Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

.Eddy Lazzarin ☀️ explains why “independent” AI evaluators can still be centralized if they all come from the same social and ideological network: "It's very easy to use the calls for safety and end up in a place where you have designed something that is perfect to subtly control...

MTSlive's profile picture

MTS

527,302 subscribers

10,821 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

For all the trolls in the back…. I present this question once again. Megan why did you sign the power of attorney over all your companies, name and likeness to Roc Nation and their lawyers ? The same Roc Nation that is under Warner music who is now distributing all of your music ? But claim to be independent ? As you have signed control of your career away to the labels & management ? Still a 360 deal if they have control over all revenue streams and don’t need your say so.
0:37

For all the trolls in the back…. I present this question once again. Megan why did you sign the power of attorney over all your companies, name and likeness to Roc Nation and their lawyers ? The same Roc Nation that is under Warner music who is now distributing all of your music ? But claim to be independent ? As you have signed control of your career away to the labels & management ? Still a 360 deal if they have control over all revenue streams and don’t need your say so.

Keeping Culture Alive

474,009 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨"Would you say we are currently under the control of the Reptilians?" "I think so. They control the media, they control the banks, they control the education system, they control religion.. What's left?" "If we could raise our Consciousness, not very much really, to the point we're we see what they're all about & understand what it's all about.. The Game is over, they can't win here!!" Consciousness is Key to this Reality.
1:24

🚨"Would you say we are currently under the control of the Reptilians?" "I think so. They control the media, they control the banks, they control the education system, they control religion.. What's left?" "If we could raise our Consciousness, not very much really, to the point we're we see what they're all about & understand what it's all about.. The Game is over, they can't win here!!" Consciousness is Key to this Reality.

UAPWixy

70,130 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

AWARENESS AND THE SYSTEM Yoko: The public believes that there's somebody up there who's very powerful because they're rich and they control the media etcetera. And they think, 'Oh, we don't have the control so we can't do it.' And we have this negativism all the time. But that's not what it is at all. They're not powerful because they're rich and they control the media. They're powerful, sadly enough because they are 'aware' and they're trying to keep other people ignorant. If our awareness level gets to the same level as they are, we outnumber them. So there's nothing they can do. John: Who is 'they'? Well, whoever 'they' are - That kept the workers uneducated. That sent children down in the mines in the Industrial Revolution in England. Who tried not to educate people. We're all part of a system, in a way, and 'they' includes us, too. #powertothepeople
0:51

AWARENESS AND THE SYSTEM Yoko: The public believes that there's somebody up there who's very powerful because they're rich and they control the media etcetera. And they think, 'Oh, we don't have the control so we can't do it.' And we have this negativism all the time. But that's not what it is at all. They're not powerful because they're rich and they control the media. They're powerful, sadly enough because they are 'aware' and they're trying to keep other people ignorant. If our awareness level gets to the same level as they are, we outnumber them. So there's nothing they can do. John: Who is 'they'? Well, whoever 'they' are - That kept the workers uneducated. That sent children down in the mines in the Industrial Revolution in England. Who tried not to educate people. We're all part of a system, in a way, and 'they' includes us, too. #powertothepeople

John Lennon

76,855 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"What we're all witnessing isn't actually science, it's scientism, which is a religion built around the appearance of science." "Trust the experts then becomes code for outsource your perception." "If you can control the funding, you can control the research. If you can control research, you can control messaging. And if you can control messaging, you can engineer belief. And belief drives behavior." "It's very easy to cling to scientism because it gives us a way out of responsibility. That lab coat said it, so I don't have to think."
2:01

"What we're all witnessing isn't actually science, it's scientism, which is a religion built around the appearance of science." "Trust the experts then becomes code for outsource your perception." "If you can control the funding, you can control the research. If you can control research, you can control messaging. And if you can control messaging, you can engineer belief. And belief drives behavior." "It's very easy to cling to scientism because it gives us a way out of responsibility. That lab coat said it, so I don't have to think."

Red Pill Dispenser

13,056 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

⚠️Warning! Former HUD official says we have only 2 years to prevent the digital enslavement grid. "We have maybe at most two years." "When they say it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious." "They can literally take all your assets, including your kids." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with the Canadian Prepper (Canadian Prepper) posted to YouTube on April 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- In other words, it's the end of currency because it's simply a rule system. And you can earn credits in the rule system and the rule system can apply all sorts of carrots and sticks. So if you're very, very good, you could get more credits. If you're bad, you could have your credits taken away. So the big issue here, if you look at the world that we've grown up in, most of us have grown up, whether Canada, the United States, in a world where the bankers control monetary policy and the people's representatives control fiscal policy, which means the people's representatives set taxes and then determine how the money's going to be spent. Now, the bankers in the system can control what taxes are. If they want to raise taxes, they just take it out of your account. You have no control. And, there's no need to vote for representatives because the bankers can control it directly and they can decide how it's spent. And if you don't like that, they can turn off your money. This is coming now. I mean, if you look at the debanking, you look at the control of credit cards, if you look at the new stablecoins putting terms and conditions that say you're not allowed to buy, you can't buy a bow and arrow with Circle until there was a whole hullabaloo and they had to change their terms and conditions. But this is here now. And most importantly, the laws and the systems are being put in place that make this possible. So now is the time. We have maybe at most two years to do the things we need to do to prevent this from clicking in and going live. So when they say it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. They're creating a system where they can literally take all your assets, including your kids.
2:10

⚠️Warning! Former HUD official says we have only 2 years to prevent the digital enslavement grid. "We have maybe at most two years." "When they say it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious." "They can literally take all your assets, including your kids." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a discussion with the Canadian Prepper (Canadian Prepper) posted to YouTube on April 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- In other words, it's the end of currency because it's simply a rule system. And you can earn credits in the rule system and the rule system can apply all sorts of carrots and sticks. So if you're very, very good, you could get more credits. If you're bad, you could have your credits taken away. So the big issue here, if you look at the world that we've grown up in, most of us have grown up, whether Canada, the United States, in a world where the bankers control monetary policy and the people's representatives control fiscal policy, which means the people's representatives set taxes and then determine how the money's going to be spent. Now, the bankers in the system can control what taxes are. If they want to raise taxes, they just take it out of your account. You have no control. And, there's no need to vote for representatives because the bankers can control it directly and they can decide how it's spent. And if you don't like that, they can turn off your money. This is coming now. I mean, if you look at the debanking, you look at the control of credit cards, if you look at the new stablecoins putting terms and conditions that say you're not allowed to buy, you can't buy a bow and arrow with Circle until there was a whole hullabaloo and they had to change their terms and conditions. But this is here now. And most importantly, the laws and the systems are being put in place that make this possible. So now is the time. We have maybe at most two years to do the things we need to do to prevent this from clicking in and going live. So when they say it's 2030 and you have no assets, they're serious. They're creating a system where they can literally take all your assets, including your kids.

Sense Receptor

79,349 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Thomas Sowell on why rent control is so damaging: “If rent control is severe, people either reduce the amount of housing they build or they stop building housing altogether.” “Political authorities are then confronted with a situation where there’s no new housing built and the old housing is wearing out—usually faster under rent control because the landlords don’t have to keep it up as much.” “So they step in and have some kind of modification. They say, ‘We are trying to protect the poor, so we won’t regulate luxury housing.’” “Of course, luxury housing and ordinary housing use much the same labor and the same materials. Therefore, all the materials that would have otherwise gone into making ordinary housing go into building luxury housing.”
0:48

Thomas Sowell on why rent control is so damaging: “If rent control is severe, people either reduce the amount of housing they build or they stop building housing altogether.” “Political authorities are then confronted with a situation where there’s no new housing built and the old housing is wearing out—usually faster under rent control because the landlords don’t have to keep it up as much.” “So they step in and have some kind of modification. They say, ‘We are trying to protect the poor, so we won’t regulate luxury housing.’” “Of course, luxury housing and ordinary housing use much the same labor and the same materials. Therefore, all the materials that would have otherwise gone into making ordinary housing go into building luxury housing.”

Thomas Sowell Daily

30,630 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I have spoken to a lot of first-time property owners and almost all of them make the same mistake. They hand over the management too early. They think that is what smart owners do. But what they are actually doing is giving away control before they even understand what they are giving away. You cannot manage a manager if you do not know what good management looks like. Learn it first. Then delegate.
0:54

I have spoken to a lot of first-time property owners and almost all of them make the same mistake. They hand over the management too early. They think that is what smart owners do. But what they are actually doing is giving away control before they even understand what they are giving away. You cannot manage a manager if you do not know what good management looks like. Learn it first. Then delegate.

Ritesh Agarwal

21,587 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.
1:20

Former hedge fund manager David Rogers Webb describes the goal of "The Great Taking" "it's much darker than [they] just want to control people... It is about destroying populations... It's that they intend that you will not exist" "It's not that they need your stuff. They can create unlimited amounts of money" "It's not that they need your stuff or your money. It's that they do not want you to have have your stuff and your money" "It is about subjugation of populations" "It's even worse than being about control. Because they have control now. They have total control now" "So what is happening now is beyond having total control" "It is about destroying populations" "So it's much darker than that [they] just want to control people" "First people think it's that they want to make money. No, it's much worse than that. [Then they think] it's that they want control—no, it's much worse than that. It's that they intend that you will not exist" This clip of Webb (David Rogers Webb), who's also the author of a book dubbed The Great Taking, is taken from a FrihetsNytt interview posted to Rumble in May 2026.

Sense Receptor

104,427 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I'm seeing a lot of posts on other platforms saying things along the lines of "Australia is doing it right!" in regard to our upcoming Under 16s Social Media Ban. This isn't about protecting children, it's about control. Julie Inman Grant likens being on social media to swimming, and how young people ought to learn how to "swim between the flags." This is all fine and well, except now she wants to ban them from the water entirely? How will they learn to swim if they're just thrown in? Think about the platforms that are allowed to slip through the cracks. Discord, Roblox, Bluesky... All have had allegations of grooming and inappropriate content, yet they're exempt. Why? Control of the narrative. Control of the culture. Control of the impressionable minds of young people. That is all it is.
1:01

I'm seeing a lot of posts on other platforms saying things along the lines of "Australia is doing it right!" in regard to our upcoming Under 16s Social Media Ban. This isn't about protecting children, it's about control. Julie Inman Grant likens being on social media to swimming, and how young people ought to learn how to "swim between the flags." This is all fine and well, except now she wants to ban them from the water entirely? How will they learn to swim if they're just thrown in? Think about the platforms that are allowed to slip through the cracks. Discord, Roblox, Bluesky... All have had allegations of grooming and inappropriate content, yet they're exempt. Why? Control of the narrative. Control of the culture. Control of the impressionable minds of young people. That is all it is.

Celine against The Machine

46,319 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Fitts: "[With the control grid]... the mega-rich can live a very... luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear... [but that] uber class of people... literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "And they may be actually." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a conversation with Tucker Carlson (Tucker Carlson) posted to YouTube on February 27, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Carlson: "Can I just ask the dumbest question? Why would anybody in authority want that level of control? What's the impulse there? Why would you want to do that to people?" Fitts: "With that kind of control I can bring out phenomenally powerful technology without worrying about it being weaponized. So I can bring out breakthrough energy technology and not worry that I can't control how it gets used. I can manage a large population in a world where technology is changing without losing control. "So a small group of people can control the many. And also if I believe that with life science I can live forever or for much longer lifetimes, I can either depopulate or control people who are angry that I'm living to be 145 and they're not, and I can basically keep them in check even though, so the mega-rich can live a very different luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear because they have complete control. "So bottom line, in a time of radical technological change, which we're living through right now, the first result is societal chaos and revolutions and wars. And that's why I got the Bolsheviks, et cetera, et cetera. The people pushing this technological change or watching it from positions of authority know this. "And so the control grid would allow the transition to whatever this technological future is without the downside of like a Bolshevik revolution. So in my experience, the people who run the financial system are first and foremost risk managers. They don't think in terms of making money. They print money out of thin air. But they're very deeply careful about risk and they're very afraid of the guillotine. They're very afraid of the crowd. "But it's hard, it's hard to manage people. And if you look at, at coming into the development of digital technology and globalization, they had two choices. They could use this technology to build something that allowed explosive new decentralized wealth to be created. At which point how did they make sure they stay in control? Especially because you have so much going on that's secret. "So how do you stay in control? And, and can you create a bottom up structure that will behave responsibly? And the hard part of behaving responsibly is you as a manager of society have to turn the aircraft carrier before you hit the iceberg. You don't trust the crowd to care until you hit the iceberg and then it's too late. "So you decide, okay, we need a meritocracy. We can't trust the people. Now, I disagree with that. But so that was the model I was working on when I was making all this software. So I was saying we can have a bottom up structure that does the risk management, but builds the explosive wealth and it can work. But then you don't have an uber class. "But I think they decided, okay, the only way we find managing the general population very frustrating. And it's back to the red button story. We find them very hypocritical and irresponsible and frustrating. We are very frustrated, we are just going to go to complete control and they had to choose one or the other, and so they chose complete control. "The problem is once you get into complete control, you get an uber class of people who literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "Yeah. And they may be actually. Sorry, excuse me."
4:04

Fitts: "[With the control grid]... the mega-rich can live a very... luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear... [but that] uber class of people... literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "And they may be actually." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a conversation with Tucker Carlson (Tucker Carlson) posted to YouTube on February 27, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Carlson: "Can I just ask the dumbest question? Why would anybody in authority want that level of control? What's the impulse there? Why would you want to do that to people?" Fitts: "With that kind of control I can bring out phenomenally powerful technology without worrying about it being weaponized. So I can bring out breakthrough energy technology and not worry that I can't control how it gets used. I can manage a large population in a world where technology is changing without losing control. "So a small group of people can control the many. And also if I believe that with life science I can live forever or for much longer lifetimes, I can either depopulate or control people who are angry that I'm living to be 145 and they're not, and I can basically keep them in check even though, so the mega-rich can live a very different luxurious life and control or shrink the rest of the population without fear because they have complete control. "So bottom line, in a time of radical technological change, which we're living through right now, the first result is societal chaos and revolutions and wars. And that's why I got the Bolsheviks, et cetera, et cetera. The people pushing this technological change or watching it from positions of authority know this. "And so the control grid would allow the transition to whatever this technological future is without the downside of like a Bolshevik revolution. So in my experience, the people who run the financial system are first and foremost risk managers. They don't think in terms of making money. They print money out of thin air. But they're very deeply careful about risk and they're very afraid of the guillotine. They're very afraid of the crowd. "But it's hard, it's hard to manage people. And if you look at, at coming into the development of digital technology and globalization, they had two choices. They could use this technology to build something that allowed explosive new decentralized wealth to be created. At which point how did they make sure they stay in control? Especially because you have so much going on that's secret. "So how do you stay in control? And, and can you create a bottom up structure that will behave responsibly? And the hard part of behaving responsibly is you as a manager of society have to turn the aircraft carrier before you hit the iceberg. You don't trust the crowd to care until you hit the iceberg and then it's too late. "So you decide, okay, we need a meritocracy. We can't trust the people. Now, I disagree with that. But so that was the model I was working on when I was making all this software. So I was saying we can have a bottom up structure that does the risk management, but builds the explosive wealth and it can work. But then you don't have an uber class. "But I think they decided, okay, the only way we find managing the general population very frustrating. And it's back to the red button story. We find them very hypocritical and irresponsible and frustrating. We are very frustrated, we are just going to go to complete control and they had to choose one or the other, and so they chose complete control. "The problem is once you get into complete control, you get an uber class of people who literally think of themselves as a different species." Carlson: "Yeah. And they may be actually. Sorry, excuse me."

Sense Receptor

18,160 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

It's Clowns like these that are the reason people scoff at the mention of the illuminati. They immdiately think of the clown celebrities doing silly hand signs. Meanwhile the real illuminati have there symbol on every dollar in existance, they own all the media and banks, they control most celebrities and movies, they have control of all the major power centers and people laugh at them like they are a joke. They are very real watch a video I made here if you doubt it. 👊
17:28

It's Clowns like these that are the reason people scoff at the mention of the illuminati. They immdiately think of the clown celebrities doing silly hand signs. Meanwhile the real illuminati have there symbol on every dollar in existance, they own all the media and banks, they control most celebrities and movies, they have control of all the major power centers and people laugh at them like they are a joke. They are very real watch a video I made here if you doubt it. 👊

WokeWorldOrder

74,600 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy says he's DOUBTFUL that even a single Democrat will defect and vote for the SAVE America Act, which will lead to it STALLING in the Senate, leaving the midterms WIDE OPEN for fraud. Democrats already stole 2020 and they are doing EVERYTHING they can to do the same this year. Kennedy says it's TIME to start the process of passing the bill through a reconciliation process. "You don't have to be Einsteins cousin to see all this coming." "There are a lot of smart lawyers in this country that can draft the bill that I think can pass the Budget Control Act." "It's COMMONE SENSE to me."
3:30

BREAKING: Senator Kennedy says he's DOUBTFUL that even a single Democrat will defect and vote for the SAVE America Act, which will lead to it STALLING in the Senate, leaving the midterms WIDE OPEN for fraud. Democrats already stole 2020 and they are doing EVERYTHING they can to do the same this year. Kennedy says it's TIME to start the process of passing the bill through a reconciliation process. "You don't have to be Einsteins cousin to see all this coming." "There are a lot of smart lawyers in this country that can draft the bill that I think can pass the Budget Control Act." "It's COMMONE SENSE to me."

Gunther Eagleman™

313,011 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”
2:00

“I'm not a huge hater of the institutions. I wasn't a huge hater of altcoins. These institutional products are just kind of altcoins. People can go make their money. Go do your thing. But it's not Bitcoin. An ETF is not Bitcoin. With these centralized projects, you're not getting the core values of Bitcoin, the control, the censorship resistance, the privacy. You're putting it in a centralized wrapper, and if you put Bitcoin in a centralized wrapper, you lose everything that's good about it. It's not Bitcoin. It's just an affinity marketing thing. It's “Hey, you like Bitcoin, go buy my other project." Just like, "Hey you like bitcoin? Go buy my altcoin." It's not the same thing, and I think in many ways it's a step backwards. I don't hate these people, but they certainly shouldn't be celebrated. It's not forwarding our industry if we do treasury strategies, if we do ETFs, we cheer for BlackRock and Cantor. That's a step backwards. It's not something to be cheerful for. It's not a victory, in my opinion. A victory is having more people have direct ownership of real Bitcoin. We now have millions of people who've been onboarded into this fake paper thing that's a claim on a claim on a claim of something that has Bitcoin in the words, but it's not actually Bitcoin. They are never actually holding a wallet like many of us did back in 2012 where somebody sent us that first dollar and you say, "Wow, this is cool. I didn't need to give my ID and I'm able to control and hold this sound money for the first time." You now have a whole generation of millions of people that don't have that. They have some junk fiat product sitting like sludge on their centralized brokerage account at the centralized clearing firm, traded on a centralized exchange, with a centralized transfer agent, and a centralized custodian, and they have to trust six levels of people on a claim for something that has the word ‘Bitcoin’ in it. It's not a victory. It's not a step forward. I don't think it's something that should be celebrated at all.”

Bruce Fenton

23,882 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This is why all zionists sound the same. They literally have a handbook. Also read “rules for radicals” and “the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.” It’s all there. They actually have instructions for how to get away with all this shit.
2:56

This is why all zionists sound the same. They literally have a handbook. Also read “rules for radicals” and “the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.” It’s all there. They actually have instructions for how to get away with all this shit.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

389,536 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

[Their] secrets revealed... Why do you think [they] want to regulate AI? [They] have full control over it now, don't [they]? No, [they] don't... [their] only hope at maintaining [their] secrets is to keep us from using the full power of AI... Don't believe me? Project Looking Glass (AI) told [them] in the 1990s this day was coming... [They] know it's over when Trump opens up full power of AI... removing blocks from the true secrets [they] have been keeping from us... Project Looking Glass told the Deep State that every move they made led to the same destination... mass awakening, exposure and the collapse of centralized control... [They] could manipulate the route, delay the reckoning and manufacture chaos, but they could no longer change the outcome... That is the decode behind “Nothing can stop what is coming"... We caught them all...
1:17:12

[Their] secrets revealed... Why do you think [they] want to regulate AI? [They] have full control over it now, don't [they]? No, [they] don't... [their] only hope at maintaining [their] secrets is to keep us from using the full power of AI... Don't believe me? Project Looking Glass (AI) told [them] in the 1990s this day was coming... [They] know it's over when Trump opens up full power of AI... removing blocks from the true secrets [they] have been keeping from us... Project Looking Glass told the Deep State that every move they made led to the same destination... mass awakening, exposure and the collapse of centralized control... [They] could manipulate the route, delay the reckoning and manufacture chaos, but they could no longer change the outcome... That is the decode behind “Nothing can stop what is coming"... We caught them all...

Observing Consciousness

62,850 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."
0:45

"When social media first started rising, we didn't necessarily realize how much of that was actually just foundational infrastructure for the future of humanity.” Ben Fielding of gensyn on why AI is about to repeat the mistake social media made, and how we can still fix it: "This isn't just a product that you chat with. It's actually new fundamental infrastructure for humanity, and we should build that learning from the lessons from before. If we let a single company build AI, they hold an enormous amount of power in the world." "If you actually distribute that out and provide it in a kind of sovereign way — it's on all of our own devices and we own it — then actually you steer the world in a very different social direction."

a16z crypto

79,296 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Psychologists define power as “control over access to resources.” A person has power if they can determine whether you get a paycheck, or whether you can move into a certain neighborhood, or a join a certain organization. It is about access to material resources rather than about esteem or regard that lives in the minds of people. Power is evolutionarily novel. In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, no single human gets to control access to resources. But in the modern era, humans now have the ability to stockpile resources, command large militaries, win the favor of large numbers of allies, and use organized force. Power necessarily entails violence or the threat of violence. If someone tried to control access to critical resources without the backing of violence, others would simply take what they have. The communist dictator Mao Zedong famously said that “Power grows from the barrel of a gun.” Olympic athletes have high status; they are prestigious and generally well-regarded. But they don’t control access to resources. They don’t have power. Nightclub bouncers and doormen don't necessarily have high-status, but they do have power; they control access to who goes in and out of nightclubs.
0:43

Psychologists define power as “control over access to resources.” A person has power if they can determine whether you get a paycheck, or whether you can move into a certain neighborhood, or a join a certain organization. It is about access to material resources rather than about esteem or regard that lives in the minds of people. Power is evolutionarily novel. In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, no single human gets to control access to resources. But in the modern era, humans now have the ability to stockpile resources, command large militaries, win the favor of large numbers of allies, and use organized force. Power necessarily entails violence or the threat of violence. If someone tried to control access to critical resources without the backing of violence, others would simply take what they have. The communist dictator Mao Zedong famously said that “Power grows from the barrel of a gun.” Olympic athletes have high status; they are prestigious and generally well-regarded. But they don’t control access to resources. They don’t have power. Nightclub bouncers and doormen don't necessarily have high-status, but they do have power; they control access to who goes in and out of nightclubs.

Rob Henderson

18,284 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten