Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ELECTION CYBER SECURITY EXPERT: Dominion Voting Systems Has Backdoors That Could Allow Results to Be Changed Election cybersecurity expert Mark Cook is sounding the alarm and says the evidence is hiding in plain sight. Mark Cook claims Dominion voting systems contain backdoor software accessible right from the Start menu...

68,270 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

MUST WATCH:🚨 Watch this crucial 20-minute video featuring prominent Democrats, computer science professors, and election security experts discussing the vulnerabilities in America's election system. They warn that the system is online, easily hackable, and often operates on outdated Windows 7 or older systems. Key Points: Easily Hackable Voting Equipment: All electronic voting equipment can be hacked as they must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems. These systems are often connected to the internet and run outdated Windows versions. Spread of Malware: If a county election management system is infected with malware, it can spread to USB drives, which then transfer it to voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices throughout the county. Programming Practices: Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county officials or third-party vendors. They use previously used USB drives on internet-connected computers before plugging them into scanners, tabulators, and voting machines. Outdated Systems: In 2019, the Associated Press reported that most of the 10,000 election jurisdictions, including swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older systems for ballot production, vote programming, counting, and reporting. End of Windows 7 Support: Windows 7 reached its end of life on January 14, 2020, with Microsoft stopping technical support and security updates. Remote Access and Modems: Voting machine manufacturers have installed remote-access software and wireless modems, connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported in 2020 that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems. Dominion Voting Systems: The second-largest vendor, Dominion, has publicly acknowledged using modems in their machines and running remote-access software during the 2020 election. For example, in Georgia, election worker Susan Voyles testified that Dominion employees operated remotely on ballot-marking devices and poll pads. Findings from Wisconsin and Michigan: Investigations found Dominion and ES&S machines online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, a modem chip was discovered in an ES&S voting machine, potentially allowing hackers to intercept and manipulate election results. Conclusion: Hackers can potentially infiltrate elections through vulnerable USB cards, election management systems, and voting machines themselves. This underscores the urgent need for securing America's election infrastructure.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,146,565 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

19,397 просмотров • 23 дней назад

In October, before the 2020 election, Dominion Voting Systems received a $400 MILLION dollar payment from Staple Street Capital, which has ties to China and the CCP. Smartmatic, SGO, and Dominion all allegedly share the same physical address in a small building in Barbados, as a registered headquarters. These companies also share licensing agreements which is also a part of their core software and coding. This connection alone poses a massive national security risk as Smartmatic itself was engineered specifically to alter and manipulate the outcome of elections through backdoors built into the systems, where NO hacking is even required to change election results, it is a feature which was created at the direction of Hugo Chavez to alter election outcomes during Smartmatic's development. The operator's manual itself exposes these backdoor, built-in, features that these systems have that give administrators and operators of these systems full control to alter multiple data points, both on-site and remotely. Testimonies of election workers calling Dominion when problems occurred with Dominion remotely fixing the problems, even after stating under oath that there was no internet connection. Stacy Abrams' website listed numerous vulnerabilities in these systems, Texas rejected using Dominion because they lacked basic security, but swing states and others were allowed to use their systems? These systems seem to have been permitted to use because of their remote and other backdoor capabilities. There were no errors, just sophisticated, intentional, fraud.

The SCIF

24,768 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

157,068 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,459 просмотров • 1 месяц назад