Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
Earlier this year, the Trump administration allowed states to implement a ban on SNAP recipients using their food benefits to buy soft drinks and candy. Five states sued to reverse the ban and on Monday, a federal judge sided with them.
28,513 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 35

Taxpayers shouldn’t fund diabetes and its treatment

And they wonder why people on welfare are morbidly obese, riddled with heart disease and diabetes…

So a federal judge that thinks soft drinks and candy are food. Really their hate for Trump makes then not care whether children get healthy food. Just ridiculous.

So because a judge hates Trump, he’s going to let all these children become fat and diabetic. What a weird world we live in.

Unbelievable. Did they consult a Diabetes Educator on the proper way to manage blood glucose levels? If you found one who said through candy and soda I would never take one of my family members to them. I had no idea my tax dollars were going to this stupidity. Just when you thought the incredible fraud was the only thing impacting American taxpayers??

If taxpayers must fund supplemental NUTRITION,as well as medicaid costs, then it’s responsible to restrict foods with 0 nutritional value that cause disease. Soda is the top snap purchase! Leftists activist judges yet again show just how wasteful&insane the Democrat party is now.

If they eat the sugary drinks and snacks, they wouldn't have insulin issues or diabetes. These activists judges are not for what is right, but for whatever is against the Trump Administration! 🙄

You folks are crazy to defend obesity, diabetes and poor health. Why are taxpayers responsible for other people's poor decisions? Anything positive for Americans you tear to shreds.

Read more here:

I agree. Why shouldn't snap recipients be allowed to get big and fat like the rest of us? That's discriminatory or something, isn't it?

Hey cbs news you could at least put it in your headline that they were Democrat states that sued

So the states felt that the people were best served by going to court to fight for people to get SODA AND CANDY on the government dole. Our nation is totally f'd.

Of course ...because democrats need them to become diabetic so democrats can spend MORE of other people's money on diabetic care... The left needs victims.

CBS cannot report without bias—pure TDS bullshit. These TDS idiots sued for the right to buy junk food with taxpayer dollars.

Judges are using FEELINGS and not law to make law ... it's not their job!

Which 5 states? It will be good to know which states are trying to poison their voters on our dime

So now tax payers must continue paying for SNAP recipients to get type II diabetes?

Propaganda machine for the Zios now fuck CBS

Any and all decisions by a federal judge can be appealed and many states have already enacted Snap BANs on those purchases. The activist judges who went on a blitz denying the Trump administration is the first opening salvo in an executive vs judiciary war, expect appeals all across the board. Supreme Court will be very busy this year.

Imagine wanting children to be unhealthy. 🤦🏻♂️

And in a couple more Mondays, an appeals court will overturn another activist judge.

Why would states sue to allow govt food benefits to be used for Doritos and Coke?

It is taxpayer money, we should get to decide how it is spent. They need to buy healthy foods, not garbage with high sugar. This will be overturned by the Supreme Court . STFU.

And we wonder why we have a health care crisis in America!

That is horrible. Leftist judge fighting against health. If we pay the bill, we should dictate terms.

That judge is insane. Let my taxes buy fudge rounds. Fk off.

Why would states sue to allow this? Truth is stranger than fiction. If you can’t pony up for your own groceries you shouldn’t be drinking soda and eating candy

Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program How the fuck does soda and candy fall under NUTRITION!!!!!????

Another bad decision

So what you are saying those 5 states will never have a fully charged electric shopping cart for their customers.

Pretty simple. They want to clean up the ineligible and actually illegal parasites of SNAP so those that truly qualified will be able to receive them and the program will not be as unnecessarily expensive.

Those 5 states are wrong. Assistance is to help you stay alive not give you diabetes.

The Judge is wrong. Tax Payers should be not be "required by small tyrants in robes" to poison the poor with unhealthy processed sugars.

The only people that wanted that back on there are the candy and soda companies

Impeach the judges



