Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dutch political commentator, Eva Vlaardingerbroek: CBDCs will be programmable, in a way that will enable governments to dictate how, when, where, on what and by whom they can be spent, including the imposition of a personal carbon allowance, "to save the planet". "It's all about control... When politicians, or...

726,463 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Wide Awake Media
Wide Awake Mediavor 2 Jahren

T-shirt available here: Currently running a 15% off sale. Hurry, sale ends at midnight tomorrow!

Profilbild von Lado Ramsey
Lado Ramseyvor 2 Jahren

Here's more. Orwellian stuff.

Profilbild von Maria Paula
Maria Paulavor 2 Jahren

New way of slavement.

Profilbild von Smackemback / SBUK 66
Smackemback / SBUK 66vor 2 Jahren

The WEF & their Great Reset is well underway. The Slogan : "You Will Own Nothing & You'll Be Happy !" Was never a suggestion it was an order & you will comply. Credit Scores, Digital ID's, Bar Codes, Loyalty Cards & Even Your Smart Devices will all be used against the citizen !

Profilbild von Tadeusz Sonsala
Tadeusz Sonsalavor 2 Jahren

“You will own nothing and you will be happy”. It becomes reality🤔

Profilbild von allan young
allan youngvor 2 Jahren

Bring back Mark Steyn.

Profilbild von Carmen's Ice Cold XRP
Carmen's Ice Cold XRPvor 2 Jahren

Will farmers be allowed to buy more land, farm equipment, fertilizer, animals, and anything they need? I doubt it

Profilbild von Terry Flynn
Terry Flynnvor 2 Jahren

You people voting in LAB,LIB,CON,GREEN,SNP,PLAID CYMRU Looking at this. This is what you just voted in in these elections. Are you going to do this in the general elections too? If so you will get what you voted for. Unfortunately we who vote against this will too if you win.

Profilbild von Jim Esposito
Jim Espositovor 2 Jahren

China has already done that.

Ähnliche Videos

Digital ID & Central Bank Digital Currencies risk becoming a Trojan horse towards much wider government digital control. We're on the brink of a global financial revolution with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). But this tech comes with a catch: programmability. What does that mean? Governments could control what you can and cannot spend your money on. China is the blueprint. Their social credit system is already limiting millions from purchasing train tickets, passports, and luxury goods. Your identity, actions, and bank account are all linked, creating an unprecedented level of state control over personal finance. And the West is taking notes. Trials for programmable CBDCs are already underway in nations like Sweden, South Africa, and Canada. Nearly half the world's countries are exploring this. This future is not a distant "what if"—it's a "when." So, where does the "personal carbon allowance" fit in? This is where programmable money meets the climate agenda. Imagine a monthly carbon limit. Go over it, and one proposed penalty is a direct fine. Too many car trips? A little too much steak? Your government-tracked CBDC would calculate your excess usage. And here’s the kicker: since they control the currency, they wouldn’t need to send a bill. The fine could be automatically deducted from your account. No appeals. No hiding. This isn't just about charging polluting companies anymore. It's about programming the financial freedom—or lack thereof—of every individual citizen. The question is no longer if this technology is coming, but how we will choose to govern its use.

Camus

15,348 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The biggest financial shift in history is happening RIGHT NOW, and almost no one is talking about the dark side. What people don't realize is that over 100 countries are actively developing their own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). This isn't speculative crypto; this is government-backed digital currency built on blockchain. Europe, the UK, Asia—they're all in the pilot phase. Within two years, we will begin a forced transition from the current fiat system to a new, programmable monetary grid. Why the push? Control. 100% yes, this is about control. CBDCs are programmable, trackable, and traceable. Every transaction you ever make will be visible on a permanent ledger. They will know what you buy, where you go, and who you support. But it gets worse. This technology has the terrifying capability to: ▪️ Block your spending entirely. ▪️ Cap how much you can spend on fuel, food, or travel. ▪️ Stop you from transferring money abroad. ▪️ Punish you for "non-compliant" behavior by freezing your assets. This isn't a conspiracy theory; it's the inherent capability of the technology they are building. They might not use these powers day one, but the framework for total financial control will be in place. Your money will no longer be yours. It will be a permissioned tool for social engineering. Wake up. Understand the difference between decentralized cryptocurrency (freedom) and centralized digital currency (control). The future of financial freedom is at stake.

Camus

245,889 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Catherine Austin Fitts: "[With] digital ID & programmable money...you're talking about complete control...[&]...we are in a political war between the mega-rich & everybody else. And the question [for] the mega-rich [is] how are you going to control the many when you are few?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from an interview with Holistic Hilda posted to YouTube on September 26, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My chief concern, if you look at what AI is good at, AI is very good at simulating anything that can be expressed mathematically. And of course, the thing we all know can be expressed mathematically are our, financial transactions. And the reality is, if I can track you closely where you're going and what you're doing, and I can get you on programmable money which can be turned on and off, then I can start to use AI and surveillance systems and algorithms to basically manage and control your behavior. "If I want you living in a 15 minute city, your money won't work beyond the 15 minutes unless you do what I say. We have a wonderful woman who runs our team Cash, and she says, what are you going to do when they show up and say either you transgender your children or we're going to turn off your money? "So what we're talking about doing is building a system that will allow you to be surveillance and tracked and turn your money on and off, or incentivize you or penalize you in a variety of ways with your money that can be integrated with your behavior. "So once you add programmable, all this stuff looks great. And there are many wonderful applications in theory, but when you integrate it with a digital ID and programmable money, then you're talking about complete control. And let me tell you why that's a problem. If you look around the world today, we are watching many different divide and conquer tactics used to cover up the real problem. "Right now we are in a political war between the mega rich and everybody else. And, the question is, if you're the mega rich, how are you going to control the many when you are few? The way you're going to do it was with programmable money. But programmable money doesn't click in and work well unless you've got everybody on the grid. You need to be able to track them, you need to be able to watch their behavior, you need to be able to influence their behavior. "And then you've got complete control. And that is not just wearables, that is not just an Internet of bodies. That is a coup d' Etat. That is the end of human liberty in the West."

Sense Receptor

86,861 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."

Sense Receptor

13,996 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Ultimate Weapon of Control: How Programmable Money & Digital ID Will Be Used to Enforce Medical & Dietary Compliance. Refuse a Vaccine? They Turn Off Your Money. Question a Health Policy? Your Funds Are Frozen. This Isn't a Future Prediction—It's the Logical Endpoint of CBDCs. Catherine Austin Fitts delivers a stark and critical warning: all progress in health and food freedom is ultimately vulnerable to a single point of failure—financial control. She argues that our foundational work in preserving access to real food and medical autonomy will be "deleted, negated, and reversed" the moment a centralized system gains absolute control over our financial transactions. The mechanism for this takeover? A 100% digital system featuring Digital ID and programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). This isn't just about convenience; it's about establishing "meta-control." This digital infrastructure becomes the train track upon which all other freedoms travel, and those who control the switches can derail any dissent. The consequence is a world of chilling, granular control: Refuse a mandated medical procedure? Your money gets turned off. Decline a state-recommended health intervention for your child? Your access to funds is revoked. Your compliance with health and food policies would no longer be a choice, but a financial imperative. Fitts illustrates this by pointing to the report "PharmaFood" on lab-grown and artificial foods. The market barrier for such products vanishes when your programmable money can be directed—or restricted—to force their consumption. The conclusion is inescapable: the battle for our future is not being fought solely in the doctor's office or on the farm. It is being decided in the architecture of our financial system. To secure our health and food, we must first secure our money.

Camus

13,258 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The Architecture of Control: How Programmable Money Ends Liberty Catherine Austin Fitts issues a stark warning about the convergence of AI, surveillance, and digital finance. Her chief concern isn't AI itself, but what it enables when paired with two other technologies: Digital ID and Programmable Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). The logic is chillingly simple: 1. AI's Domain: Artificial Intelligence excels at simulating and managing anything that can be mathematically expressed. Our financial lives—every transaction, every purchase—are now pure data. 2. The Trap of Programmable Money: Once your money is digital and programmable, it can be turned on or off based on your behavior. It becomes a tool for compliance, not a tool for freedom. Fitts illustrates this with a provocative example: "If I want you living in a 15-minute city, your money won't work beyond the 15 minutes unless you do what I say." This isn't just about geography; it's about enforcing any desired behavior, from consumption habits to personal beliefs. The real goal, she argues, is to solve the ultimate problem for the mega-rich: "How are you going to control the many when you are few?" The answer is this integrated system of surveillance and programmable money. It allows for a society where you are constantly tracked, incentivized, and penalized through your financial means. Your compliance is purchased, and your dissent is made financially impossible. This isn't just a privacy issue. This isn't just "wearables" or the "internet of bodies." This is a silent, digital coup d'état. As Fitts powerfully concludes, this convergence marks the potential end of human liberty in the West. It is the architecture for total control, built under the guise of convenience and efficiency.

Camus

17,536 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten