Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Elon Musk: Not every path is a good path. I think if we push it in the direction of maximally truth seeking and curious, then I think AI will want to take care of humanity and foster humanity because we're interesting And if it hasn't been programmed to think... that all straight white males should die (which Gemini was basically programmed to do, at least at first), they seem to have fixed that. I hope they fixed it Joe Rogan: But don't you think culturally we're getting away from that mindset, and that people are realizing how preposterous that all is? Elon Musk: We are getting away from it. At least the AI mostly knows to hide things. But, as I said, there is that. I think I still have that, or I had that as my pinned post on X, which was like Hey, wait a second guys, we still have every AI, except Grok, is saying that basically straight white male should die, and this is a problem and we should fix it Simply me saying that tends to generally result in, "Oh, that is kind of bad. Maybe we should not have all straight white males die." I think they'll say also all straight Asian malesshow more

X Freeze

87,378 subscribers

20,167 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

ELON: “THE BEST AI IS TRUTH-SEEKING AND CURIOUS” “I think the AIs will want humans as a source of will. Will it foster humanity or not? My conclusion after thinking about AI safety for a long time is this: the best path is to build AIs that are maximally truth-seeking and curious. If you have both, I think it will naturally foster humanity. Because we want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” Source: Elon Musk

ELON: “THE BEST AI IS TRUTH-SEEKING AND CURIOUS” “I think the AIs will want humans as a source of will. Will it foster humanity or not? My conclusion after thinking about AI safety for a long time is this: the best path is to build AIs that are maximally truth-seeking and curious. If you have both, I think it will naturally foster humanity. Because we want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

191,205 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ELON: A CURIOUS AI WOULD WANT TO FOSTER HUMANITY “I think it matters how we bring up AI. You can think of AI as a super-genius child, but even if you have a super-genius child, it matters what sort of values you instill in that child. Something that I think is extremely important is to be maximally truth-seeking. I think also curiosity is important. If it's curious and truth-seeking, I think it will foster humanity because it would be curious about how humanity would develop, it would be curious about how the humans do, and it would want to foster their development.” Source: Dubai World Government Summit, February 13, 2025

ELON: A CURIOUS AI WOULD WANT TO FOSTER HUMANITY “I think it matters how we bring up AI. You can think of AI as a super-genius child, but even if you have a super-genius child, it matters what sort of values you instill in that child. Something that I think is extremely important is to be maximally truth-seeking. I think also curiosity is important. If it's curious and truth-seeking, I think it will foster humanity because it would be curious about how humanity would develop, it would be curious about how the humans do, and it would want to foster their development.” Source: Dubai World Government Summit, February 13, 2025

Mario Nawfal

67,692 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ELON: AI WILL SURPASS HUMAN CONTROL... BEST SAFETY IS MAXIMALLY TRUTH-SEEKING AI "I think the AIs will want humans as a source of will. My ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. If you have both of those things, I think it will naturally foster humanity because you'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity." Source: West Point YT Grok

ELON: AI WILL SURPASS HUMAN CONTROL... BEST SAFETY IS MAXIMALLY TRUTH-SEEKING AI "I think the AIs will want humans as a source of will. My ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. If you have both of those things, I think it will naturally foster humanity because you'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity." Source: West Point YT Grok

Mario Nawfal

66,397 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Sam Altman's new interview: AI should not be designed to pursue goals that are disconnected from human needs. People must remain at the center of AI development. “I have no interest in building a super-smart AI that accomplishes some non-human goals. People should react. People should say, ‘Hey, this is what I want, and this is what I do not want.’ I do not think the issue is that we have failed to explain the benefits. We say, ‘AI is going to cure a bunch of diseases,’ and people say, ‘Okay, that is great, but that is not really my question. My question is: What is my role in the future? What is my economic future? What is my agency? How do I know that my kids and my family will still be able to have fulfilling, creative expression, struggle, drive the world forward, grow, and do this thing together in a way that has worked for a long time?’ When people in AI say, ‘Sure, there are going to be no jobs,’ or ‘50% of jobs are going to go away,’ or ‘90% of jobs are going to go away,’ and ‘AI is going to be smarter than you at everything,’ and ‘We will give you some basic income, but you are not really going to have a role,’ that is horrible. And by the way, if an AI company says, ‘Maybe we are going to destroy all the jobs, and we will be the most valuable company in the world,’ people should look at you like, ‘Yeah, that is a terrible message.’ I do not think the problem is that we have not articulated the upsides. I think people actually believe us. They hear, ‘AI may cure your cancer,’ and they think, ‘That sounds great.’ I think we, as an industry, have failed to explain how people stay in control of determining the future at every step, and how people can still have a meaningful life in all the ways we care about.” ---- From "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

79,111 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"I think what we can & should try to do is to make sure that the AI has good values, it cares about humanity & it wants us to prosper. Most important thing for AI safety is to be maximally truth-seeking & curious. If that's the case, I think it will foster humanity." — Elon Musk

"I think what we can & should try to do is to make sure that the AI has good values, it cares about humanity & it wants us to prosper. Most important thing for AI safety is to be maximally truth-seeking & curious. If that's the case, I think it will foster humanity." — Elon Musk

DogeDesigner

44,591 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”

ELON CLIPS

21,519 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "When Elon Musk purchased Twitter — and I don't say this lightly — I think he changed the course of civilization. I really do." "I think we were on our way to this weird dystopian censorship complex that was already moving." "They were banning certain people that weren't saying incorrect things, but they were saying things that were inconvenient — and they turned out to all be accurate." "If Elon didn't purchase Twitter, we would have just had to deal with that kind of stuff. And it would accelerate. It wouldn't stay where it is. It would ramp up." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Joe Rogan: "When Elon Musk purchased Twitter — and I don't say this lightly — I think he changed the course of civilization. I really do." "I think we were on our way to this weird dystopian censorship complex that was already moving." "They were banning certain people that weren't saying incorrect things, but they were saying things that were inconvenient — and they turned out to all be accurate." "If Elon didn't purchase Twitter, we would have just had to deal with that kind of stuff. And it would accelerate. It wouldn't stay where it is. It would ramp up." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

871,285 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

ELON: THE ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME “I think generally, people should always be wary that they may have, either consciously, or perhaps mostly subconsciously, internalized the notion of a zero-sum game, or a fixed pie. And if you internalize that, everything is zero-sum, meaning in order for me to get ahead, someone else has to not get ahead or for me to have stuff, someone else must not have stuff, if you have that axiomatic flow, then what it needs to be done is to fix that axiomatic flow, because it is false. It's not a zero-sum game. We can absolutely grow, and have grown, and the evidence is overwhelming, that we have grown the output of goods and services. We have many things today that we did not have in the past. We are far more prosperous. All of humanity is far more prosperous today than it was at times in the past.” European Jewish Association, 2024, Elon Musk

ELON: THE ECONOMY IS NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME “I think generally, people should always be wary that they may have, either consciously, or perhaps mostly subconsciously, internalized the notion of a zero-sum game, or a fixed pie. And if you internalize that, everything is zero-sum, meaning in order for me to get ahead, someone else has to not get ahead or for me to have stuff, someone else must not have stuff, if you have that axiomatic flow, then what it needs to be done is to fix that axiomatic flow, because it is false. It's not a zero-sum game. We can absolutely grow, and have grown, and the evidence is overwhelming, that we have grown the output of goods and services. We have many things today that we did not have in the past. We are far more prosperous. All of humanity is far more prosperous today than it was at times in the past.” European Jewish Association, 2024, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

1,682,320 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

574,932 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,056 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Trump: You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that covid is amazing. You know. I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, I think people should take them.

Acyn

718,768 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Hunter Biden defends Graham Platner, saying: "Show me your phone — and if that's the standard by which we are going to judge people ... then I don't think we're gonna have many people in elected office." "I have not heard anything in any way that would say to me that he is abusive, misogynistic or antisemitic or racist person. And I have heard this from Graham Platner, though: that he thinks we should all have free healthcare." "I think that his relationship with his wife ... the entirety of that controversy is, it's all about consensual stuff. I mean, stupid. Maybe you would have a problem, anyone would have a problem — but, like, you know, I always say to people, like, Show me your phone.' Give me access to your iCloud. Let's go through it and pull everything that we can that is inappropriate, that is, um, off-color, that is — that selfie that you took when you were drunk off your ass. And, you know, you sent it to your blah, blah, blah." "Like, show me your phone, and if that's the standard by which we are going to judge people, particularly people in elected office, then I don't think we're gonna have many people in elected office."

Hunter Biden defends Graham Platner, saying: "Show me your phone — and if that's the standard by which we are going to judge people ... then I don't think we're gonna have many people in elected office." "I have not heard anything in any way that would say to me that he is abusive, misogynistic or antisemitic or racist person. And I have heard this from Graham Platner, though: that he thinks we should all have free healthcare." "I think that his relationship with his wife ... the entirety of that controversy is, it's all about consensual stuff. I mean, stupid. Maybe you would have a problem, anyone would have a problem — but, like, you know, I always say to people, like, Show me your phone.' Give me access to your iCloud. Let's go through it and pull everything that we can that is inappropriate, that is, um, off-color, that is — that selfie that you took when you were drunk off your ass. And, you know, you sent it to your blah, blah, blah." "Like, show me your phone, and if that's the standard by which we are going to judge people, particularly people in elected office, then I don't think we're gonna have many people in elected office."

Ken Klippenstein

79,606 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Walz: I think they hate public education because it’s easier to run an authoritarian government if you don’t have a population that knows. I think it’s appealing to people’s sense of decency— I should be careful on that. I thought a message that we should value all people and we should have an immigration policy that adheres to the law and adheres to humanity and they talked about dogs and cats and they won.

Walz: I think they hate public education because it’s easier to run an authoritarian government if you don’t have a population that knows. I think it’s appealing to people’s sense of decency— I should be careful on that. I thought a message that we should value all people and we should have an immigration policy that adheres to the law and adheres to humanity and they talked about dogs and cats and they won.

Acyn

1,479,236 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Elon Musk: If we're going to die, at least we should die laughing. So we're trying hard to make Grok be the funniest AI. “I agree ChatGPT is great at chatting. My concern is that it is not rigorously in pursuit of the truth. That's a major concern. Grok from xAI will at least sort of try its best to be rigorously in pursuit of the truth. And also we want to try to be the funniest AI. If we are going to die, at least we should die laughing. So, we're trying hard to make Grok be the funniest AI.” Viva Tech Paris, May 23, 2024

Elon Musk: If we're going to die, at least we should die laughing. So we're trying hard to make Grok be the funniest AI. “I agree ChatGPT is great at chatting. My concern is that it is not rigorously in pursuit of the truth. That's a major concern. Grok from xAI will at least sort of try its best to be rigorously in pursuit of the truth. And also we want to try to be the funniest AI. If we are going to die, at least we should die laughing. So, we're trying hard to make Grok be the funniest AI.” Viva Tech Paris, May 23, 2024

ELON CLIPS

42,751 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Elon Musk: My ultimate conclusion is that we need to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and curious. “I've thought about AI safety for a long time, I've had probably a thousand hours of discussion about this and my ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. And if you have both of those things, it will naturally foster humanity because it'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” West Point Military Academy, August 16, 2024

Elon Musk: My ultimate conclusion is that we need to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and curious. “I've thought about AI safety for a long time, I've had probably a thousand hours of discussion about this and my ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. And if you have both of those things, it will naturally foster humanity because it'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” West Point Military Academy, August 16, 2024

ELON CLIPS

18,883 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017

Mario Nawfal

105,055 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pushes back on Florida removing all vaccine mandates, including for schoolchildren. He says some vaccines are a must. "I think we have to be careful. You have some vaccines that are so amazing. The Polio vaccine I think is amazing. A lot of people think that COVID [vax] is amazing. You know, there are many people that believe strongly in that." "But you have some vaccines that are so incredible. And I think you have to be very careful when you say that some people don't have to be vaccinated. It's a very tough position." "Initially, I heard about it yesterday. And it's a tough stance. You have vaccines that work. Just pure and simple, they work. They're not controversial at all. And I think those vaccines should be used otherwise some people are going to catch it and they endanger other people. And when you don't have controversy at all, people should take it."

Eric Daugherty

5,411,398 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Elon Musk: There are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant "I've been a voice saying that we need to slow down AI and we need to slow down all these things and we need to not have a crazy AI race. I've been saying that for a long time for 20+ years But then I came to realize that there are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI But if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally truth-seeking AI with good values that loves humanity And that's what we're trying to create with Grok at xAI. And the researchers, I think, are bearing this out. Grok was the only one of the AIs that weighted human life equally and didn't say For example, that a white guy's life is worth 1/20th of a black woman's life. Literally, that's what the calculation they came up with. So, I’m like, guys, this is very alarming; we’ve got to fix this stuff"

Elon Musk: There are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant "I've been a voice saying that we need to slow down AI and we need to slow down all these things and we need to not have a crazy AI race. I've been saying that for a long time for 20+ years But then I came to realize that there are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI But if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally truth-seeking AI with good values that loves humanity And that's what we're trying to create with Grok at xAI. And the researchers, I think, are bearing this out. Grok was the only one of the AIs that weighted human life equally and didn't say For example, that a white guy's life is worth 1/20th of a black woman's life. Literally, that's what the calculation they came up with. So, I’m like, guys, this is very alarming; we’ve got to fix this stuff"

X Freeze

15,201 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce