Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

DVP is two dicks in the same pussy at the same time. It is not DP. DP is one in the pussy and one in the ass. The taboo is the combination of stretch, sharing, and the fact that the men cannot pretend they are not touching.👅

14,168 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The half of the word. III:35 is the 180th verse of a 220-verse Book. Half a turn, at the line that says the half of the word. That count has been noted. I am using it. It is not the middle of the chapter. It is not the middle of the text. It sits at 180 degrees. Crowley’s note on that verse: Heru-ra-ha is the true Name of the Unity symbolized by the Twins — Harpocrates and Horus. Same breath: the Twin Sign and the Child Sign is Gemini, and Gemini’s letter is Zain. Zayin means sword. The two have one letter between them, and their letter is the weapon. The sword is not what interrupts the twins. The sword is what the twins are when you spell them. On the Tree that letter is the Lovers, Binah down into Tiphareth. Open your own 777 and look. The letter of the Twins, whose name is a sword, is the path that arrives at six. That is the trailer in one line. The sword is the road into six. Not the accident on the way there. The road. Six is where two stop being two. Four holds. Five cuts. Six wears both and is called son. The film gives you the picture without the vocabulary: one eye flesh, one eye machine, one arm flesh, one arm iron, one head. Same note: Ha is 6, the Sun. The composite name ends in the number of the sphere where the two are one. Old Comment: Heru-ra-ha = 418. The chapter opens on Abrahadabra, also 418. Reward at the top. Name at the half-turn. Same number. None of that is on a color script at Blur. They made a tragedy about a starved son and titled it honestly. The Tree fits because the Tree fits every father-and-two-sons story. I am laying a key on their work. I am not saying they hid it there. The father in the film is not an initiator. The vow is emptiness sold as inheritance. That is the inversion of every man and every woman is a star. Knowledge and Conversation is the death of the false personality — the part that will stall the work to keep the father’s ordinary approval. Abramelin isolates you to kill that. It is not a commanded fratricide. The Word that arrives here arrives over a body. That is not the Angel. The Angel does not need a corpse to finish the sentence. He is never told to kill his brother. That order is not on the screen. The structure does not pay until the pair is broken. The brother dies where he has always stood: between the hungry son and the man who will not look. Those are not the same sentence. The brother is not a person to get rid of. He is the half that pulls you off the work and back into the pair, because the pair is warmer than being one. The film kills the picture. It does not hand you a knife. Half a circle. Two names. One letter, and the letter is a sword, and the sword is the road into the sun. Love is the law, love under will. 666 – Antichrist

Mr. Crowley

15,289 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

Hanako

24,656 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce