Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

during the drift exploit, Mert was in Illia's DMs: "shut it down." solana's loudest infra voice, asking NEAR's founder to freeze the exits. because stolen funds from every chain now try to leave through intents - it's the deepest cross-chain liquidity there is. Illia's version, told on chopping block:...

10,227 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Jamie Dimon just described the real race nobody’s talking about. Not AI vs AI. Intelligence vs the systems built to suppress it. Dimon: “Bureaucracy kills. Bureaucracy drives out good people, it drives out innovation, it makes the person in the office next to you a competitor and not a collaborator.” We’re spending trillions building artificial intelligence while running every major institution on a system designed to make human intelligence useless. AI accelerates capability. Bureaucracy neutralizes it. Both are operating systems. Only one is being disrupted. Dimon: “If you look at the companies who failed, it was because they were dumb, bureaucratic, backward, and political.” 88% of the 1955 Fortune 500 is gone. Not disrupted from outside. Suffocated from within. Every one of them had the talent. Had the ideas. Had the resources. Every one of them had a system that buried those ideas in an approval chain before reaching daylight. Dimon: “It creates politics, and if you look at what’s killed companies over the years, it was bureaucracy.” The smartest people in a bureaucracy learn one lesson before any other. Your best idea is worth less than your ability to get it approved. So they stop producing ideas. Not because they ran out. Because the return on having one went negative. Every hour spent navigating an approval chain is an hour someone without that chain spent building. Every builder who left because the system punished execution is now building for someone who rewards it. Bureaucracy doesn’t just lose talent. It funds its own competition with the people it drove out. Now scale that to government. The largest institution on Earth. The deepest talent pipeline. The greatest structural advantage of any organization in history. Running the one operating system proven to neutralize all of it. The trillion-dollar question isn’t whether AI will be smarter than humans. It’s whether institutions will let humans be smart enough to use it. We spent decades worrying AI would replace our ability to think. We never noticed the org chart already did. We built machines that think at the speed of light inside systems that move at the speed of permission. The bottleneck was never intelligence. It was the system we built around it.

Dustin

12,689 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.

2xnmore

19,549 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A PulseChain theory I've been thinking about... I think a lot of people are judging the original PulseChain infrastructure as if it was supposed to be the finished product. I don't think it ever was. I think it was scaffolding. Hear me out. When PulseChain launched, it needed four things to exist on day one: • Validators so blocks could be produced. • A bridge so capital could enter the ecosystem. • PulseX so assets had somewhere to trade. • High INC emissions to incentivize liquidity. Without those four things, there is no ecosystem. Remember the bridge during launch?😤 It was taking days to complete transactions because demand was overwhelming it. People initiated a bridge on Monday and sometimes didn't receive funds until Friday. That wasn't because the idea failed. It was because the chain had just been born. Then something interesting happened. Community members began standing up validators. The original bootstrap validators became unnecessary. Those validators were shut down and the PLS was burned instead of remaining in circulation. A complete act of benevolence by the RH team. The network transitioned from bootstrap infrastructure to community infrastructure. Now look at INC. At launch, emissions were extremely generous because PulseX needed liquidity. That incentive worked. Liquidity providers supplied capital, markets formed, and the DEX became functional. Then emissions were gradually reduced. Less inflation. Less incentive driven liquidity. Potentially less sell pressure from newly issued INC. To me, that looks like another bootstrap mechanism being dialed back as the ecosystem matured. Now fast forward to today. We have projects like ZKX Wallet | The Secure and Private Wallet 🗽 and Internet Money: Crypto Wallet with built in security, privacy integrations, and a far more polished user experience. We have Liberty Swap | C.R.O.P.S. on PulseChain 🗽 making cross chain movement dramatically easier and aggregators like Piteas finding you the best route. We have new V3 liquidity solutions that didn't exist at launch. Here's my speculation. What if PulseX was never meant to be the final user experience? What if it was designed to become the economic engine underneath everything else? Modern wallets... Modern bridges... Aggregators... Privacy tools... V3 interfaces... ...all routing activity into the same underlying liquidity layer. In other words: The front end evolves. The settlement layer stays. People keep saying: "PulseX sucks." "The bridge sucks." Maybe we're asking the wrong question.... Maybe those products accomplished exactly what they were supposed to accomplish. Bootstrap the ecosystem. Everything we're seeing now feels less like replacing PulseChain's original infrastructure and more like building mature products on top of it. Just like you remove the scaffolding after a building is complete not because the scaffolding failed, but because it succeeded. One final thought. Richard Heart once said there were multiple teams working on PulseChain. I have no evidence about who is behind today's upgraded ecosystem projects or how they're organized, so I'm not making any claims there. But I do wonder if what we're seeing is the next stage of the architecture finally coming online. Maybe we've spent the last four years judging the scaffolding... ...instead of looking at the building. Curious what everyone else thinks.

Obey 126

12,329 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Your observations are almost correct, but your conclusions are not. What you see flying out, as what others thought was his ear piece, is not his ear piece. It is his chain he had around his neck, with, what I am pretty certain, a cross on it, which all Christians would wear, if they have a chain on their necks. So, what apparently happened, which seems so astronomically unlikely, is the bullet did not hit him in the neck first, but hit him in the chest, and to be more specific in that cross. So, after a hit into that cross, his chain snaps, and it is that which you see flying out backwards. When the chain snaps, and starts flying up and backwards, it also pulls up the front edge of is shirt, in less than 0.1 sec. So, that is how that anomaly is explained at the same time. What happens next, is his mic had a wire under his shirt. It kind of just laid in the back of his neck, going around his shoulder, and disappearing under his shirt on the front. That wire must have had some contact with this chain, or even being wrapped around it like may be just one turn. So, when that chain snaps and starts flying backwards, it starts pulling on his mic at the same time. Just the mic had a wire that was most certainly lose a little bit. So, that is why that responds with a few tens of a second delay. But still, the mic also, after jerking around for a few tens of a second disappears completely of his shirt. So, basically, the bullet hits his cross first, which is on his chain, would explain all of these anomalies at the same time, including the wire on the back of his neck being pulled around from the front, and thus bulging his shirt in the back a little bit. If you pay all of this is slow motion, you will see that it all gets seqeuenced correctly. And the last thing to note, is after hitting his cross, and getting deflected, the bullet now would start going up, instead of forward, and would go up into his neck from the bottom up, and disappear into his head. That would also explain at the same time why there is no exit wound. Because his skull would stop the bullet from exiting. One side note, not related to all of these anomalies, but still a necessary thing to keep in mind - that alleged high velocity bullet Mauser 30_06, could not have possibly be the weapon used, as that bullet would have taken one third of his neck out. For everything to be explained correctly, no Mauser, or any other kind of shotgun could have been used. Another, much smaller caliber weapon had to be used, like some kind of a hand gun, and from a much closer distance too, as a hand gun without the scope, from a far way roof would just not work. And so, that is how all of this happened. I know this was long. But this is one bizarre, super difficult to crack episode. So, I could not make it any shorter.

US_did_ 911

31,104 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr