Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

During his sit-down with DJ Akademiks, Charlamagne pointed to an article claiming #Drake botted streams and was essentially a manufactured artist, saying both the website and the author were reputable. However, people quickly noticed the “author” appears to be AI, the website was reportedly created just two days before...

20,828 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🧐 HIS LIES ARE MORE ENTERTAINING THAN HIS TRUTHS… CHARLAMAGNE FINALLY ADDRESSES THE INVERSE WIRE SITUATION 👀 In a new episode of The Brilliant Idiots, habitual liar and false narrative spreader Charlamagne Tha God finally acknowledged the viral conversation surrounding his exchange with DJ Akademiks about InverseWire . com — after previously acting like he didn’t know what people were talking about. For those who missed it, Charlamagne was speaking with Akademiks and referenced an article from Inverse Wire as a credible news source. Akademiks immediately questioned the website and told Charlamagne that the article sounded like AI. Akademiks then asked him who the writer was. Charlamagne responded “Dalton Jackson” and presented him like this was a legitimate journalist behind the story. Then Akademiks and his chat started doing what they do best — DIGGING. 😂 And according to their investigation, they allegedly found that Inverse Wire was a questionable website, with questions surrounding its articles, its alleged writers and whether much of the content was AI-generated. Since then, people have been on Charlamagne asking him to address the situation. And now that he finally does… 🗣️ “Inversewire . com is a, um, what do they call it? It’s called an aggregator site.” After pretending like he didn’t know what the topic was about or what it was going to be about. He picks up his phone, doesn’t type or search anything and some how already has an definition/ explanation for what a aggregator websites is 😂😂😂😂 Charlamagne basically says: “I don’t know if these allegations in this article are true, but the article is real.” Okay… BUT THAT’S NOT REALLY WHAT PEOPLE WERE ASKING YOU. 🤔 The question wasn’t simply whether the allegations in the article were real. The question was WHY DID YOU PRESENT INVERSE WIRE LIKE IT WAS A CREDIBLE NEWS PLATFORM WHEN AKADEMIKS SPECIFICALLY QUESTIONED THE WEBSITE? And if you knew Inverse Wire was simply an aggregator taking stories from other publications… WHY DIDN’T YOU SAY THAT DURING THE ORIGINAL CONVERSATION? Instead, when Akademiks asked who wrote the article, Charlamagne gave him Dalton Jackson and made it sound like he was dealing with an actual established writer. That’s where people started looking deeper. And then there’s the other part Charlamagne didn’t really address… 👀 THE TIMING. People reportedly discovered that Inverse Wire had only been around for a very short period of time, allegedly appearing shortly before Drake’s Iceman album rollout, while also having a bunch of NEGATIVE Drake-related content. Then after people started investigating the website and questioning whether its content was AI-generated… THE WEBSITE DISAPPEARED. Also after pretending to not know what the topic was Charlamagne finally admitted that he has been seeing people repeatedly sending him this topic through his DMs and algorithm. So now we’ve gone from: “What are you talking about?” to… “Oh, Inverse Wire? That’s an aggregator site.” 😂😂😂 And I’m sorry, but this is exactly why people are still asking questions. Nobody is saying an article cannot exist on multiple websites. Nobody is saying The Sydney Morning Herald or The Age didn’t publish the story. The question is: 🧐 HOW DID A.i. WEBSITE INVERSE WIRE BECOME A “CREDIBLE” SOURCE FOR YOU TO USE IN YOUR CONVERSATION WITH AKADEMIKS IN THE FIRST PLACE? And why did you identify the alleged writer instead of simply saying: “Yeah, it’s an aggregator site.” Because if that’s the truth… WHY WASN’T THAT THE ANSWER THE FIRST TIME? And that’s why I’m saying… 🧐 HIS LIES ARE MORE ENTERTAINING THAN HIS TRUTHS. 😂🍿 At this point, Charlamagne may have answered the question — but he definitely opened up about five more questions.

Cousin Tino ™️

37,355 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

🚨🤖 DJ Akademiks & His Chat Question Whether A News Site Charlamagne Tha God Cited Was Using AI-Generated Journalists During a recent livestream, DJ Akademiks and members of his chat claimed they investigated a news website that Charlamagne Tha God referenced as a reputable source and questioned whether several of the site's listed journalists were AI-generated. According to Akademiks, his viewers searched for the writers' online presence and claimed they were unable to find social media profiles or other publicly available information tied to several of the bylines. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: > "Chat, we got a research team on it. They're saying Dalton Jackson is looking like 95% AI. No one could find this guy on social media." Akademiks also pointed to what he described as an unusually high publishing volume, noting that one writer was credited with more than 150 articles in a short period after the website launched. As he continued browsing the site live, Akademiks questioned additional author profiles, including "Jackson Miller," "Brianna Lawson," "Claudia Martinez," and others, arguing that the profile photos and biographies appeared artificial. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: > "The reputable website... bro, it's AI. Charlemagne used an AI website." Akademiks went on to criticize what he described as Roc Nation's public relations strategy, claiming the people he believes are defending Jay-Z continue to make mistakes that hurt their credibility. 🗣️ DJ Akademiks: > "The people you have being your mouthpieces are so bad at their jobs. Roc Nation has the worst PR hires. They're using blatant AI, and they get exposed every single time." Akademiks concluded by saying he believes the situation validates why he has continued covering the story, arguing that his criticism isn't random but based on what he views as inconsistencies in the information being presented.

Cousin Tino ™️

18,357 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat