Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

During the debate on this I asked, multiple times, whether Labour were “giving votes to children” or redefining 16-17 year olds “as no longer children” They couldn’t answer this simple question.

James Cleverly🇬🇧

251,421 subscribers

108,379 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Giving 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote is an attempt to rig the political system. If this goes ahead, Labour could be in for a shock.

Giving 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote is an attempt to rig the political system. If this goes ahead, Labour could be in for a shock.

Nigel Farage

456,112 views • 1 year ago

This is interesting. The young woman Aaron Bastani interviewed said that a lot of 15 to 16 year olds in Chichester are talking about Reform UK than Labour. I think Labour may u-turn on votes at 16. 😂

This is interesting. The young woman Aaron Bastani interviewed said that a lot of 15 to 16 year olds in Chichester are talking about Reform UK than Labour. I think Labour may u-turn on votes at 16. 😂

Chris Rose

1,310,755 views • 2 years ago

Sen. Adam Schiff: "You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing, when you approved the president recovering a $400 million gift from the Qataris. You refused to answer that question. You were asked what role you played in asking that Trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents...You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Tom Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if prosecutors found insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked how military strikes on boats in the Caribbean are legal. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if you discussed indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question...You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6 investigations. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you believe government officials like immigration officials have to abide by court. You refused to answer that question."

Sen. Adam Schiff: "You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing, when you approved the president recovering a $400 million gift from the Qataris. You refused to answer that question. You were asked what role you played in asking that Trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents...You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Tom Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if prosecutors found insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked how military strikes on boats in the Caribbean are legal. You refused to answer that question. You were asked if you discussed indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question...You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrectionists who attacked the Capitol. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6 investigations. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you believe government officials like immigration officials have to abide by court. You refused to answer that question."

The Bulwark

244,781 views • 9 months ago

Schiff: I think it's valuable that the American people get a sense of what you have refused to answer today. So these are just some of the questions you refuse to answer, but or have answered with personal attacks on members of this committee. You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing. When you approved the president receiving a $400 million gift from the qataris, you refused to answer that question. You were asked who or what role you may have played, or who played the role in asking the trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents gathered by the FBI? You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did career prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, how are military strikes on these boats in the caribbean legal. And you refuse to even answer that question. You are asked, excuse me, excuse me? You are asked, did you discuss indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did you approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who disagreed with the Hewlett Packard merger. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrections, insurrections to attack the capitol on January 6th. Refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career professionals, career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6th. Question January 6th investigations. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked by my colleague whether you believe government officials, like immigration officials, have to abide by court orders. You wouldn't answer that question

Schiff: I think it's valuable that the American people get a sense of what you have refused to answer today. So these are just some of the questions you refuse to answer, but or have answered with personal attacks on members of this committee. You were asked whether you consulted with career ethics lawyers, as you promised you would do during your nomination hearing. When you approved the president receiving a $400 million gift from the qataris, you refused to answer that question. You were asked who or what role you may have played, or who played the role in asking the trump's name be flagged in any of the Epstein documents gathered by the FBI? You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan kept the $50,000 bribe money. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether Homan paid taxes on the $50,000 bribe money. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did career prosecutors find insufficient evidence to charge James Comey. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, how are military strikes on these boats in the caribbean legal. And you refuse to even answer that question. You are asked, excuse me, excuse me? You are asked, did you discuss indicting James Comey with the president. You refused to answer that question. You were asked, did you approve the firing of antitrust lawyers who disagreed with the Hewlett Packard merger. You refused to answer that question. You were asked whether you support a restoration fund for violent insurrections, insurrections to attack the capitol on January 6th. Refuse to answer that question. You were asked whether you were firing career professionals, career prosecutors just because they worked on January 6th. Question January 6th investigations. You refuse to answer that question. You were asked by my colleague whether you believe government officials, like immigration officials, have to abide by court orders. You wouldn't answer that question

Acyn

1,117,864 views • 9 months ago

Andy Burnham being asked about the Muslim grooming gangs. Labour government voted against an inquiry into this because they didn’t want to look racist, or lose the Muslim vote. They also didn’t want the public to know how much they had betrayed these children or the British people. As long as I live, I will never trust that party or anyone who votes for them.

Andy Burnham being asked about the Muslim grooming gangs. Labour government voted against an inquiry into this because they didn’t want to look racist, or lose the Muslim vote. They also didn’t want the public to know how much they had betrayed these children or the British people. As long as I live, I will never trust that party or anyone who votes for them.

Around Liverpool

15,891 views • 2 months ago

"How can you object to democracy in this way?" James O'Brien passionately defends the idea of votes for 16 and 17-year-olds.

"How can you object to democracy in this way?" James O'Brien passionately defends the idea of votes for 16 and 17-year-olds.

LBC

202,103 views • 3 years ago

What's John Swinney's take on the Scottish Labour/Reform saga? Well, I asked three times whether he believes Anas Sarwar or Malcolm Offord - but I didn't get an answer.

What's John Swinney's take on the Scottish Labour/Reform saga? Well, I asked three times whether he believes Anas Sarwar or Malcolm Offord - but I didn't get an answer.

Craig Meighan

14,803 views • 2 months ago

Why is it so hard to answer a question? He literally asked her the exact same thing seven times, and she refused to answer something so basic. even phrased it as a simple yes no question, multiple times: Will Canadians be mandated to buy EVs by 2035? We all know why she won’t answer 😆

Why is it so hard to answer a question? He literally asked her the exact same thing seven times, and she refused to answer something so basic. even phrased it as a simple yes no question, multiple times: Will Canadians be mandated to buy EVs by 2035? We all know why she won’t answer 😆

Mario Zelaya

51,807 views • 1 year ago

At PMQs, I asked Keir Starmer multiple times if he would exempt hospices from his jobs tax. He repeatedly refused to answer. They had no idea the mess they were making or the impact it would have on so many vulnerable people.

At PMQs, I asked Keir Starmer multiple times if he would exempt hospices from his jobs tax. He repeatedly refused to answer. They had no idea the mess they were making or the impact it would have on so many vulnerable people.

Kemi Badenoch

300,881 views • 1 year ago

In 15 days SC set to hear a fervent plea that wants 16-year-olds to be legally free to have consensual sex. In this "RAW DISPATCH FROM MY DESK" i lay out the debate. The question is whether the plea stems from "woke virtue-signalling" or wisdom? What are your views?

In 15 days SC set to hear a fervent plea that wants 16-year-olds to be legally free to have consensual sex. In this "RAW DISPATCH FROM MY DESK" i lay out the debate. The question is whether the plea stems from "woke virtue-signalling" or wisdom? What are your views?

Rahul Shivshankar

40,455 views • 8 months ago

“We’ve got a current Labour government headed by Keir Starmer at the moment and potentially in future headed by Andy Burnham makes no difference because both of them appear to have the same view on this and therefore the Labour government’s view won’t change and that is that they’ve decided that they can ban 16 year olds from accessing social media due to the vulnerability of their minds and how social media may well indeed manipulate their minds and due to that vulnerability. The Labour Party doesn’t want 16 or under accessing social media. Meanwhile, an 11 year old, according to the Labour Party, does have the mental capacity to decide that they are not a boy or that they are not a girl, that they’ve been born in the wrong body and that they can irreversibly alter the way that their body grows their sexual organs by stopping and blocking puberty chemically. So an 11 year old can make that decision. But at the same time, a 16 or 15 year old can’t access social media. It is a very, very strange position that the Labour government has taken, explained by the facts, of course, as you saw Andy Burnham there giving £100,000 as a grant as mayor of Manchester to an organisation that was lobbying for this change. Also explained by the fact that Keir Starmer and the Labour government clearly don’t care about the mental wellbeing of children, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowing 11 year olds to block their own puberty. And so this online safety in 16 year olds, what that’s really about is introducing digital ID for every single citizen by stealth, using the name of the children and protecting the children as the excuse.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

“We’ve got a current Labour government headed by Keir Starmer at the moment and potentially in future headed by Andy Burnham makes no difference because both of them appear to have the same view on this and therefore the Labour government’s view won’t change and that is that they’ve decided that they can ban 16 year olds from accessing social media due to the vulnerability of their minds and how social media may well indeed manipulate their minds and due to that vulnerability. The Labour Party doesn’t want 16 or under accessing social media. Meanwhile, an 11 year old, according to the Labour Party, does have the mental capacity to decide that they are not a boy or that they are not a girl, that they’ve been born in the wrong body and that they can irreversibly alter the way that their body grows their sexual organs by stopping and blocking puberty chemically. So an 11 year old can make that decision. But at the same time, a 16 or 15 year old can’t access social media. It is a very, very strange position that the Labour government has taken, explained by the facts, of course, as you saw Andy Burnham there giving £100,000 as a grant as mayor of Manchester to an organisation that was lobbying for this change. Also explained by the fact that Keir Starmer and the Labour government clearly don’t care about the mental wellbeing of children, otherwise they wouldn’t be allowing 11 year olds to block their own puberty. And so this online safety in 16 year olds, what that’s really about is introducing digital ID for every single citizen by stealth, using the name of the children and protecting the children as the excuse.” Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

18,378 views • 26 days ago

WATCH: The cringe-inducing moment this Labour minister was asked 6 times how many gangs they "have smashed" so far... She refused to say. But it's a simple answer - ZERO.

WATCH: The cringe-inducing moment this Labour minister was asked 6 times how many gangs they "have smashed" so far... She refused to say. But it's a simple answer - ZERO.

Conservatives

30,064 views • 1 year ago

I asked Secretary Noem a simple yes or no question: “Do you believe the Constitution guarantees everyone in our country the right to due process?” She couldn’t give me a straight answer.

I asked Secretary Noem a simple yes or no question: “Do you believe the Constitution guarantees everyone in our country the right to due process?” She couldn’t give me a straight answer.

Rep. Lauren Underwood

108,059 views • 1 year ago

At the debate, all the candidates were asked whether we’d block Flock cameras as Governor of Florida. Paul Renner and Jay Collins couldn’t give a yes-or-no answer. My answer: Yes. We will block a surveillance state from emerging in the State of Florida.

At the debate, all the candidates were asked whether we’d block Flock cameras as Governor of Florida. Paul Renner and Jay Collins couldn’t give a yes-or-no answer. My answer: Yes. We will block a surveillance state from emerging in the State of Florida.

James Fishback

41,871 views • 12 days ago

One day, I watched on the radio a Somaliland mother who claimed that a woman called Adna took 100 children from Somaliland to Israel. This mother was interviewed on the radio and said that six of the children she gave birth to were among those 100 children. She was asked how her children were taken to Israel, and whether she visited them. She said that she was allowed to visit once and then was sent back. She claimed she was promised that she would be allowed to visit every six months. Then the journalist asked her another question and said: the 100 children who were taken were said to be suffering from heart disease. When the journalist asked whether all of her children had heart disease, she avoided answering the question.” Then the journalist asked her another question and said: ‘Did all six of your children go abroad for medical treatment?’ At that point, she said yes. The journalist then asked: ‘So all six children needed medical treatment?’ and she remained silent. The journalist asked again whether all six of her children had heart disease, but she avoided answering the question. Here is the video of that TV interview.”

One day, I watched on the radio a Somaliland mother who claimed that a woman called Adna took 100 children from Somaliland to Israel. This mother was interviewed on the radio and said that six of the children she gave birth to were among those 100 children. She was asked how her children were taken to Israel, and whether she visited them. She said that she was allowed to visit once and then was sent back. She claimed she was promised that she would be allowed to visit every six months. Then the journalist asked her another question and said: the 100 children who were taken were said to be suffering from heart disease. When the journalist asked whether all of her children had heart disease, she avoided answering the question.” Then the journalist asked her another question and said: ‘Did all six of your children go abroad for medical treatment?’ At that point, she said yes. The journalist then asked: ‘So all six children needed medical treatment?’ and she remained silent. The journalist asked again whether all six of her children had heart disease, but she avoided answering the question. Here is the video of that TV interview.”

Qurux Wanaag

86,691 views • 5 months ago

"'So-called innocent Palestinians'? 17,000 Palestinian children were killed. Were they not innocent?" A shocking Jubilee exchange between me & a pro-Israeli Iranian-American Batman villain. I asked him a simple Q, FIVE times. Clip below. Full 'debate':

"'So-called innocent Palestinians'? 17,000 Palestinian children were killed. Were they not innocent?" A shocking Jubilee exchange between me & a pro-Israeli Iranian-American Batman villain. I asked him a simple Q, FIVE times. Clip below. Full 'debate':

Mehdi Hasan

2,499,661 views • 1 year ago

'Sarah is not a racist!' 'You can't answer this question!' Reform UK Councillor Jaymet McIvor and Labour Councillor Sebastian Salek have a heated debate over whether Sarah Pochin's comments on DEI were 'racist'.

'Sarah is not a racist!' 'You can't answer this question!' Reform UK Councillor Jaymet McIvor and Labour Councillor Sebastian Salek have a heated debate over whether Sarah Pochin's comments on DEI were 'racist'.

GB News

23,111 views • 8 months ago

Again, I asked Trump nominees a simple question: whether they believe Russia was the aggressor in the war against Ukraine. Again, they refused to answer. This is America in Retreat — not America First. What an embarrassment for our country.

Again, I asked Trump nominees a simple question: whether they believe Russia was the aggressor in the war against Ukraine. Again, they refused to answer. This is America in Retreat — not America First. What an embarrassment for our country.

Senator Chris Van Hollen

169,383 views • 1 year ago