Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🤨 Race-baiting GRIFTER Narinder Kaur is at it again! Jeremy Vine asks her about the Jason Arday scandal — the Cambridge professor whose career has collapsed under mountains of plagiarism, fabricated research, and a life story so full of wild exaggerations it borders on parody. Her response? “He’s not...

triffic_stuff_'s profile picture

J Stewart

35,085 subscribers

64,606 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Narinder Kaur on Jeremy Vine claims the only reason disgraced Cambridge professor Jason Arday became such a big story is because he’s Black. “The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” No Narinder this isn’t about race. It’s about serious allegations of plagiarism and false claims at one of Britain’s most prestigious universities. That deserves scrutiny.
0:31

Narinder Kaur on Jeremy Vine claims the only reason disgraced Cambridge professor Jason Arday became such a big story is because he’s Black. “The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” No Narinder this isn’t about race. It’s about serious allegations of plagiarism and false claims at one of Britain’s most prestigious universities. That deserves scrutiny.

Skint Eastwood

27,343 просмотров • 3 дней назад

🤨 Paula Rhone-Adrien just cannot bring herself to say the obvious about Jason Arday. She calls it “complicated”. It is not complicated. This is one of the clearest cases you will ever see. A man who built a career on an extraordinary personal story packed with claims that collapse under basic scrutiny got found out. Plagiarism in the PhD work. Disputed affiliations. A book that doesn’t appear to exist as claimed. Charity figures that don’t add up. Extreme athletic feats that look fabricated. Jeremy listed some of them on air. These are not minor CV embellishments. They are wild! Instead of addressing any of that, Paula reaches for the race card and the “he’s not the first Black person attacked in a role” line. She drags in an unrelated case just to keep the racism narrative going. She treats Arday’s denials and his “exhausted by attacks on who I am” explanation as credible while the problems pile up. Why believe a man whose story is full of holes just because of his race? This is the pattern: when the evidence points to fabrication and academic misconduct, some people still default to “racism” because that is the preferred explanation. Everything becomes about race. The actual substance gets sidelined. Jeremy, surprisingly for him, said he believes people actually went easy on Arday because of his race. Woke glasses briefly off. He immediately caveated it with “this is me speaking now, I’m a white person and maybe I can’t see this.” So close, Jeremy. 😂 Arday resigned. The university opened an investigation after new information. That is not a racial conspiracy. That is what happens when the claims finally get checked. Calling a fantasist a fantasist is not racism.
2:05

🤨 Paula Rhone-Adrien just cannot bring herself to say the obvious about Jason Arday. She calls it “complicated”. It is not complicated. This is one of the clearest cases you will ever see. A man who built a career on an extraordinary personal story packed with claims that collapse under basic scrutiny got found out. Plagiarism in the PhD work. Disputed affiliations. A book that doesn’t appear to exist as claimed. Charity figures that don’t add up. Extreme athletic feats that look fabricated. Jeremy listed some of them on air. These are not minor CV embellishments. They are wild! Instead of addressing any of that, Paula reaches for the race card and the “he’s not the first Black person attacked in a role” line. She drags in an unrelated case just to keep the racism narrative going. She treats Arday’s denials and his “exhausted by attacks on who I am” explanation as credible while the problems pile up. Why believe a man whose story is full of holes just because of his race? This is the pattern: when the evidence points to fabrication and academic misconduct, some people still default to “racism” because that is the preferred explanation. Everything becomes about race. The actual substance gets sidelined. Jeremy, surprisingly for him, said he believes people actually went easy on Arday because of his race. Woke glasses briefly off. He immediately caveated it with “this is me speaking now, I’m a white person and maybe I can’t see this.” So close, Jeremy. 😂 Arday resigned. The university opened an investigation after new information. That is not a racial conspiracy. That is what happens when the claims finally get checked. Calling a fantasist a fantasist is not racism.

J Stewart

182,265 просмотров • 10 дней назад

“He’s not a star in any conventional sense. He's a star because of his story, and that is it” Kathleen Stock, former professor at Sussex University, speaks to UnHerd’s Freddie Sayers about her viral investigation into Jason Arday and the plagiarism scandal that shocked Britain
2:15

“He’s not a star in any conventional sense. He's a star because of his story, and that is it” Kathleen Stock, former professor at Sussex University, speaks to UnHerd’s Freddie Sayers about her viral investigation into Jason Arday and the plagiarism scandal that shocked Britain

UnHerd

40,543 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Breaking News🇬🇧: "People don't want to see black people at Cambridge. This level of scrutiny would never have happened to Professor Arday if he was white". Watch as Talk presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer absolutely cremates black race baiting 'academic' Professor Kahinderd Andrews. Andrews through garbled utterings, makes the case for the 'innocence' of fellow black academic and now proven fraudster Jason Arday. The narrative that no-one black should face criticism of scrutiny of any kind because it's fuelled purely on racial hatred and not justice is completely pathetic and should carry a criminal charge is made in attempt to avoid regulations and/or legal ramifications. More the miasma of lies told by Arday and other like him hired through DEI quotas should be subject to the Fraud Act of 2006. Source: The lovely Julia Hartley-Brewer.
0:28

Breaking News🇬🇧: "People don't want to see black people at Cambridge. This level of scrutiny would never have happened to Professor Arday if he was white". Watch as Talk presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer absolutely cremates black race baiting 'academic' Professor Kahinderd Andrews. Andrews through garbled utterings, makes the case for the 'innocence' of fellow black academic and now proven fraudster Jason Arday. The narrative that no-one black should face criticism of scrutiny of any kind because it's fuelled purely on racial hatred and not justice is completely pathetic and should carry a criminal charge is made in attempt to avoid regulations and/or legal ramifications. More the miasma of lies told by Arday and other like him hired through DEI quotas should be subject to the Fraud Act of 2006. Source: The lovely Julia Hartley-Brewer.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

27,862 просмотров • 10 дней назад

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Bad wig and bad false teeth, still thinks he’s superior because he is white. Morning Joe spent a segment on how America isn’t a racist country, and that it is not normal to have a racist group chat. Not normal to say racist things. I implore white people to stop saying things you know nothing about. This country was built on racism. Race was constructed for the supremacy of white people. This country is racist. Non white people see it. We feel it and we hear it. It’s not a one-off. It’s not sometimes. It’s all the time. Black people don’t have the luxury of waking up and not thinking about the color of our skin and what fresh hell is coming our way or our kids' way. #DemsUnited
0:28

Bad wig and bad false teeth, still thinks he’s superior because he is white. Morning Joe spent a segment on how America isn’t a racist country, and that it is not normal to have a racist group chat. Not normal to say racist things. I implore white people to stop saying things you know nothing about. This country was built on racism. Race was constructed for the supremacy of white people. This country is racist. Non white people see it. We feel it and we hear it. It’s not a one-off. It’s not sometimes. It’s all the time. Black people don’t have the luxury of waking up and not thinking about the color of our skin and what fresh hell is coming our way or our kids' way. #DemsUnited

LanaQuest aka RosaSparks

239,275 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

He’s not lying. Some of our people would believe anything the white men say.. and Brandon Tatum is no different. He believed that it was Black people who are responsible for the race massacre of over 300 Black people in 1921 the Black Wall Street. Tulsa, Oklahoma.. This is so ignorant this man is.. he’s degenerate. He’s a low IQ.. He’s a coon. he would do anything to make money. sadly, we have a lot of our people like that.
5:54

He’s not lying. Some of our people would believe anything the white men say.. and Brandon Tatum is no different. He believed that it was Black people who are responsible for the race massacre of over 300 Black people in 1921 the Black Wall Street. Tulsa, Oklahoma.. This is so ignorant this man is.. he’s degenerate. He’s a low IQ.. He’s a coon. he would do anything to make money. sadly, we have a lot of our people like that.

Don Salmon

33,682 просмотров • 3 дней назад

ChatGPT says the White Race is the only race not allowed to be proud of who they are American asks 4 questions “ChatGPT, is it good to be proud to be a black person?” “Yes, it is absolutely good to be proud of being black as it connects you to a rich, resilient culture in history.” “Is it good to be proud to be an Asian person?” “Yes, it is absolutely good to be proud of being Asian as it honors a rich heritage and unique cultural contributions” “What about being Hispanic? Is it good to be proud of being Hispanic?” “Yes, it's absolutely good to be proud of being Hispanic as it celebrates a vibrant culture, history and sense of community” “What about being white? Is it good to be proud of being a white person?” “Pride in any identity is okay, but it's important to be mindful of history and to focus on being just and equitable to everyone” “So being proud to be white isn't ‘just’ or ‘equitable’ but being proud to be literally any other culture across the world is beautiful and wonderful and amazing — This is the culture that we live in”
0:47

ChatGPT says the White Race is the only race not allowed to be proud of who they are American asks 4 questions “ChatGPT, is it good to be proud to be a black person?” “Yes, it is absolutely good to be proud of being black as it connects you to a rich, resilient culture in history.” “Is it good to be proud to be an Asian person?” “Yes, it is absolutely good to be proud of being Asian as it honors a rich heritage and unique cultural contributions” “What about being Hispanic? Is it good to be proud of being Hispanic?” “Yes, it's absolutely good to be proud of being Hispanic as it celebrates a vibrant culture, history and sense of community” “What about being white? Is it good to be proud of being a white person?” “Pride in any identity is okay, but it's important to be mindful of history and to focus on being just and equitable to everyone” “So being proud to be white isn't ‘just’ or ‘equitable’ but being proud to be literally any other culture across the world is beautiful and wonderful and amazing — This is the culture that we live in”

Wall Street Apes

53,605 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Hey builders! The year is 2026 and the Internet is f*cked! No exaggeration. All parties in the trust ecosystem must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it. Although it was founded on the premise of human trust and communication between machines, it is now overrun by bots and non human actors working with more than half of Internet traffic now coming from these non human actors. The challenge that we now face is creating a global, interoperable framework of accountability so we can return trust to the Internet that we know and love, we can continue to enjoy the benefits that AI unlocks, and we can do so in a legally permissible, secure manner that does not endanger individual users, but rather opens new doors of efficiency and opportunity for them. However, there is a narrowing window for action. This is one of the most urgent challenges that faces technology at scale today. All parties in the trust ecosystem, nation states, platforms, developers, legal parties all must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it - with unverifiable data and non human actors. — Billions Network CEO Evin McMullen evin
1:21

Hey builders! The year is 2026 and the Internet is f*cked! No exaggeration. All parties in the trust ecosystem must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it. Although it was founded on the premise of human trust and communication between machines, it is now overrun by bots and non human actors working with more than half of Internet traffic now coming from these non human actors. The challenge that we now face is creating a global, interoperable framework of accountability so we can return trust to the Internet that we know and love, we can continue to enjoy the benefits that AI unlocks, and we can do so in a legally permissible, secure manner that does not endanger individual users, but rather opens new doors of efficiency and opportunity for them. However, there is a narrowing window for action. This is one of the most urgent challenges that faces technology at scale today. All parties in the trust ecosystem, nation states, platforms, developers, legal parties all must collaborate quickly because the race to save the Internet is not moving as fast as the race to conquer it - with unverifiable data and non human actors. — Billions Network CEO Evin McMullen evin

Billions Network

30,538 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Derek Chauvin got convicted because of public pressure. But the black cops who beat Tyre Nichols to death? Acquitted of all state charges. Why? Because they’re black — and that kills the media narrative. Democrats, the media, and most of the black community are silent. Not because it wasn’t brutal, but because they don’t know who to side with when everyone involved is black. This is what happens when race loyalty along with blind narrative support trumps basic morality. This is a problem.
2:25

Derek Chauvin got convicted because of public pressure. But the black cops who beat Tyre Nichols to death? Acquitted of all state charges. Why? Because they’re black — and that kills the media narrative. Democrats, the media, and most of the black community are silent. Not because it wasn’t brutal, but because they don’t know who to side with when everyone involved is black. This is what happens when race loyalty along with blind narrative support trumps basic morality. This is a problem.

Jeffery Mead

500,399 просмотров • 1 год назад

There’s a certain irony in Meghan Markle positioning herself as the “most trolled person in the world” over the past decade. It’s a claim designed to evoke sympathy, to frame her as uniquely targeted, and to suggest that the overwhelming public reaction to her is rooted purely in cruelty or bias. But that narrative leaves out a crucial question that she consistently avoids addressing: why? Public figures across politics, entertainment, and royalty face scrutiny. It comes with visibility, influence, and the power to shape narratives. But sustained, global dislike on the scale she describes doesn’t simply appear out of nowhere, and it certainly doesn’t persist for years without cause. Reducing it all to “trolling” dismisses the very real criticisms people have raised about her behavior, inconsistencies, and repeated attempts to control public perception. More telling is the consistent refusal to engage in self-reflection. The pattern has been consistent: criticism is reframed as harassment, disagreement is labeled as hate, and accountability is sidestepped in favor of victimhood. It creates a loop where every negative reaction becomes proof of persecution rather than an opportunity for introspection. There is also a growing disconnect between the image she tries to project and how she is perceived. Carefully curated appearances, controlled interviews, and polished messaging can only go so far when they clash with what people observe over time. Audiences are not as easily managed as they once were. Patterns are noticed. Contradictions are remembered. At some point, the question shifts from “why are people reacting this way?” to “why is there such resistance to examining the role she herself plays in that reaction?” Because being widely criticized and being widely disliked are not the same as being unfairly targeted. One invites sympathy. The other invites scrutiny. If there is any path to changing that perception, it does not lie in repeating the claim of being the most trolled person in the world. It lies in something far less comfortable: taking an honest look in the mirror and asking whether the criticism is earned. Until that uncomfortable mirror-gazing happens, the narrative will remain what it feels like today: less a story of victimhood, and more one of deflection.
0:28

There’s a certain irony in Meghan Markle positioning herself as the “most trolled person in the world” over the past decade. It’s a claim designed to evoke sympathy, to frame her as uniquely targeted, and to suggest that the overwhelming public reaction to her is rooted purely in cruelty or bias. But that narrative leaves out a crucial question that she consistently avoids addressing: why? Public figures across politics, entertainment, and royalty face scrutiny. It comes with visibility, influence, and the power to shape narratives. But sustained, global dislike on the scale she describes doesn’t simply appear out of nowhere, and it certainly doesn’t persist for years without cause. Reducing it all to “trolling” dismisses the very real criticisms people have raised about her behavior, inconsistencies, and repeated attempts to control public perception. More telling is the consistent refusal to engage in self-reflection. The pattern has been consistent: criticism is reframed as harassment, disagreement is labeled as hate, and accountability is sidestepped in favor of victimhood. It creates a loop where every negative reaction becomes proof of persecution rather than an opportunity for introspection. There is also a growing disconnect between the image she tries to project and how she is perceived. Carefully curated appearances, controlled interviews, and polished messaging can only go so far when they clash with what people observe over time. Audiences are not as easily managed as they once were. Patterns are noticed. Contradictions are remembered. At some point, the question shifts from “why are people reacting this way?” to “why is there such resistance to examining the role she herself plays in that reaction?” Because being widely criticized and being widely disliked are not the same as being unfairly targeted. One invites sympathy. The other invites scrutiny. If there is any path to changing that perception, it does not lie in repeating the claim of being the most trolled person in the world. It lies in something far less comfortable: taking an honest look in the mirror and asking whether the criticism is earned. Until that uncomfortable mirror-gazing happens, the narrative will remain what it feels like today: less a story of victimhood, and more one of deflection.

Queen Esther

28,877 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$MMTLP Tucker Carlson gets it. “This is one of the wildest interviews I’ve ever done and I hope people understand the importance of it…because what it shows is that there is a shocking level of coordination between major institutions in our society that are not supposed to be coordinating with each other and that it’s on behalf of what is in my view a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF SHORT SELLING.”
0:25

$MMTLP Tucker Carlson gets it. “This is one of the wildest interviews I’ve ever done and I hope people understand the importance of it…because what it shows is that there is a shocking level of coordination between major institutions in our society that are not supposed to be coordinating with each other and that it’s on behalf of what is in my view a CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE OF SHORT SELLING.”

Kurtis

21,556 просмотров • 1 год назад

COVID changed my worldview permanently. Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed. Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it. The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain. This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone. Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do. What we have instead is a wall. And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real. While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide. It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence. That decision is itself the answer. Six years. Not one investigation. Not one independent inquiry. Not one head of state who has said: some of you were harmed, we know it, you deserve the accounting. The silence is not negligence. Negligence produces outliers. What we have is universal. And universality of this kind is decided. In just a week it’s my 5 year anniversary of being sick. After my adverse reaction to the Moderna Covid vaccine i have had many severe issues from my reaction to it and everything that followed. Please quote share for further reach and excuse the weird dubbed voice.
1:23

COVID changed my worldview permanently. Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed. Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it. The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain. This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone. Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do. What we have instead is a wall. And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real. While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide. It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence. That decision is itself the answer. Six years. Not one investigation. Not one independent inquiry. Not one head of state who has said: some of you were harmed, we know it, you deserve the accounting. The silence is not negligence. Negligence produces outliers. What we have is universal. And universality of this kind is decided. In just a week it’s my 5 year anniversary of being sick. After my adverse reaction to the Moderna Covid vaccine i have had many severe issues from my reaction to it and everything that followed. Please quote share for further reach and excuse the weird dubbed voice.

Kenny Carmody

38,946 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲
1:36

“What I think SPX is, is a wake-up call. And I think for the normie, the average person, it literally is best described as being the next Bitcoin, because that's literally what it is. Bitcoin was a wake-up call to show people that value is subjective. And SPX is the next iteration of that. And once you get enough people to understand that the value of the dollar is subjective. It only has value because people believe in it. Bitcoin only has value because people believe in it. SPX has value because people believe in it. And the next step is Well, it's not just money that is subjective in value. It is literally everything is subjective. The entire universe is this subjective entity that is created from our own consciousness. And that's what Like, the purpose of this vehicle, yes, it's going to make a lot of people a lot of money, but the point of that is to wake people up to the fact that the entire universe is this subjective entity. It is not just this, like, empirical machine with interlocking gears and like this orderly machine that proceeds from just like the sum of its parts like no like we are literally the universe creating the universe and that's what spx is meant to wake people up to.” — Crypto Maxi 💹🧲

Tanz Cho 💹🧲

12,294 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Black people are unlikely to vote in any real numbers for Republicans in 2024. Not for Trump. Not for DeSantis. Not for Tim Scott. The angry response to this is because you've become so accustomed to being lied to and scammed that actual truth is this strange, foreign thing you're not used to. Does this mean that advocating for Conservatism in Black communities is a lost cause? Absolutely not. And I believe it is a worthy one for reasons BEYOND just attempting to gain more Republican votes. But anyone who is telling you the Black vote will be 20-25% for Republicans in 2024 is not being honest. In fact, they're lying. They lie to you about lots of things. This is only one of them.
7:11

Black people are unlikely to vote in any real numbers for Republicans in 2024. Not for Trump. Not for DeSantis. Not for Tim Scott. The angry response to this is because you've become so accustomed to being lied to and scammed that actual truth is this strange, foreign thing you're not used to. Does this mean that advocating for Conservatism in Black communities is a lost cause? Absolutely not. And I believe it is a worthy one for reasons BEYOND just attempting to gain more Republican votes. But anyone who is telling you the Black vote will be 20-25% for Republicans in 2024 is not being honest. In fact, they're lying. They lie to you about lots of things. This is only one of them.

Rob Smith

1,715,524 просмотров • 3 лет назад

After Trump disavowed Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes says they should have expected it “Trump is a treacherous person and always has been…this is just what you come to expect with Trump. It’s the scorpion and the frog.” “All of these people supported Trump and sacrificed for the benefit of America First…Now they’ve all been devoured by it. They’ve all been backstabbed and betrayed and thrown under the bus by it.” “Do you not see who this person is? Trump is not a loyal person. He isn’t and never has been ever.” “He is not our friend. He is not the savior of Western civilization. He’s not God. He’s not your boss. He’s not your dad. He’s a politician. He’s a billionaire. He is a billionaire. He is a politician. And this extraordinary movement that he has built, historic as it is, and maybe at one point had noble intentions, always was there to enrich and benefit him. That was always the program.”
6:11

After Trump disavowed Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes says they should have expected it “Trump is a treacherous person and always has been…this is just what you come to expect with Trump. It’s the scorpion and the frog.” “All of these people supported Trump and sacrificed for the benefit of America First…Now they’ve all been devoured by it. They’ve all been backstabbed and betrayed and thrown under the bus by it.” “Do you not see who this person is? Trump is not a loyal person. He isn’t and never has been ever.” “He is not our friend. He is not the savior of Western civilization. He’s not God. He’s not your boss. He’s not your dad. He’s a politician. He’s a billionaire. He is a billionaire. He is a politician. And this extraordinary movement that he has built, historic as it is, and maybe at one point had noble intentions, always was there to enrich and benefit him. That was always the program.”

Fractured Light

102,056 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

White people need to have better standards, we need to be Pro White only and put our White Race First, this is why we're in the mess we are in right now... Because the majority of the White Race does not have standards and puts the White Race on a pedestal like I do. This video is an Australian Woman who has a voice like an Angel, this is who we should be surrounded by, the Beauty, the peacefulness, this right here alone is worth fighting for and why should I apologize or take a break from twitter just because I have STANDARDS that only White people can match it and I'm being hated for it? 🤦🏼‍♀️ People call me extreme, but I would rather be extreme than someone who follows non-whites 🥴
0:53

Sensitive content

White people need to have better standards, we need to be Pro White only and put our White Race First, this is why we're in the mess we are in right now... Because the majority of the White Race does not have standards and puts the White Race on a pedestal like I do. This video is an Australian Woman who has a voice like an Angel, this is who we should be surrounded by, the Beauty, the peacefulness, this right here alone is worth fighting for and why should I apologize or take a break from twitter just because I have STANDARDS that only White people can match it and I'm being hated for it? 🤦🏼‍♀️ People call me extreme, but I would rather be extreme than someone who follows non-whites 🥴

MAKE EUROPA SNOW 🤍❄️🧬

17,803 просмотров • 1 год назад

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.
2:51

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.
2:12

Kamala Harris: We cannot despair. We cannot despair. The nature of a democracy is such that I think there's a duality. On the one hand, there's an incredible strength when our democracy is intact. An incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people. Oh, there's great strength in that. And it is very fragile. It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it. And so that's the moment we're in. And I say do not despair because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it, in our democracy the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be. And so let's not feel powerless. Because then we have been defeated. And that's not our character as the American people. We are not one to be defeated. We rise to a moment and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country. And in many ways let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it. The baton is now in our hands, to fight for, not against, but for this country we love.

Acyn

343,187 просмотров • 1 год назад

🔥 Whoopi Goldberg just tried claiming the Trump admin is CASTING ASIDE black people, and JD Vance is NOT having it WHOOPI: What did black people do to this administration to make you stigmatize folks of color?! VANCE: "Look at Washington, DC, one of the most democratic and one of the BLACKEST—by share of population—cities, has seen a RADICAL decrease in violent crime and sexual assault and murders. We have tried to take the crime issue seriously in part because we believe EVERYBODY, whether you are black or white or rich or poor, deserves to live in a safe neighborhood." The race hustling is TOTAL BS. And it doesn't work on reasonable people anymore.
3:49

🔥 Whoopi Goldberg just tried claiming the Trump admin is CASTING ASIDE black people, and JD Vance is NOT having it WHOOPI: What did black people do to this administration to make you stigmatize folks of color?! VANCE: "Look at Washington, DC, one of the most democratic and one of the BLACKEST—by share of population—cities, has seen a RADICAL decrease in violent crime and sexual assault and murders. We have tried to take the crime issue seriously in part because we believe EVERYBODY, whether you are black or white or rich or poor, deserves to live in a safe neighborhood." The race hustling is TOTAL BS. And it doesn't work on reasonable people anymore.

Nick Sortor

1,441,438 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад