looking like a disastrous episode of home-building show Grand Designs. The key difference? The budget for the horror reno is now north of $1 billion. Documents obtained using the Freedom of Information (FOI) process detail the difficulty and unexpected expense of renovating the central bank's flagship office at 65 Martin Place in Sydney, built in 1964.” Quote from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

82,391 次观看 • 2 年前

“Remember when first campaigning to be elected, the Albanese government said it would reduce power bills by $275. Surely the slogan ‘Fire the Liar’ has relevance to millions of Australians? Was it a lie to campaign in 2022 on the slogan ‘A Better Future’? Is this how Australians feel today? The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. Food is dearer, housing is dearer and rent is dearer. There is your cost of living crisis. Albanese lied to become elected, and Australians are paying for it.” The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. It is central to why the cost of living is such a struggle for so many Australians. Remember when the Albanese Government said it would reduce energy bills by $275? Remember when, in 2022, it campaigned on the slogan "A Better Future”? All lies. Through net zero, the Albanese government has fuelled cost of living struggles for everyday Aussies. One Nation will scrap net zero, make full use of our natural resources, and engage with nuclear energy. All steps that would make a decisive contribution to bringing down your energy bills.
0:46

“Remember when first campaigning to be elected, the Albanese government said it would reduce power bills by $275. Surely the slogan ‘Fire the Liar’ has relevance to millions of Australians? Was it a lie to campaign in 2022 on the slogan ‘A Better Future’? Is this how Australians feel today? The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. Food is dearer, housing is dearer and rent is dearer. There is your cost of living crisis. Albanese lied to become elected, and Australians are paying for it.” The cost of energy feeds into everything we use, eat and manufacture. It is central to why the cost of living is such a struggle for so many Australians. Remember when the Albanese Government said it would reduce energy bills by $275? Remember when, in 2022, it campaigned on the slogan "A Better Future”? All lies. Through net zero, the Albanese government has fuelled cost of living struggles for everyday Aussies. One Nation will scrap net zero, make full use of our natural resources, and engage with nuclear energy. All steps that would make a decisive contribution to bringing down your energy bills.

One Nation Australia

10,953 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast
2:25

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

64,026 次观看 • 1 个月前

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) has announced another electricity price hike - between 2.5% and 8.9%. For 20 years, we've been told wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy, yet prices keep going up! I questioned the AER about when Australians might see relief from these crushing power bills. Their response? No clear path to returning to the affordable prices we had just 5 years ago. Even more concerning - they recently added "emissions reduction" to the national electricity objectives alongside price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply. When I asked for examples of projects that were approved because of this new emissions target that wouldn't have been approved before - they couldn't name a single one! The truth is clear: We've gone from having the cheapest electricity in the world to being among the most expensive. These price increases aren't accidents - they're the direct result of failed green energy policies. Australians deserve affordable, reliable power. Not expensive virtue signaling that drives up costs for families and businesses. #Electricity #CostOfLiving #MalcolmRoberts #OneNation
6:13

The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) has announced another electricity price hike - between 2.5% and 8.9%. For 20 years, we've been told wind and solar are the cheapest forms of energy, yet prices keep going up! I questioned the AER about when Australians might see relief from these crushing power bills. Their response? No clear path to returning to the affordable prices we had just 5 years ago. Even more concerning - they recently added "emissions reduction" to the national electricity objectives alongside price, quality, safety, reliability and security of supply. When I asked for examples of projects that were approved because of this new emissions target that wouldn't have been approved before - they couldn't name a single one! The truth is clear: We've gone from having the cheapest electricity in the world to being among the most expensive. These price increases aren't accidents - they're the direct result of failed green energy policies. Australians deserve affordable, reliable power. Not expensive virtue signaling that drives up costs for families and businesses. #Electricity #CostOfLiving #MalcolmRoberts #OneNation

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

30,224 次观看 • 1 年前

Stephanie Ruhle vs Stephanie Ruhle on inflation. Notice the difference between Ruhle framing inflation during the Trump vs Biden administrations: Ruhle 2026: “Here's the thing about inflation, Mr. President. You can distract people with other stories. You can convince the government. Don't let the data out. You don't have to let the data out. My mother goes to the grocery store every day. People in this country buy food, drive their cars. They don't have to see inflation reports. They know what their lives cost.” Ruhle 2021: “And the dirty little secret here, Willie. Well, nobody likes to pay more. On average, we have the money to do so. Household savings hit a record high. Over the pandemic, we didn't really have anywhere to go out and spend. And as we said a moment ago, we're expecting retail sales this holiday season to break records for those who own their homes. “The value of our homes are up. And while the stock market isn't the economy, you got over half of American households with some investment in the markets and the markets have hit record highs. So we need to put all of this in perspective.” So we only “have the money” for inflation when Democrats are in power. This is why media trust is at an all-time low.
0:50

Stephanie Ruhle vs Stephanie Ruhle on inflation. Notice the difference between Ruhle framing inflation during the Trump vs Biden administrations: Ruhle 2026: “Here's the thing about inflation, Mr. President. You can distract people with other stories. You can convince the government. Don't let the data out. You don't have to let the data out. My mother goes to the grocery store every day. People in this country buy food, drive their cars. They don't have to see inflation reports. They know what their lives cost.” Ruhle 2021: “And the dirty little secret here, Willie. Well, nobody likes to pay more. On average, we have the money to do so. Household savings hit a record high. Over the pandemic, we didn't really have anywhere to go out and spend. And as we said a moment ago, we're expecting retail sales this holiday season to break records for those who own their homes. “The value of our homes are up. And while the stock market isn't the economy, you got over half of American households with some investment in the markets and the markets have hit record highs. So we need to put all of this in perspective.” So we only “have the money” for inflation when Democrats are in power. This is why media trust is at an all-time low.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

73,697 次观看 • 6 个月前

Scott Jennings just made a FOOL out of 25-year-old Democrat wunderkind, David Hogg. Hogg used his time on CNN to blame Republicans for the government shutdown, even accusing Scott Jennings of not caring about people in his home state on ACA subsidies. He was silenced pretty quickly. HOGG: “The entire reason the government is not open right now is because Democrats refuse to be complicit in having millions of Americans, including 100,000 in Kentucky, you’re home state if I’m remembering correctly Scott, that rely on ACA, that would see their premiums rise several dozen percent.” When Jennings finally jumped into the discussion, he came armed with the facts and Hogg didn’t stand a chance. JENNINGS: “But David, you would admit that the ACA was a Democrat legislation, yes?” “And you would admit that the subsidies that we’re talking about now were passed by Democrats, yes?” “And you would admit that the sunset provision in the subsidies, which comes up at the end of the year, was in place because of Democrats, yes?” “Now you want to make it a Republican problem. These are not the same issues.” “You could open the government today and then you could negotiate with Republicans about ACA subsidies.” “And by the way, my suspicion is and you know this, there are probably and I know there are some House Republicans that would love to negotiate on it, but under duress, under a hostage taking situation, connecting disconnected issues.” “And now you’re throwing SNAP onto it. You’re throwing all the federal workers who aren’t being paid onto it, all because of this fight that you wandered into, because of your wing of the Democratic Party.” “YOU ALL led to this SNAP crisis. You all led to this crisis of the government being closed and you don’t know how to get out of it!”
1:36

Scott Jennings just made a FOOL out of 25-year-old Democrat wunderkind, David Hogg. Hogg used his time on CNN to blame Republicans for the government shutdown, even accusing Scott Jennings of not caring about people in his home state on ACA subsidies. He was silenced pretty quickly. HOGG: “The entire reason the government is not open right now is because Democrats refuse to be complicit in having millions of Americans, including 100,000 in Kentucky, you’re home state if I’m remembering correctly Scott, that rely on ACA, that would see their premiums rise several dozen percent.” When Jennings finally jumped into the discussion, he came armed with the facts and Hogg didn’t stand a chance. JENNINGS: “But David, you would admit that the ACA was a Democrat legislation, yes?” “And you would admit that the subsidies that we’re talking about now were passed by Democrats, yes?” “And you would admit that the sunset provision in the subsidies, which comes up at the end of the year, was in place because of Democrats, yes?” “Now you want to make it a Republican problem. These are not the same issues.” “You could open the government today and then you could negotiate with Republicans about ACA subsidies.” “And by the way, my suspicion is and you know this, there are probably and I know there are some House Republicans that would love to negotiate on it, but under duress, under a hostage taking situation, connecting disconnected issues.” “And now you’re throwing SNAP onto it. You’re throwing all the federal workers who aren’t being paid onto it, all because of this fight that you wandered into, because of your wing of the Democratic Party.” “YOU ALL led to this SNAP crisis. You all led to this crisis of the government being closed and you don’t know how to get out of it!”

Overton

1,548,889 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | On the states reducing the incentive caps in ISM 2.0, Ashok Chandak CEO and President of SEMI India and the President of the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA), says, "I don't expect that the states would also increase the subsidies to much larger extent because there are a lot of other topics for the states as well to manage their finances for multiple schemes including some social benefit related efforts and developing a state in terms of the infrastructures and other stuff. I do not see any discussions as of now of the states dropping or reducing their subsidies... They would like to attract these industries into their home states, and my expectation is they would continue with these amounts of subsidies, whatever is available. If a few percentage points up and down happen, I don't see that it is going to change the entire culture or confidence in the program." Watch full interview here:
1:12

#WATCH | On the states reducing the incentive caps in ISM 2.0, Ashok Chandak CEO and President of SEMI India and the President of the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA), says, "I don't expect that the states would also increase the subsidies to much larger extent because there are a lot of other topics for the states as well to manage their finances for multiple schemes including some social benefit related efforts and developing a state in terms of the infrastructures and other stuff. I do not see any discussions as of now of the states dropping or reducing their subsidies... They would like to attract these industries into their home states, and my expectation is they would continue with these amounts of subsidies, whatever is available. If a few percentage points up and down happen, I don't see that it is going to change the entire culture or confidence in the program." Watch full interview here:

ANI

18,006 次观看 • 2 个月前

Why do we have inflation? The Fed tries to force 2% inflation. It wasn’t always this way. “The natural tendency for prices is to go down. If you look at the CPI in 1900 and you look at it in 1800, it was down by 50%. So for a hundred years in America, prices went down. And during that time, we had the Industrial Revolution.” “We had the most rapid period of economic growth in the history of America, which was after the Civil War and into the early 1900s. All the time prices were coming down.” “Today, the Federal Reserve says that we need to have 2 % inflation. Prices have to go up 2 % a year. Why? I mean, why does the cost of living have to go up? Why can't it go down or at least remain the same? And what is the answer to that? What's the rationale for that?” “Well, they have a bunch of BS explanations and it's all to justify the fact that the government wants inflation. It's not that it's good for us. The government needs it.” “It's the way the government raises revenue and repudiates its debts.” Peter Schiff
3:36

Why do we have inflation? The Fed tries to force 2% inflation. It wasn’t always this way. “The natural tendency for prices is to go down. If you look at the CPI in 1900 and you look at it in 1800, it was down by 50%. So for a hundred years in America, prices went down. And during that time, we had the Industrial Revolution.” “We had the most rapid period of economic growth in the history of America, which was after the Civil War and into the early 1900s. All the time prices were coming down.” “Today, the Federal Reserve says that we need to have 2 % inflation. Prices have to go up 2 % a year. Why? I mean, why does the cost of living have to go up? Why can't it go down or at least remain the same? And what is the answer to that? What's the rationale for that?” “Well, they have a bunch of BS explanations and it's all to justify the fact that the government wants inflation. It's not that it's good for us. The government needs it.” “It's the way the government raises revenue and repudiates its debts.” Peter Schiff

Wall Street Mav

98,990 次观看 • 5 个月前