Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Ebun Joseph's dissertation for her PhD. I have it divided into 10 parts. Putting it through plagiarism applications. It will be repeated using two other plagiarism applications in addition to this one. Already her introduction is rampant with plagiarism(pinned post) This isPDF 2

30,926 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🤨 Race-baiting GRIFTER Narinder Kaur is at it again! Jeremy Vine asks her about the Jason Arday scandal — the Cambridge professor whose career has collapsed under mountains of plagiarism, fabricated research, and a life story so full of wild exaggerations it borders on parody. Her response? “He’s not the first to have plagiarised. He’s not the first to have lied. He’s not the first to have exaggerated.” Jeremy: “That’s not a good defence.” Narinder: “It is actually, because the level of reaction. The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country, can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” There it is. The race card, played on autopilot. Arday’s record includes extensive PhD plagiarism, fabricated research data and academic affiliations, claims of raising £5.5 million for charity, near-professional snooker success (one recorded amateur loss) and semi-pro football, ultra-running feats like 600 miles in six days and 30 marathons in 35 days (some after a broken leg and epileptic fit), being non-verbal until 11, a pig’s head sent to his parents, and attacks by knife-wielding masked intruders. This is one of the most egregious cases of academic and biographical inflation in history! Most people looking at the evidence simply call it what it is. Narinder can’t. Because the man is Black, criticism must be “unhinged racism”. She does this constantly: any pointed criticism of a Black public figure is reframed as racial animus, while she herself is permanently fixated on race, constantly dividing people by colour and treating disagreement as evidence of bigotry. No one is more obsessed with race than the person who sees it in every disagreement. When the evidence of plagiarism, invention and exaggeration is this extensive and public, the honest response is to condemn the conduct. Turning it into “you’re only angry because he’s Black” is not analysis. It’s cynical race-baiting that excuses clear wrongdoing to protect a preferred narrative.

J Stewart

65,335 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat