正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

ELECTION CYBER SECURITY EXPERT: Dominion Voting Systems Has Backdoors That Could Allow Results to Be Changed Election cybersecurity expert Mark Cook is sounding the alarm and says the evidence is hiding in plain sight. Mark Cook claims Dominion voting systems contain backdoor software accessible right from the Start menu...

RealLindellTV's profile picture

LindellTV

108,225 subscribers

68,270 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

👇👇 Here it is: One month before the 2020 election, the parent company of Dominion received four hundred million dollars from 🇨🇳 Communist China 🇨🇳 through an investment bank in Switzerland. A court-approved forensic examination of Dominion Voting Systems concluded that the system was designed to manipulate election outcomes, overthrow governments, and facilitate the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020. A forensic examination concluded that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 Michigan presidential election and covered it up by manually deleting the results of the 2020 election. “The Antrim County computer system maintains records of the adjudication process for previous elections, but records for the 2020 election were deleted.” “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.” “The Federal Election Commission allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008% for computerized voting systems. The error rate of Dominion voting systems, at a shocking 68.05%, is 85,000 times higher than the threshold.”
4:22

👇👇 Here it is: One month before the 2020 election, the parent company of Dominion received four hundred million dollars from 🇨🇳 Communist China 🇨🇳 through an investment bank in Switzerland. A court-approved forensic examination of Dominion Voting Systems concluded that the system was designed to manipulate election outcomes, overthrow governments, and facilitate the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020. A forensic examination concluded that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 Michigan presidential election and covered it up by manually deleting the results of the 2020 election. “The Antrim County computer system maintains records of the adjudication process for previous elections, but records for the 2020 election were deleted.” “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.” “The Federal Election Commission allows a maximum error rate of just 0.0008% for computerized voting systems. The error rate of Dominion voting systems, at a shocking 68.05%, is 85,000 times higher than the threshold.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

104,252 次观看 • 19 小时前

Here it is: A COURT-APPROVED forensic examination of Dominion Voting Systems CONFIRMS BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that the system was designed to manipulate election outcomes, overthrow governments, and, on November 3, 2020, facilitate the overthrow of the United States government. A forensic examination concluded that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 Michigan presidential election and covered it up by manually deleting the results of the 2020 election. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.”
4:22

Here it is: A COURT-APPROVED forensic examination of Dominion Voting Systems CONFIRMS BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that the system was designed to manipulate election outcomes, overthrow governments, and, on November 3, 2020, facilitate the overthrow of the United States government. A forensic examination concluded that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 Michigan presidential election and covered it up by manually deleting the results of the 2020 election. “We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

573,924 次观看 • 24 天前

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."
4:25

After a 68% error rate with mail-in ballots was found in the Michigan 2020 election, a forensic audit of Dominion Voting Machines by election experts was performed, the results were released by a judge that read: "We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that the Dominion Voting System should NOT be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified."

The SCIF

790,941 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 “We’ve basically got the blueprint… this is the Holy Grail of evidence.” Election data analyst Mark Cook is raising serious questions, pointing to what he says is detectable manipulation inside voting systems. During testimony, a key portion was reportedly cut from the live stream, drawing attention to what was said and why it was removed. “This right here is the proof… manipulation within the tabulation systems.” Mark Cook points to what he calls “lockstep parallel motion”, synchronized voting patterns that he says should not naturally occur. “This is the signature of fraud in the data.” And he says it’s not isolated: • Patterns appear across multiple counties and states • Votes are allegedly shifted while data is made to look normal • The system creates an illusion of a legitimate election “They’re flipping votes… while making it look normal.” Now connect the dots: A key clip goes missing. The data shows patterns. And the claims point to a larger system. For years, concerns like this were dismissed. Now they’re being laid out, in the data itself. The question is no longer whether people raised concerns, it’s what happens next.
5:00

🚨 “We’ve basically got the blueprint… this is the Holy Grail of evidence.” Election data analyst Mark Cook is raising serious questions, pointing to what he says is detectable manipulation inside voting systems. During testimony, a key portion was reportedly cut from the live stream, drawing attention to what was said and why it was removed. “This right here is the proof… manipulation within the tabulation systems.” Mark Cook points to what he calls “lockstep parallel motion”, synchronized voting patterns that he says should not naturally occur. “This is the signature of fraud in the data.” And he says it’s not isolated: • Patterns appear across multiple counties and states • Votes are allegedly shifted while data is made to look normal • The system creates an illusion of a legitimate election “They’re flipping votes… while making it look normal.” Now connect the dots: A key clip goes missing. The data shows patterns. And the claims point to a larger system. For years, concerns like this were dismissed. Now they’re being laid out, in the data itself. The question is no longer whether people raised concerns, it’s what happens next.

LindellTV

97,308 次观看 • 3 个月前

MUST WATCH:🚨 Watch this crucial 20-minute video featuring prominent Democrats, computer science professors, and election security experts discussing the vulnerabilities in America's election system. They warn that the system is online, easily hackable, and often operates on outdated Windows 7 or older systems. Key Points: Easily Hackable Voting Equipment: All electronic voting equipment can be hacked as they must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems. These systems are often connected to the internet and run outdated Windows versions. Spread of Malware: If a county election management system is infected with malware, it can spread to USB drives, which then transfer it to voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices throughout the county. Programming Practices: Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county officials or third-party vendors. They use previously used USB drives on internet-connected computers before plugging them into scanners, tabulators, and voting machines. Outdated Systems: In 2019, the Associated Press reported that most of the 10,000 election jurisdictions, including swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older systems for ballot production, vote programming, counting, and reporting. End of Windows 7 Support: Windows 7 reached its end of life on January 14, 2020, with Microsoft stopping technical support and security updates. Remote Access and Modems: Voting machine manufacturers have installed remote-access software and wireless modems, connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported in 2020 that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems. Dominion Voting Systems: The second-largest vendor, Dominion, has publicly acknowledged using modems in their machines and running remote-access software during the 2020 election. For example, in Georgia, election worker Susan Voyles testified that Dominion employees operated remotely on ballot-marking devices and poll pads. Findings from Wisconsin and Michigan: Investigations found Dominion and ES&S machines online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, a modem chip was discovered in an ES&S voting machine, potentially allowing hackers to intercept and manipulate election results. Conclusion: Hackers can potentially infiltrate elections through vulnerable USB cards, election management systems, and voting machines themselves. This underscores the urgent need for securing America's election infrastructure.
21:51

MUST WATCH:🚨 Watch this crucial 20-minute video featuring prominent Democrats, computer science professors, and election security experts discussing the vulnerabilities in America's election system. They warn that the system is online, easily hackable, and often operates on outdated Windows 7 or older systems. Key Points: Easily Hackable Voting Equipment: All electronic voting equipment can be hacked as they must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems. These systems are often connected to the internet and run outdated Windows versions. Spread of Malware: If a county election management system is infected with malware, it can spread to USB drives, which then transfer it to voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices throughout the county. Programming Practices: Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county officials or third-party vendors. They use previously used USB drives on internet-connected computers before plugging them into scanners, tabulators, and voting machines. Outdated Systems: In 2019, the Associated Press reported that most of the 10,000 election jurisdictions, including swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older systems for ballot production, vote programming, counting, and reporting. End of Windows 7 Support: Windows 7 reached its end of life on January 14, 2020, with Microsoft stopping technical support and security updates. Remote Access and Modems: Voting machine manufacturers have installed remote-access software and wireless modems, connecting voting machines directly to the internet. NBC News reported in 2020 that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems. Dominion Voting Systems: The second-largest vendor, Dominion, has publicly acknowledged using modems in their machines and running remote-access software during the 2020 election. For example, in Georgia, election worker Susan Voyles testified that Dominion employees operated remotely on ballot-marking devices and poll pads. Findings from Wisconsin and Michigan: Investigations found Dominion and ES&S machines online and connected to the internet. In Michigan, a modem chip was discovered in an ES&S voting machine, potentially allowing hackers to intercept and manipulate election results. Conclusion: Hackers can potentially infiltrate elections through vulnerable USB cards, election management systems, and voting machines themselves. This underscores the urgent need for securing America's election infrastructure.

KanekoaTheGreat

1,146,565 次观看 • 2 年前

This is: Antifa member and Vice President of Strategy and Security at Dominion Voting Systems, Ph.D. Eric Coomer, is going to be deposed under penalty of perjury in January 2026. Patrick Byrne Who facilitated the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020. “Don’t worry about the election. Trump is not going to win. I made a fucking sure of that.” He oversaw the Dominion Voting Systems in all the battleground states for the 2020 election. Think about that for a full minute!
2:10

This is: Antifa member and Vice President of Strategy and Security at Dominion Voting Systems, Ph.D. Eric Coomer, is going to be deposed under penalty of perjury in January 2026. Patrick Byrne Who facilitated the overthrow of the United States government on November 3, 2020. “Don’t worry about the election. Trump is not going to win. I made a fucking sure of that.” He oversaw the Dominion Voting Systems in all the battleground states for the 2020 election. Think about that for a full minute!

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

18,888 次观看 • 7 个月前

Arizona 2020 election official testified that she personally witnessed Dominion systems switching votes from Trump to Biden. She also testified that election supervisors were decreasing signature verification settings on Dominion systems from 15 points of verification, down to ZERO, and told to just pass ballots through. Ballots were being counted with completely different signatures when compared to the ballot envelope signatures. They were all threatened not to talk about it when election workers approached their supervisors about the fraud occurring. There were NO errors. This was a coordinated operation with election supervisors, workers, compromised election companies and equipment, foreign countries, and state officials involved, all the way to the top, to steal the 2020 election.
2:33

Arizona 2020 election official testified that she personally witnessed Dominion systems switching votes from Trump to Biden. She also testified that election supervisors were decreasing signature verification settings on Dominion systems from 15 points of verification, down to ZERO, and told to just pass ballots through. Ballots were being counted with completely different signatures when compared to the ballot envelope signatures. They were all threatened not to talk about it when election workers approached their supervisors about the fraud occurring. There were NO errors. This was a coordinated operation with election supervisors, workers, compromised election companies and equipment, foreign countries, and state officials involved, all the way to the top, to steal the 2020 election.

The SCIF

21,433 次观看 • 4 个月前

I’m breaking down a fundamental question: who has the right to vote—and how do we protect that right? Voting is a cornerstone of American democracy, but it also requires integrity, verification, and accountability. In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I explain why election integrity starts at the front end—before fraud happens—not after. From voter ID and election security to concerns about double voting, ballot integrity, and verification, this is about protecting the system and ensuring confidence in U.S. elections. If you’re following election integrity, voter ID laws, election security, or debates around voting rights in America, this is a conversation you need to hear. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:
0:41

I’m breaking down a fundamental question: who has the right to vote—and how do we protect that right? Voting is a cornerstone of American democracy, but it also requires integrity, verification, and accountability. In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I explain why election integrity starts at the front end—before fraud happens—not after. From voter ID and election security to concerns about double voting, ballot integrity, and verification, this is about protecting the system and ensuring confidence in U.S. elections. If you’re following election integrity, voter ID laws, election security, or debates around voting rights in America, this is a conversation you need to hear. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

46,886 次观看 • 3 个月前

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.
4:10

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.

The SCIF

74,294 次观看 • 1 个月前

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.
4:05

Election officials testify that DOMINION voting machines were sending and receiving signals through wifi and connecting to the internet in an active voting location during the 2020 election. A Georgia election official also testified that QR codes located on ballots were used to tabulate votes through the machines instead of the markings made by voters on the actual ballots themselves. This proves that there is no way to actually confirm that Joe Biden won the 2020 election because the QR code can not be read or verified by election officials to determine what the QR code is actually telling the voting machines to tabulate for since it is not reading the actual filled in selections by the voter. This is just another variable and method to program the machines to manipulate, read, and rig an election in your favor.

The SCIF

152,165 次观看 • 6 个月前

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.
6:39

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

19,397 次观看 • 25 天前

2020 election manager in Antrim County, MI explicitly admits to deleting and modifying critical election data, logs, and files from the Dominion voting systems and the Election Management System (EMS) after the election to cover-up fraud. The clerks actions were allegedly directed, influenced, and instructed by the Michigan Secretary of State, which clearly violates state retention laws. - Adjudication logs and security/audit trail logs for the November 2020 election are completely missing or deleted, while present and intact in prior elections. - Alleged 68% overall error rate in the system, far above the normal 0.0008%, with one township reportedly sending 82% of ballots for adjudication/manual review. - Initial vote tabulation flip with unofficial results initially showing a massive swing, Biden leading in a heavily Trump county by thousands, corrected after a software/ballot definition update, flipping the county back to Trump by around 4,000 votes. - Unauthorized software changes, updates, and modifications made inside the 90-day "safe harbor" prohibition window before the election. - Other irregularities included claims of attempts to "zero out" results, lack of oversight on adjudicated ballots, and overall assertions that the results were not certifiable due to these issues.
5:20

2020 election manager in Antrim County, MI explicitly admits to deleting and modifying critical election data, logs, and files from the Dominion voting systems and the Election Management System (EMS) after the election to cover-up fraud. The clerks actions were allegedly directed, influenced, and instructed by the Michigan Secretary of State, which clearly violates state retention laws. - Adjudication logs and security/audit trail logs for the November 2020 election are completely missing or deleted, while present and intact in prior elections. - Alleged 68% overall error rate in the system, far above the normal 0.0008%, with one township reportedly sending 82% of ballots for adjudication/manual review. - Initial vote tabulation flip with unofficial results initially showing a massive swing, Biden leading in a heavily Trump county by thousands, corrected after a software/ballot definition update, flipping the county back to Trump by around 4,000 votes. - Unauthorized software changes, updates, and modifications made inside the 90-day "safe harbor" prohibition window before the election. - Other irregularities included claims of attempts to "zero out" results, lack of oversight on adjudicated ballots, and overall assertions that the results were not certifiable due to these issues.

The SCIF

33,223 次观看 • 3 个月前

In October, before the 2020 election, Dominion Voting Systems received a $400 MILLION dollar payment from Staple Street Capital, which has ties to China and the CCP. Smartmatic, SGO, and Dominion all allegedly share the same physical address in a small building in Barbados, as a registered headquarters. These companies also share licensing agreements which is also a part of their core software and coding. This connection alone poses a massive national security risk as Smartmatic itself was engineered specifically to alter and manipulate the outcome of elections through backdoors built into the systems, where NO hacking is even required to change election results, it is a feature which was created at the direction of Hugo Chavez to alter election outcomes during Smartmatic's development. The operator's manual itself exposes these backdoor, built-in, features that these systems have that give administrators and operators of these systems full control to alter multiple data points, both on-site and remotely. Testimonies of election workers calling Dominion when problems occurred with Dominion remotely fixing the problems, even after stating under oath that there was no internet connection. Stacy Abrams' website listed numerous vulnerabilities in these systems, Texas rejected using Dominion because they lacked basic security, but swing states and others were allowed to use their systems? These systems seem to have been permitted to use because of their remote and other backdoor capabilities. There were no errors, just sophisticated, intentional, fraud.
4:10

In October, before the 2020 election, Dominion Voting Systems received a $400 MILLION dollar payment from Staple Street Capital, which has ties to China and the CCP. Smartmatic, SGO, and Dominion all allegedly share the same physical address in a small building in Barbados, as a registered headquarters. These companies also share licensing agreements which is also a part of their core software and coding. This connection alone poses a massive national security risk as Smartmatic itself was engineered specifically to alter and manipulate the outcome of elections through backdoors built into the systems, where NO hacking is even required to change election results, it is a feature which was created at the direction of Hugo Chavez to alter election outcomes during Smartmatic's development. The operator's manual itself exposes these backdoor, built-in, features that these systems have that give administrators and operators of these systems full control to alter multiple data points, both on-site and remotely. Testimonies of election workers calling Dominion when problems occurred with Dominion remotely fixing the problems, even after stating under oath that there was no internet connection. Stacy Abrams' website listed numerous vulnerabilities in these systems, Texas rejected using Dominion because they lacked basic security, but swing states and others were allowed to use their systems? These systems seem to have been permitted to use because of their remote and other backdoor capabilities. There were no errors, just sophisticated, intentional, fraud.

The SCIF

24,768 次观看 • 4 个月前

Here it is: The Georgia 2020 election in just three minutes. The machine count—the first machine count, the Election Day ballots that were scanned from in-person voting—GONE. Hash validation files that authenticate the 2020 election: obliterated. Election officials refused to sign 80–90% of poll tapes. Dropbox custody forms duplicated, xeroxed. A federal judge seals a report that says Dominion voting machines rigged the 2020 election. Brian Kemp and his co-conspirator Rat Raffensperger outperformed the polls by 20% to win re-election. And then they hired a prostitute named Fani Willis to prosecute the very people who questioned this atrocity they call an election.
3:00

Here it is: The Georgia 2020 election in just three minutes. The machine count—the first machine count, the Election Day ballots that were scanned from in-person voting—GONE. Hash validation files that authenticate the 2020 election: obliterated. Election officials refused to sign 80–90% of poll tapes. Dropbox custody forms duplicated, xeroxed. A federal judge seals a report that says Dominion voting machines rigged the 2020 election. Brian Kemp and his co-conspirator Rat Raffensperger outperformed the polls by 20% to win re-election. And then they hired a prostitute named Fani Willis to prosecute the very people who questioned this atrocity they call an election.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

75,891 次观看 • 5 个月前

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.
2:44

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

159,495 次观看 • 3 天前

#2 All electronic voting equipment can easily be hacked because all such equipment must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems which are computers often connected to the internet running out-of-date versions of Windows. If a county election management system is infected with malware, the malware can spread from that system to the USB drives, which then would transfer it to all the voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices in the county. Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county election officials or third-party vendors, who plug previously-used USB drives into computers connected to the internet before plugging those same USB drives into the optical scanners, tabulators, and voting machines that collect, count, and determine election results.
2:13

#2 All electronic voting equipment can easily be hacked because all such equipment must receive programming before each election from memory cards prepared on election management systems which are computers often connected to the internet running out-of-date versions of Windows. If a county election management system is infected with malware, the malware can spread from that system to the USB drives, which then would transfer it to all the voting machines, scanners, and ballot-marking devices in the county. Most U.S. election systems are programmed by local county election officials or third-party vendors, who plug previously-used USB drives into computers connected to the internet before plugging those same USB drives into the optical scanners, tabulators, and voting machines that collect, count, and determine election results.

KanekoaTheGreat

2,730,161 次观看 • 3 年前

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,509 次观看 • 1 个月前

Antrim County forensic audit exposes 68% error rate with DOMINION Voting Machines during the 2020 Election. This is engineered election theft. Michigan audit showed that Dominion Voting Machines were "intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors" to generate massive ballot discrepancies, to enable fraud and influencing results. Conducted by Allied Security Operations Group, the audit exposed tabulators, software logs, and ballots, uncovering a 68% error rate, with claims of deliberate vulnerabilities. Corrupt state officials dismissed it as "inaccurate and misleading," attributing initial miscounts to human error, this report tells us exactly what we knew all along, not human error, but specifically engineered and designed for this purpose. Especially with the alleged cartel connected ballot printing company, with no oversight, called RunBeck, who collaborates with Dominion in order for Dominion's machines to read their ballots and program software. The glitch and the adjudication is the steal and just ONE of many ways to manipulate elections.
3:47

Antrim County forensic audit exposes 68% error rate with DOMINION Voting Machines during the 2020 Election. This is engineered election theft. Michigan audit showed that Dominion Voting Machines were "intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors" to generate massive ballot discrepancies, to enable fraud and influencing results. Conducted by Allied Security Operations Group, the audit exposed tabulators, software logs, and ballots, uncovering a 68% error rate, with claims of deliberate vulnerabilities. Corrupt state officials dismissed it as "inaccurate and misleading," attributing initial miscounts to human error, this report tells us exactly what we knew all along, not human error, but specifically engineered and designed for this purpose. Especially with the alleged cartel connected ballot printing company, with no oversight, called RunBeck, who collaborates with Dominion in order for Dominion's machines to read their ballots and program software. The glitch and the adjudication is the steal and just ONE of many ways to manipulate elections.

The SCIF

31,345 次观看 • 6 个月前